Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 05.05.24 Ever so sorry if I have entered this in the wrong part of this website.   My grandfather is in his 70's and retired.  He asked me to help him find a work pension that he was paying into when he was working. From 1967 - 1982 he worked for a Fabric Dying Company, Celanese, Spondon Derby UK. I have already used the GOV.uk Trace Pension Scheme. It listed a few pension companies : Akzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme formerly Courtaulds Pension Scheme.  I do not fully understand how this works but I think this scheme is administer by a company called Willis Tower Watson. We have called this company, got through to the pension department submitted all my grandfather's details (D.O.B. , N.I. no. etc.) but that agent tells that they have no record of my grandfather and ask what is the name of the pension scheme. Here is the problem, his home was burgalled in 2005 and a briefcase which contained his legal documents was stolen. So he does not know who was the Pension Scheme company. I have a this phone number 01332 681 210 for Celanese but it just rings and never gets answered. So I am asking for help if anyone can tell us where we can try next. I am also hoping for a massive long shot that one of them members on this website, worked for or knows someone who worked for British Celanese Spondon Derby and could tell us of any pension company. Thanks for any help.
    • Well I sent them the letter of claim, the only responses so far was a few emails reopening the claims on the parcels where they asked for information such as proof of value (which I get) but other things like photos of the parcels, which I haven't got as I never took photos of them. It's been well over the 14 days since I sent the letter now anyway, so what do you think I should do now?
    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism in these circumstances  to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know. Just a tip - if you are offered a fixed penalty be sure to submit your driving licence details as instructed. I've seen lots of instances where a driver has not done this. There will be no reminder and no second chance; your £100 will be refunded and the police will prosecute you through the courts.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4817 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

Few months ago we received a letter from Equita that we own around £500 for unpaid council tax.

I paid full amount same day but on the council website. Two weeks later the bailiff came to our flat and because my younger brother was not aware of that he let him in.He called me and I was trying to explain that we paid everything and we don't want pay again.

anyway,because we never had anything to do with this situation we decide to pay again to give us some time to sort out this "misunderstanding"

Next day we called council to check our balance which was £50 cr and then we've cancelled credit card payment.

I thought that it has been sorted but few days ago we received another letter form Equita saying that we still own some money ( no amount on the letter) and that they will take our staff without even asking us.I called them to check whats going on and to find out how much we own them. "Nice" Lady told me that it's £240 and all this money is their Fee.When I asked to send me brakedown she refused and told me that it is to late for that and if I not pay NOW someone will come on Saturday to take my goods.I told her what I think about all this situation and hang up.No one came on Saturday

but today I found another letter with the 24H notice that they will remove my goods even in my absence!!!.

I went to council to talk with someone.Nice lady from council office called them to check what is it and they told her that I need to pay £240 fee. She asked for the brakedown and they said that they will send it by email in 15 minutes but it's been 6 h now and still nothing.

Do you think I need to be worried that someone will come and break in to my flat when I'm at work?

please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would e-mail the CEO of your local council explaining exactly what has been happening, how you've paid the debt twice and yet for some reason are still running up fees. Ask if s/he will recall the debt from the bailiffs pending an investigation of your complaint and tell him that the bailiffs have refused to give both you and the council a full breakdown of fees. Until you get those fees which you are legally entitled to I would not pay the bailiffs anything. To put your mind at rest , they cannot use the original liability order to break into your house to levy against items so they can collect their fees.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks.i will do.

I was just thinking, why he came today and left this letter without even checkin if anyone is at home??? to charge even more for each visit?

I don't wont to find out soon that from £240 it can be £340 and then....etc

:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that you've paid off your council tax in full? If unsure, phone them and ask how much of the actual council tax bill remains outstanding. As long as there is a CT debt outstanding, the bailiffs fees can and will keep rising.

 

If on the other hand all you owe is the bailiffs fees then don't rush into anything. Give me a minute and I'll post up what they are legally allowed to charge. From that you can work out exactly how much you owe them. that is what you then pay them and they can whistle for the remainder.

 

Back in a second.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fees for Council Tax are listed in Schedule 5 of The Council Tax (Administration & Enforcement) Regulations 1992 as amended. This does not mean to say that Bailiffs strictly adhere to this and if they think you don't know they will try to screw you for as much as they can - simply put do not believe a word they say. Incidentally how old is your younger brother?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am I right in thinking that you've paid off your council tax in full? If unsure, phone them and ask how much of the actual council tax bill remains outstanding. As long as there is a CT debt outstanding, the bailiffs fees can and will keep rising.

 

If on the other hand all you owe is the bailiffs fees then don't rush into anything. Give me a minute and I'll post up what they are legally allowed to charge. From that you can work out exactly how much you owe them. that is what you then pay them and they can whistle for the remainder.

 

Back in a second.

 

Hi Tingy

 

I suspect what has happened is that the OP has paid at the same time the Council has passed it over & the Bailiff is chancing his arm!

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you sure the actual Council Tax debt is settled? If unsure phone them tomorrow and ask how much of the actual CT debt (excluding bailiffs fees) remains to be paid. Hopefully you'll have a zero balance meaning all that's owed is bailiffs fees.

 

These are quite simple as they're down in law. Here they are:

Council Tax

 

Fees

 

For each liability order where no levy is made, £24.50 for the first or only visit and £18 for a second visit can be charged. Despite any further visits, the bailiff is only permitted to charge a maximum of 2 separate visits.

 

For levying distress, the following fees may be charged (or a lesser amount if that would be reasonable):

 

£24.50 for the first £100

For the next £400 - 4%

For the next £1,500 - 2.5%

For the next £8,000 - 1%

For any additional sums - 0.25 %

 

Charges

 

Walking possession------------------------------ £12.00

Attendance with vehicle/removal/storage ---------Reasonable costs and fees incurred.

Valuation --------------------------------------- Reasonable costs, but no charge can be made unless the debtor has been advised of the charge and the manner of its calculation, beforehand.

Sale --------------------------------------------Reasonable costs and fees incurred.

Where sale does not take place ------------------£20 or actual costs up to 5% of the amount of the liability order (whichever the larger sum).

You can now work out easily what you owe the bailiffs (or shout if you need help). There is no rush over this. They are not allowed to add to them and it is important to pay only for what they have done. If they visited your house they should have left paperwork. Every visit there should be a paper trail. If that is not there, you don't pay it, simple as. They won't like it. They'll phone and make all sorts of threats, but as long as your CT bill is clear there is absolutely nothing they can do about it. I'm in the process of doing it with a bailiff firm local to me from 3 years ago before I knew any better and just paid as I was terrified. I've already claimed back over £500 and have today sent an invoice to my council for just over £200 of fees they cannot prove.

 

So, step 1 check CT is clear.

Step 2 Work out what you think you owe, either post up here or pm them to me and I'll check them

Step 3 Pay what, if anything, remains.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked three times.Last time today was in my council office.I have £42 credit which I leave for the next year...just in case...

How do I know how many times they've been here.

I received first leter 6 months ago ,then I paid full amount...

week ago another letter ( from the bailiff's office)

and today the last one (from Mr X)

is that mean that it will be 3 visits?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked three times.Last time today was in my council office.I have £42 credit which I leave for the next year...just in case...

How do I know how many times they've been here.

I received first leter 6 months ago ,then I paid full amount...

week ago another letter ( from the bailiff's office)

and today the last one (from Mr X)

is that mean that it will be 3 visits?

 

No. A visit means they come to your home and leave a slip of paper saying they have called.If you have proof you paid the full £500 on that day, you owe the bailiffs not one penny. Ignore them, refer them back to the council. Complain to the council they are still harassiing you illegally for fees which are fabricated as they have never visited your house while you owed the council any money. They cannot claim a payment for visiting to collect a debt of £0.00. Send all this to the CEO, ask he calls the bailiffs off immediately as his council is vicariously liable for the behaviour and charges of their appointed bailiffs who are laying the council open to litigation. Personally I would do this via e-mail direct to the CEO, nobody else and await the reply. As long as what you have said is accurate you owe the bailiffs nothing. If they do come don't let them in, but ask for a breakdown of fees (point that bit out to the CEO as well).

 

Let us know how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That what she've send me.

 

Stage

Amount

Debt

£414.23 ---- That was paid before the first visit!!!!

1st Visit

£24.50

2nd Visit

£18.00

Levy Fee

£38.00

Attendance/Enforcement Charges

£160.00

Card Payment Fee

£1.00

Total Balance

£655.73

Payment Received

-£655.73

Refund of debt amount as per your instructions due to direct payment

£414.23

Chargeback by defendant

£241.50

Balance Outstanding

£241.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

That what she've send me.

 

Stage

Amount

Debt

£414.23

1st Visit

£24.50

2nd Visit

£18.00

Levy Fee

£38.00

Attendance/Enforcement Charges

£160.00

Card Payment Fee

£1.00

Total Balance

£655.73

Payment Received

-£655.73

Refund of debt amount as per your instructions due to direct payment

£414.23

Chargeback by defendant

£241.50

Balance Outstanding

£241.50

 

 

did they give you the dates these fees were charged

did they leave you a notice of seizure listing the goods levied

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't read the rest properly, do not put the date you paid on here as you never know who else is watching & although I'm positive they would never do it they may make the dates fit otherwise.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unusually I'm not sure I agree with you. If the OP is sure the payment was made in full to the council before the bailiffs' first visit and this can be proven. It is not his duty to inform the bailiffs the debt is settled, it is the councils.

 

Why then can he not write to the bailiffs (copy to the CEO of the council) along the lines of:

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for your recent breakdown of fees. They were to say the least vague as they contained no detail of dates etc.... However, I believe this does not matter.

 

As I had already paid the council in full before your first visit, please could you inform me why you made that and any subsequent visits? What debt were you collecting? As far as I am aware there was no debt to collect.

 

If the council who employ your services failed to mention that to you, with respect that is not my problem, it is the council's problem. May I respectfully suggest therefore that instead of pursuing myself for fees, none of which could be legally applied as there was no debt for you to collect, you pursue the council who employ you.

 

I trust this resolves the matter and that no further correspondence will be forthcoming.

 

If you do write again and I have to reply, please find attached a letter outlining my fees for time taken responding to and administration of your correspondence.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

LETTER 2

 

Account No: 1234 1234 1234 1234

 

I write with reference to the above numbered account. I would like to point out that this account is formally in dispute with (insert company name) and has been since they failed to acknowledge my Consumer Credit Agreement (CCA) Request, in line with s.77-s.79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA1974).

 

As you are no doubt aware, your continual harassment not only breaches the Consumer Credit Act (1974), but also the Data Protection Act (1998-), the Consumer Protection From Unfair Tradinglink3.gif Regulations (2008-) and the Office Of Fair Trading's debt collectionlink3.gif Guidelines. Being that the Original Creditor is now in default of my CCA Request and OFT Debt Collection Guidelines, I consider this account to be in serious dispute, especially due to the fact that whilst my CCA Request remains in default (outstanding), enforcement action is not permitted in line with s.127(3) of the CCA1974.

 

Consequently, any legal action you pursue will not only be fully and vigorously defended, it will also be averred as both unlawful and vexatious. As such I respectfully suggest that this account is returned to the original creditor for immediate resolution prior to my seeking legal advice; due to the fact you cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities as the account was already in dispute at the time you became involved.

 

If (insert name of company) has chosen not to advise you of a dispute then that is between you and them. The OFT advise in their guidelines that you should ensure that there is no dispute before embarking on your collection activities.

 

I accept that this matter has now reached an impasse with both parties apparently having equally strong views about the merits or otherwise of the case.

 

Therefore, other than a summons, or your appropriate response to this complaint indicating the immediate closure, if you contact me again on this matter then I will invoice you £35 administration fee for my time-consuming response. This fee will be applied for every letter written. Any pre-litigation action including issuing an N1.

 

Should you fall outside of my fourteen day terms of settlement of such an invoice then I will seek remedy in the small claims court against you, without further notice where any further costs incurred will then be claimed.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...