Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parking ticket whilst displaying visitors permit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4852 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good afternoon,

 

I am posting this on behalf of a friend of mine. Where else to get the best help in the world than the CAG :)

 

"We recieved a parking ticket on Devonshire street in Workington where we were residents. At the time we did not have a full permit but were supplied with a visitors pass to park on the street. This was clearly on display and we still recieved a parking ticket.

I took it upon myself to go to Allerdale Council and ask them to remove the fine as we had the permit plus proof of address and they said it would be sorted. A few weeks later i got a letter saying we owed double the ticket as it hadnt been paid. Again i went down to the office and they said it was all sorted now. 3-4 weeks later i recieved a letter off the Bailiffs stating on the letter i owed £395. I phoned the baliffs which wernt interested that i had all the proof and stuff i needed and that the council had said it was sorted he just wanted the money with their charges!

I phoned the council they said they could not do anything further as it had been to Northampton court which we did not know about and it was out of there hands and with the baliffs now. They also said they had no recollection of me being down to the office to complain about this matter!.

The bailiffs stated i need to pay this money to them then i can try and claim it back 10 days after the payment has been made and claim it back off the council which i find far fetched as i wouldnt get there charges back. I rang Carlisle law office up and they stated i should pay the fine as its been to court now and in the hands of the baliffs and i dont really have a leg to stand on. They sent a letter to say that they would take the car but the car is on finance so i know they cant take that. But i shouldnt have to pay it in the first place when i have proof of living at this address and permit to park there !. Any help would be appreciated."

 

Thanks for taking the time to read throught this :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's too late now to go into the original issue of the permit/PCN.

 

It is essential when you want to contest a PCN that you do so in writing at the time. If you did not write, then you have not appealed it, and so there are no grounds by which you can get the matter resolved now. The PCN was not paid or appealed - therefore the charges escalated to where they are now. Maybe Tomtubby can tell you something different, but without a written appeals trail I don't see how.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good afternoon,

 

I am posting this on behalf of a friend of mine. Where else to get the best help in the world than the CAG :)

 

"We recieved a parking ticket on Devonshire street in Workington where we were residents. At the time we did not have a full permit but were supplied with a visitors pass to park on the street. This was clearly on display and we still recieved a parking ticket.

I took it upon myself to go to Allerdale Council and ask them to remove the fine as we had the permit plus proof of address and they said it would be sorted. A few weeks later i got a letter saying we owed double the ticket as it hadnt been paid. Again i went down to the office and they said it was all sorted now. 3-4 weeks later i recieved a letter off the Bailiffs stating on the letter i owed £395. I phoned the baliffs which wernt interested that i had all the proof and stuff i needed and that the council had said it was sorted he just wanted the money with their charges!

I phoned the council they said they could not do anything further as it had been to Northampton court which we did not know about and it was out of there hands and with the baliffs now. They also said they had no recollection of me being down to the office to complain about this matter!.

The bailiffs stated i need to pay this money to them then i can try and claim it back 10 days after the payment has been made and claim it back off the council which i find far fetched as i wouldnt get there charges back. I rang Carlisle law office up and they stated i should pay the fine as its been to court now and in the hands of the baliffs and i dont really have a leg to stand on. They sent a letter to say that they would take the car but the car is on finance so i know they cant take that. But i shouldnt have to pay it in the first place when i have proof of living at this address and permit to park there !. Any help would be appreciated."

 

Thanks for taking the time to read throught this :)

 

If the bailiff is claiming that you should pay him and then claim back from the council after 10 days, I would INSIST that you get this in WRITING and produce a copy to the council. This is UTTER NONSENSE.

 

Also, the council are WRONG as the Operational Guidance to Local Authorities issued by the Secretary of State clearly provides that a PCN can be cancelled at ANY TIME. Yet another council who would appear to be unaware of the guidance !!

 

This enquiry is actually quite simple. Your friend needs to file an Out of Time Witness Statement with the Traffic Enforcement Centre. On the form your friend will need to tick the 2nd box on the TE9 to state that he had made appealed the PCN and had not received any further notices. All enforcement will then cease until the matter had been considered.

 

Before a bailiff visit, your friend should have received a Notice to Owner, Charge Certificate and Order for Recovery. He will need to ring the Traffic Enforcement Centre in the morning on 08457 045 007 and ask them to confirm the date on the warrant and the ADDRESS of the warrant. While on the phone state that he needs to file an Out of Time Application and they will email a copy to him.

 

PS: When he gets through to TEC he will need to press button 6 to speak with an operator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Jamberson and tomtubby. I will send him over your replies and tell him to do everything that you have instructed (tomtubby). Yet again your advice on these kind of matters is second to know. Thank you

 

I will let you all know how he gets on :)

<----------- If I have helped in any way please click on my scales :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiff is claiming that you should pay him and then claim back from the council after 10 days, I would INSIST that you get this in WRITING and produce a copy to the council. This is UTTER NONSENSE.

 

Also, the council are WRONG as the Operational Guidance to Local Authorities issued by the Secretary of State clearly provides that a PCN can be cancelled at ANY TIME. Yet another council who would appear to be unaware of the guidance !!

 

This enquiry is actually quite simple. Your friend needs to file an Out of Time Witness Statement with the Traffic Enforcement Centre. On the form your friend will need to tick the 2nd box on the TE9 to state that he had made appealed the PCN and had not received any further notices. All enforcement will then cease until the matter had been considered.

 

Before a bailiff visit, your friend should have received a Notice to Owner, Charge Certificate and Order for Recovery. He will need to ring the Traffic Enforcement Centre in the morning on 08457 045 007 and ask them to confirm the date on the warrant and the ADDRESS of the warrant. While on the phone state that he needs to file an Out of Time Application and they will email a copy to him.

 

PS: When he gets through to TEC he will need to press button 6 to speak with an operator.

 

Unless the OP lies it is highly unlikely the stat dec will be accepted, representations against the NTO must be made in the form specified on it this as far as I'm aware never includes poping down the Council. Phoning or personal enquiries would not be considered representations in my view as there is no proof they happened, no signature confirming they are true or proof they are made by the keeper.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the OP's freind is going to claim to have made representations without response, when that is not true, than this would not only be rejected by the council, it would also be committing perjury. They can do that if they want, but it's not likely to succeed.

 

Also, in the account given, the person stated "A few weeks later i got a letter saying we owed double the ticket as it hadnt been paid. Again i went down to the office and they said it was all sorted now. 3-4 weeks later i recieved a letter off the bailiffs"

 

The only document wherein the amount owed has doubled, is the NTO, when compared with the initial discounted rate. So an NTO was received? There is no way a case can progress from NTO to bailiffs in 3-4 weeks. Either the person has delayed responding to the NTO (and then done so imappropriately, by visiting the council rather than appealing it), or there are two different cases in progress, or the account is simply inaccurate. In any of these scenarios, the case is not going to hang together.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...