Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO 'Reminder notice of Assignment'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Standard threatogram letter and a crude attempt to use personal data to further intimidate you. The threats are rubbish. You must report this to OFT and Trading Standards via Consumer Direct (insist to them that it is a complaint, you are not seeking help) I think I gave you the links. These HFO tactics must be stopped.

 

Send them the CCA request with £1 postal order by recorded delivery. Leave the PO blank and write on back 'for purposes of CCA request only'. If no agreement returned within 12 plus 2 working days days send the 'Account in dispute' letter

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would go direct to the OFT contact with this one CD

 

Here is a contact with the OFT- James Waldron, Fleet Bank House, 2-6 Salisbury Square, London, EC4 8JX.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Links for complaints - BA has given you the contact at OFT - either write or email. You can also complain about the misuse of your data to ICO

Trading Standards via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

OFT http://www.oft.gov.uk/

ICO via http://www.ico.gov.uk/complaints/data_protection.aspx

OFT Guidance link

This helps when drafting a letter to OFT

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?416-The-OFT-Debt-collection-guidance

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

This ones quite bad even even by HFO's vulgar standards.

 

I often feel the more threatening they are and the more intimidating they are , the weaker their case maybe.

 

Perhaps they feel your using this forum as they search CAG and are trying to panic you into paying before we get our teeth into them. Just my opinion.

 

Like BA and CD say, report them, report them , report them!

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are times when I could actually leave the forum as my issue has gone away (have another go if you want), but when you see the tactics they use to collect these alleged debts and how they try to intimidate people, it makes it a pleasure to stay and do my little bit to help.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is an appalling breach of personal data - they have tried it before with photos of homes, credit reports and 'bailiffs action sheets', I cannot believe they are still doing it as they must have been officially warned about this (the streetview photos seem to have stopped for example).

 

They did it to me - once - and I have been kicking their assets ever since, so be warned HFO:evil:

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree BA, my personal debt problems have met a stalemate, but I stay on the forum for my personal hatred of the stench of these vultures

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello all, apologies for not keeping you informed, I received another letter last week, the 72 hour notice, dated 2 feb. I didn't manage to get to the post office until the friday to send the cca. They received this on Monday 7th. Have heard nothing as yet. Do you think they could be starting proceedings?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I very much doubt, their letters tend to be empty threats. If they do not send you an agreement (which meets the terms of the CCA) by 23rd, I reckon that you can send the account in dispute letter. If you have made a CCA request they cannot proceed with court action. If they send anything, let us know.

 

Please, please make a complaint to OFT, details in the posts above and send copies of all this correspondence. This will be another nail in the coffin for our womble friends

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 72 hours letter just comes off their computer automatically. I have had several over the past few years. Ignore it, they are usually empty threats

My advice is given through personal experience and is given without prejudice

 

 

If I Have helped please feel free to click the star

:smile:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi I have actually received some statements from HFO today (had though it was SAR from Citi :( ). So, like I say they have only sent statements, the last dated Nov 2006. I have some that I have scanned but unsure how to upload. They have sent nothing else other than covering letter advising me to contact when received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is standard, they have still not produced a credit agreement so the Account in Dispute letter still needs to go to them. They may send a 'recon' agreement in the future which is basically a set of Terms and Conditions, but we can deal with that if they do. Do the statements indicate when last payment was made?

 

See if anything else turns up via the SAR request. The level of Citi paperwork is very poor, in my experience

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry the last statement date was Dec 2006

 

Also a few points that may be useful:

 

1. The last payment I was made was April 2006 (although unsure of any contact after that until SAR)

2. On the Dec 2006 statement it shows a debit sale receipt of £458 (transaction date 27/11006 Ref Number: HFO debt s...thats all it shows)

3. On the Nov and Dec statement is shows my parents address, however I never gave them this as a new address (although earlier statements do show this address before I moved) ALSO on these last two statements the address is spelt wrong!!!

 

I actually sent them the dispute letter this morning. This letter was arrived Saturday but I was unable to view until this afternoon.

 

Any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello all, I wonder if you could help me again following on from this thread?

 

Today I have received info from Citi following SAR, the letter reads:

 

Thank you for your recent request for copies of the personal data under s 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998 regarding your account.

 

Please find enclosed:

A copy of the personal data provided as part of the application process.

Copies of correspondence received from you.

Copies of the statements issued on the account. There were no statements produced for this account after November 2006 as the account was sold to HFO.

 

We can confirm that there were no notes of manual intervention produced for this account.

 

You should note that we do not routinely keep copies of all correspondence sent to customers because the majority of our letters are issued by our customer management system, and this does not maintain any records beyond the letter type and the date the letter was sent, and generally this information is only held for a two year period.

 

We have not provided you with copies of the terms and conditions as these fall outside the definition of personal data for the purposes of the Data Protection Act 1998. Similarly, s 7 (1) © only requires a data controller to provide a copy the information constituting any personal data, not the actual document on which the personal data is recorded; therefore we have supplied a copy of the information on the agreement/application.

......

 

So, the documents they have provided are:

  • a change of address document sent to them on 3/7/06
  • a letter from myself dated 20/07/06 offering a monthly payment plan as advised by Payplan, including a list of expenditure and income and list of creditors. (This offer was dismissed from what I recall)
  • Application information including, personal details e.g. address, dob,contact no, time at address, marital status, employment details, date application processed, bank details and 'card protection plan insurance - 0 (meaning not requested) and 'Cardholder repayment protection insurance' - 0 (again not requested).
  • statements from Feb 05 until Nov 06.

Citi actually sent statements from commencement until Dec 06, the last of which stated 'debt sale receipt' from HFO.

Also statements all show cardholder repayment protection insurance from commencement.

 

So I would really appreciate any thoughts on what I have received, all of your contributions mean a lot to me.

 

Also, I have heard nothing from HFO since account in dispute letter. (sorry if any spelling mistakes, second time of writing this through as lost the first! Really should do in word next time!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual poor response from Citi, nothing of value. Please remember that when HFO request data from Citi they will receive the same. Bit of as waiting game I am afraid to see if HFO make a move, if they do you will be ready for them.

 

Hfo may send you a response to your CCA request which consists of Citi Tems and Conditions, not worth a light. Please let us know if you receive anything and make sure that you send complaints to OFT etc.

 

HFO should not bother you as the account is in dispute

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...