Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mercers and Barclaycard


chairy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4715 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am new to this Forum and new to the Consumer Action Group.

 

Recently, I have been dealing with Mercers Debt Collection, who I understand have very close links with Barclaycard (or is that "are owned by"?)

 

I have sent an Incomings/Outgoings form (prepared by the CCCS) to them clearly stating my affairs, and a letter offering a interim payment of £5, as I am off work ill. This is all I can afford for the time being.

 

Mercers have written back saying that they will only accept £35.92 as a minimum payment, and if I cannot afford it, then they will pass my details to a Doorstop Collection firm.

 

My question is, simply, how should I proceed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

Have a look at this link (particularly 2.6) then complain

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

I will move this thread to the Barclays forum

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would respond with letter d from this link:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?590-Creditors-and-DCAs-Letter-Templates-Budget-Planner

 

I would also suggest that you pay what you have offered wjether they accept your proposal or not

 

and welcome to CAG.

 

:welcome:

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I

 

I've been through all this with Mercers(in house) calders (in house) resolvecall(doorstep) and then Credit Solutions.

 

BCard will not accept my token offer so I made a formal complaint based on the recent OFT MBNA ruling which I have 6 months to take to fos.

 

To be truthful I don't think it much matters what you do, they carry on regardless. It's up to you whether you make the payments anyway; I think much depends on the status of the original alleged debt (CCA etc).

 

x

 

vic

Edited by victoria_siempre
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for the start. It's going to take me a while to get my head around all the acronyms, but I will.

 

Barclaycard is not the only Creditor I have, and the rest are being far more understanding and agreeable to my situation, vis-a-vie my health issues. The CCCS had me in a Debt Management Plan, but when my pay dropped due to illness, they dropped me like a hot potato, and fed me to the wolves!

 

Hey ho, look forward to anyone giving me advice!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chairy,

 

I agree with what others have said above.

 

Mercers are one of BC's in-house DCA's and are part of BC.

 

If you've already sent BC the budget planner and your offer to pay £5 pm, pay that to them, whether they agree to it or not.

 

Don't worry about doorstep collectors. Read this - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?441-If-you-do-receive-a-doorstep-visit-we-give-these-suggestions-to-Members.

 

Any penalty charges that BC have charged can be reclaimed by you in full, plus interest. Do you have all your a/c statements going back 6 years or more, to check for penalties.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Darn, no I don't have all my Statements. I do have other Creditors (4) and the other one I have a similar balance with has taken a totally different view, and accepted my offer straight away. Have Mercers got a reputation for being ummmm difficult?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Mercers got a reputation for being ummmm difficult?

 

Barclays have a tendency to be very difficult to deal with but not impossible (try having a debt with Citi!)

 

As you don't have all your statements, it would be a good idea to SAR them. Have a look at section 2 HERE (bookmark that link-you may need it)

 

All late payment and overlimit charges on any credit card or loan are reclaimable-with interest.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi just a little snippet about mercers,I just received my old bank statements from abbey,for 01 to 04 I never really looked at statements just the bottom line,well looking at these it seems I was making monthley payments to these edits because looking at the statements it says VP which is a debit payment by card well it seems every time I made a payment by card on the phone they would take two,if it was £100 there is two withdrawals so they got £200 this as just come to light.I was so trusting but not anymore dont believe a word they say.

Edited by slick132
Please read Site Rules about defamatory remarks - they put the Site at risk !
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi putupon12

 

Don't want to start a hi jack, but why were you paying Mercers for an Abbey alleged debt? Mercers are a wholly owned subsidiary of Barclaycard and are noramally BC's first line of assault on an aleged debtor. In fact they are a dormant company looking at the registration at companies house and their accounting methods etc have been called into question many times because the activities of dormant compnaies are very very restricted indeed. Should they now be offering their services to companies outside the Barclays coven, then a report should be made toute suite to Companies House.

 

regards

oilyrag

Link to post
Share on other sites

To avoid further hijack, if Putupon wants to discuss this further, please start a new thread.

 

I assume Putupon was clearing a BC debt through Mercers but was paying from an Abbey a/c.

 

Mercers remain BC's in-house collection arm and have no connection outside the Barclays group, AFAIK.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chairy,

 

undoubtedly slick will be along soon but our experience with Mercers is that they are not exactly shifty as such, just plain incompetent. Unless you do exactly what they demand, they will harrass you for a long time even after you have sent them all the relevant letters telling them in writing etc only. Now a ot depends on what you want from all this, what is your goal?

 

If you stop paying because you believe the account is in dispute, e.g. no response to CCA 1974 s78 request, and SAR, Mercers will issue you with a Default Notice which to date all mercers DNs are defective. Followuing this they are likely to pass the account acroos the gangway to the next level of BC thuggery known as Calders.

Who after a while harrassing you ewill isue a termonation notice or demand for payment in full of the outstanding amount. At this point, although there is some debate on here about it, a termination or demand for payment in full on the back of a defective DN rneders them under the legislation and regulations only able to sue for any legitimate arrears (not the full amount) at the time the DN was issued (which almost certainly will be less than the DN figures). Thats the theory anyway. from then on its on to the dCA merry-go round. However whatever you offer BC, Mercers, Calders and associated rovers and travellers, BC will not accept.

 

Like I said its up to you, if you want to do battle then batten down the hatches and sit it out, if not then I would look to achieving some form of full and final after getting back any charges/PPI that you can. An F & F can be as low as 10% properly handled, we have just done one at this level for an OD, the bank was so greedy and arrogant they fell into the legal quagmire that awaits them if they put a foot wrong. All of these subjects are discussed at length here on the forum along with much help and support, but ultimately the decisions have to be your own.

 

Companies House is where you look for their dormant status and the guidelines for the very strict way they can operate are also on that site and regulated by the Registrar of Companies.

 

best regards

oilyrag.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chairy

 

Echo oilyrag.

 

Mercers harass and tell fibs. They will put you through all sorts of hoops but refuse any affordable offer. Then I got Resolvecall on doorstep (no prob), Calders, Credit Solutions ltd, power2contact (threatening doorstep - I don't think so, but am I bovvered?).

 

So, to be fair, Mercers are no more shifty than everyone else in this edit run extortion industry, including Barclaycard.

 

I continue to make my affordable offer in accordance with recent OFT v. MBNA ruling and add to my extant complaint to fos.

 

love

 

vic

Edited by slick132
Defamatory remark removed. Please see Site Rules about posting, thanks :)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chairy,

 

I've not seen any quote about Mercers being shifty but others have already pointed out how they and other DCA's try and harass folk.

 

Have you started the process of reclaiming penalty charges on this a/c. If not, you need to get your a/c statements from BC using the Subject Access Request in the Bank Templates Library.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

I've had what I consider to be a success today.

 

I got one of Mercer's calls today, and when I called back, I went through "Security" and explained my situation and asked for their help. I decided to play the slightly confused, if not just plain daft, client. They tried to ask me for £35.92pm to cover my arrangement, and I explained that I just couldn't do that.

 

With that, I was past through to a "Barclaycard Agent", (Security AGAIN) with a distinctly Scouse accent. This surprised me as I thought they were in Northampton... Having explained again, this "Agent" agreed that £5.00 was agreeable, and I was put back to Mercers (or was I just passed around the 0office I wonder??? I paid my £5 and said I would call next month, and they were ok with me.

 

I can see now that it is just a bit of a game which I am forced to play. Ah well, as long as they leave me alone for a bit!

 

Chairy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chairy,

 

I agree with Victoria - make damned sure the amount they've taken is only £5.00 as agreed. Check this carefully online with the bank or when the bank statement arrives. If they've taken a penny more than £5.00, come down on them hard.

 

Also, it's unusual for them to agree to a lower payment in this way. Remember, of course that they continue to charge interest on the o/s balance so you are better to pay off as much as poss to reduce the balance when you can.

 

You didn't say whether you have listed al penalty charges on the a/c, to get them refunded. With compound interest on top, this can represent a significant refund if there are older charges on the a/c. If the charges are more recent penalty charges (say the past year or two), the impact of compound interest is not as great, in which case it may make more sense NOT to seek compound int't as this will involve court action by you.

 

Let us know on this point please.

 

8-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi chairy and slick,

 

May i just reinforce and stress that is most unwise to deal with anyone involved in any way with a Barclaycard dispute, on the telephone UNLESS you are able to record the call in its entirety and save the recording for future reference.

 

It is wise counsel indeed to deal with all matters in writing only. Yes I know its irksome but it is far safer. I won't even communicate via e-mail with any of them. Recorded mail only and we keep everything they send including envelopes each marked with the date of actual arrival.

 

regards

oilyrag

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid I fell for this with another credit card company. They wanted just £1 to set the lower payment deal up and I gave them my card details. You know what's coming .......... I sent a cheque off for the lower amount agreed and they also took the same amount from my card details. I had to change my card details etc. Never again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...