Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent: I need some help/advice re: Equita bailiff - action due tomorrow 5th Nov 2010


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4953 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I've read quite a few posts on the forum and now have a general idea of what to do and what not to do (or what should have been done!) but would appreciate advice regarding the current situation since it may be too late?

Apologies if there's too much information but I just want to be sure and find out where she stands.

 

Here's the deal:

 

My girlfriend received a knock on the door by an Equita bailiff on 23rd September 2010 re: unpaid council tax.

Unfortunately, she was waiting for a courier that day and mistook the Bailiff knocking the door for the courier.

The bailiff explained who he was and asked to come in, to which she agreed :!:

(Having read several forum posts here today, we now realise that doing this was not a good idea).

 

Anyway, he was actually quite a pleasant chap and explained the situation to her and gave her 2 documents.

One of the documents was a standard 'Delivered by hand - BAILIFF REMOVAL - Final Notice' red letter (she can't recall receiving any letters prior to this) dated 23rd September 2010 stating 'Payment due in full - 24 Hours'. Nowhere on this letter is an amount stated although it does mention the outstanding Council Tax Liability Order. He crossed through the content of the letter and circled his contact details and went on to explaining the other document and what was involved/what would happen.

 

The other document is an Equita 'Form 7 - Notice of seizure and inventory of goods' - I'm guessing this is a pretty standard document at the 'I'm in your house' stage. The printed form has space for Bailiff ref, Debtor Name and Address, Bailiff Name etc and states 'I have attended today at the above address to seize and distrain upon goods and chattels for' with Council Tax ticked.

It goes on to say 'Absence of payment will result in goods being removed and sold at public auction ....' etc.

There is an 'Inventory of goods' section where he listed TV, Xbox and DVD player (all of which my girlfriend doesn't actually own).

 

The form also has 'Form 8' - 'Form of walking possession agreement (request not to remove goods immediately)

 

He got her to sign the form and get her to agree to pay the debt on or before 5th November 2010, but to call him if she anticipated any problem with this arrangement.

 

The amount owing on the Council Tax is £1314.96

Bailiff costs (inc VAT) £263.50

Nothing under 'Total amount if paid today' or 'Bailiff costs continue at _p per day thereafter'

Total: £1578.46!!!

 

Is this daylight robbery or what?

 

With the above scenario in mind, my girlfriend is fortunate enough to be in a position to make full payment tomorrow if necessary, but is it necessary? ie, can the Council Tax arrears be paid directly to the council and can the Bailiff fee be fully/partially avoided?

 

I read some of the comments in another thread about £42.50 bailiff fees and speaking to/paying the Council directly, but to be honest I'm confused as to what can and can't be done under the circumstances.

 

The only other thing to add was that my girlfriend called the bailiff earlier this evening and left a message on his voicemail re: payment and that she'd call him again in the morning.

Unfortunately, this was before reading through some of the posts - it's a real shame we didn't find this forum before now but you live and learn.

 

As time is of the essence, any good advice would be most appreciated so thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

needinfo

Edited by needinfo
Link to post
Share on other sites

pay the council what they want by internet banking using the details on the back of a ctax bill.

 

as for the bailiff.

 

 

write to the bailiff co asking for a breakdown of his fees and a screenshot.

 

when the bailff calls, dont let him in, tell him its been paid direct to the council and that you are disputing his actions/fees/charges.

if he will not leave, call the police.

 

if you have had no previous letters etc, then i think he is trying to fleece you blind.

 

i would also complain to the council about his actions

they are responsible for what he does as they have employed him

don't be fobbed off, ask to speak to the chief exec office if they play silly buggers.

 

you should also have received court papers and a liabilty order well before he got to your door.

if you did not get those,

then you need to ask the council where they were sent too ask well

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As DX has suggested your girlfriend can pay direct to the council via their online payment facility.

The levy is invalid as the items do not belong to her so the bailiff cannot charge for these, all your girlfriend owes at this stage to the bailiff is £24.50.

May I suggest your girlfriend pays what she owes to the council via internet and print off the receipt and either pin it to the door for the bailiff to see when he comes round, She will however incur another bailiff fee of £18.00 for a second visit. However this can be included in with what she owes to the council. Alternatively she can text the bailiff that the bill has now been paid and all relevant paper work has been faxed/email to the bailiffs office.

You need to write/email the bailiffs office and ask for a breakdown of fees and to let them know that the items listed did not belong to her. This makes the levy invalid

A state dec may need to be obtained and this can be done at your local county court or at a solicitors. It usually costs about £10.00

A bailiff can however Levy on a first visit, but be sure to get a breakdown of all his fee's and charges as what he has charged is wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

he cant levylink3.gif etc etc on the first visit.

 

dx100ulk this is wrong bailiffs should levy on the first visit thats the reason for the bailiffs visit to levy distress

 

 

For making a visit to premises with a view to

Levying distress (where no levy is made)

Edited by hallowitch
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks so much for all the help and advice so far.

 

As she needs to get on this asap in order to avoid today's planned visit, to summarise:

 

My girlfriend need only pay the CT amount + £24.50 to the council via internet payment and then follow this up with a text to the bailiff to advise what's been done, ie payment made direct.

Thereafter, send copies of the respective documentation to the council (complaint) and bailiff co. (receipt and stat dec) as appropriate?

 

Does this sound right?

 

Many thanks again for all your help, it is most appreciated.

 

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sorry amended

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bailiff has made 2 visits to her property so legal bailiff fees are £42.50 pay this and the amount outstanding on the liability order

 

 

As it stands the bailiff is under the assumption that he has a valid levy as no one has laid claim to levied goods as of yet therefore he can assume they belong to the debtor

Having said that The bailiff wont re-enter your property to remove goods

when a bailiff Levy's goods the goods levied must cover

all bailiff fees removal fees storage fees auction fees and a substantial portion of the debt so unless the TV, Xbox and DVD player are top of the rage and would make a considerable amount at auction he wont re-enter to remove them

 

you will have to contest the levy either by a statutory declaration or several letters of complaint to Equita and your council

Link to post
Share on other sites

To: (the bailiffslink3.gif) (their address)

I (your name)

of (your address)

Do solemnly and sincerely declare that:

the items listed

tv

x Box

DVD player

are not the property of (your friends name) and (reason why they were there) and have always been my sole property

And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 and Section 5 of The Perjury Act 1911.

 

signature:

 

Declared at

 

On the day of two thousand and

 

Before me

 

A Commissioner for Oaths, or Notary Public/Justice of the Peace/Solicitor having the powers conferred on a Commissioner for OathsBefore me

 

 

 

councils don't administrate there own council tax they outsource it one of the company's some councils use is Capita who own Equita

 

As you are dealing with Equita i suggest a stat dec is the way to go get 3 copy's send 1 to equita 1 to the revenues department of your council ask for it to put on file for future use if necessary and 1 to keep they MUST BE SENT BY RECORDED DELIVERY

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!

Now that's thorough.

I can't thank you guys enough for this invaluable information.

Getting the remaining docs sorted asap.

 

Btw, to confirm - the bailiff has only made the one visit to date.

Now he's had the text message and from what you're saying about the listed goods (they're not top of the range), is it fair to assume he won't be returning?

Thanks,

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

what you're saying about the listed goods (they're not top of the range), is it fair to assume he won't be returning?

Thanks,

 

No it fair to assume that he wont re-enter the property with a locksmith because once he takes this action he would have to sell the goods at auction

and he cant do that as they have very little value and wont cover the fees

 

He will however still pursue the outstanding fees until you have either provide the stat dec or go down the invalid levy route ( because the goods levied wont cover the fees) and get it in writing that the levy and associated fees (van/attendance)have been cancelled

 

 

Bailiff company's add there 1st 2nd visit fees before they visit

 

phone the council and ask for the date the of the liability order the date it was passed to Equita and the amount

 

send an e-mail to Equita asking for a breakdown of fees this will tell you when the 1st 2nd visits were allegedly made

 

If you can post up the notice of seizure (removing all personal info) it would help

did you look to see if the bailiff is Certificated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all again, an update:

 

C Tax amount + £24.50 paid via Internet to local council last Friday morning - have a Payment Authentication Receipt email and PDF copy of web page receipt/confirmation.

Sent bailiff a text advising that the bill has now been paid and that documents will be sent to Equita.

Still need to get the Stat Dec witnessed by an appropriate signee (doing this today).

Have an email address for the council's council tax dept. Although, have no email address for Equita and refuse to use the insecure contact form on their web site - does anyone have a valid email address for Equita?

 

Last night, my girlfriend and I arrived outside her house to find the bailiff sitting in his vehicle with an accomplice. As soon as he saw that I had opened the front door and picked up the day's post, he immediately told me 'Oh, ignore that' - referring to the red 'Bailiff Removal - payment due in 24 hours - final notice' letter.

He then said that he was there to speak to her, but asked me about the payment on Friday. I advised him that indeed a payment had been made to the council which covered the cost of the outstanding council tax + £24.50 fee. I did not however, disclose the full amount.

He then advised me that he'd checked over the weekend and 'sometimes, with the way she paid, these things don't show up straight-away'.

I advised him that I could assure him that she has a receipt for the payment - he didn't ask to see this.

 

By this time, his bouncer-like accomplice was standing by the vehicle in the middle of the road with arms crossed - obviously in an attempt to be menacing and intimidating.

The bailiff then approached my girlfriend although I didn't catch what was said as I was making sure the front door was locked.

 

Words were exchanged, although not particularly aggressive until I mentioned that my girlfriend was writing to both the council and Equita concerning all of this.

He asked what was the nature of the correspondence to which I replied that she wants to request a break-down of his 'charges' and to complain about the manner in which she was made to feel intimidated on his previous visit.

The bailiff then proceeded to show me a copy of the original walking possession order stating that the break-down was already clearly shown ie, the split between council tax amount and his 'charges'. I argued that the amount shown could not in any way be considered a break-down.

 

It was clear that the conversation wasn't proceeding as he would have liked and his parting comments were that my girlfriend had 24 hours in which to pay or he'd be back with a locksmith to gain entry.

 

 

Having checked the Certificated Bailiff Register on the HM Courts site, the 'Bailiff in charge' is not listed - what is the significance with this?

 

Also, under the circumstances, clearly, physical documentation won't arrive at either the council or Equita before the 24 hours is up - what action should she take now?

Do you think the threat of returning with a locksmith is a valid threat considering a) the value (or lack of) of the goods he's intending to remove and b) the fact that she doesn't actually own the goods?

 

I suppose the key thing this afternoon is to get the Stat Dec done.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well he cant use a locksmith

usual crap from them

 

hallo should be up soon

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK great, thanks for your comment dx.

 

Just found this:

 

Non-certificated Bailiff

Working on behalf of companies and organisations, a Non-certificated Bailiff has the power to recover the money owed for a variety of debts by seizing and selling a person's goods. However, Non-certificated Bailiffs cannot levy distress for rent, road traffic debts, council tax or non-domestic rates.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off any

link3.gif

has to come from the Company and not the
bailiff
link3.gif
. He is clearly trying to intimidate/bully/harrass/threaten which if done in a public place could be possibly classed as a criminal offence. His threat of the locksmith is just that. To do that he has to get the authorisation of the Claimant then go before a magistrate and prove that you were wilfully refusing to pay and pretty please could he have a piece of paper to allow him to force entry. This is something that is very rarely given so I wouldn't worry, if he does call again keep up the good work and deny him entry.

 

You could always contact the Council higher ups and complain their contractor is being a pain in the derriere and ask them to call him off, if they refuse you could always remind them they are wholly responsible for any actions he takes and you will have no hesitation in naming the Council as Co-Defendant in any future action you may take.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to double-check, I spoke to Ministry of Justice Public Register of Bailiffs on 020 3334 6355 who advised that this bailiff had a hearing due in July this year and advised me that I'd need to speak to the regular county court for confirmation of certificated status. He said that it doesn't necessarily mean that the bailiff isn't certificated ie, it could be that the court hasn't sent through updated details (July was a fair few months ago though?)

Anyway, I called the county court but was asked to call back later. So, in lieu of obtaining completely accurate confirmation, should my girlfriend text the bailiff saying that she's checked the HMCS on-line Certificated Bailiff's Register and that the search does not show him as certificated?

I also found out that he works for another bailiff company and so at this stage, can only assume Equita are sub-contracting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

Got confirmation that this bailiff is indeed certificated. Called HMCS to advise and query why the database hadn't been updated and was advised that any changes should have been notified by the court.

Basically, the list isn't 100% trustworthy so I would advise anyone not to rely on it and make as many enquiries as you can to find out the exact position/situation.

 

Anyhow, back to today - any advice on if the bailiff turns up again tonight?

ie, should she just be able to hand over a copy of the Stat Dec and send him packing?

 

Also, got all contact details ie, email addresses, postal addresses and fax/phone numbers for both council and Equita now re: complaint so the idea is to email, snail mail and telephone.

 

Any more advice?

 

Thanks so much.

 

 

needinfo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...