Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I had some contact with this company earlier in my working life but I'm afraid there's not a lot I can suggest that you haven't already done. During your grandfather's time  British Celanese was a subsidiary of Courtaulds. Courtaulds was subsequently (after your grandfather had stopped working there) acquired by Alzo Nobel. They in turn closed down the Spondon site and sold it. I have no idea what the number is that you are trying to call. It's a Derby (Spondon) area code but the number appears not to be allocated. From my slim knowledge of the history of the company I would have expected your grandfather's pension to be in the Alzo Nobel (CPS) Pension Scheme.  But Willis Tower Watson are the Pension Scheme Administrator of that scheme and would be the people who should know if your grandfather had contributed. Is your grandfather certain he contributed? Joining pension schemes wasn't compulsory in those days. Or might he have got his contributions returned when he left them? That happened sometimes back then. Sorry not to be of more help.      
    • I am sorry I am not aware of this report from IAS assessors? The Court will consider my application at a online hearing in June. The Court instructed me to send Bank copies of my sons condition proving he could not have been the driver I have heard nothing further. My son is not aware of any proceedings I have not involved him to avoid causing him distress, he has been sectioned a fair few times and I need to avoid this happening.
    • I am very pleased that the Court has taken the decision to allow you to  represent your son and hope that he is happy enough with that to relieve the stress he will also be feeling. I do agree that Bank parking are so insensitive, greedy, horrible etc etc to continue proceedings considering  in what it is a very minor case of a wrong number plate . Even their  own  IAS Assessors, who are normally hopelessly biased in favour of their members, went out on a limb and said  " The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." That is damning evidence and you must take that report with you as well as including that in your Witness Statement which we will help you with. I would expect that Bank would discontinue the case at that point.  But I am sorry to say  that you should not count on it.  
    • Evening all,   I have deliberated over this offer for two weeks and I have decided to take their offer. I do understand that some may prefer us to go to court and receive a judgement but with our personal circumstances and my current military commitment that could become an issue. I am so grateful for all the help and support you have all offered me over the last few months. I will continue to monitor this site and push all those that are being wrong to get in touch.   Thank you! what you all do is truly amazing!
    • When I first responded to the PAPLOC, and received that 29 page junk back it was accompanied with a letter saying that they had already responded to my request back on Feb 18th 2023,(I never received it). I was just clearing out some paperwork today and found a letter from Lowell, dated Feb 17th 2023, explaining that they were still waiting for the documents from PayPal, and my account was on hold  until further notice.  Does this mean they were lying and can it be used against them if this goes any further? I have now filed my defence, and have had an acknowledgement from Overdales and the court. A little threatening from Overdales , explaining that part of my defence was invalid because they have now complied with the CCA, and they were still waiting for the Default notice from PayPal.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My money is missing


dg211262
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6451 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

This is my first time here because I am looking for some advice on an ongoing problem I have. On the 17/07 my bank carried out a transaction on my behalf but as it was an International payment it had to go through correspondent banks to reach my account. My bank actually put the wrong IBAN number down so on the 24/07 they sent a correction notice but the money still didn't appear in my account. On the 03/08 they sent a recall notice and guess what...my funds still haven't been applied.

 

I have closed the account where the funds were originally supposed to go so I thought that the recall notice would simply take effect but boy has that been a mistake because still no money.

 

Now since the 17/07 quite a bit of my money has 'gone missing' and although my bank where it went from have tried their hardest to recall the funds, the bank where it was going to, The Abbey, are not trying to solve the problem and are not interested in resolving the issue so I am still a considerable amount missing.

 

Any ideas on what I should do to try and get somewhere with this problem would be very much appreciated as I am at my wits end with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where were the funds transferred from? Your bank may well be able to ask for the money to be sent back but you would incur a charge for them to return them to your account(transfer fee). Have the funds been applied to someone else's account? If not then they should be sitting in an internal account. The bank where the funds have been sent from should have an identification number that the bank should be able to trace where the funds are.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bank that transferred the money have been great but due to the fact that it was a foreign transfer, correspondent banks were used as at the time the Abbey were having problems with their systems.

 

All banks involved apart from the Abbey have been really helpful but they are a nightmare to try and get information from and they just keep saying that as it is an incoming payment they can't chase it up even though I have given them the details.

 

If the funds were applied to a different account then someone has made a big mistake because even though the IBAN number was incorrect initially they aren't supposed to apply funds unless the IBAN number and account name match.

 

The bank that transferred the funds waived the fees for the transaction and aren't charging me to recall the funds but their hands are tied. I have spoken to numerous people without any success.

 

I even spoke to the police and they told me that as the funds were 'just a set of numbers' and that I hadn't actually had the cash in my hands and had it taken from me personally it wasn't theft or fraud.

 

Quite simply there just doesn't seem anywhere to go and the Abbey appear to know this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My bank used Deutsche bank London and the Abbey used Citibank. I have tried in vain to send Abbey copies of the faxes that show all of the transaction numbers and confirmations but Abbey just keep giving me the speil that they cannot trace incoming payments. They won't even speak to Citibank and are not responding to their requests.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bit about they cannot trace incoming payments is rubbish. When ot went to Deutsche, did they forward this one by CHAPS? If they did and the details were wrong then then they should look at their CHAPS internal account and be able to trace it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right..I if am reading this correctly what you are saying is that as long as the funds were received by Deutsche bank then all of the transactions no matter how many banks were involved would be within the UK, by Chaps, and therefore traceable by any of the parties involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The funds absolutely have to be traceable under the various maoney laundering regulations. If the Abbey are admitting that they are unable to trace payments such as this, then they're admitting non-compliance with the regs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...