Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
    • No doubt the hotel will have security cameras on the floor you were staying to confirm or deny the allegation??   The only compensation you will probably get, which will be discretionary as a goodwill gesture, will be a credit voucher for the entire hotel group. Very much doubt anything more than that as you have not substantiated, the hotel committed the transgression 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Clear Associates


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4288 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

New on the forum - I have three or four debts outstanding at the moment - a couple informal arrangements - nothing major overdue or in litigation etc but today I received a letter, the brief outline as follows:-

 

Clear Associates, PO Box 7292, Corby, NN17 9BX Tel: 0800 1804136.

 

Dear Sir

 

Our client as requested that we contact you in relation to an important matter.

 

Please telephone this office, quoting reference xxxxxx to discuss this matter further etc.

 

Our client has a legilative obligation to update their file with data concerning change of address ....etc

 

If we do not receive any contact in the the stipulated time (NOT GIVEN!!), the record will be passed to our investigations department who will undertake various procedures which may include visiting the property .....etc.

 

 

This has worried me - I cannot seem to find any info on Clear Associates..has anyone dealt with them and if so who do they act on behalf of any help and advice would be very much appreciated.

 

 

Mkel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
If we do not receive any contact in the the stipulated time (NOT GIVEN!!), the record will be passed to our investigations department who will undertake various procedures which may include visiting the property .....etc.
Well, they cannot just invite themselves to your property. Invesitgations department sounds pretty pretentious and also ideas perhaps above their station where saying they 'may include visiting the property' ... more exploitation of consumer knowledge ie they cannot just show up and do that without your permission and of course you aren't going to give it are you.

 

 

Our client has a legilative obligation to update their file with data concerning change of address ....etc

 

Oh, well, if they are going to start quoting 'legislation' maybe they should look up what the OFT says about such things ie contacting a debtor not making themselves clear who they are nor what they want.

 

Yet another letter I presume from the mysterious DCAs not using a proper address ... Hmmm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Maybe, Clear needs some window cleaning, maybe Windowlene or something, then they can be more 'clear' to people who they are. Tsk tsk! ;):lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Legislative - sorry about the typing!

 

I will inform consumer direct, one other thing? should I ignore, phone/write to see who they are - who their client is?

 

The letter has no other details other than the PO box address, telephone number - no details of the legal status I.e company, partnership or sole trader/practitioner etc - which i assume is wrong - I can scan and upload if required.

 

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will inform consumer direct, one other thing? should I ignore, phone/write to see who they are - who their client is?

 

When you ring Consumer Direct tell them that you are aware of the OFT's Debt Collection Practices, and these clowns fall way short of complying with the OFT in not making it clear as to who they are, why they are contacting you, and what they want.

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

 

Specifically this section;

2 UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES

Communication

2.1 It is unfair to communicate, in whatever form, with consumers in an unclear,

inaccurate or misleading manner.

2.2 Examples of unfair practices are as follows:

a. use of official looking documents intended or likely to mislead

debtors as to their status, for example, documents made to resemble court

claims.

b. leaving out or presenting information in such a way that it

creates a false or misleading impression or exploits debtors'

lack of knowledge

c. those contacting debtors not making clear who they are, who

they work for, what their role is, what the purpose of the

contact is

d. unnecessary and unhelpful use of legal and technical language, for

example, use of Latin phrases

 

And NO, DON'T phone them EVER,

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Rick, you should start your own thread as this will go missed here,

Try this http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/newthread.php?do=newthread&f=167

 

Give it your own title, "unclear Associates" or whatever and others will be able to see your new post and advise accordingly, welcome to CAG, happy New Year and all that Jazz!

 

You will need to explain what they want. how much roughly, and what it is for? How old it is etc etc etc....any dramas reply to this and I will hopefully be able to guide you further, but MOST importantly DO NOT RING THEM or speak to them OVER THE PHONE keep EVERYTHING in WRITING!!

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I had the exact same letter this morning, but however it was addressed to a female version of my first name! All very suspicious, and as far as I am aware I don't owe anybody anything now although I've had problems in the past due to divorce etc.

I am going to ignore the letter as it is far too vague, and I think it may be a Phishing [problem].

:sad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I've had numerous voicemails left by an automated sort of thing: "Please call Clear Associates now on XXXXXXXXXX quoting reference XXXXXXX". Never a letter or any other form of contact. I'm totally ignoring them. I'd suggest the OP does the same until they actually reveal who they're representing. The reference number they gave me doesn't correspond with anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

they have phoned my work, my work will not pass on any details but they passed this info on to me. Hannah French from Clear associates wants to speak to me on 08001804136, but wouldn't say why. HOW DID THEY GET MY WORKS OFFICE NUMBER, AND HOW DO I STOP THIS!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore them, make a formal complaint to the OFT&TS via consumer direct, and then to Ofcom. Keep a diary of events, with a SERIOUS view of taking legal action against them in court for the criminal offence of harassment.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a letter from them today, addressed to 'The Occupier' at my address, requesting information as to whether I currently reside here so 'they can update their records'. I have no knowledge of why they have a record for me, who they are working on behalf of (if anyone), what should I do with this letter, destroy it, keep it, ignore it?

 

Seems like an unfair business practice as outlined above however!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder how they would update their records if they were to receive a letter, from your address, stating that, "The Occupier can confirm that he, [or she], does not live here"?

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

I've just had a phone call today from these jokers saying that they have confidential mail for me. It must be for a very old debt as I have behaved myself for the past 6 years. It makes me wonder how they got hold of my mobile number because I hardly advertise it. Obviously not through fair means.

 

Anyway, I hope to start playing with my new friend shortly :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received a letter today from this crowd addressed to "the occupier". They say that they are trying to contact me and as per the data protection act 1998 they are attempting to confirm the data they hold is up to date.

They are part of Empingham with whom I currently have dialogue. There is no reason to contact me since I have never returned mail as not known etc.

Can they in fact legally make that statement about the dpa?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can and will do whatever they want, sending a letter addressed to the 'occupier' is a very clear breach of the OFT debt collection guidelines and is a very clear indication of just how much they really care for legislation and guidelines.

 

Ignore the fools, they have NO legal powers to do anything, send a copy of that childish letter to the OFT&TS along with your complaint.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...