Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will try again...................... Even at my age there is quite clearly a PCN envelope by the windscreen wipers on your car on some of the photos.  But as I said in the IPC letter, that is not the dispute. The dispute is that CPM sent you the second PCN on the 28 th day of the issue date of the first PCN. It should not have been sent until the day AFTER the original PCN was issued. Therefore they broke the Act, they breached the IPC Code of Conduct and their agreement with the DVLA. It is something that the IPC cannot ignore since to do so will bring the ICO down on them and the DVLA should ban CPM from getting data from them once they know if the ICO do nothing. The minimum I expect is that your PCN will be cancelled. But it is up to you. I have given you the details, you have copies of both PCNs sent to you on the sar  with all  the relevant dates. 
    • Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card   An HM Armed Forces Veteran Card is a way to prove that you served in the UK armed forces. The card can make it quicker and easier to apply for support as a veteran. It’s free to apply. You can currently only apply for a Veteran Card if you have a UK address. Veterans who do not have a UK address will be able to apply later this year. READ MORE HERE: Apply for an HM Armed Forces Veteran Card - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK Apply for an armed forces veteran card to prove that you served in the UK armed forces.
    • The Private Parking Code of Parking has been postponed as the poor dears are frightened that thew will all go out of business once it becomes Law. We all wish but nothing could be further from the truth so doubtless most of them will have to change their ways if they don't want to be removed as approved parking companies. Thank you for still retaining and producing the original PCN which, no surprise, fails to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4. [It even states the vehicle "breeched" the terms  when it was the driver that allegedly breached the terms}. It fails to specify the Parking Period and whilst it does show the arrival and departure ANPR times on the photographs [that I cannot read] they do not include how long you actually parked nor was it specified on the Notice  [photos don't count]. So that means that you spent even less time parked though it would help had you not blocked out the dates and times, so good if you could please include them on your next  post. Pofa  asks the driver to pay the charge S( [2][b] which your PCN doesn't though they do ask the keeper to pay.and they have missed out theses words in parentheses S9[2][f] ii)  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; All of those errors mean that the cannot transfer the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now responsible . What a rubbish Claim Form -doesn't even give the date of the event which it should.  
    • it doesn't matter what you are being charged or if you missed the discount period. you ain't paying anyway..... if this ever gets before a judge. then the ins and out of POFA2012 or any IPC/BPA guidelines might come into play. until then i go get on with your life. you are spending far too much time on a speculative invoice scan scheme  its almost as if you believe these are fines and enforceable in a criminal court and you could have bailiffs at your door any minute.    
    • Debt Respite Scheme (Breathing Space) guidance - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk) but dont get scammed into a DMP. simply tell whomever you call to simply apply for the BS for you.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

moorcroft


brecken
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6041 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hiya Priorityone,

 

Just to say thanks for the letter it will be very useful in the next couple of days and thanks for the very fast transfer of the letter.

 

Keep on Claimimng your right

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 155
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Help each other not the DCA`s

If you have sent letters to a DCA and have proof of delivery you do not have to remind them. It is there problem if they do not respond.

By writing you may just put your request to the top of the pile and they may just find the doc`s within the time frame.

They will jump on you fast enough given any opportunity think of the postage too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help each other not the DCA`s

If you have sent letters to a DCA and have proof of delivery you do not have to remind them. It is there problem if they do not respond.

By writing you may just put your request to the top of the pile and they may just find the doc`s within the time frame.

They will jump on you fast enough given any opportunity ( think of the postage too)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Guys and Girls,

 

Just to keep you all updated, as of today the 16.02/07 there are 3 companies recieving the amended letter highlighted by priorityone by me.

They are Moorcroft bas%$^%$, Cabot, and last but not least, JB Dept Recovery.

They are going to sent by recorded delivery first thing in the morning.

 

I have had enough of their bullying tactics and I am going to fight all the way to the courts if needed.

 

Thanks Priorityone for a helpful letter and I will be useing it to them all.

 

Thanks

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys and Gals,

 

Just to say letters have gone off,and waiting to print reciept signatures.

My next question is once these people have recieved their letters what is my next course of action.

Espiecally with Moorcroft can I request the money that I have already paid to them at the door back and if so how do i go about it, is there any template letters to help in this action.

 

Thanks

 

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi to all,

 

Just to keep you informed that I have had no reply from Moorcroft, no reply from JB Dept Recovery, But I have had a 4 page reply form Cabot and I am opening a fresh thread for this beauty.

 

Here it is . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/72094-cabot-all-help-apprieciated.html

 

Keep On Claiming The Right

 

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Moo cow crafters Limited (my nick name for them in the brown suites) can not produce the info how do we get them to stop issuing threatening letters?

"The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." Albert Einstein

 

"No-one can make you feel inferior without your consent" - E. Roosevelt

 

 

Don't lie, thieve, cheat or steal. The Government do not like the competition.

 

 

All advice is offered without prejudice.

We are being sued for Libel. Please help us by donating

 

Please support the pettition to remove Gordon Brown as he was not elected primeinister. He was elected Party Leader something completely different.

 

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/gordan-brown/

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Moo cow crafters Limited (my nick name for them in the brown suites) can not produce the info how do we get them to stop issuing threatening letters?

 

 

Protection from Harassment Act 1997

its supposed to be section 40 !!!!!

 

http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1997/97040--a.htm

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Guys and Gals,

 

Just to say that I have still not heard from Moorcroft, its been 12+2+30+ many more days since I sent them my first letter, so it is on the compliants track I must go now I intend to complian about these tos%^&s to all governing bodies.

 

But nobody as come back with an answer for me as yet,

CAN I CLAIM MY MONEY BACK FROM THE GORILLA WHO KEPT COMING TO MY DOOR

 

Thanks

Mikey

 

Keep Claiming The Right After all its your right.

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Guys and Gals,

 

Just to say that I have still not heard from Moorcroft, its been 12+2+30+ many more days since I sent them my first letter, so it is on the compliants track I must go now I intend to complian about these tos%^&s to all governing bodies.

 

But nobody as come back with an answer for me as yet,

CAN I CLAIM MY MONEY BACK FROM THE GORILLA WHO KEPT COMING TO MY DOOR

 

Thanks

Mikey

 

Keep Claiming The Right After all its your right.

 

Hi Scouser,

 

I started off with the same idea as you.... to re-claim all payments back after the 12 days + one calendar month default, but I then discovered it wasn't quite as simple as that.

 

It seems that although Moorcroft may not be able to comply with your request for a CCA, they will have had a Deed of Assignment from the original creditor upon sale of the debt. This means that, although the debt is unenforceable in court (no CCA), Moorcroft will have proof that the debt exists (Deed of Assignment)... which means that you would lose if you took them to court over this.

 

You are probably wondering.... "but what if they don't have a Deed of Assignment ?" Unfortunately, there may be no way of knowing this for sure before going to court. They are not going to tell you if they still have it and they are not going to send you a copy because it is covered by the Data Protection Act, 1988.

 

So, I am not saying that you can't do it..... but it would be a huge gamble on your part if you did take it to court. The only way you could win is if they were not able to produce a D of A in court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Priorityone,

 

I think I will leave that alone then eh!!!

 

Thanks

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Guys And Gals

 

Just to add if we are not careful the Bailiffs are going to get more power to break and enter your house for goods or monies owed. Please click on the link below and join the petition that we need to sign on line to stop this dead.

 

We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to Restore the ancient rights of British citizens to refuse the forced entry of bailiffs.

 

Come on guys keep fighting for the right

 

Thanks in Advance

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi Guys,

 

Just to update everyone about my timescales against all the DCA's

 

Lowell Portfolio & Lowell Financial = 46 Days Total

Moorcroft = 96 Days (Never had a reply from at all)

Cabot = 90 Days ( Still exchanging letters)

JB Dept = 94 Days (Never had a reply from them either)

 

 

And still I am counting the days.

 

What do you think I should do about Moorcroft or JB Dept as they have never replied from my first letter and it was Moorcroft door bouncer told me at the door he would be back, that started me off on this trail. perhaps I should send them both a second letter letting them know where I stand, and also show that I tried to commicate if needed further down the line.

 

What do you all think

 

Thanks

 

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no need to write anything Scouser. I have also not heard from Moorcroft for ages..... CCA request was made in January and their Standing Order was cancelled after the 12 working day default.

 

Not heard a thing !! Fantastic !! If they contact me now without a CCA, they will have to go to court to re-enforce it and possibly explain why it has taken so long to appear. Therefore, any contact in pursuit of payments will be deemed as harrassment and dealt with if/when it happens.

 

In the meantime, I am not worried and you shouldn't be either. Just make sure you hang on to all correspondence, rec. delivery slips, etc.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

 

Yes thanks PP I will follow your direction and wait to see what happens from them next.

My Cabot thread is still running letters to and fro as yet, but I will keep everybody up to date as and when it happens.

 

Thanks again PP

 

Mikey

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi all,

 

I am back with an update as to what as happened with Moorcroft. Well if you go back in my posting I have never heard anything from Moorcroft since 13/ 12 / 06.after me sending in my SAR.

 

But as I previously stated they were acting o behalf of Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd of Chester. Well today I recieved an interesting letter and I thought I would post it for you lot to have browse and please leave your remarks clean please. I would also be very grateful if anyone could pen a reply draft for me please as you all know I am useless at writing letters to these bum holes. the letter follows

 

AKTIV KAPITAL

HAMILTON HOUSE

CHESTER

CH1 2 BE

Tel : 08701-609543

Fax: 01244 - 314635

e-mail: [email protected]

Dear Mr Scouser9

We tried to obtain the copies of the original documents on your behalf but unfortunately we been informed by the selling bank that these cannot be retrieved from archives.

The Credit Services Association, of which this company is a member, advises in its guidelines that the debt sale process can be complex. However states that members of the Association are to deal with requests under section 77(1) as though they were the originating creditor, in so far as they are able to. The CSA states that it is up to each member on an individual basis to decide how far to comply with the Act. It is the decision of this group to seek to adhere to the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act as much as possible, but we have not inherited the liabilities of the original creditor, for instance having to prove a copy of the original agreement.

We did not provide you with the original facility. We purchased your outstanding debt balance and the right to collect that balance. We did not purchase the documents; consequently there is not an obligation to provide you with any copies. When accounts are legally assigned, we do not purchase the liabilities of the original creditor.

However, as a matter of good practice, we have tried to obtain copies from the original credit grantor. As we have previously stated, these are not available.

Entirely without prejudice, we would be prepared to accept 50% of your debt as full and final settlement of the account. As a gesture of good business practice we shall, on receipt of payment, update your Credit File to show the account as paid in full. That should be of future benefit to you.

Our offer is made on condition that payment is received within 3 weeks from the date of this letter and is made simply to try and resolve matters amicably.

In line with our official complaints procedure this letter constitutes the company’s Final Response.

We reserve the right to litigate and to produce a copy of this letter in Court, on the the subject of costs.

We await your response

Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd

 

 

Can you please go over it for me

Thanks in advance

 

Mikey

 

Keep on Fighting the fight

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, the stupid bergers can't re-enforce the debt because they haven't got any paperwork.... but are hoping you're not savvy enough to realise.:D . For your amusement, the letter also has some creepy undertones that you don't normally read from DCAs... such as "try and resolve matters amicably" and "as a matter of good practice".... although my favourite is the bullpoo in paragraph 2 from their friends in the CSA.... :D

 

If you still want a letter, I will post one up later unless someone else beats me to it.... lol !

 

Excellent result !!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep, tell em to do one, they are trying to salvage something from a bad situation. I will enjoy priorityones letter I am sure :D

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

HOHO. Just write back and say that, as you have no recollection of ever having signed an agreement, and that they are unable to prove that such a document ever existed, in the most amicable way possible, you suggest that they cease all attempts to collect on what is patently a non-debt, and that they cease processing all data in relation to the account. This to include removal of ALL adverse information placed with any third party, including the CRAs.

 

You reserve the right to escalate matters to the appropriate regulatory bodies igf they do not comply, and you do not rule out court action of your own as final resort.

 

You trust that this will not prove necessary, as the fiscal implications for them would be an unwelcome burden on them.

 

Give them 7 days to reply, and if they do not feel they are able to comply, then would they please forward a copy of their complaints procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... here is a suggested letter, as promised. As always, please fell free to add/delete/edit, etc. :) If happy, send by rec. delivery....

 

Dear xxxx

 

Ref xxxx

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/2007. I have reviewed your response to my concerns and now write with my own final response.

 

To date, xxxxxx, xxxxxx and xxxxxx have all failed to comply with my statutory request for a true, signed copy of a regulated credit agreement and have therefore defaulted in respect of the above account.

 

As you are aware, a credit agreement that is not properly documented and signed by the customer is totally unenforceable under the Consumer Credit Act, 1974, regardless of whether an account has been passed/assigned/sold and as such, is a complete defence in any court claim that may be issued. It also remains unenforceable until such time as a default is either removed or enforced by a court of law.

 

This means that any attempt by your company or any other company to enforce collection on the above account will represent a further offence until such time as the original Consumer Credit Agreement can be produced and re-enforced in court (Consumer Credit Act, 1974).

 

In view of your comments in the aforementioned letter, I have no alternative but to assume that you never had such documentation in your possession following the purchase of this account. Furthermore, as it's now apparent that you will never be in a position to comply with my request, I cannot ever confirm that I have given authority for my personal data to be processed by any third parties.

 

Therefore, under the Data Protection Act, 1998 please take notice that as from receipt of this letter, I require you to cease and desist from processing any personal data and, that you do not begin to process, communicate, pass or sell any personal data of which I am the subject, to any other third party.

 

I trust this clarifies your position and mine.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I am back with an update as to what as happened with Moorcroft. Well if you go back in my posting I have never heard anything from Moorcroft since 13/ 12 / 06.after me sending in my S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

 

But as I previously stated they were acting o behalf of Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd of Chester. Well today I recieved an interesting letter and I thought I would post it for you lot to have browse and please leave your remarks clean please. I would also be very grateful if anyone could pen a reply draft for me please as you all know I am useless at writing letters to these bum holes. the letter follows

 

AKTIV KAPITAL

HAMILTON HOUSE

CHESTER

CH1 2 BE

Tel : 08701-609543

Fax: 01244 - 314635

e-mail: [email protected]

Dear Mr Scouser9

We tried to obtain the copies of the original documents on your behalf but unfortunately we been informed by the selling bank that these cannot be retrieved from archives.

The Credit Services Association, of which this company is a member, advises in its guidelines that the debt sale process can be complex. However states that members of the Association are to deal with requests under section 77(1) as though they were the originating creditor, in so far as they are able to. The CSA states that it is up to each member on an individual basis to decide how far to comply with the Act. It is the decision of this group to seek to adhere to the provisions of the Consumer Credit Act as much as possible, but we have not inherited the liabilities of the original creditor, for instance having to prove a copy of the original agreement.

We did not provide you with the original facility. We purchased your outstanding debt balance and the right to collect that balance. We did not purchase the documents; consequently there is not an obligation to provide you with any copies. When accounts are legally assigned, we do not purchase the liabilities of the original creditor.

However, as a matter of good practice, we have tried to obtain copies from the original credit grantor. As we have previously stated, these are not available.

Entirely without prejudice, we would be prepared to accept 50% of your debt as full and final settlement of the account. As a gesture of good business practice we shall, on receipt of payment, update your Credit File to show the account as paid in full. That should be of future benefit to you.

Our offer is made on condition that payment is received within 3 weeks from the date of this letter and is made simply to try and resolve matters amicably.

In line with our official complaints procedure this letter constitutes the company’s Final Response.

We reserve the right to litigate and to produce a copy of this letter in Court, on the the subject of costs.

We await your response

Aktiv Kapital (UK) Ltd

 

 

Can you please go over it for me

Thanks in advance

 

Mikey

 

Keep on Fighting the fight

 

 

I received excact same letter yesterday, and Im not the only one, see my thread aktiv kapital, me thinks they are hopeing if they send enough out someone soft sod might just give in and pay them.

 

Brecken xxxxxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the speedy reply and help with the drafted letter, I will be altering afew things on the above and posting for your recommendations also i will be sending them 2 copies one byrecorded letter and the other by e-mail as i have both address's I thought I would use them the they cannot say that they did not recieve either. And as my e-mail asks for reciept it would 2 ways of holding them responsible of reciept.

 

Thanks for all the replys

and thanks to brecken and curleyben for all your help and thanks priotyone for the well written letter

 

Keep on Fighting the fight

 

scouser9 ( mikey)

Keep claiming the right

 

Mikey

 

If you find that I have helped in anyway please click on the scales to left of the screen- Thank you

 

Advice & opinions of Scouser9 are offered informally, without any assumption of liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified and insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

 

50% Of claim offered by The Halifax 09/12/2006

LBA letter sent 11/12/2006

Refusal in part of Payment sent 12/12/2006

Halifax settled with £4200 agreed amount 27/12/2006

Survey Submitted and Donation Made 02/01/2007

PPI Claim Sent To Halifax 25/11/2008

PPI Claim Halifax Won 31/12/2008

PPI Claim Sent To Carcraft 22/12/2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...