Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Welcome & HFO Services


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 297
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Good point my canine friend - them pitney bowes aint cheap to run you know.

 

i should have used that silverpoint couriers.

 

I’ve heard they’re very good for deliveries in the Wimbledon area. In fact, only one building in the Wimbledon area.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Jonathan - hope you are well:-)

 

Been a few developments my end - I hope no one has done anything naughty - or illegal. :shock:

naughty, illegal :shock:

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Regarding NOA's and assignements in general.

 

1. Is an NOA all that is needed to prove a change of ownership of debt?

2. If the OC has the Actual Assignement - (or shold have one) - should they issue a copy of this if requested under an SAR - EVEN if they have sold the debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DH

 

The NoA is all that is required to be produced to the alleged debtor by either the assignor or the assignee, however, the deed is a different kettle of fish. BC are not too forthcoming with this, although I think that there are a few fragmented copies (first and last pages floating aout).

EDIT

---------------------------------------

In an ideal world with perfect unambiguous documentation, I would imagine that an original copy on proper letterheaded paper, would be acceptable as evidence of a credible transaction having taken place.

---------------------------------------

 

If the OC alledges that THEY sent the NoA, then accordingly, that should be included in the SAR, as it is a document that originated from thier organisation. This is where they have screwed up big time with me, but the less said about that here the better. they told me that they are under no legal obligation to produce the deed as this is so called confidential.

Edited by loanbuster
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what i have been told by welcome.

 

However there are "other" issues with the NOA

 

I also recall a case in the high court - i believe it was Lord Denny - who said something along the lines of the actual assignment should be available to court. - but now can't fine it - google time me thinks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have requested three times for the deed of assignment

 

on each ocassion the judge ordered it to be produced

 

on each ocassion the claimant withdraws there claim rather than release the deed of assignment

 

request it

 

its your right

 

mind you

 

it will be edited alot and ive only ever seen one actual deed of assignment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

 

Regarding NOA's and assignements in general.

 

1. Is an NOA all that is needed to prove a change of ownership of debt?

2. If the OC has the Actual Assignement - (or shold have one) - should they issue a copy of this if requested under an SAR - EVEN if they have sold the debt?

 

The purpose of the NoA is to inform you of change of ownership and this can be done by either assignor or asignee, the NoA does not prove ownership, it just gives you notice.

 

Would this be in your SAR, with HFO only if they have passed a copy back to the OC as we know HFO always give the notice.

 

Would the OC have the Deed, of course they should, are they obliged to give you a copy, No, this is because all the agreements betwen OC,s and HFO do not mention any specific accounts, so no personal data is within it, so the data subject is not entitled to it in their SAR.

 

What they do is send all the account on a CD rom to HFO, the deed mentions this.

 

Can you see the Deed, yes you are entitled to see what they state in the POC, ie assignment, if they are not forthcoming you obtain a court order for them to produce, the Judge wanted to see it at my set aside, they discontinued shortly after.

 

The Deeds for HFO are legally flawed.

 

As I stated last week HFO and OC,s do collude, I think this has now been proved.

 

Have you made Welcome aware of that settlement letter yet, that might make them sit up, very naughty in my opinion.

 

B A

Edited by broken arrow

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made Welcome aware of that settlement letter yet, that might make them sit up, very naughty in my opinion.

 

B A

 

Yes have spoke to welcome about this - they say it has not come from them - at least they do not have a copy on their records

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes have spoke to welcome about this - they say it has not come from them - at least they do not have a copy on their records

 

I know what I would do with that letter, their tactics are getting out of hand.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have requested three times for the deed of assignment

 

on each ocassion the judge ordered it to be produced

 

 

Hi Post

 

At what stage in the proceedings woul i need to request this - allocation questionnaires have been sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have done CPR 31.14. CPR18 request you probally have requested it, you can make an N244 application to the court and order they disclose the deed, they normally give you a redacted copy with their WS.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have done CPR 31.14. CPR18 request you probally have requested it, you can make an N244 application to the court and order they disclose the deed, they normally give you a redacted copy with their WS.

 

would that be to welcome or HFO via T/R?

 

THough will check cpr i sent - think i did ask.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HFO/TR

As stated they do not like giving you a copy, but a Judge can order them to, then They will probally give up which I am surprised they have not already.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HFO/TR

As stated they do not like giving you a copy, but a Judge can order them to, then They will probally give up which I am surprised they have not already.

 

I have only contacted them once since case started - but will be contacting them again asking for the production of certain docs.

 

May force their hand a bit - they have no case now thats for sure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just so we make it simple...

 

The Notice of Assignment is the carrier of information contained within the Deed of Assignment between the OC and the new owner of the debt. The NOA is an essential part of the process and only takes effect from the date on the notice. If the notice does not contain the correct value for the debt it may be ineffective.

 

Hence why the Deed is an essential document for the court; if the information stream does not match then the assignment is void.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget that at common law (Court of Appeal Obiter in Van Lyn Developments) you are entitled to inspect the actual assignment to satisfy yourself it is valid.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...