Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax advice on bill from 2003


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5041 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have just had a letter from a council for 2 bills:

 

1. dated 21 March 2000 for £37.47

2. dated 16 November 2003 for £182.08 (the dated we moved away from the area).

 

I thought that the council tax was up to date and the council had our new address.

 

In the letter it is saying that unless I pay within 7 days the council will make an application to the Magistrates for committal to prison.

 

Any advice would be helpful please

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. dated 21 March 2000 for £37.47

 

I don't think there will be a liability order for this one (the council would have charged you approx £60 for administration/court costs ) If they don't have a liability order they cant get one now as far as i can make out

 

 

(3) Section 127(1) of the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980[14] does not apply to such an application; but no application may be instituted in respect of a sum after the period of six years beginning with the day on which it became due under Part V.

 

dated 16 November 2003 for £182.08 (the dated we moved away from the area).

 

If you move from a property during a financial tax year and the council don't amend there records there automated system sends out letters court summons etc to you at the billing address

a liability order is then granted for the remainder of the financial tax year

 

You need to know the exact date of the missed payment that trigged court action (if any)

 

you need to get in touch with the council and get a statement of account for both years

 

you need to know if they have any liability orders for the debts conserd

 

If they have a liability order for any of the above debt they will send bailiffs to collect this

 

you need it confirmed in writing that no bailiffs enforcement action will be sanctioned on any of the accounts until it is established that you do indeed owe the debts

and that you are willing to set up a standing order with the council to cover any outstanding amounts that you do owe

 

If you are unemployed on benefits etc you need to make the council aware of this Deductions can be taken from benefits and they should not use bailiffs to collect this debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for getting back to me.

On the bottom of the letter there is:

 

1. (£37.37 amount) Summons date 25.07.200 with court cost of £30.70 so they took me to court for £6.67!

2. (182.08) Summons date 04-05-2004.

 

At the time I was on some H/B & C/T benefit so when I moved out I let the council know and they had knowledge of my new address.

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to say I'm surprised that you were take to court for £6.67 but I'm not

 

get the statements of accounts

 

ask for copy's of any/all original letters and liability orders

 

If they have liability orders they will send bailiffs (as i said try and get this stopped before it starts) until its resolved don't leave your car (if you have one) on your drive or outside your house don't leave anything in your garden that a bailiff can levy

keep garages.garden sheds greenhouse doors locked and don't what ever you do do not under any circumstances allow a bailiff into your home

 

If the bailiff does come ask to see his ID authorisation

 

Enforcement agents should always produce relevant identification on request, such as a badge or ID card, together with a written authorisation to act on behalf of the creditor

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the info.

On top of the letter it says 'The liability order in respect of your Council Tax and costs has been returned by the Council's Bailiffs as they have been unable to collect the £219 outstanding to 17th November 2003.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for the info.

On top of the letter it says 'The liability order in respect of your Council Tax and costs has been returned by the Council's Bailiffs as they have been unable to collect the £219 outstanding to 17th November 2003.

 

 

 

Now they know where you live they will send them again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter sent recorded so we will see what happens now.

Can I ask they took me to court over £6.67 for the year 200. But why wasn't this included in 2001 - 2002 & 2002 -2003 bills which were paid in full? I don't understand that.

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Right the council have sent back some statements regarding the amounts owed, and have put the account on hold for one month whilst I sort it out.

 

1st letter, on the 27-05-2004 a liability order was issued against you for £182.08

2nd letter which is really confusing me:

Council Tax bill total £733.65

Payment made of £73.00

CT Benefit £13.98

Court summons £660.65 + Summons Cost £15.70 (£676.35)

Liability order £691.35

Further Payments made: 640.00

 

Total CT Payable: £37.37

 

If a do a SAR will it show a breakdown of all the payments and at the time I was ill and signed off work and was handed over to the bailiffs will it show payments made to them and their charges?

 

Thanks again for all the help and advice

 

JJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

A subject access request should bring you a copy of everything they have about you on file. There is a maximum fee for this of £10, so send them a tenner by cheque and that will be proof they have received it.

 

They then have 12 in which to respond and if they don't, that puts the account into dispute. If they still don't reply by another 30 days, they have committed an offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...