Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ESA & disability etc


Mrs_Jeeps
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Mrs Jeeps

Am Really sorry your post got hijacked i hope the advice i gave u did help but i'm still none the wiser on the dla credit thing hopefully there will definately be someone coming soon who can help you. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yikes! Sorry Mrs J for getting side-tracked.

 

You can find out quite a bit from the Disability Alliance Factsheet list (F31-33). BTW you get the £30 premium (or £25 for the WRAG) backdated to day 192.

 

Kindest regards,

Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mrs Jeeps. The answer to your first question is that you need to satisfy the three conditions as follows:

 

1. You need to usually work at least 16 hours a week

 

2. You have a disability that puts you at a disadvantage in

getting a job.

 

3. You have evidence that you are receiving, or have recently

received, a qualifying sickness or disability-related benefit.

 

Obviously nothing is as straightforward as that. The full inns and outs, including waiting periods for ESA as your qualifying benefit are contained in this factsheet here.

 

The answer to your second question is that whether you qualify for the work related activity group or the support group, the extra sum of the award will be backdated to the 13th week.

 

In regard to the other posting, which have hijacked poor Mrs Jeep's thread:

 

ESA is not for care needs - it is a personal allowance.

 

A condition of receiving ESA is that the claimant has limited capacity to work - the money awarded is a personal allowance and to spend as they wish. Further, not all claims to ESA are based on income. If a person has paid in sufficient National Insurance Contributions they will qualify for contributory based ESA and this is not affected by most other income/savings that the claimant has; they are still in most case entitled to their full whack of ESA where a person receiving income related ESA would not be. They cannot cut your benefit because you are spending it on your children. You can do whatever you like with it. The law does not prescribe for how the money is to be spent.

 

A condition of receiving JSA is that the claimant must be available for, and actively seeking work. The money they get does not have to be spent looking for a job. Again, it's a personal allowance to spend as they wish.

 

Most benefits (and certainly ESA) are paid in arrears. This means that when a benefit claimant dies, they are usually due some arrears. These arrears are payable to the estate of the deceased. The deceased's next of kin completes a notification of death form (free from the registrars) and sends it to their nearest DWP office. The benefit arrears are paid to the deceased's next of kin. Any benefit money that has already been paid out prior to death which is not an overpayment cannot be claimed back and again, the next of kin/exec is free to take that money because it was due to the deceased for the relevant period - it forms their estate.

 

So yes, a benefit claimant is free to leave their legacy to their children, whether or not that legacy consists of benefit payments.

  • Haha 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well everyone!

 

I've been put into the work related activity group so I passed!

 

Was so pleased and one less thing to worry about. The worrying has made my condition horrendous of late.

 

So i guess another success story... X

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well everyone!

 

I've been put into the work related activity group so I passed!

 

Was so pleased and one less thing to worry about. The worrying has made my condition horrendous of late.

 

So i guess another success story... X

 

Congrats and well done!!! One quick question and it might appear to be a daft one - when you completed the ESA50 (the medical questionaire which you returned to ATOS) how much info did you put on it (was it comprehensive?) - did you have help in filling the form out (CAB, Welfare Office etc?) and did you enclose medical evidence to prove your illness?

 

I have a good reason for asking this as it has been told to me this week (off the record) by a neighbour who is a DM at DWP, that he and his staff always treat the ATOS medical reports with distrust. He has in no uncertain terms said that if the ESA50 is not filled out comprehensively (ideally with the help of CAB etc) and that there is no evidence from the claimant (even a letter of support from the GP would suffice) attached to it, then his hands are tied and he must accept the ATOS report as the primary evidence!

A lot more was discussed as you can imagine, but he kept on stating that if the claimant does not help him/herself in the first place what more can he do.

AND that is the main reason why appeals are in the main sucessfull at the Tribunal stage. It is only then that the claimant gets off his/her backside and looks for help from some professional organisation and produces the evidence.

 

Bottom line he states that it is not the system of the DWP that is failing - they know and are acutely aware of the way ATOS complete the assessments, it is because the claimants fail to put forward a compelling enough argument to the DWP in order that the DM can give the right result first time round. "If the claimant did put as much effort as they do at the Tribunal stage to produce the contradictory evidence at the ESA50 stage, there would be 50% more cases being decided by the DM in favour of the claimant"

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ ANDYANDFLO, well said, although my last review was for I.B., I found that providing them more detail and evidence made all the difference and consequently for the first time I wasn't even required to have the Atosh medical. I added 3 extra pages of my own answering each of the mental health descriptors one by one.

 

If only more people going on to ESA would read the forums before they do their ESA50s.

 

Kindest regards,

Paul.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul, I will second that statement!!

 

I blame no one really other than myself for the mess that I have caused to my ESA claim.

But, having said that, there must be 1000's of people out there that don't know about the forums and conequently have no input from other claimants.

Maybe then my friendly neighbour is right and that we who fail at the first hurdle, appear, to the DWP, that our claims are not that important to us.

 

Quite an expensive, time consuming and stressful lesson!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Andyandflo, that is a very very worthwhile piece of advice. Mind you, I'll see what happens as I've just submitted my latest ESA50 with GP letter, medical results etc enclosed... :eek:

If you're a member of my Facebook page please feel free to add this...

Best wishes

Rae

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou Andyandflo, that is a very very worthwhile piece of advice. Mind you, I'll see what happens as I've just submitted my latest ESA50 with GP letter, medical results etc enclosed... :eek:

If you're a member of my Facebook page please feel free to add this...

Best wishes

Rae

 

I'm an ex- CAB worker as it goes Hun and I've had a lot of training in DLA/the old IB50 forms so I applied what I knew to the ESA form.

 

I filled it in very comprehensivley stating what would happen if I tried to do certain things or why I couldn't do certain things. Again using my worst day. It came easy to me as I was just getting over a 4 day stint in bed through my illness.

 

No further submissions attached for my claim although I took all medication I had ever been given at the appointment.

 

Good luck xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...