Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Long standing debt finally found my new adress


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5067 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So the best course of action is to just sit tight? At what point should I take action?

 

Just a recap for anyone jumping straight to end of this thread:

 

I have an approximately £500 debt which I last acknowledge around 6 years ago. I'm 75% sure it was over 6 years ago, 25% it will be 6 years within a couple of months.

Edited by Didji
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

If the alleged debt is statute barred it is up to them to prove you have acknowledged the debt or made payment in the last six years, (unless they have a ccj on this debt within the six years).

 

Whatever letters you send to them, be it the "prove it letter" or the "statute barred letter", make sure that you mark it conspicuously on each page with "i do not acknowledge this debt".

 

Dont worry, it is unlikely they will doorstep you, if they do just tell them to go away, they have not been invited and if they refuse you will ring the police as they are trespassing and harrassing you.

 

As someone else has already said the only person who has the right to enter your home (under these circumstances) is a court appointed baillif and then only under certain circumstances - this is from the direct.gov website:

When bailiffs may be used

 

Your creditor (the person you owe money to) can make a claim against you in the county court. A County Court Judgment (CCJ) may be made stating that you must repay the debt.

If you don’t make the payments ordered by the court, your creditor can ask the court to issue a 'warrant of execution'. This means that county court bailiffs may be called in to help recover the debt.

Edited by MONX

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

and just to clarify the bailiff point

no! they DO NOT have an automatic right to enter any property!!

 

do some reading!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just as a recap for anyone who is skipping right to the end, I have £500ish debt that I am 90% sure is statute barred. They've recently obtained my new address and have sent various letters. People in this thread have advised I ignore the letters. They have since sent me a letter offering reduced payment by a certain deadline which has now passed. I ignored this letter too.

 

Today, the 7th, they've sent me a new letter dated the 2nd, saying that 7 days after the date of the letter they intend to instruct they're Legal Department to review "my" account. It says it may involve applying for a CCJ. Then it goes into a bunch of reasons why I wouldn't want a CCJ, etc, and ends in the normal plea to contact them.

 

So, is this the time to contact them, or is this yet another phishing attempt? I pretty much figured, after they sent me the payment option, they had nothing. If they had something - or so my lay logic goes - they'd have used it by now.

 

If it's still wise to ignore them, when do I contact them?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

phishing attempt

ignore everything.

 

TBH you really need to do some reading of other peoples exps

or threads alike to yours.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The way I see it, is that you have two options....well three, firstly I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong but no court would allow a CCJ on a Statute Barred debt.

 

1. If you are positive it is statute barred then continue to ignore them.

 

2. If you are not sure, I would send either a statue barred letter or prove it letter,

 

3. or thirdly you could send a letter stating that you have no knowledge of the alleged debt and unless they can provide evidence to the contrary they should do one! heres a link: http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/573-general-debt-letter-if-you-know-nothing-of-the-debt

 

I think its very telling that their legal department is going to review your account and that they may apply for a CCJ!

Hope this helps.

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

thats all they can say

may,might, could, should, approved etc etc

all drivel.

 

its NOT for the consumer to prove it IS statute barred

its for the dca to prove its not.

 

how do you think they make 75% of their money????

 

by fleecing people that know no better than to believe a dca does no lie or that they have legal powers !!!!! they do NOT.

 

you ould be a dca tomorrow

you dont have to have a licence either!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let them continue digging their own grave, ignore them, if they had anything remotely enforceable they would have had you up before the beak a long time ago, so don't worry.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...