Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If that was the reason then that is good news. The whole reason that being able to charge £100 for breaching private car park rules is because the law Lords decided in a celebrated case that the rogues had a legitimate interest in keeping their car park spaces available for all motorists . {parking Eye v Beavis]. However when the business is closed then there is no legitimate interest in keeping spaces free so to charge £100 is a penalty. As such any Court would automatically throw out the case when the penalty charge is accepted.
    • gives them a feeling of grandeur. dx  
    • yep they can be a bit like the TV licencing lot. for 4yrs ive been getting a series of about 8-10 diff letters that just go round a loop. currently upto 61
    • thread tidied. new thread for the court claim is here  
    • new thread created for this claimform please post here now for anything to do with it now . pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

hfo, sent photo of my house.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4620 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

barclaycard9thnov.jpghi all

just received this letter from barclaycard and when i phoned and explained they must have got £10 po because it was in the same letter they said they would only send me a SAR if their agents (HFO) ask them to. I told them they are the OC and I have a right to this information but they said no, only if HFO ask them to send it to me

 

Any help please!!!

Edited by whatdoido
added link
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hang on... so you DID send the £10 as a postal order? Then they must comply. Make this clear to them. Did you keep a copy of the PO number?

 

HFO are NOT their agents – that is an interesting comment. In regards to this account, Barclaycard is the original creditor and the account has been assigned (supposedly) to HFO. If there is a client/agent relationship going on here, then I think they should explain what they mean.

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Have they accepted that the PO has been received? Do you have the PO receipt with the number on it and you can check if it has been cashed.

 

The person on the phone is talking absolute rubbish - HFO are not their agents and anyone under the DPA can request your personal data from anyone else at any time. They are probably overwhelmed by the number of requests they are getting. Poor dears ahhh!

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes ive got the postal order receipt, but theyre saying theyve got no record of it, only the SAR letter which theyre saying i should have sent to HFO. They will only accept a SAR from their agent (HFO) and not me, so I am right that BC should send me this information? Will resend SAR and another £10 postal order tomorrow, is that correct?? thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are right – as others have said, the SAR goes to Barclaycard. It is absolutely nothing to do with HFO, nothing at all. You must continue to push to get exact date of assignment and name of assignee from Barclaycard, as well as copies of DNs, etc.

 

You can check whether the PO has been cashed on the post office website (a google search will find it).

 

Regarding the issue of the relationship between certain companies, I started this thread a few days ago to highlight relationships like this, which, if they are on an agent/client basis AFTER an assignment, are improper:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?283075-Has-an-account-REALLY-been-assigned-when-the-OC-gets-a-kickback

Edited by DonkeyB
Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough but I would say that you did enclose PO Number xxxxxx and will be tracing the encashment of this and also that you wish to complaint in the strongest possible terms about their failure to handle this correctly and that you were informed over the phone that BC were not responsible for fulfilling this request. Inform them that you will expect the SAR information to be forwarded to you within 40 days of the receipt of your first letter and you will be reporting the matter to the Information Commissioners Office. Ask for a copy of their formal complaints procedure.

 

Pratts (IMO)

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed that the ICO should be informed of their miserable attitude, but in light of the amount of paperwork and complaints they are dealing with, as well as lodging a complaint with them have a read of the following link and follow the advice on there, either way Barclays are not on this planet and there is a plethora of organisations I can think of who should investigate their lazy ways, however that can be done at a later date, first things first is to show them the error of their ways and get the info you legally requested.

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?593-Data-Protection-Act-Non-Compliance-Template-Letters

 

As you have already sent them the correct request with payment, there is zero need to send it again, OR any subsequent payment.

Once they have had the LBA or time extension, after all they are not outside of the 40 days yet?

Then lodge formal complaints with the OFT&TS via http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

And the FOS http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/consumer/complaints.htm

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Barclays seem to have shot themselves in the foot with this lot - I still cannot believe that these debts sat on one side without any action for three years (they claim to have bought them in late 2006/early 2007 in most cases) before being chased.

 

Surely somebody must have realised they had more chance of getting money the 'newer' their claim was, now it has been left many of these debts are statute barred due to the date of the last payments on them (not from CONTACT by letter as HFO have recently been claiming - the sad planks think that writing to last known address every few years resets the statute of limitations!).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes Donkey B, received this letter today from Barclaycard with pages and pages of statements and nothing else. Another letter needed i think, can someone tell me which letter template to send and which documents should i ask for in particular.

Im still non the wiser as to if and when it was sold to HFO. Last payment i made was January 2007

 

Good news tho, ive not heard a peep from HFO yet.

 

newletter-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Account:

 

I am in receipt of the documents that you have supplied in response to my Data Protection Act information request dated --.--.-- The disclosure of personal datalink3.giflink3.gif is incomplete in that at least the following documents are missing.

 

 

1) You have failed to provide a Default Notice and Notice of Assignment

2) You have failed to inform me to whom the account was sold. Please note that this must include company name, company registration number, full address and telephone numbers. Also the exact date on which the account was sold.

3) You have provided no notes, or documents relating to instances of manual intervention.

 

This is not an exhaustive list by any means, it is just an example of some of the information I am missing.

 

Accordingly, I have to tell you that you have not yet complied with your obligations under the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

You have a further 24 days to comply.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

-------------------

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to wait until the 40 days are up before requesting any information that is missing as quite often you will get further paperwork before the 40 day deadline is up. However once that 40 days has gone, you send a recorded delivery LETTER BEFORE ACTION,, enclose a copy of your original SAR, and give them a further 14 days to reply, if that is all they hold on you then you should request they confirm this. - there is an example of a LBA here for a SAR. - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?178660 if they haven't responded after the 14 days then, you can either take them to court where if successful the judge will award you compensation or you give it to the ICO (which could take months) - more useful links here - http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/practical_application/taking_a_case_to_court.pdf and these - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?49571 - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?200771

Link to post
Share on other sites

Appreciate this, 42man, but the simple reminder letter does seem to be working and a number of people have used it to get at the specific information they need before going down the official route! It maybe that they are intending to send more docs but this is a way of keeping at them

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spoke too soon .... here is a copy of todays letter received from HFO. Also sent me another copy of my e-consumerview credit report, a copy of pre-approved application loan and a copy of the email BC sent to them (which must be the letter of assignment of debt mentioned in point 1 of todays letter) copy of this email is post 162 on here.

Urgent advice please as theyre saying its going to their litigation department on 29th November.

hfoletter26thNov2010.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

They sent you an application form didn't they? May be time for a CPR request if they are threatening legal action. Also did you make a complaint to Experian and OFT about the use of your data in this way?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...