Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I do disagree with you regarding one thing - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake. So far you have stood up to Excel and their threats, immediately given us the information in the sticky, done loads of reading up to educate yourselves, learnt from the mistake of outing the driver so you'll know not to do so in the future, got on to the organ grinder to try to get them to call off their dogs, etc., etc.  Good grief - we wish everyone who came here would do this!!! Most people who get these invoices sadly think they have been fined and if they don't pay a drone from Ukraine will be diverted and will fall on their home (or some such vague grand apocalyptic threat) and they fold and give in.  You haven't.  Well done. Don't worry - you won't be paying a penny.  Although it will take some time to see off this vile company.
    • Spot on!  You learn quickly. Who cares if the case gets sent to debt collectors?  They have no powers.  All the effort you will have to put in will be to open envelopes - and then spend time laughing at their daft "threats".  No stress at all!
    • I did ask them why, but seems they have more spare cash than we do .. ;-( .. I doubt their bank would even support a chargeback after a year has passed. Anyway I've constructed my first DRAFT Snotty Letter .. so here goes ..   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you had added. Shall we raise that related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding the ANPR entry / exit periods compared with actual valid parking periods. Especially with no consideration of the legally allowed grace periods and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the issues with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture more useless ANPR photos. We will of course be requesting “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Legal Counsel on behalf of the Vehicle Keeper.  
    • Hi,t I'm not sure if I'm posting in the right subsection but General Retail appears to be the closest to it I think... About a year and a half ago I got a new phone so I listed my iPhone 10 on eBay.  The listed stated 'UK only' and 'no returns accepted'. Considering I had had the phone for about 4 years, I myself was amazed that I had kept it in such good condition all that time - apart from being slightly scuffed around the charging port there was absolutely nothing wrong with it. It had the original box, its unopened original Apple cable, plug, and earbuds, and I threw in a case for it and It had always had a screen protector on it. Someone wanted it from Armenia, and I stupidly agreed to it.  She paid and I sent it off, fully insured. Not long after she received it, she sent a message saying it 'was not as described', so I asked to see photos of whatever was the problem.  She sent two photographs of the box.  Just the box.  I said I wasn't even going to consider refunding her unless she told me what she meant by 'not as described'.  I thought, if it's been damaged in transit, then it would be covered by the insurance. Anyway, she didn't respond at all, even though I had messaged her several times, so she opened a case with eBay. I have sold a fair few things of mine on eBay in the past buy had never had had anyone come back to me asking for a refund.  I got in touch with eBay several times by phone and by email, and found out they always side with the buyer, no matter what with their 'eBay Seller Guarantee'.  She had been told she could keep the phone and told me they would recover the money from me from my account blah blah.  So I unlinked all of my cards etc and changed my bank account to one that I never use with no money in it. My account got suspended.  I continued to try to explain to eBay that I had been scammed but I got nowhere. My account was permanently inaccessible by this point. I reported the phone stolen and the IMEI blacklisted but I'm not sure if that would make any difference being in Armenia, but it was all I could think of to piss the buyer off. A couple of months later I was contacted by email by a debt recovery company (I can' remember who now), to whom I explained I will not discuss the matter with them until I had received an SAR I had requested from eBay. As I could no longer access my account, I couldn't review the communication I needed to show I was not in the wrong. The SAR was produced but I was advised that the information I was looking for would not be included but I said I wanted it anyway.  There were so many codes etc. and hoops to jump through to access it, that even after trying whilst on the phone to them, I still couldn't get into it, so I never got to see it in the end.  I think they said they would send the code by post but they never did and I forgot about it after a while. I've just come across a couple of emails from Moorgroup, asking me to phone them to discuss a private matter regarding eBay.  I haven't replied or done anything at all yet.  The amount they are trying to recover from me is £200ish from what I remember. I know it's not that much but I don't want to pay the b*astards on general principle. I've had a lot of useful advice from CAG in the past about debt collectors but it has always been about being chased by creditors, I've never been in this situation before. I don't know what power they legally have to recover the 'debt', and most importantly, I am two years into a DRO, and the last thing I want is another CCJ to shake off if I'm cutting my nose off to spite my face.   Any advice gratefully received!!
    • Hi, I have the Sims 4 on Macbook. Over the last year I have paid for multiple add on packs spending a lot of money on them. I bought them all in good faith as my Mac met all the minimum requirements to play them. I have been playing happily for about a year and bought my latest pack just over a week ago. The games were all working fine yesterday. Then suddenly today EA released a new app to launch the games and this new app requires a MAC OS that my computer cannot use. Now suddenly none of my games are accessible and I am unable to play anything. They did not warn us about this change in requirements and if I had known they would be doing this I wouldn't have bought all these add ons as they are now all totally unusable. The games themselves have not changed, only their app to launch them and I can't afford to buy a brand new mac just to play. So my question is how can they change the minimum requirements after I have paid for a game? I agreed to pay for them based on the fact my mac met their requirements and was not informed when purchasing that this would be an issue in the future. I understand new games (like Sims 5 which is to be released next year) might not be compatible but this is a 10yr old game that they have suddenly made inaccessible due to their new launch app. Does anybody know if I can do anything or anyway to get a partial refund from them? Thanks   Here are their T&C... I can't find anything in there about them being able to do this so not sure what to do https://tos.ea.com/legalapp/WEBTERMS/US/en/PC/
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Esa/atos.. Ask The Leaders A Question Bbc/itv/sky


COUNTMEIN
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is the DWP the Dickensian Circumlocution Office of today? What does the Government intend to do to improve the lives of the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers given the condemnation by the recent Parliamentary Inquiry of the DWP and their contractor Atos Origin? Why did the Parliamentary Inquiry find that there are no statistics for after 2002-2003 from the DWP? Why are the medical conditions of those refused allowances not published? Why can't the HMRC pay allowances and pensions? Why can't the DoH (NHS) authenticate claims and forward their medical advice to the HMRC. Why do we need a nationalised recruitment agency when there are so many good ones in the private sector?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ive just had an email on behalf of Gordon Brown about DLA ill post it up soon as i can get to pc

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go from the office of Gordon Brown:

 

Dear Mr C,

 

I am writing on behalf of Gordon Brown, Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party, to thank you for your recent message and for your support of the Labour Party. The Prime Minister appreciates you taking the time to write and the comments that you have made in your message about disabilities have been read and carefully noted.

 

As you may be aware, the Prime Minister is currently travelling around the country during the General Election Campaign, meeting and listening to the concerns and ideas of many people like yourself. He has asked me therefore to respond on his behalf.

 

Labour is determined that the UK should always be a world leader in disability rights and we have legislated to provide protection against discrimination at work, while also offering new support for people into work. We will always seek to strengthen the rights of disabled people to access services, work and to be supported to make the choices they want to make in their own lives.

 

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) supports Labour’s welfare reform agenda which supports people into work. It is paid to people with care and/or mobility needs irrespective of whether they are working. Those who qualify for the higher rate mobility component can use the Motability scheme to lease or buy a car, with further support to provide specialist adaptations.

 

We are bringing forward part of next year's increase to be able to raise Disability Living Allowance above inflation this year and from April 2011 we will extend the higher rate mobility component of DLA to over 20,000 severely visually impaired people, allowing them greater freedom to get out and about, either socially or to find work. At current rates this will mean an additional payment worth £30.45 a week to those who qualify (£1,583 per year).

 

Between 1979 and 1997, the number of people on incapacity benefits trebled, and people were left without the support to help them ever return to work. Over the last decade the employment rate for working age disabled people has increased from 42 per cent to 47 per cent, with the gap between the rates for disabled people and the general working-age population decreasing from 32 per cent to 26 per cent. In total, there are now an additional 576,000 working-age disabled people in work at the end of 2009 compared to the end of 1999.

 

Labour will ensure that if disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the proposed National Care Service, people receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform will continue to receive the same level of cash support, under a new and better care and support system. We have also ruled out any changes to working age Disability Living Allowance as we establish the National Care Service

 

We strengthened the Disability Discrimination Act in 2005, fulfilling the Government’s commitment to a comprehensive and enforceable set of civil rights for disabled people, and in 2006 we introduced a duty on public authorities to promote equality for disabled people, known as the Disability Equality Duty. We are further strengthening disability discrimination legislation through the Equality Act.

 

By 2015 our £370 million Railways for All scheme will improve the accessibility of our train stations. Of this, £35 million per year is targeted at improving access at the busiest stations to ensure an accessible route within each station which includes providing step-free access. Labour has also introduced free nationwide off-peak travel on local buses for the over-60s and eligible disabled people in England.

 

I hope you find this information helpful.

 

Thank you again for taking the time to write.

 

Best wishes,

Chris Murray

Office of the Leader of the Labour Party

Labour Party

39 Victoria Street

London

SW1A OHA

t. 08705 900 200

e. [email protected]

 

 

Sent by email from the Labour Party, promoted by Ray Collins on behalf of The Labour Party, both at 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HA.

Website: www.labour.org.uk to join or renew call 08705 900 200.

277810885_a-future-fair-for-all_485.gif

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally think the only way this will change is after someone wins a `medical malpractice` claim. I know for a fact I`ve got in writing that the AtoS nurse claims that in her `professional opinion` I`m fit to work and my condition will not change. A class action by people who have appealed and had the decision of the HCP working for AtoS over ruled by a real doctor is the only way I see the current situation changing. Just my opinion and you may or may not agree.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the bbc web site ouch there`s a post inviting disabled people to join radio 4 in asking the three main parties questions,on this tuesday,not sure if this would be beneficial to anyone,just thought some may want to take a look

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok put my question in:

 

My Question regarding Disability is:

 

The carers allowance earnings cap is this fair - my wife looks after two people in our household our disabled mum who we choose to look after thus saving the government a great deal of money and myself due to me having a major stroke.

 

Not only does she only get carers allowance for just one of us but it is also stopped for any weeks she earns over £100 in her part-time job so if she say does 1 extra hour as overtime she loses £53.90 how is that fair being penalised for doing extra work in a time when the government is encouraging people to work.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it was to me so thank you.

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indeed I do because I expect a few people on this site would like to post there questions and it may get lost here.

 

So go ahead.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings All

 

This makes an interesting read from the Centre for Analysis for Social Exclusion, and although last year is extremely relevant.49 pages in the full pdf.

 

Centre for Analysis for Social Exclusion :Reducing the risks to health

 

It should also be noted that in the Welfare Reform Act 1999 introduced by Labour just after they came to Power that the tag line for the Act was "Work for those who can , security for those who can't " ...hmmmmmmmm

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the bbc web site ouch there`s a post inviting disabled people to join radio 4 in asking the three main parties questions,on this tuesday,not sure if this would be beneficial to anyone,just thought some may want to take a look

 

"THANK YOU VERY MUCH" ee-bee... I HAVE ASKED THEM A QUESTION!!:-x

BBC - Radio 4 - Contact You and Yours

Link to post
Share on other sites

The "You and Yours" prog will still be available another 6 days on BBC I-Player listen again.

BBC iPlayer - You and Yours: 27/04/2010

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go from the office of Gordon Brown:

 

Dear Mr C,

 

I am writing on behalf of Gordon Brown, Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party, to thank you for your recent message and for your support of the Labour Party. The Prime Minister appreciates you taking the time to write and the comments that you have made in your message about disabilities have been read and carefully noted.

 

As you may be aware, the Prime Minister is currently travelling around the country during the General Election Campaign, meeting and listening to the concerns and ideas of many people like yourself. He has asked me therefore to respond on his behalf.

 

Labour is determined that the UK should always be a world leader in disability rights and we have legislated to provide protection against discrimination at work, while also offering new support for people into work. We will always seek to strengthen the rights of disabled people to access services, work and to be supported to make the choices they want to make in their own lives.

 

Disability Living Allowance (DLA) supports Labour’s welfare reform agenda which supports people into work. It is paid to people with care and/or mobility needs irrespective of whether they are working. Those who qualify for the higher rate mobility component can use the Motability scheme to lease or buy a car, with further support to provide specialist adaptations.

 

We are bringing forward part of next year's increase to be able to raise Disability Living Allowance above inflation this year and from April 2011 we will extend the higher rate mobility component of DLA to over 20,000 severely visually impaired people, allowing them greater freedom to get out and about, either socially or to find work. At current rates this will mean an additional payment worth £30.45 a week to those who qualify (£1,583 per year).

 

Between 1979 and 1997, the number of people on incapacity benefits trebled, and people were left without the support to help them ever return to work. Over the last decade the employment rate for working age disabled people has increased from 42 per cent to 47 per cent, with the gap between the rates for disabled people and the general working-age population decreasing from 32 per cent to 26 per cent. In total, there are now an additional 576,000 working-age disabled people in work at the end of 2009 compared to the end of 1999.

 

Labour will ensure that if disability benefits for older people are reformed as part of the proposed National Care Service, people receiving the affected benefits at the time of reform will continue to receive the same level of cash support, under a new and better care and support system. We have also ruled out any changes to working age Disability Living Allowance as we establish the National Care Service

 

We strengthened the Disability Discrimination Act in 2005, fulfilling the Government’s commitment to a comprehensive and enforceable set of civil rights for disabled people, and in 2006 we introduced a duty on public authorities to promote equality for disabled people, known as the Disability Equality Duty. We are further strengthening disability discrimination legislation through the Equality Act.

 

By 2015 our £370 million Railways for All scheme will improve the accessibility of our train stations. Of this, £35 million per year is targeted at improving access at the busiest stations to ensure an accessible route within each station which includes providing step-free access. Labour has also introduced free nationwide off-peak travel on local buses for the over-60s and eligible disabled people in England.

 

I hope you find this information helpful.

 

Thank you again for taking the time to write.

 

Best wishes,

 

Chris Murray

Office of the Leader of the Labour Party

 

Labour Party

39 Victoria Street

London

SW1A OHA

t. 08705 900 200

e. [email protected]

 

 

Sent by email from the Labour Party, promoted by Ray Collins on behalf of The Labour Party, both at 39 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0HA.

Website: www.labour.org.uk to join or renew call 08705 900 200.

277810885_a-future-fair-for-all_485.gif

Was there a disclaimer on this email?

Link to post
Share on other sites

nope as you see is how it is in full i just copied and pasted the whole email as is PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"You and Yours" prog was a disappointment, they got onto benefits after 38 minutes and no-one could say where jobs for the disabled are going to magically appear from in a recession. There was some guff about training and support - no sh1t, it still doesn't create jobs. So it was, more smoke and mirror obfuscation was the order of the day. Remploy got mentioned as providing jobs, what total and utter bovine manure, I seem to remember them laying off people a year or so back:

Remploy: 26 Nov 2008: Written answers and statements (TheyWorkForYou.com)

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it still might, EB. You and Yours is a consumer programme and might be persuaded to broadcast something on disabled problems [if they haven't done so recently. Peter White, one of the, presenters, does a newsletter for disabled people, being blind himself.

 

HB x

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ ee-bee, it was worth it for me (you posting). I was able to show-up the government for the lying toads they are by mentioning Remploy.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Work and Pensions Secretary of State Yvette Cooper, her Conservative shadow Teresa May and Lib Dems contender Steve Webb, outline their plans for welfare claimants on Employment and Support/incapacity/I.S. and job-seekers allowances after the election. From “The Daily Politics Election Special” BBC2 29/04/2010

 

 

Yvette Cooper said:

“we’ve seen some drops in the number of people claiming long-term sickness benefits, we’re also in the process of introducing a new assessment which focuses on what people can do and not what people can’t do, it’s finding that about 60% of people are able to work and are able to find some jobs, and that is now being rolled out to all of the people who are currently still claiming long-term benefits, they will all go through the new test.”

 

How can she lie like this, the DWP have said that there are no statistics collected on how many WCA failed claimants have moved into work. In a recent survey more than 60% of employers admitted they were against employing the sick and disabled, so what chance have we during the recession. Watch the video and I think you will choose to vote for the Liberal Democrats because the other two are complete b*******s with compassion by-passes who will have us doing full-time work-fare in return for JSA or have our benefits stopped if we refuse or are too ill/disabled to comply.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Work and Pensions Secretary of State Yvette Cooper, her Conservative shadow Teresa May and Lib Dems contender Steve Webb, outline their plans for welfare claimants on Employment and Support/incapacity/I.S. and job-seekers allowances after the election. From “The Daily Politics Election Special” BBC2 29/04/2010

 

 

Yvette Cooper said:

“we’ve seen some drops in the number of people claiming long-term sickness benefits, we’re also in the process of introducing a new assessment which focuses on what people can do and not what people can’t do, it’s finding that about 60% of people are able to work and are able to find some jobs, and that is now being rolled out to all of the people who are currently still claiming long-term benefits, they will all go through the new test.”

 

How can she lie like this, the DWP have said that there are no statistics collected on how many WCA failed claimants have moved into work. In a recent survey more than 60% of employers admitted they were against employing the sick and disabled, so what chance have we during the recession. Watch the video and I think you will choose to vote for the Liberal Democrats because the other two are complete b*******s with compassion by-passes who will have us doing full-time work-fare in return for JSA or have our benefits stopped if we refuse or are too ill/disabled to comply.

 

What a load of clap trap from labour and cons. it's kick a cripple time again i think it's a harsh time for us, if they get in we must fight back..

 

I agree lone ranger

Vote Lib Dems... they might be better for us it's worth a try i think it can't get any worse or can it.:x

 

Libro.

My advice is based on my opinion and my experience. It is not to be taken as legal advice as I am not legally qualified

If my advice has been helpful, please take a moment to click on the scales

on the bottom left hand side of my profile :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...