Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, Purchased a car from Arnold Clark, Nottingham branch, on 5th April this year. Car was located in a different branch of Arnold Clark (Glasgow I believe) so was purchased on the standard proviso that it would be checked over by them etc.  Collected the car on 12th April, when I inspected it prior to handover it was noted that there was a ding/paint chip on the driver's door, a mark on the roof and damage to the screen of the infotainment (radio) where there was a chunk taken out of the touch screen. At the time I was told by the staff member who did the handover all these would be fixed as I had pointed them out to him, I even sent follow up photos of the damage a few days after. I drove the car away, signed the paper work etc. After some delays on their part the paint work was eventually booked in and fixed last Friday. The roof is still apparently being looked into (it's a standard wrap that appears to be a common issue with the car). The major issue here is the damage and chunk out of the touch screen infotainment system. This forms a major part of the car as you can change settings etc. in there. Arnold Clark are now advising me, after having a few people, including a manager there look at it, that they won't fix this, despite advising that they would during the handover. I have raised this with their internal complaints team but am receiving the same response. The general manager of the branch, who already had a very aggressive/blase attitude, which has been downright rude at points to this whole thing, treating it like's a trivial little mark. All this has left me with a very sour taste in my mouth and I'm now at a loss as to how to proceed and get this work repaired by them. Do I go to the Motor Ombudsman/finance company or?
    • You'll need to acknowledge service pretty sharpish then. I'm sure dx will pop up once you've filled in the template with the next steps.
    • It's possible, either way the OP's level of worry is far far higher, than any consequences.
    • Hi lolerz thanks for your reply. I'll fill this in when I get home. Just to let you know the 25/05/24 is incorrect I received the county court letter on fri 17/05/24
    • Can you complete this ASAP also:    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Right to Offset Rule - Lloyds credit card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5122 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

On my Lloyds credit card statements it says that they have the right to offset any available funds in bank/savings accounts to clear outstanding balance on a credit card.

 

If I had no available funds in my bank account can they go in and take the credit card payment and then make me overdrawn?

 

Thanks

 

Vicky

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

On my Lloyds credit card statements it says that they have the right to offset any available funds in bank/savings accounts to clear outstanding balance on a credit card.yes thats correct

 

If I had no available funds in my bank account can they go in and take the credit card payment and then make me overdrawn? yes they can:mad::mad:

 

Thanks

 

Vicky

xxxx

 

hi, this did indeed happen to me, [edit], i am in the process of changing banks.

Edited by saintly_1
potentially libellous remark removed
Link to post
Share on other sites

So they will make me overdrawn even if I don't have an overdraft facility?

How can they take it out of my account if it's not there to have?

That would then cost me £35 for being overdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont think they can cause more indebtedness by 'forcing' an overdraft situation

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Honeypot,

 

All banks will try to do the same. We have an account stripped to its OD limit by Barclays. However we did a song and dance at a very busy time in the local branch and our money was returned toute suite when we started spouting the rules in public. Basically they cannot take money legally to leave you further in debt than you first started. The OFT takes a very dim view of such a state of affairs. One of the few things they do not like, but all banks will try it on. To do as some have said here is an infringement of the guidelines laid down by the OFT with regards to debt collection and as such total compliance with these guidelines is a condition of said bank holding a credit licence. This licence can be restricted or suspended if the OFT decide to do so based on the level of complaints. So the moment you have a justifiable complaint, then complain loudly.

 

We have an open criminal allegation on the table based this very unlawful activity at the moment.

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree D4T. Always have a "parachute account" somehwhere else other than where your dispute resides. However a small point I forgot, on our Lloyds terms & conditions about the current account it does say about credit cards and the right to set-off. It does say clearly that they are only allowed (please note the wording) to take money from the account if it is in credit not if the account is OD. Plus you can always lodge a letter of appropriation with your bank to ensure priority bills are paid first. The Card co. is not classified as a priority bill.

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can omly take the amount that is in default if they took all of it then effectively they are demanding payment s before they are due surely

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys

 

so oilyrag if my credit card bill is £100 and I only have £50 in my bank then they can only take £50 out not £100 and make me £50 overdrawn?

 

correct

 

urm ah no hang on.

 

they can only take what is needed to put you at your CC credit limit - not the whole bill [if that is more]

 

and that must not make you overdrawn from the source of that funding.

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fundamentally correct dx100uk. I have just been told not only is it against OFT guidelines it is also illegal to take money from your account leaving you more indebted on that account than you were previously. It is immaterial what is owed on the card in payment arrears if it is excess of the amount of credit you have in the account they are about to raid.

 

This protrection is in place as a matter of principle in law. Just think about how UN principled the banks are. If this was allowed to go on unchecked and uncontrolled then the banks would just take money from whereever to ensure that you are indebted to them on the account that has the largest amount of interest and charges repayable to them regardless of any other consideration and keep doing this iteration after iteration. As weak as the OFT are in protecting our interests, this they recognise as a [problem] and are generally along with trading standards very unhappy if a bank exceeds their rights on this "right to set-off". Most we have told on here that we got our money back were surprised but we did and raised Cain in doing so. As I say you can, certainly if you are on a restricted income eg benefits lodge a "letter of appropriation" with your bank to ensure your essential bills are paid before any "raid" takes place. And the CC co are way down the list whatever they or their cohorts try to tell you.

 

regards

oilyrag.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi

 

HSBC recently zeroed out my current account to pay the outstanding balance I have on a credit card account eventhough they have confirmed that they cannot find a CCA!

 

Also, at the time i opened the current account (1996), the T&Cs have no clause in relation to setting off. However, if you look at their present T&Cs they have inserted that clause.

 

I wonder whether i can challenge HSBC to get my funds back?

 

Super

;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...