frank galler - kubic investments ltd

[princess5]

i think its frank??? heheh i love senor well said!

i paid £600 so did my friend so thats another £1200

[loopinlouie]

Dont forget peoples, you can always whilst keeping abreast of this thread, get free unbiased advice on the debt forums. You could list each card or account seperately and even in some cases if you have to go back to the beginning, you can still get help that wont cost you anything.

 

Even if some agreements are found to be enforceable, you only pay what you can afford. Good luck to you.

[MARTIN3030]

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/194270-tate-lloyd-claims-management.html

[princess5]

martin i cant find that link tate-lloyds thing what did it say? sounds like we need to know about it??

[MARTIN3030]

The one above should open

[princess5]

ahhh just read it seems like frank has struck yet again then!!

[loopinlouie]

Am I silly or is one of names in the linked thread familiar as in I dont need to say anymore.

[MARTIN3030]

one quote from there;

 

 

"

re: Tate-Lloyd/Claims Management UK

Can i just say that there are alot of unfair comments about this firm.

Re wordings, their system has been copywritten so you need to be aware of this.

The problem is more likely to be the company that clients go direct to which has been already mentioned who do not manage client expectations.

 

This system works, it can be messy but it is effective and fast unlike the other systems out there. It does not use the CCA. I think people should be more careful before jumping to conclusions. This firm is not a [problem] but is under pressure due to the huge demand.

I have just done two cards with them. Yes the companies were still calling until I told them that the debts were disputed and under the CCA (although the process does not use the CCA) when a debt is disputed then the monthly payments can be ceased until the matter is concluded one way or another. The companies are no longer calling me.

I have had a good service and although they have been difficult to get hold of (they are moving offices), I have found them honest and also realistic.

Clients should not be calling them direct but instead their first providers of the service."

 

 

Hmn so another "American system" ............and no use of CCA !!

[princess5]

from reading this i see that natashas name has appeared on this??!!!!

hmmmmm explain please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[loopinlouie]

Thats what forgive me is confusing me.

[princess5]

seems she has been dabbling before with http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/194270-tate-lloyd-claims-management.html

 

now who can we really trust??

[MARTIN3030]

By the way-Swansea Trading Standards took a very different view to the OP above.....as you will see in the thread

[princess5]

have they been done since or still on the loose?? well done martin good job!

[natasha123]

one quote from there;

 

 

"

re: Tate-Lloyd/Claims Management UK

Can i just say that there are alot of unfair comments about this firm.

Re wordings, their system has been copywritten so you need to be aware of this.

The problem is more likely to be the company that clients go direct to which has been already mentioned who do not manage client expectations.

 

This system works, it can be messy but it is effective and fast unlike the other systems out there. It does not use the CCA. I think people should be more careful before jumping to conclusions. This firm is not a [problem] but is under pressure due to the huge demand.

I have just done two cards with them. Yes the companies were still calling until I told them that the debts were disputed and under the CCA (although the process does not use the CCA) when a debt is disputed then the monthly payments can be ceased until the matter is concluded one way or another. The companies are no longer calling me.

I have had a good service and although they have been difficult to get hold of (they are moving offices), I have found them honest and also realistic.

Clients should not be calling them direct but instead their first providers of the service."

 

 

Hmn so another "American system" ............and no use of CCA !!

 

 

The problem with tate lloyd was that the company was not licenced, therefore had to stop trading whilst overloaded with clients from the call centre. This is excactly the reason, why I have refused to use this system, Frank was in the picture then, and asked me to work for him I agreed and worked with the Consumer Credit Act.

Thats the story! I wasnt aware that this is happening in a similar way.

[princess5]

do these people on this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/194270-tate-lloyd-claims-management.html know about kubic now? as they are probably still waiting for their cash back lol

[MARTIN3030]

Am I silly or is one of names in the linked thread familiar as in I dont need to say anymore.

 

 

I would not like to say - except that there are some striking obvious similarites-its up to users to make up their own minds.

[natasha123]

do these people on this thread http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/194270-tate-lloyd-claims-management.html know about kubic now? as they are probably still waiting for their cash back lol

 

 

They have been moved to other legal teams!

[kiptower]

so natasha you worked for them with frank also , you are saying ? IE, Tate-Lloyd

[princess5]

how comes martyn is using them now then again? from what you said in a message

[princess5]

welcome kiptower! have you had dealings also?

[princess5]

guys also i want to say if you havent donated to the site yet please do so when you can as the guys on here have been amazing thank you

[kiptower]

no lets just say I spent a lot of my life in fraud investigation, in the industry I was involved in, and i spot porkie pies a mile off, religion dont let me eat them though

 

but I still eat bacon sarnies ,,,,lol

[natasha123]

so natasha you worked for them with frank also , you are saying ? IE, Tate-Lloyd

 

I met Frank in february 2009, at the time I didnt have that many dealings with him, somebody else took care of him. Then in April we were about the licence issue, which yes was our fault no doubt. we couldnt carry on working, and we had to leave the clients with other legal teams who needed time to sort out each individual client, which caused obviously problems.

 

Then in May-June he asked me if I wanted to work for him, and I agreed.

But as I already said under the Consumer Credit Act.

 

Frank however continued to sell the system of tate lloyd, which he shouldnt have done.

 

The system is not all bad, the questions are for example to see the original agreement etc. however there are to many questions you cannot ask the lender.

I joined tate Lloyd in February when Frank was already there, but I was only there for about 2 month which can be checked out.

[MARTIN3030]

Cags own investigations into TL were around March /April 2009

 

Trading Standards were alerted in late April.

 

Company search records indicate that a limited liability partnership was formed in February 2009

 

It was dissolved in April 2009 !!!

[MARTIN3030]

I dont think it would be too difficult to get copies of the documents filed.