Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asset Recoveries UK hassling re mortgage shortfall from 2000- ** Statute barred ** :)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4649 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ARUK are claiming that, they are attempting to resolve the matter in an amicable manner.

 

But, they have not complied with the SAR and to date have failed to provide any documentary evidence providing proof of the alleged debt.

 

Making wild statements about producung the above letter in court, is absolutely ridiculous when the firm itself has not fulfilled its legal obligations!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 332
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Dear Sirs,

 

I acknowledge no debt to your company

 

With reference to your letter dated 19th February 2009.

 

"I note your statement that you intend to instruct agents to visit my home and I would advise the following:

 

Under the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) Rules, you can only visit me at my home if I have made an appointment with you. There no need, as Written Communication is quite acceptable in Law.

 

Please note, there is only implied license under Common Law for people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions (Armstrong -v - Sheppartd and Short Ltd (1959) 2Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R..). Therefore, take note that I revoke license under Common Law for your Employees, Agents or Representatives to visit me at my property and , if any of the above does so, your Company will be liable to Damages for a Tort of Trespass and Civil Action will be taken.

 

I reiterate, that I require all communication between ourselves to be in writing. This protects both of us in the event of litigation.

 

Please also note, that I have asked you to provide proof of the liability which you say I owe both by letter and in the form of a Subject Access Request. You have failed to respond.

 

Yours etc,

 

 

Unless anyone else has any ideas ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Unless anyone else has any ideas ?

 

It's already been sent CB, I think that this will continue for a while yet, they seem unable or unwilling to understand the rules of the game that they are insisting on playing.

 

Once this particular series of threats has run its course then I reckon

 

Unable to fulfill an SAR (complaint to ICO)

Unable to prove the debt (complaint to OFT/TS)

SAR to OC.

 

Will hopefully prove if debt is SB and in the case that it's not, then hopefully put ARUK back in their box until it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... have re-read the thread and am pretty sure Aruk have bought this one in the hope of getting money from you prior to it becoming stat-barred. Not sure what role Phoenix have in all of this at the moment, but as it is Aruk who are writing to you, then it is Aruk you should be dealing with for the time being at least. From what I've read so far, Phoenix have never made contact with you. Is that correct?

 

You've said that a SAR already went to Aruk some time ago? They replied with a letter that you've since deleted from the thread, but under a SAR.... they should provide you with everything that they have on you... but don't seem to have anything, as I see it.

 

So.... I've drafted up a letter of complaint that needs to go to Aruk by rec. delivery. As this has been put together rather quickly, I'd be grateful for any comments before you send it off..... but I think all of your points have been covered and the ball is now in their court.

 

 

Dear xxxxx

 

Your Ref xxxxxx

 

COMPLAINT

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or to any company or “client” who you claim to represent. I refer to your most recent correspondence; the content of which has raised a number of concerns.

 

Firstly, your company has failed to establish any legal right to pursue me for payment towards an alleged debt, either by Equitable or Absolute Assignment and until such times as I am satisfied that I owe anybody any money at all, no payments will be forthcoming to anyone. I therefore require a full, written explanation as to the basis of your claim for payment.

 

Secondly, you appear to have used the threat of court proceedings to coerce me into providing you with information that you have no legal right to receive, yet as already stated, have been unable to furnish me with the requested documentation under my SAR. Notwithstanding the content of this letter, you now have X amount of time within which to comply.

 

As I am sure you are aware, your threat of legal action puts you in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on debt collection. I therefore require a full, written explanation as to your reasoning behind these threats. I also require full, written details of the type of assignment that you claim to have; Equitable or Absolute; together with the date upon which you claim this took place and any Notice of Assignment that you sent out prior to making contact with me.

 

Thirdly, I am concerned with your apparent anxiety in urging for a written acknowledgement from me in relation to the ambiguous Mortgage Transaction History that you claim to have in your possession, but which has never materialized in any of your correspondence. I therefore require a full, written explanation as to where this document originated from, together with a full breakdown of the alleged balance that you claim to be outstanding.

 

Fourthly, should it be your intention to carry out your additional threat of a doorstep visit to my home, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Notwithstanding the above, at no time have I consented to the processing by you of my data in any way that would breach The Data Protection Act, 1998. If this alleged debt had been legally assigned to you, then any personal data held in the Mortgage Agreement allegedly entered into may only have been passed to you provided that my (the borrower's) authority was obtained in that Agreement. As this is not the case however, then I must point out that you have certainly not requested and I have not given any permission for my personal data to be passed/shared/received by you at all.

 

You may therefore consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act, 1998 to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies (if applicable). Should you refuse to comply, you must within 14 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a legal right, you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

I look forward to a favourable response within 14 days of the date of this letter; informing me that on this occasion you have made a genuine mistake and that your files are now closed. Failure to respond favourably however, will result in me reporting this matter to Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, The Financial Crimes Branch of HM Treasury and any other authorities as I see fit.

 

Please also note that any further attempts to contact me by telephone will be duly logged by time and date before being rejected.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:)

 

IW, has already sent the above CB!

Link to post
Share on other sites

by CarVal:

 

We Focus on Loans that are:

Sub-performing,non-performing or write-off

 

Slow paying, partially paying or delinquent

 

Paying under a modification agreement, or bankruptcy plan

 

Other Assets that are:

 

Non-uniform or non-conforming Management intensive

 

Illiquid

 

Generating uncertain/random cash flow streams

 

Irregular, falling below standard market returns."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry AC and spamheed, I didnt read the thread.. just saw the last couple of posts. :D

 

P1's is a far better constructed letter :D

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh my lord, what a pretty picture these people paint for a judge to see th arrogance and predatory nature of their business. "We reserve the right to produce this letter in court in future.....?" that's not a threat is it?

 

You owe us the money because ......well we say you do?

 

IW if you become concerned about a doorstep visitor actually attending, I'm close enough to pop over and lend six feet and 18 stone of "moral support" if you need it

Hi spamheed, thanks for that, if I do need you I will get you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there my friends, Just to let you know I havent forgotten about you all and a quick update as to whats happening, I sent the letter of complaint to aruk and apparantly they recieved this on 23rd feb, still had no reply to it as of yet. i honestly thought something would of came on saturday as thats the normal day for me recieving letters from them. Well thats all to report for now. Just keeping fingers and toes crossed they come back with a good result.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,IrW............dont think you will find ARUK will reply at all quickly,they will probably try to phone you,just tell them in writing only.Ive had an SAR lodged with ARUK since November 2009,No Reply,they have tried to phone on 2 occasions,they just get the message I will not discuss it on the phone ,in writing only,cant even get a reply from Phoenix.Ive put this on the thread before,you need to get a letter from Phoenix confirming that ARUK can act on their behalf,as it stands at the moment you are accepting the word of ARUK that they represent Phoenix,as a number of Caggers have already said DONT,the longer you keep them in the position of not aknowledging any debt of any description time will run out and become Statute Barred which I think it has already................Keep fighting you will win....FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there my friends, Just to let you know I havent forgotten about you all and a quick update as to whats happening, I sent the letter of complaint to aruk and apparantly they recieved this on 23rd feb, still had no reply to it as of yet. i honestly thought something would of came on saturday as thats the normal day for me recieving letters from them. Well thats all to report for now. Just keeping fingers and toes crossed they come back with a good result.

 

They're little brain cells are under a lot of pressure IW.... :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive had an SAR lodged with ARUK since November 2009

 

I presume you used these details

Registration Number: Z6745827

Date Registered: 19 June 2002 Registration Expires: 18 June 2010

 

Data Controller: ASSET RECOVERIES UK LIMITED

 

Address:

1ST FLOOR DOMINION HOUSE

SIBSON ROAD

SALE

MANCHESTER

M33 7PP

 

If so you really *must* complain to the ICO and Trading Standards and the OFT and basically anyone else you can think of.

 

Complaints to the ICO really matter to these people

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi......gh2008......yes sent sar to Sale,Manchester and complaint gone into ICO and FOS,sent complaint also to OFT some time ago as you are probably aware OFT will record your complaint for future action if they get enough complaints,they will act (i hope) dont want to hijack the thread it belongs to IR even though were both dealing with the same SC......m..ARUK and PHOENIX for the same reasons.............thankyou.........FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi friends, just a quick update. 14 days have now past since my letter of complaint was recieved by ARUK and no response whatsoever from them. Also the response to the subjust access request has not been met in the timelimit. I suppose I will just have to sit and wait til their next correspondence arrives. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi FS I got til may next year for it to be SB. I been watching your thread also. I wish you all the best luck in the world and thank for your kind words. I am just hoping they dont continue with this as it had me really worn down at first, I am just glad I happened to come accross this site or I might of been tempted to pay this. Everyone on here helping me are Royal Gems. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose I will just have to sit and wait til their next correspondence arrives. :D

 

Get your formal complaints off to the ICO about the SAR and the OFT and their local TS about the ignored formal complaint.

 

The more complaints the authorities get about these people the better. They need to get a 'threshold amount' before they take action, although when they do take action it can be quite comprehensive!!

 

Get those complaints in and keep complaining

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know if you can claim credit card charges as I have 2 and my huband says I can claim them back. I know its got nothing to do with this thread but if you can point me in right direction it would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the law clearly states that the statute barring clock clock starts from the date the account would have defaulted. the other side (ARUK) are using the date of sale because it serves their purpose.

 

Be aware that the OP has been advised that the other half have been reading this thread and have basically told the OP that what they are being told is rubbish.

 

Just to reiterate the following:

 

The OP has been advised to make them prove that the debt is not statute barred - they have failed to do this.

 

The OP has been advised to make them prove that they have a lawful right to enforce this debt (something that the Gov't, CAB, Trading Standards et al confirm is the correct action to take) - they have failed to do this.

 

On the other hand, the other side claim that the OP has been misinformed and that the information delivered is incorrect.

 

So they will be popping proof of the debt not being statute barred and also of their lawful right to enforce the debt in tomorrows post?

 

I thought not

 

Simply be aware before you type another letter that not everyone who posts on this forum is genuine and not everyone is taking a real interest in your situation, it is now clear that ARSEUK are perusing these forums in order to find out a little about the law.

Edited by spamheed
Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone know if you can claim credit card charges as I have 2 and my huband says I can claim them back. I know its got nothing to do with this thread but if you can point me in right direction it would be much appreciated.

 

 

There is an entire forum section covering this practice. It al;l starts with a single letter.

 

IW Please be patient, The people who have been helping you may not be online immediately.

 

Look at it this way, if they were so sure of their case and could prove the SB status in their favour, if they could show how the amount demanded was arrived at, as well as showing that they have a lawful right to enforce the debt, oh and they could demonstrate exactly how they and phoenix are linked and how a Luxembourg company has managed to get a UK credit Licence and why neither company have answered any of your queries. If they get you into court they are going to have to answer all of these questions to the judge in any way

 

But they haven't done any of these things have they?, despite your numerous requests to do so, so I'm not exactly sure which bits of the information you have received is incorrect.

 

Perhaps we should all be telling you to send wads of money in bra=own paper bags to unknown persons in Luxembourg?

 

Nah I don't think so neither

Edited by spamheed
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...