Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The ISA quoted vehicle CY08JCJ entering 12.49 and exiting 14.19 this is not my sons vehicle. These times also vary from the two payments made?
    • Not completely black and white. ICO says if you ask for the information to be sent in a particula way, in your case electronically, then they should send in that way "if possible". So I suggest making that request firmly. I would guess if they actually only hold paper copies they'd be with their rIght to decline to scan everything for you. Or they could transcribe just your personal information. 
    • Hey guys, just wanting to double check since it's been a a year since my last claims mediation, this is the best stance to have during the mediation right?: "I am willing to be flexible by not taking Evri to court to get a judgement against  them and i'm willing to settle now. but I'm not here to compromise on my rights or the amount i'm owed as I have all the rights in this claim and Evri know this, despite what they may say now. I do not wish to waste the courts time and our time, it's Evri who are being inflexible and they are just wasting evryones time if the are not just paying up now. they should just offer the full £ and we can proceed The function of mediation is not to persuade you to give up some of your rights. The function of mediation is to help you obtain what you are entitled to without having to go to court and without having to inconvenience or trouble anyone further. The benefit to the defendant is that they are saved the expense and the inconvenience of going to court." I can also bring up that 1. they no showed this court in our previous mediation call and wasted all our time, and 2. they already settled in full with me last year on an identical parcel and case so we're going down the same road?
    • Regarding SARs - does the recipient provide hard or digital copies of info?  I sent out a request recently. All the info was digital and I'd like it sent digitally - for expedience -  but they want to post hard copies.  Can I demand digitally?  If it's hard then I will have to labour over scanning it all back in to my computer - which is a waste of my resources.  I had this issue recently with a lawyer - they said they had too much info to send by email. Yet miraculously found a way within 2h. (It would be useful to have hard copies too - but in terms of short-term follow up communication digital is best for me)
    • As the tories declare they will do all sorts of err things they had already promised, and often actually themselves blocked,  including 40 hospitals policy, ground rent caps, abolishing no-fault evictions and restoring historic train lines .. all feature in the 2019 and 2024 documents.   .. in perhaps better news Man, 46, arrested in connection with criminal investigation into PPE Medpro | UK news | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Suspect understood to have been arrested on suspicion of offences including conspiracy to commit fraud     Man, 46, arrested in probe into PPE linked to ex-Tory peer Michelle Mone - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The National Crime Agency said a 46-year-old man was arrested in Barnet, North London, in an ongoing investigation into how PPE...   Correcting the mirror - thats current tory peer isnt it?   Arrest in probe into Michelle Mone-linked company PPE Medpro WWW.HERALDSCOTLAND.COM A 46-year-old man has been arrested as part of the National Crime Agency (NCA) investigation into PPE Medpro.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Any Help Appreciated - Council Tax / Rossendales


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5247 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all.

 

In a bit of a state of panic, any help would be so gratefully received because I just don't know what to do now. I've tried to find answers on the forum but nothing specific has come up...

 

My husband and I owe Council Tax. Apparently there was a court hearing in Feb 2008 which we did not attend. This was a really bad time for my husband, health wise, and I don't recall a Summons - but it was such a confused period I can't be sure. Anyway, we didn't attend.

 

We moved house in April 2008. The council were aware of this my husband's health problems had lead to him having to go on to ESA, and we were claiming Housing Benefit. The council tax arrears stem from 06-07 when he was still working. I'm not sure of the exact amount.

 

We heard nothing until November 2008 when we got a bit of paper through the door from Rossendales, saying they had visited along with an arrest warrant and were there to execute it. I didn't even know who Rossendales were, we'd had no contact from them at all. I called our local court to see if this arrest warrant existed and they couldn't confirm, but they did say that Rossendales were our council's bailiffs so I should try the council.

 

Council were very unhelpful and said that we owed money and it was now with Rossendales so we needed to contact them. Have a bit of previous experience dealing with this from helping a friend, so asked them to take the debt back but they said no.

 

We called Community Legal Advice, who told us to send Rossendales an income/expenditure form and offer repayments. We offered £7 a month which I know is paltry but it's all we can afford due to husband's ill health and reliance on benefits, and my Carer's Allowance still hasn't come through. We sent the letter recorded delivery and I still have the proof. This was in November.

 

At the end of December, we got a letter from the council saying we needed to surrender to the arrest warrant but we ignored it as we thought we had covered that on advice of CLA with the income/expenditure.

 

Then, nothing, until this morning when we got another of those "we visited to arrest your husband" cards through the door. My husband is a deeply unwell man and this panicked the heck out of me. I've had no recognition of the means test I sent.

 

What on earth do we do? I'm loathe to contact Rossendales - they've never sent us a letter or anything, and I don't want to call the mobile number on these "arrest" slips. Should I call the council again? Resend the means test?

 

Or does my husband need to surrender to this warrant? What does that even entail? He's got severe memory problems and I'm terrified of what that might mean.

 

I just don't know what our next course of action is - 5.30am fear has hit and it seems forever until the CLA open, not that it seems to matter as their suggestion didn't seem to do anything. :oops:

 

Any help GREATLY appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent a message to the site team as i feel you need some expert help with this

 

try not to panic not easy i know

If you are worried your husband will go to jail he wont the fact that you have sent an income expenditure and made an offer of payment means you have not refused to pay this debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent a message to the site team as i feel you need some expert help with this

 

try not to panic not easy i know

If you are worried your husband will go to jail he wont the fact that you have sent an income expenditure and made an offer of payment means you have not refused to pay this debt

 

Thanks so much, it's not easy but it is nice to hear. Just woke up in the middle of the night panicking about it.

 

I'm not actually worried he'll be sent to prison. I probably should have mentioned that the letter from the council says he needs to surrender to the warrant so a Magistrates Hearing can be scheduled for an 'enquiry'. I'm just wondering what "surrendering" means really... he's not very cognitive but still physically fit and able, so people assume he can do things he can't.

 

Is 'surrendering' a case of going to the police station or can he just call and ask them to fix a new court date, is the basic issue on that front.

 

I should have been clearer. :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is 'surrendering' a case of going to the police station or can he just call and ask them to fix a new court date, is the basic issue on that front.

 

In all honesty i don't know

 

If/when your hubby goes to court take a copy of the income/expenditure letter you sent to Rossendales, along with your proof of posting

proof of your income and proof of your husbands illness

also make sure that you ask to pay this by standing order

a lot of bailiffs firms are insisting you pay with a payplan card (i think thats what it called ) this will cost you an extra £1/£2 every time you make a payment and there is more chance of defaulting paying it this way

Link to post
Share on other sites

a lot of bailiffs firms are insisting you pay with a payplan card (i think thats what it called ) this will cost you an extra £1/£2 every time you make a payment and there is more chance of defaulting paying it this way

 

That's really good to know, I'll say it has to be standing order.

 

I have all those proofs to hand, should it come to that.

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

you welcome i just wish i could have done more

this might help you

NATIONAL STANDARDS FOR ENFORCEMENT AGENTS may 2002

Those who might be potentially vulnerable include:

  • the elderly;
  • people with a disability;
  • the seriously ill;
  • the recently bereaved;
  • single parent families;
  • pregnant women;
  • unemployed people; and,
  • those who have obvious difficulty in understanding, speaking or reading English

__________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definately dont know as much as Hallowitch about all this (indeed I have received help from her :-) )

 

But my first thoughts on reading this were that I would be on the phone to the head of recoveries at the council at 9am and I wouldnt take no for an answer, if he/she isnt available ask for a call back and if they havent called back by a certain time, then call again.

 

I understand that the council should know what benefits you are receiving and as a result realise that your husband is ill, however just because they should doesnt mean they do.

 

One call may go a long way to sorting this out, especially if you can prove that you have tried to make an arrangement to pay.

 

I would also look to see if your husbands doctor would provide a letter to state that he isnt well enough to attend court.

 

As I say the above are just my thoughts and I will be interested to see what the more knowledgable people suggest.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely don't know as much as Hallowitch about all this (indeed I have received help from her :-) )

 

But my first thoughts on reading this were that I would be on the phone to the head of recoveries at the council at 9am and I wouldn't take no for an answer, if he/she isn't available ask for a call back and if they haven't called back by a certain time, then call again.

 

defiantly a good idea

 

I understand that the council should know what benefits you are receiving and as a result realise that your husband is ill, however just because they should doesn't mean they do.

correct all they have to do is look and see if you are in receipt of housing/CT benefit this tells them what benefits you receive

 

One call may go a long way to sorting this out, especially if you can prove that you have tried to make an arrangement to pay.

Rossendales have obviously not done there job or it wouldn't have got to this stage IMO

 

I would also look to see if your husbands doctor would provide a letter to state that he isn't well enough to attend court.

another excellent idea

 

As I say the above are just my thoughts and I will be interested to see what the more knowledgeable people suggest.

 

I thought i would get tomtubby on this as the council have said he has to surrender to an arrest warrant

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert in any shape or form - it hasn't happened to me or anyone I know.

This sounds as though they want to consider imprisonment for your husband which is an option for those who willingly and intentionally won't pay up.

As this doesn't apply in your case I would rest easy on that score. But you will need to have all your documentation ready in order to support your statement of your circumstances as you will, at least initially, be treated like a common criminal.

You will have to face some firm, maybe even aggressive, questioning until the facts of the case are accepted.

 

 

As a side issue I would welcome the option to be imprisoned. It costs the state a lot of money to imprison people, and (depending on where you are) the local papers would love this sort of news. Some national papers would also be interested.

On the down side they will take a tissue sample to obtain your DNA. If you are eventually convicted you will have this on file for some time (until it is 'spent'). You won't be able to go to the USA and some other countries because of your conviction - and some of these countries don't even subscribe to the principle of convictions being spent - you have them for life. These things may or may not be imprtant to you.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive not actually heard of this either, or the procedures of this happening.

You are definitely in the 'vulnerable stage' and your council should be made aware of this. Unfortunately in cases like this the councils often dont know their arse from their elbow and when some one has failed to pay they dont look at circumstances they look towards their bailiffs to do that job for them, which they often do incorrectly. keep us informed of any further actions and I know that people will be along shortly to give some advice on how to proceed. Dont forget that we are hear to help and see you through this :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel sorry for you having come to this. It will pay to "Surrender" to the warrant issued - this will be at the Court where the Liability Order was granted. This will be a precursor to you filing a means test through the Court and they will establish what level(s) of payment you will pay and how this will be done. If on Benefits then it will be deducted at source. As your husband is unwell you must provide proof of this and this will all be taken into account at any hearing.

 

As a first step you should contact the Court on your husband's behalf - you may have to pass the phone to him for him to confirm you can speak on his behalf.

 

The Council will have taken this decision in view of the length of time and sums involved and will be trying to categorise you as a won't pay rather than a can't pay. Does your husband have a "Case" worker or similar who can speak for you or provide further evidence of his health. You also really need to contact the Council to see if they also have a Welfare Rights Adviser or similar who may be able to speed any Benefit applications up - for instance are getting all you are entitled to.

 

Have you enlisted your local Councillor for help as I'm sure when you tell him the Council are hounding a sick person with an Arrest Warrant and the local press are very interested he will jump - he has direct access to the higher ups at the Council.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cupcates. Sorry, late into the fray as usual.

Well, in those immortal words penned by Douglas Adams - Don't panic!

I'm going to start by saying a very bizarre thing indeed. In my view, I think this is very good news for you and hubby.

Ploddertom and Hallowitch, amongst others, have given you very good advice. A sort of two pronged approach.

There is no doubt in my mind that you both fall into the vulnerable category as determined by the National Standards of Enforcement Agents. I know HW has mentioned this document to you but I can't remember if she posted a link. So here it is:

 

http://www.dca.gov.uk/enforcement/agents02.htm#part10

 

[you may need to put a dot between 'www' and 'D C A' - not sure what's happening, there must be gremlins about...]

 

The council will be aware of this and should be following it. Problem being it's not a legal obligation but a moral one. You have the moral highground here for sure!

 

Why do I think it's good news being summonsed? Well, the magistrates court will definately be fully aware of the Standards and the magistrate should have them very firmly in mind. For you and hubby, that's a good thing. All you need do is turn up, provide proof of benefits, and proof of illness - I'm sure his GP will be happy to confirm his health issues. Obviously, this is not a get-out clause but a means for you to establish a realistic and sustainable payment plan. The court should help you with this. Make it clear you recognise the debt, wish to pay, but under the circumstances didn't know how to proceed.

I do not believe for one second that incarceration is in the offing. Look forward to your day in court as an opportunity to sort this out and say goodbye Mr Bailiff.

 

And in the meantime, of course, give the council a pain in their proverbials!

 

I will be very interested to see how things work out for you both. You have many people on here who care, so do keep us posted.

 

Best wishes

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
Hey! What happened to my linky thing?????????
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for report Rae-I have refd it to Webmaster.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...