Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • so the debt is statute barred then more than 6yrs since your last payment?  
    • what is an OCA letter? you follow post 2 as stated. dx    
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre, Northampton Name of the Claimant ? CA Auto Finance UK Limited How many defendant's  joint or self ? One (self) Date of issue –  02 May 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – Unpaid car loan 1. By an agreement in writing dated 26 November 2015 and made between the Claimant and the Defendant, the Claimant loaned the Defendant a sum of money. The agreement was Regulated. 2. The Defendant failed to make payment of the sums due and the Agreement was terminated by the Claimant. 3. On the 7 February 2019 the balance due from the Defendant was £8,196,38. The Defendant has paid £0.00.       THE CLAIMANT THEREFORE CLAIMS  1. £8,196,38 2. Contractual interest to the date hereof £0.00 3. Further interest at 10.70 per annum (£0.00) per day until judgement or sooner payment. 4. Costs to be assessed. CLAIMANTS CLAIM £8,196.38                                         What is the total value of the claim? £8751.38 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Car Loan When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In Branch Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Creditor was FCA Automotive Services UK Limited Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No and No Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? No Why did you cease payments? Unaffordable What was the date of your last payment? Feb 28 2018 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes (irresponsible lending and they did not supply all documents when CCA sent. The Terms and Conditions they sent as part of the request were different to the original Ts and Cs. Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

just heard on another thread


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OFT not going to continue with bank charges case, I think it may have been better if they had kept their noses well and truly out of it! :(

 

 

So what does that mean for us meer mortals. Do we have to fight on by ourselves?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh - is that so....haven't been to the OFT thread today, but whatever the weather......Balls to the OFT. I don't feel bad anymore over the snotty email I sent to them (which of course they have not responded to) - and I don't care what they say they are PATHETIC. Of course the useless tools never got back to me.

 

What a game it is! Did anyone see that utterly useless mong on the telly? He was nothing short of a very bad liar, that is the world we live in!! Bond et al weren't any better, tragic in fact, but you can count on the policy makers to lie out of their skin!!! Jaysus.

 

I just bloody give up with this pathetic, useless, excuse for a country....it was once great. Now sh*t.

Link to post
Share on other sites

start_quote_rb.gif If the OFT is not going to act as the consumer champion, who is? end_quote_rb.gif

 

 

Marc Gander, CAG

 

Who indeed!!

 

It seems that once again the liccle peeps are left to fight on alone, because those in "authority" either can't see past the end of their noses or don't have the bottle to stand up for what's right!!

 

Shame on them.:-x

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marc has made an annoucement which acknowledges the reports elsewhere.

Only 26. minutes until, its made official

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-charges-finance-industry/239238-regulator-decides-bank-overdraft.html

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

just seen it im raging how are we any better off now than we were 2 years ago were worse off now as someone has said because i dunno how we go about it now at 1east 2 years ago we were getting back as someone e1se a1so said :mad:so what now are we back to been on our again and i bet the banks wi11 be much more cocky this time knowing we a11 1ost that fight and i a1so bet they wi11 turn up the court cases cos we wont be so sure of ourse1ves we11 i wont be thats for sure xkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT, FSA and other regulatory bodies in the financial world only exist to support eachother, and not the 'little person'.

 

Well, I am not impressed by any of them, too many regulators and not enough clout.

 

The Banks will find that people will now not leave any money in them and keep it somewhere else... I have plenty of odd socks at the moment should anyone need one to store funds in!

Link to post
Share on other sites

start_quote_rb.gif If the OFT is not going to act as the consumer champion, who is? end_quote_rb.gif

 

 

Marc Gander, CAG

 

Does anyone else hate it when someone asks a question then answers it? :lol: :lol:

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OFT, FSA and other regulatory bodies in the financial world only exist to support eachother, and not the 'little person'.

 

Well, I am not impressed by any of them, too many regulators and not enough clout.

 

The Banks will find that people will now not leave any money in them and keep it somewhere else... I have plenty of odd socks at the moment should anyone need one to store funds in!

:D:D:Dxxxkia

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why not start something on Facebook? If the Rage campaign can kick Simon Cowell's prodigies off the No1 slot, then surely we could kick up a big enough stink against the OFT.

Edited by SOD'EM

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why oh why do we bother and why are we surprised.

 

Ultimately departments like the OFT are under the control of the politicians. The same trustworthy individuals who have pilfered the public purse so blatantly with their expenses (with a few notable exceptions). Have the OFT been got at? Surely not? :rolleyes: Under pressure from the banks and probably treasury? As majority shareholder/major creditor in a number of banks they have a vested interest in supporting the banks don't they?

 

The OFT have already shown their incompetence in not raising the all the legal issues that make the charges unfair. The appeal court has made it clear there is another avenue for the consumer to persue under the same legislation. Not rocket science is it?

 

So sod the OFT, sod the government - I'll carry on my own fight with the support and advice available on CAG. In the words of Winston Churchill, I'll keep "buggering on" until I've gotten my money back. I suggest everyone else does likewise.

 

PS Rant over - Merry Christmas everyone

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...