Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Sainsbury's 'fines'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5272 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I picked up the leaflet below in my local Sainsbury's. I thought others here might be interested:

 

sc0021f9cb.jpg

 

sc00220c6e.jpg

 

 

They use a PPC to issue 'parking charge notices'.

 

I contacted Sainsbury's and suggested that they had no authority to issue fines, and that the leaflet is misleading as to fact and in that it tries to legitimise unenforceable penalties. Their reply was that they can 'issue fines because we are the landowner'.

 

I've spoken to the Advertising Standards Authority and have now made a formal complaint to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Asa disabled Driver I cant really see what you find to complain about.

 

I simply think that Sainsbury's literature should be factual, honest and not breach advertising regulations. Sainsbury's aren't above the law any more than disabled drivers are.

 

I do not condone the actions of anyone who does not possess the appropriate permit parking in disabled bays, any more than I condone the actions of those who abuse such permits.

 

Whilst parent and child bays have no legal status, I actually approve of them - it prevents the possibility of damage from poor driving of Chelsea tractors and brats opening doors carelessly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for the inconsiderate people that use disabled bays / Parent toddler bays being charged (and dare I say clamped) when they do not qualify to use these spaces.

 

What I am NOT for is the likes of Sainsburys, Morrisons, retail Parks, restaurants etc. sending out their invoices via a PPC for overstays, parking on a white line etc. when you are a genuine customer and sending intimating correspondence in order to try and extract disproportionate sums of money from them.

Edited by asmodeus
Grammer before I am accused of being a clamper !
Link to post
Share on other sites

Asa disabled Driver I cant really see what you find to complain about.

 

Whilst there are indeed "Moral" grounds for not parking in Disabled Spaces and Parking & Child bays in supermarkets they are no different to any other parking space - aside from the nice blue or green paint on the ground.

 

A disabled Blue Badge has no legal status on private land.

 

The point being made by SP is that Sainsburys are suggesting otherwise and that a "fine" can be issued. Complete twoddle. Any Invoice issued is no different to any other issued by a PPC.

 

I'm sure you will find that the vast majority of users (I'll include myself in that lot) will allow these spaces to be used by those who can best make use of them - it is probable that those that choose to park in such spaces whilst they nip in for a pack of 20 are the type of people who go through life being ignorant and inconsiderate to others anyway.

Edited by Blagton
Link to post
Share on other sites

I just find it [EDIT] unbelievable a shop welcomes its customers with leaflets threatening to fine them.

 

you unwittingly become the "customer" of the PPC, and for what? for someone else to make a buck by intimidating people into paying

Edited by Rooster-UK
Swear filter bypass in quote.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spoken to the Advertising Standards Authority and have now made a formal complaint to them.

 

We shop at Sainsbury's and we also hold a Blue Badge.

 

Disabled bays on private property have absolutely no legal status

whatsoever, they have the same legal status as, "fines", issued

by a supermarket chain.

 

We're going shopping on Sunday, and if I find one of those leaflets, I

too will be making a complaint to the Advertising Standards Authority.

 

I also wonder what the Police would think about a supermarket

chain openly advertising the fact that they are fining their customers?

 

I might also add that the leaflet DOESN'T say anything about displaying

said Blue Badge.......

Only use a disabled bay if you have a valid Blue Badge

This could be interesting!! ;)

Edited by diskmandave
Link to post
Share on other sites

Also... In the event of a dispute due to failing to display,

forget the fine argument, forget the unenforceable invoice

argument, who is the contract with? The driver or the Blue

Badge holder, in the event that they are not one and the

same, as is the case in our situation..

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Another interesting argument...

 

When Mum and I go shopping, if I park in a, "Parent and Child" bay, in

theory, and by strict definition, I'm not doing anything wrong...??

 

Only Mum and I in the car... Mum is the parent, and I'm her child..?

There's absolutely NO arguing away from that.. Makes absolutely

didley squat difference that Mum's 78 and I'm 44...

 

I can see this going somewhere.. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If we believe that customers are misusing these bays, our policy is to ask them to move their vehicle. If they refuse to do so and the car park is managed or owned by us, we will issue the driver with a fine. Indeed, in 2007 we issued more than 5,500 penalty charge notices to customers misusing parent and child bays and disabled parking bays.

 

 

IN 2007

 

So, it's not NEW then...?!!

 

Ashton Under Lyne Sainsbury's has ALWAYS been patrolled.

 

Whilst I respect the theory behind what they're trying to do, they're

acting outside of the law... Only a Judge or the Police can issue a fine,

or a FPN, and only a Local Authority can issue a PCN.

 

Sainsbury's are taking the law into their own hands..

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they get a few 1000's on there they may think again

 

Asda & Tesco have been doing this for years....

 

The day after, "The Judgement", this is a little more than convenient..

 

Expect many more to follow... Sainsbury's are just jumping on the Money Tree..

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've spoken to the Advertising Standards Authority and have now made a formal complaint to them.

If you've taken the time to make a formal complaint to the ASA why not complain to Trading Standards as well. I would suggest that this clearly breaches the Consumer Protection From Unfair Trading regulations. It is a misleading factual statement which will cause consumers to act differently than they otherwise would have. Something that clearly falls under the CPUT regulations and into TS's remit as well.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...