Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
    • Sleep apnoea: used to require the condition  to be “completely” controlled Sometime before June 2013 DVLA changed it to "adequately" controlled. I have to disagree with MitM regarding the effect of informing DVLA and S.88 A diagnosis of sleep apnoea doesn't mean a licence wont be granted, and, indeed, here it was. If the father sought medical advice (did he?) : this is precisely where S.88 applies https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64edcf3a13ae1500116e2f5d/inf1886-can-i-drive-while-my-application-is-with-dvla.pdf p.4 for “new medical condition” It is shakier ground if the opinion of a healthcare professional wasn’t sought. in that case it is on the driver to state they believed they met the medical standard to drive. However, the fact the licence was then later granted can be used to be persuasive that the driver’s belief they met the standard was correct. What was the other condition? And, just to confirm, at no point did DVLA say the licence was revoked / application refused? I’d be asking DVLA Drivers’ Medical Group why they believe S.88 doesn’t apply. S.88 only applies for the UK, incidentally. If your licence has expired and you meet the conditions for S.88 you can drive in the U.K., but not outside the U.K. 
    • So you think not pay until DN then pay something to the oc to delay selling to dcas?    then go from there? 
    • think about it, if you don't pay the full amount, what more can they do , default you  they've already registered a default notice by that point.  why have you got to await sale to a DCA.... for what?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Wescott Credit going back on word!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5231 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello there, this is the first time I've posted here so bear with me....

 

I had an old credit card with RBS which was passed to Wescott Credit Services when I could keep up with the payments. I went on a reduced payment plan and kept this up.

 

Back in march this year the balance was £980, and I had a call (to my parents house!) asking me to call Wescott asap. When I called I spoke to a very nuce young man who said that if I could make a lump sum payment off the debt, RBS had agreed to apply a credit to the account of £600!

 

I borrowed £300 to make a payment thinking that this would then give me a credit of £600, leaving only £80 to pay. So I've been carrying on with the payments as normal, then after making the payment in November 09, by my calculations I should have only had around £14 left to pay.

 

I sent Wescott an email to confirm this and they replied saying;

'Good morning, further to your recent email I can confirm that you current balance is £614.87'.....

 

Obviously I hit the roof! and replied.....

Please could you tell me why it is £614.87? During a phone conversation with someone at Wescott back in March, I was told that if I could make a lump sum payment, RBS would apply a credit of £600. I made a lump sum payment of £300 in April (which I borrowed from my parents on the promise that I would get credited with £600) and it looks like RBS (or Wescott) haven’t kept their part of the deal. I will have to dig out my old bank statements to get the exact date I sent the payment, but can you please explain?

I’m sure Wescott record their phone conversations so if I get the date of the call can you check it?

I am very annoyed by this.

 

they then replied saying.....

 

Good morning

Further to your recent email,

Upon reading the notes on this account

It states a settlement figure of £600 was quoted to you

We received a payment on £300 24*04*09, therefore £300 short of the settlement

Should you require further assistance, please contact us

I then replied

 

No I’m sorry but that is not what they said to me. The balance was £980 and they said if I could make a lump sum payment I would receive a CREDIT of £600 on the account. I was not asked to make a PAYMENT of £600 in settlement.

This is ridiculous. Yet another example of a debt collection agency going back on their word. I knew I should not trust a phone call.

Ok so maybe I lost the plot a bit there but you can imagine I'm really peed off, as thought the debt would now be paid off.

So anyway now I've had an email from some manager person saying that my emails have been passed to her and could I forward details of times names etc who promised me the credit. I stupidly didnt get the guys name but I know from my phone bill the exact date/time of the call.

I just wanted to know how I should go about replying to them, shoulkd I stick to email or write? I'm never ever speaking to them on the phone again after what they've done.

Where do I stand with my arguement that they promised me a credit to the account and should I contat RBS?

Any advice much appreciated!!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately you appear to have been stitched up like so many others are.

RBS will know nothing about this offer, it is all in Wescots imagination as a ploy to extract money from you.

You will get no sense out of any of their brain dead threat monkeys, so no point in trying.

Have you at any point requested a copy of the credit agreement under s78 CCA?

If not I suggest you do. They then have 12+2 days to come up with the goods or the account goes in to dispute. It is very unlikely Wescot will come up with anything, so you can tell them to wistle for the balance.

 

The Moral of the story is never speak to any of these DCA planks on the phone, they will tell you any old bull if it gets money out of you.

 

The CCA request I think is your best bet, if the debt proves to be unenforceable then it is 'san fairy ann' to them. They can do jack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCAs don't go back on their word - they don't have a word to go back on. Never speak to them on the phone - ever. Everything in writing. Depending on how old this card is, RBS won't have an agreement - you will soon find out once you send your CCA request. Hard lesson No 1 - DCAs lie to their back teeth and will tell you anything to get money off you. Welcome to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you'll find they either cannot find the conversation or will claim it has been wiped, we all know on here how dca's operate..it is the poor punters who do not know about this site that get ripped off by them.. send the cca request chances are you will find they dont have it and you can legally stop payment then, you wont see your money again, and its a difficult lesson to learn..but hey most of us here have been seen off at one time or another by these parasites

Link to post
Share on other sites

you can try this one if you like

 

 

 

 

 

Your ref

Dear Sir,

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx, and the outstanding balance of £xxxx to which I do not agree.

With reference to the above, we would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement of this alleged debt.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

I understand a copy of my credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

For your future reference

I am only prepared to communicate with you in writing. Should it be your intention to send 'doorstep agents' to my premises, please remember that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.) and doorstep agents representing your company are not of the afore mentioned prescibed list.

Take note therefore that I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone from a doorstop collection service company to visit me and should it be necessary, I will seek an injunction.

Note also each and every further breach you make of the Office of Fair Trading debt collection guidelines that you are obliged to abide by will not only be reported to them, but will also be followed up by another formal complaint to yourselves that may require the arbitration of the financial ombudsman, and subsequent fee incurred by yourselves, should I not be satisfied with your response.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! Should I send a postal order for the £1.00 payment?

 

Yes postal order is best, you don't want them knowing your bank account details, which they would if you sent a cheque. Make sure its a crossed PO made payable to Wescot and stick this bit in same where within the letter,

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i keep getting phone calls from Westcot asking to speak to Mr xxxxxx (me) then want me to confirm for security, my address postcode and D.O.B. told the woman that i had never heard of them and refussed to give any details at all.

she said that a letter had been posted a couple of days ago (not recieved) and told her to send the letter again and not to phone me again. she then said 'well how the hell do you expect us to sort this out if you wont give us your details'

i was just starting to say once more that i would not give my details and to write to me when......BEEEEEEEEEP...she hung up!

how professional eh!!!

called yesterday and same thing. got very rude with me (which is a big mistake if people know me) started talking over me when i was explaining i requested not to be phoned regarding the matter and i just lost it and told her in words i would never use on this site, just where to go and hung up myself!

 

its been nearly 2 weeks since first phone call and supposed letter they sent...and still no letter!

 

anyone have any advice on how best to get them to stop calling me?

as i dont want to write to them as obviously i will be giving my details away to them as i would if i phoned them.

I'm no expert in things really but i do have 36 years of experience in life, and some of those years fighting off bailiffs.

Nicknamed Victor Meldrew among friends as i love to complain!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert, but from doing a lot of reading on this site (& others) I guess you could claim harassment, i'd be tempted to send them a harassment by telephone letter (Harassment by telephone - Consumer Wiki) - @ least then any further inquiries from them should come by post so you will have a full record of any communications.

Question for more experienced peoples - is it ok to send a letter like this to a DCA without including your name, just sending it from 'the occupier' @ your address?

sigpic278087_5.gif
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert, but from doing a lot of reading on this site (& others) I guess you could claim harassment, i'd be tempted to send them a harassment by telephone letter (Harassment by telephone - Consumer Wiki) - @ least then any further inquiries from them should come by post so you will have a full record of any communications.

Question for more experienced peoples - is it ok to send a letter like this to a DCA without including your name, just sending it from 'the occupier' @ your address?

 

thanks for that, good idea.

 

i wont include my address in the letter tho just my phone number and name (which they already have) just incase they are fishing for my address.

do they really expect people to give away such details to a total stranger over the phone? i have the right mind to phone them and ask for there D.O.B and home address :)

......now theres an idea :idea: ......wonder what the respose would be to that :)

I'm no expert in things really but i do have 36 years of experience in life, and some of those years fighting off bailiffs.

Nicknamed Victor Meldrew among friends as i love to complain!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes postal order is best, you don't want them knowing your bank account details, which they would if you sent a cheque. Make sure its a crossed PO made payable to Wescot and stick this bit in same where within the letter,

 

I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

 

If the debt is still owed to RBS and Wescot are acting on their behalf, should the CCA request and payment of the £1 fee not go to RBS?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are calling on a land line and it is a BT one then you can get a service called Choose To Refuse - you can block up to ten callers. Once your list is full, if you add another number it knocks off the first number you blocked... but I have found that it doesn't matter... I have been blocking calls for the last few years... and (fingers crossed that I don't jinx myself) we haven't had any calls for over a month...

 

I don't know if other land line providers have a similar service but there is no harm in asking...

"I am prepared to meet my Maker. Whether my Maker is prepared for the great ordeal of meeting me is another matter" - Sir Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not an expert, but from doing a lot of reading on this site (& others) I guess you could claim harassment, i'd be tempted to send them a harassment by telephone letter (Harassment by telephone - Consumer Wiki) - @ least then any further inquiries from them should come by post so you will have a full record of any communications.

Question for more experienced peoples - is it ok to send a letter like this to a DCA without including your name, just sending it from 'the occupier' @ your address?

 

i will get the letter in the post on monday i think and see what happens from there.

 

from what i have been reading on many sites, they all say the same things about them, that they are rude and dont tend to play by the law.

i love companies like that...i just love a challenge :D

I'm no expert in things really but i do have 36 years of experience in life, and some of those years fighting off bailiffs.

Nicknamed Victor Meldrew among friends as i love to complain!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are calling on a land line and it is a BT one then you can get a service called Choose To Refuse - you can block up to ten callers. Once your list is full, if you add another number it knocks off the first number you blocked... but I have found that it doesn't matter... I have been blocking calls for the last few years... and (fingers crossed that I don't jinx myself) we haven't had any calls for over a month...

 

I don't know if other land line providers have a similar service but there is no harm in asking...

 

unfortunately a few years ago i took leave of my sences and went from BT to TalkTalk :( yes i know very silly.....but...anyway...called TT yesterday and they can put a call blocking feature on my line but it will cost me something like £4 per month which i dont think i will be needing as never needed to block a number before. then again...may be worth it just for 1 month at least till they get the message :)

I'm no expert in things really but i do have 36 years of experience in life, and some of those years fighting off bailiffs.

Nicknamed Victor Meldrew among friends as i love to complain!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi just as an update...sorry I am so late.

Sent the CCa request to Wescott, got letter back returning my £1 PO sayng that RBS have the CCA not them and I still owe £600, replied basically saying no CCA no money and I havent heard a peep from them since! So finger crossed....maybe a result!

 

Thanks everyone!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wescot know what their obligations are - they should be forwarding your request onto RBS, not have you contact the client directly. They're clearly trying to fob you off - report them.

 

This isn't surprising, coming from a company whose less-than-stellar information processing was a contributory cause in at least one death.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...