Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute Barred show up on your credit file


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5294 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes it can, ........ in a way.

 

but only if a default/marker is placed in the 6yrs prior to the statute barred date. Then that marker/default will remain for 6yrs from its issue. so effectively, lets say the default/marker was placed in the last month before statute barring, it could show as a debt for almost 12yrs.

 

but once a debt is statute barred a default/marker should not be added.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it can, ........ in a way.

 

but only if a default/marker is placed in the 6yrs prior to the statute barred date. Then that marker/default will remain for 6yrs from its issue. so effectively, lets say the default/marker was placed in the last month before statute barring, it could show as a debt for almost 12yrs.

 

but once a debt is statute barred a default/marker should not be added.

 

dx

 

 

Great I will check my file again. I have aplied for a job in HR within a bank. I'm told they run pre employment credit checks..

Link to post
Share on other sites

i should have added 'in total' after the 12yrs [6yrs back - 6yrs fwd] but you know what i mean.;)

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last payment I made to hbos was in dec 02. To Rockwell called me in May 09 forcing me to pay them. I had no contact from hbos during this time. Rockwell have made me pay £1100 of £6000 already. On my credit report this is not shown as a default. Can claim the rest of the money now I've made forced payments? Also I cleared a debt with nco in august 09 & it's still on my file as default. I'm gutted paying then if my report is still negative. I'm in a right mess as you can see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes it can, ........ in a way.

 

but only if a default/marker is placed in the 6yrs prior to the statute barred date. Then that marker/default will remain for 6yrs from its issue. so effectively, lets say the default/marker was placed in the last month before statute barring, it could show as a debt for almost 12yrs.

 

but once a debt is statute barred a default/marker should not be added.

 

dx

 

No it should'nt The default marker should be placed on file at the time of the default & not years or even months after the event. If it isn't its not valid & should be removed. The alternative would be horrendous as we would have creditors & DCA's in particular renewing notices every 5 years 364 days & 365 days on leap years:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooooohhh... you can stop paying rockwell if there has been a six years period where you made no I/O on the a/c.

 

in otherwords , if a 6yrs period has existed, it cannot be un-statute barred.

nasty dca.. you've wasted money there if that is the case....

 

as for the nco one, if you can prove the default was solely because of unlawful charges, it must be removed, but you need to reclaim the charges first. if not, sadly, its thee for 6yrs from date stamped. but the debt should show as settled.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it should'nt The default marker should be placed on file at the time of the default & not years or even months after the event. If it isn't its not valid & should be removed. The alternative would be horrendous as we would have creditors & DCA's in particular renewing notices every 5 years 364 days & 365 days on leap years:eek:

 

ofcourse they should jc, my bad..

 

int scenario though, i wonder what rules govern this in effect though......

and if like all the others dca's are a master to themselves only.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just clarify this then - in most cases a Default Notice is sent by the OC as a last attempt to get you to pay. Then the alleged debt is sold/passed on to a DCA, so why is it that so many DCAs issue and record defaults on a persons CR file - often months or even years' down the line?

 

For instance, I had a default notice from an OC who, after correspondence marked my file as satisfied, then sold it on. It still shows on my credit file as satisfied. However, the DCA who purchased the alleged debt then put their own entry (difference number) on my file with a new default date (about 2 years later to be exact). I queried this and the CRA said that I had to prove it was the same debt as it showed by the OC as a loan and the DCA as a Credit Card. With no CCA provided I was not sure which it was and CRA was not interested and both are still on my file to this day!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry but it's 6 years from when the actual default letter is dated not when the OC decides to lodge it which could be months or even years after the event

 

I thought it was six years from last PAYMENT of written acknowledgement, not when they can be bothered to send a default letter? :confused:

 

Otherwise they would all be holding back the default letters until the 11th month of the 5 year.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just called Rockwell who have told me that even I'd the debt is statute barred I still need to clear the debt. I have refused and asked for this in writing I fear the money I have paid them since April is lost. Ok now I'll call NCO and thames credit.

 

Thank you all for your help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just called Rockwell who have told me that even I'd the debt is statute barred I still need to clear the debt. I have refused and asked for this in writing I fear the money I have paid them since April is lost. Ok now I'll call NCO and thames credit.

 

Thank you all for your help!!!

 

haha you have to do no such thing... (as in clearing the debt)

 

You've lost the money I'm afraid tho.. just because its stat barred doesnt mean the debt disappears, its just they cant enforce the collection.

 

Send them the stat barred letter by recorded delivery and mark this one up as done and dusted :-D

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

can anyone give me the exact rule concerning this?

 

thanks

 

All the details are contained in this, it jumps around paragraphs inside so I cant copy it all out... sorry.

 

http://www.ico.gov.uk/upload/documents/library/data_protection/detailed_specialist_guides/default_tgn_version_v3%20%20doc.pdf

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I guess Rockewell is now is closed case. I called NCO on 08709030957 asking why my file has not been updated to show the debt as settled. The chap I spoke to was useless. He just said I will speak to someone and they will look into this. I insited on taking his managers name. If I have settled this debt it's a breach of the agreement if they do not update my file right?

 

Thames credit were helpful and asked me to fax the report and they will update this on line. I'll send that today or should i hold off?

 

In 2002 I lost my job, got into a lot of debt and had nowhere to live. I'm on my feet again trying to keep up with paying it al back ever since. I'm drained out with dealing with the likes of NCO.

 

So sorry with all my questions. I really am lost. Thanks for all the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just clarify this then - in most cases a Default Notice is sent by the OC as a last attempt to get you to pay. Then the alleged debt is sold/passed on to a DCA, so why is it that so many DCAs issue and record defaults on a persons CR file - often months or even years' down the line?

 

For instance, I had a default notice from an OC who, after correspondence marked my file as satisfied, then sold it on. It still shows on my credit file as satisfied. However, the DCA who purchased the alleged debt then put their own entry (difference number) on my file with a new default date (about 2 years later to be exact). I queried this and the CRA said that I had to prove it was the same debt as it showed by the OC as a loan and the DCA as a Credit Card. With no CCA provided I was not sure which it was and CRA was not interested and both are still on my file to this day!

 

We all know they do but aren't supposed to &if they do you can complain to the ICO

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought it was six years from last PAYMENT of written acknowledgement, not when they can be bothered to send a default letter? :confused:

 

Otherwise they would all be holding back the default letters until the 11th month of the 5 year.

 

 

Correct but we are assuming that no payments have been hence the default letter The default notice & the none payment must be linked usually 14 days

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...