Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help! Received text from Apex


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5210 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a text message this afternoon that reads:

 

Dear .........

 

We have been passed your account by out client. Visit https://maapex.apexcm.co.uk or call us on 0871 etc etc

 

I have no idea who has passed my account to these people and I don't intend to ring the 0871 no. Should I just wait for a letter? Is it legal to send these texts?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. I too received a text today from myapex.apexcm.co.uk today saying that my account had been passed to them by their client. I rang the number to find out what it was about and found out that it appears Egg have sold one of my accounts to them...I have two Egg accounts, both of which I have been paying a set amount to as agreed due to financial difficulties. I have done this for the past 2.5 years and never missed a payment. I have emailed Egg to find out what is going on and what is happening to the other account I have with them...no response as yet. Apex told me I have 48 hours to contact them with a detailed breakdown of my incomings/outgoings...am now really distressed about this due to information I have read about them on the internet tonight....help!:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

What even though they told me I had to do it within 48 hours? Should I wait for them to contact me in writing or should I be writing something to them? Sorry if I sound really dumb...the person I spoke to sound very official and said that Egg were quite within their rights to sell on my debt without informing me as I had broken the original credit agreement by defaulting although I haven't broken my subsequent payment plan...EVER!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replies....

 

Celbin, I too have an account with Egg, so am assuming that my text is ref to the Egg account. I am also making regular monthly payments by Standing Order and have done for over 2 years. I am now due a review with Egg and have been expecting them to get in touch with me anytime.

 

I have a letter from Egg that they sent 6 months ago confirming what my payment should be for the next 6 months and saying that they would contact me again for a review.

 

Are they able to just sell the debt like this when I have been making payments that they agreed to???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Booklover....sounds like we're in exactly the same boat! I too was told in April 2009 that they would contact me in 6 months (October 2009) to review my circumstances and as yet I have heard nothing about either account. That's what I don't understand either, I understand I broke the original agreement but I have kept to the subsequent one for the last 2.5 years so how can they sell it with no notification? It's just crap isn't it?:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What even though they told me I had to do it within 48 hours? Should I wait for them to contact me in writing or should I be writing something to them? Sorry if I sound really dumb...the person I spoke to sound very official and said that Egg were quite within their rights to sell on my debt without informing me as I had broken the original credit agreement by defaulting although I haven't broken my subsequent payment plan...EVER!

 

Wait until you get something in writing, the telephone monkey you spoke to is commission orientated and doesn't know what planet he's on let alone anything else.

 

When they do contact you start a new thread here and we'll advise, meanwhile do not speak to them on the 'phone. If they ring you tell them you will only communicate in writing and hang up. They will not commit to paper the rubbish they'll spout on the 'phone. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Certainly is crap! Egg have been really good about my financial difficulties and I have made damn sure my standing order was set up so that I never missed any payments. Egg even told me on the phone that as long as I was making the agreed payments the debt would stay with them. I'm still only assuming that this is Egg in my case, but it sounds likely.......our experiences are identical!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me too, I had my interest frozen and am now worried that these monkeys from Apex are going to start adding stupid amounts of interest to my debt, will just have to wait and see what happens I guess, let me know if you hear anything Booklover.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Celbin - again.....same here, my interest was also frozen. I owe quite a bit, so if they charge interest i am going to be getting nowhere. I'm just going to wait for a letter and if it is about my Egg account, I am likely to challenge Egg first as to why this was sold on when they were due to review my account. As it happens I could probably have stretched to pay a bit more. I'm not going to worry about it......they can't have what I havent got and I have been making regular payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing to do when they do contact you in writing is to send them a CCA request to see whether there is an enforceable agreement in place & they have the right to collect. As for adding interest and charges, if the a/c has been sold on to a DCA 99.9% of the time they cannot legally add these charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Booklover I also owed quite on both cards in total although this has come down quite a bit with the frozen interest, and that's what I'm worried about with Apex buying my debt, it will just feel like all my hard work has been for nothing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am in the same situation, received a text from Apex 2 days ago, ignored it. Received a letter today informing me that they have purchased my account and all rights interest and claims in respect of all amounts outstanding on this account (from Egg)

It is 'apparently' imperative that I contact them regarding the existing arrangement I have with Egg, in order to set up a new arrangement.

I will send them the same letter I sent to Egg when I set up the new arrangement with them.

I was wondering how much they purchased my account for, can I request this info under the freedom of information act?

If I go to there website they seem keen for me to pay off the whole debt by making a reduced offer. https://myapex.apexcm.co.uk/settlements anyone know the lowest offer these peoiple might accept?

 

Jeremy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...