Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs beared to you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) basically saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
    • Hi Dave, I had no updates on this PCN since my last post in July 2019.  I received no further communications from the parking company.  I changed my address in May 2022. Thanks, I will send a letter to Excel parking to inform about the change in the address. 
    • I have a BMW Advanced Car Eye 3 Pro - I think it's 50/50  In any case, none of the documents / photos sent in the SAR showed a ticket on the car. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Incapacity Benefit: DWP appealing the tribunal's decision?


ee-bee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi i`v just found this forum so not sure where to start,i received a letter today telling me my is had stopped 4 days ago,and i`m at a total loss as what to do now,i`v got spondylitus,in the spine and neck,and i was asked stupid questions like can i answer the phone!where would i find out about a welfare rights worker,many thanks

hi all, well i went to my appeal on tuesday and won,i was awarded 20 points instead of the 3 i originally got,great news i thought,except today i received a letter off thejobcentre plus saying they have requested a full statement of the tribunals reasons for this decision, this means that implementation of the tribunals decision will be suspended while an appeal to the commissioner is considered,i`m so upset and worried,has this happened to any one else on here

ee-bee

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

They will be requesting a statement of reasons for the decision so they can see exactly why the decision was made; If they believe the first tier tribunal has erred on a point of law, they can apply for permission to appeal to the commisioner. They have one month from the date of the decision to request a statement of reasons and a further month to apply for permission to appeal from when the statement of reasons were sent to them.

 

If they do submit a request leave to appeal, to the upper tier will decide whether the DWP appeal can go ahead.

 

Whilst this is being considered, they can suspend any payment due as a result of the first tier tribunal's decision.

 

They can only appeal to the upper tribunal on a point of law, not on findings of fact or the first tier's medical findings.

 

I have moved your post to its own thread to attract more traffic.

  • Haha 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're not "thick". You just don't know what it means, that doesn't mean you're thick. Don't put yourself down.

 

It means there is an error in the way they have applied the law to a case.

 

When a decision to award benefit or decline benefit is made, it is made in accordance with the law that has been set for that particular benefit.

 

So if the DWP feel that the tribunal has wrongly interperated the law or feel the law should be further clarified, they appeal to the upper tribunal.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

i have received the statement of reasons from the tribunal, so i assume the dwp have received theres as well, i`v spoke to my representative and he`s also received one,everything seems okay in the statement but we`ll have to wait and see,i`m assuming they have a month now to decide what their going to do? god its like waiting for christmas:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

well its now been 2 weeks since the the statement of reasons was issued,i`m getting really frustrated ,waiting for the post every day,i`m begining to think this is going to be a very long drawn out appeal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

Same thing is happening to me with the DLA appeal I won. I,m on a countdown and will contact Tribunal Service a couple of days after the month has expired and if an appeal has not been lodged in time things will get interesting.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Cheers MelissaTeddyBear

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

Same thing is happening to me with the DLA appeal I won. I,m on a countdown and will contact Tribunal Service a couple of days after the month has expired and if an appeal has not been lodged in time things will get interesting.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Cheers MelissaTeddyBear

i`m gutted, i thought it was only me it had happened too,it seems its quite an unusual thing for dwp to do,when is your 4 week dead line?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

 

The statement of reasons is dated 2/11/09 so I think that the decision maker has to get the appeal in to the tribunal service by 2/12/09. I contacted Tribunal Service and they said that if an appeal by DWP was received late then it would be very unlikely for a late appeal to be admitted.

They tell me it is quite rare for an appeal to be made to the Upper Tier Tribunal after a Statement of Reasons has been issued but each case is individual therefore there are no guarantees.

 

My claim was made in March this year so I will complain of maladministration. The RNID website says most hearing impaired people get turned down with the initial application for DLA and most are successful on appeal but the DWP no not seem to want to learn. Probably the money saved on refusing applications outweighs the cost of appeals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my case has been a nightmare from beginning to now,first in feb i lost my pca,was given only 3 points,then when asked to look again at my case they said it had gone for re-work as there was a discrepancy with the points,then after several phone calls by me because of the time it was taking they admitted they had lost my file!!a copy was issued to the dm and then they found my file,i ended up with 2 lots of appeal papers,its been one horrible year and i feel like giving up on the whole thing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee,

 

Sounds like you have had a lot to contend with. Sometimes you might imagine the DWP searching for reasons to refer your case to an Upper Tier Tribunal and putting a lot of time and effort in to that. In reality the DWP is understaffed and under resourced to properly do the volume of work they have to process and often in arrears with work. Therefore if you have not heard anything by the end of one month from the date of the statement of reasons it is probably sitting in a pile of work to be processed.

Give up after what you have already achieved getting the tribunal to overturn the DM's decision. Not on your nelly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the support,my statement of reasons was issued on the 4th nov,but because i`v not heard of anyone else having this problem i`v took it quite personal and yes your right i visulize them spending hours trying to find a reason not to give me my money,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello ee-bee

 

Goes from 1st November to 1st Dec. Goes from date sent rather than date received.

 

You may find the following useful :-

 

www.appeals-service.gov.uk/

Left of page How to appeal Guidance on how ....

Click How to a appeal leaflet

Page 30.

 

The leaflet and website give a good background to the appeals process.

 

No post today.

 

All the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, thanks for the link,no post here either,i`m sure one of these days someone will go to the papers or press about these medicals,etc,there must be hundreds of appeals going on,it has to be costing someone somewhere a lot of money

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a look around CAG, you'll find lots of people complaining about these medicals, some are taking action.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:-?What kind of action weneed to take?

 

Alf:roll:

 

That's a good question. If some people are trying to take matters further it would be good to know. I'd certainly volunteer to help. There are two things that appall me.

Firstly, the low standard of the Atos medical assessment. They had no equipment to assess pulmonary disease, therefore no means to figure out how it would affect my work capabilities.

And secondly, having read all my tribunal papers from the DWP, it is so biased against people like myself who feel they can do some work but just need that bit of extra support.

I will confess to being very annoyed at not getting that extra £25pw premium. Not a lot to someone on fulltime work, but a life changing sum to me. And, lets be honest - should any member of the Government be reading this - it's not as if you're going to have to pay me a state pension, my lungs are saving you money in the long term! :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a look around by typing ATOS into the search facility to see posts on the subject. You will also find plenty of stories by googling. If you want to discuss this though, please start a new thread in the appropriate subforum rather than cloud over this member's thread, where advice is being sought on the appeals process.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...