Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tenant car clamping on private property.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5278 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know where a tenant stands legally if her car is towed from parking space that is part of the property in which she is living as a tenant? Our landlord recently decided to contract out a car clamping company but already they clamped our car even though we live here. They released the clamp, but now it's got me worried. Private clampers are not regulated as far as I know and could clamp or tow the car any time they like. I have a permit from the landowner but judging by what I've read about private land/car clamping, the permit doesn't mean anything - these clampers can still do what they like on private land because they're operating outside the traffic act.

 

So, does anyone know what my rights as a tenant are regarding car clamping on the site where I live? I would have thought that nobody can clamp or tow the car (permit or not) if I live there and can prove I live there.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You are right, unless there is something specific in your lease about displaying permits etc. You're also right that clampers operate in their own worlds! If they did tow your car I imagine you'd probably have to pay then claim the money back. Remember clamping / towing is a remedy for trespass, which is a tort against the landowner. Therefore, if your car is ever clamped or towed when it shouldn't be, the landowner is liable to refund your money. Always go after them rather than the clamping company, as they will probably ignore all your letters, and even the court judgement if you did obtain one against them.

 

My car was clamped in my parking space, and the landowners agreed to pay up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses.

 

You are right, unless there is something specific in your lease about displaying permits

There is nothing specific in the agreement about permits. Although I don't think the contract will be amended.

 

Just one further question.

 

Isn't it true that a landowner cannot have 'trespass to land' against their own tenant living under tenancy agreement at the property? Surely this means the landowner is liable if the tenant's car is clamped/towed on the property as the tenant has not committed an offence, regardless of permits?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Landlord/agent Has An Obligation To Make Sure All Of The Tennants Have Received A Parking Permit Prior To Engaging A Clamping Firm

 

Do Me A Favour

 

Can You Post Up The Name Of This Clamping Firm

 

They Have To Be Sis Registered, Ill Check Them Out

 

Also If PoSS

 

Can You Take A Photo Of One Of The Clamping Signs

 

Yet To See A Compliant One

Link to post
Share on other sites

They Have To Be Sis Registered, Ill Check Them Out

I think you mean SIA registered.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct - a tenant cannot trespass on their landlord's land (that is to say, the bit they rent) because they are paying rent to be there!

 

Thanks; that's what I thought.

 

You have a right to peaceful enjoyment.

 

Mmm, I wonder if worrying constantly that your car is going to be towed away from the property whenever you're there means you're not enjoying the tenancy in peace!

 

Postggj, I think the firm is SIA registered. They are called parkingcontrolservices.co.uk. Their signs are pretty basic: a phone number, a threat, a fee (more than £75) for clamp removal, but no address. Also mentions that blue badge holders can be clamped/towed - surely that isn't legal.

 

Since they already clamped without reason, I have reason not to trust them.

Edited by Housefish
Link to post
Share on other sites

The company's website looks authentic, until you visit other clamping companies and discover that all of the wording used is identical. It's as if they have cut and pasted the wording from other sites. Perhaps they have.

Car Park Security Solutions - F & M Security Ltd -

Uk Parking Management

City Watch Parking Enforcement

Parking Control Services - Solutions To Your Parking Problems

 

All the above sites, and many more like them, contain identical wording (not just the dubious legalities but the entire site text!).

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could well be the case that your landlord just wanted a company to patrol the car park, and got fooled by the 'reputable' look of the clamper's website etc. If you gather some evidence of their misconduct (usually not to difficult to find!) and send it to the landowner with a letter explaining why you don't feel safe with these cowboys about, he may get rid of them. Make sure you point out the landowner will be liable for any of their spurious attempts to extort money out of tenants!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask advice from the rent officer at your local council. You are entitled to ‘peaceful enjoyment’ of your property. If your landlord or ‘his agents’ commit acts that interfere with, or should know, will effect your peaceful enjoyment then your landlord may be guilty of harassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Housefish,

 

Have a read of the clamping guide in the stickies section at the top of this forum. You can verify SIA licensing on the SIA website: www.thesia.org.uk.

 

A couple of points to make:

 

You have signed a contract with your landlord (i.e. a lease or rental agreement).

 

Does your contract include specific about a parking space. Does it mention anything about permits?

 

If it does include a specific parking space and nothing about permits then your landlord is trying to enforce a unilateral contract change on you. This is a complete no-no. You are within your rights "to enjoy your tenancy without harrassment" and to refuse a unilateral contract change.

 

Clamping is a remedy for trespass and is dependent on implied consent. You could write to the landlord and the clampers withdrawing your consent for them to clamp you. However as you already have permission from the landlord (via your lease or rental agreement) to be there you can't be shown to be trespassing regardless of the display of any permit. In my view you would be completely within your rights to use a self-help remedy if you were clamped (i.e. bolt cutter or an angle-grinder).

 

Whether you want to be bound by a permit scheme is up to you but I would advise you to do one or all of the following

 

 

  1. Contact your landlord and tell him that you either accept or reject his permit scheme.
  2. Advise him that you will expect an immediate and full rebate of any release fee paid should your vehicle be clamped.
  3. Advise him that if your vehicle is clamped, you will be seeking damages for trespass, harassment and loss of enjoyment of the property.

You don't need to be confrontational. A polite discussion will probably achieve more. However I would put all of the above in writing as well and send it via recorded delivery. That way he cannot claim to be ignorant of your stand point.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Our landlord recently decided to contract out a car clamping company but already they clamped our car even though we live here. They released the clamp, but now it's got me worried.

 

Just wondering why did they clamp you (not that they seem to need a reason)?

 

Did they release you without you having to pay? It's very unlike them!

 

Good luck with it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, look all companys start small, as mine did, at home but as it has grown it has moved, yes i still live at my previous address. I have nothing to hide, as the company has grown as we do the enforcement process correctly and legally, of course some of you feel unhappy but the signage is clear, the fees are deemed reasonable, all of this has been decided by many judges in case law over many years. Simple solution read and obey the signs. Oh and yes our operatives are SIA VI lisenced, we have insurance, and valid ICO etc etc,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wondering why did they clamp you (not that they seem to need a reason)?

 

Did they release you without you having to pay? It's very unlike them!

 

Good luck with it all.

 

I have no idea if they made the landlord pay to release the clamps. All I know is, we all (the tenants) complained to the landlord and the clamps were released within about three hours.

 

The landlord set up the parking restriction to stop neighbours and neighbours' visitors parking in our spaces overnight and at weekends. If the clampers end up clamping and towing us (the tenants) then the landlord will cancel the contract with them.

Edited by Housefish
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, look all companys start small, as mine did, at home but as it has grown it has moved, yes i still live at my previous address. I have nothing to hide, as the company has grown as we do the enforcement process correctly and legally, of course some of you feel unhappy but the signage is clear, the fees are deemed reasonable, all of this has been decided by many judges in case law over many years. Simple solution read and obey the signs. Oh and yes our operatives are SIA VI lisenced, we have insurance, and valid ICO etc etc,

 

Well then a little common sense goes a long way. Don't clamp tenants' cars on a site you're being employed to patrol on behalf of the tenants or you're just shooting yourself in the foot. PCS are supposed to be patrolling the site for us (the tenants) not working against us, otherwise what's the point?

Exercise a little discretion.

 

By the way, I don't believe the post is from anybody at PCS.

Edited by Housefish
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, look all companys start small, as mine did, at home but as it has grown it has moved, yes i still live at my previous address. I have nothing to hide, as the company has grown as we do the enforcement process correctly and legally, of course some of you feel unhappy but the signage is clear, the fees are deemed reasonable, all of this has been decided by many judges in case law over many years. Simple solution read and obey the signs. Oh and yes our operatives are SIA VI lisenced, we have insurance, and valid ICO etc etc,

 

So if I put up a sign on your land, I can charge you £££s if you don't obey it? Rubbish.

Post by me are intended as a discussion of the issues involved, as these are of general interest to me and others on the forum. Although it is hoped such discussion will be of use to readers, before exposing yourself to risk of loss you should not rely on any principles discussed without confirming the situation with a qualified person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...