Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update! I emailed both Andrzej.Tuleja and James_Goldsmith at Whirlpool dot com. I got a phone call from their executive team a couple of days later, and a replacement part dropped on the mat a week after. She was quite apologetic, however, also reiterated the "90 day warranty" period on customer fitted parts, and did not comment when I mentioned that the CRA also applies as I was a consumer buying from them directly. So I now have a spare door switch if the machine decides to eat another in the future! Cheers all!   Note dx100 that the "Hotpoint CEO" you linked to is not related to the hotpoint appliances, but some kind of marketing app.
    • yep, throw that morality card out the window....9/10 you never owe a DCA ANYTHING!! they are NOT BAILIFFS!!
    • (See the link to DVLA’s INF188/6 document I posted above, page 4 as cited) “I have a new medical condition that I have told the DVLA about on my recent application. Can I drive? As soon as the DVLA receives your correct and complete application for a new licence and as long as you meet all the Section 88 criteria, you may drive. It is important that you are satisfied that the medical condition you have declared on your application does not stop you from driving. If you are unsure, check with your doctor or healthcare professional before you make a decision. You can also look up your condition in the ‘Assessing fitness to drive’ guide, which you can find at www.gov.uk/dvla/fitnesstodrive to see whether you meet the medical standards for driving. As this guide is intended for healthcare professionals, it can be complicated. Your doctor or healthcare professional should be able to help you if necessary." It seems that DVLA think that S.88 does apply for applications disclosing a new medical condition after all. Why might this be so, and what of “qualifying application" and "relevant disability"? S. 92(1) imposes on the driver a requirement to disclose a relevant disability. S.92(3) requires the Secretary of State to refuse such an application disclosing a relevant disability ….. EXCEPT S.92(4) requires the Secretary of State to grant such an application if the relevant disability is “adequately controlled”. Hence my belief S.88 can apply for medical conditions (if the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive) as the application remains a qualifying application IF the driver meets the medical standard of fitness to drive, until DVLA (on behalf of the Secretary of State) say it doesn’t, provided the driver believes they meet the (medical) standard. Additionally, at (or before) June 2013 (as noted in my previous post) the medical standard for fitness to drive for conditions involving excessive daytime sleepiness was changed from “completely controlled” to "adequately controlled".  
    • CFO Bill Guan allegedly led a team at the news outlet that was behind a global money laundering scheme.View the full article
    • Anyway, I've asked my Booking.com flat-rent-out-bloke what needs to be done on the Booking.com portal to cancel a reservation. I got a late message "I'll let you know tomorrow".
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How to stop automated sales messages on home phone?


Happyfeet24
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4404 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

We get Churchwood finance calling twice a day every day with an automated message about debt consolidation.

 

We've only had our phone line 4 weeks, provided by Sky, and apart from family, Sky are the only people who have our number, so I guess they very kindly sold it to this odd Churchwood company.

 

Anyway, that's neither here nor there, what I would like to know is how can I get them to stop calling? we are ex directory for all the good it seems to have done. The automated message says to press 5 to speak to an adviser, but after speaking to a friend they told me to be careful doing that as it will verify my number as ok to call? doesn't make much sense to me as if I need to verify it to be ok, then why are they ringing before I have done so?

 

So, should I press 5 and ask the advisor to remove my number from their system (honestly hold little faith in that working) or should I contact Sky to ask for that number to be blocked from getting through to me? (not sure if that service exists?) or is there some other way to get them to stop calling?

Capquest - No cca yet - OC sent what they think is a CCA - account on hold - no contact since

 

Lewis - Lost their tongue after cca request:roll: -

Now in default of my CCA request - still no contact since:D

 

Fredrickson - No cca yet - Now in default of my request - now stopped contact with me:rolleyes: **UPDATE** April - Sent back £1 p/o and gave up!!!!!!!!!!

 

1ST Credit - CCA request sent - now stopped contact with me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Churchwood will have had the number passed to them from an online application, rather than from Sky. What you need to do is contact Sky and ask them for another new number, they are obliged to give you one as you are getting these calls regularly.

 

We've always been so careful with this number since getting it, the only online application we've done was for sky itself but the number didn't exist at that point. Frustrating, thankfully as it's only family with the number then changing it wont cause many problems. Should I tell Sky the reason why I want to change it and give them Churchwoods' name and number?

Capquest - No cca yet - OC sent what they think is a CCA - account on hold - no contact since

 

Lewis - Lost their tongue after cca request:roll: -

Now in default of my CCA request - still no contact since:D

 

Fredrickson - No cca yet - Now in default of my request - now stopped contact with me:rolleyes: **UPDATE** April - Sent back £1 p/o and gave up!!!!!!!!!!

 

1ST Credit - CCA request sent - now stopped contact with me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Truecall will do everything. Record, screen, manage, - everything.

 

Get it cheap through us. We make nothing on the deal. We only want to encourage people to record their calls and to take back ownership of their telephones

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had one of those expensive bed companies silently ring us the other day. As it was an 0800 number, I rang them back and a gents voice said xx beds, can I help you to which I replied, 'I am just returning your annoying silent call, now f off', and put the phone down on him.

 

I may be abrasive, but I am getting fed up with them and have taken to using foul and abusive words to all of them. It does seem to work though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

join TPS

takes a few weeks but they all stop eventually

if they dont.

you send them the time & number and they do something about it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep i know

i got my first bt line last oct [was and still am cable but this is business line]

within 3 days all my 5 numbers were being bombarded by these calls...thanks bt!

 

tps worked though.

by xmas they went.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely joining the mail preference service will, after a while, stop the problem. Probably.

 

Unlikely. However the Telephone Preference Service might have more going for it. :)

 

I dislike Truecall as it forces the caller into having their call 'answered' by the machine, whether it is dealt with or not. Speaking with the firm directly is always the most direct solution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I've been registered with the TPS for years. It probably stops some of the firms who are prepared to respect the privacy of telephone customers, but the less scrupulous operators don't seem to be bothered. This is because, as far as I am aware, the TPS takes little or no action with respect to complaints referred to it.

In latter years these "clever" operators have started to claim that it is NOT illegal to make calls to TPS protected numbers with regards to SURVEYS. Thus they call my number asking if I will take part in a "short" survey and if I bother to take part in it they will soon be asking me why I am not using their bl**dy product or service. Like everyone else, my only defence is to give such callers short shrift, but occasioanlly I can have fun by giving them ridiculous answers to their stupid surveys and when they come around to the punch line of asking me why I am not using so-and-so they belatedly realise that my answers to their questions make it obvious that their product is totally unsuitable for my use, based on the supplied answers. Occasionally their "squirming" on the telephone can provide amusement - but only occasionally.

 

P.P.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had Truecall for a couple of months, and have seen even attempts at getting through fall to almost zero. In fact, I'm wondering whether there is an industry list being circulated of telephone numbers which have the unit attached, because whereas I was getting one or two survey calls a day, my telephone records are now showing one a fourtnight if that

MBNA - Agreed to refund £970 in full without conditions. Cheque received Sat 5th Aug.:D

Lloyds - Settled for an undisclosed sum.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing to mention is that phone numbers are re-used. It could be that your new number was used before and that was when the company got the number.

 

Seconded. Ever since we got our new phone number, we get more phone calls for a woman called Tracey than we do for ourselves - business and personal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

An epetition has been raised to make these illegal :-D. See the E petition section of this site and the thread..

Make automated phone calls to private numbers illegal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, can I ask for your support to go to the Epetition site and sign up. I know in theory you have to get to 100,000 signatures for it to be discussed in parliament, but the reality is if you get enough interest some government adviser tasked with finding popular initiatives may decide to propose it. There are so many people who moan about things but will not move a muscle to do anything about it, you just being on a forum like this show your interest in fighting for consumer justice. Find the epetition page and email it to like minded friends. Thanks:-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unluckily being a newby to these forums the system prevents me putting a link here. But I just got to the epetition section of this forum, and my post that does have a link, by using the search box at the top right of the page (not the search the web one) and puting in "epetition phone calls" and it brought up 2 items the second being my post with the link. Alternatively I went to Google and entered "Make automated phone calls to private numbers illegal" and the epetition came up second on the list (end of the epetition address has 33439 as the number). Thanks for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...