Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They couldn't afford to cut the NI level - having to borrow to do it - which breaks common sense rules let alone fiscal rules Unc   .. and thats just based on what we know of their fiscal incompetence, let alone any hidden costs
    • Interesting question regarding what Government accounts opposition parties have access to, before an General Election. From what I understand, Government department accounts that are published are always lagging behind and would not include some amounts which are classified as 'commercially sensitive'.  Therefore opposition parties and Parliamentrary select committees would not have access to accounts which contain real time up to date information. If a new Government have found £20 billion of spending liabilities they did not know about, this could be true, as £20 billion is not that much when you look at total Government expenditure. Government department are making decisions on spending all of the time and it could be the previous Government were planning tax changes and/or spending cuts to balance the books.  Jeremy Hunt has recently said that if the Tories had stayed in Government and held an Autumn budget, it would have been very difficult to cut taxes as some had wanted.
    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have been caught shoplifting at Sainsburys few weeks ago. Today I have received letter from DWF.

Im so scared and I have not been sleeping for the last few weeks and now I dont even know what to do.

Do I pay just to have a peace of mind in case I will be the unlucky once and will have to go to the court?

I have been advised to pay £150 for the security cost.

The value of good recovered was £65.

Please help me to understand what best going forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't pay. Don't do it again. If this is something that you find yourself doing then you should try and speak to a family member even though it could be embarrassing but it is important to start confiding in someone you trust.

I could also think about chatting to your GP about it.

Have a look at the other threads on this forum involving this company DWF and the advice given in respect of them.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

yep ignore everything

nothing no-one can do.

its a scam to make money out of people.

ignore

ignore

then ignore again.

dx

 

 

clickme ^^^^^

and read our threads

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you ever so much for your quick response, very appreciate that. I just feel sick and scared to death.

I will never ever do it again that's for sure.

 How many mire letters I will receive before they give up? And how I would know that this is the last letter from them?

Thank you

Best regards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you dont.

but it doesnt matter shred them or give them to your hamster.

dx

 

  • Thanks 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im extremely embarrassed to say that before I got caught in Sainsburys ( I done it only once at Sainsburys) I used to steal small things like fruits, vegs. etc from Extra Tesco when I did weekly shopping to reduce the cost.

I have been stopped by the security once but he never took my details he just took the items and told me not to come back for 3 months.

I have been reading that shops do their own investigation and collect the evidence of the shoplifters and when they have enough evidence they pass it to the police. IS THAT TRUE?

After I got caught at Sainsburys I haven't stole anything and I will never do it again as it was literally my Big wake up call.

I have not been sleeping as Im thinking if Tesco security have seen me stealing and just let me go without stopping me at the exit.

Any response would help to have better understanding.

Thank you in advance.

Kind regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, tennisroll said:

I have been reading that shops do their own investigation and collect the evidence of the shoplifters and when they have enough evidence they pass it to the police. IS THAT TRUE?

dunno where you are getting that from but its total BS...

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose security can’t do much if you steal a bag of carrots for example but if you do 100 times then value is higher and police can get involved? That’s why security let shoplifters to steal just to build up the high value of goods and in that case they can pass it to the Police. Security can get your details from check out points from the Tesco club cards? I guess police unlikely turn up if stolen valuable is les than £20 as example ?

im just panicking as I know I’m in a wrong for doing over and over until I really got caught.

thank you 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What you say about security isn't our experience here, I have to say. I don't think the police will get involved but you have to stop this now. If you're caught again, it's quite possible the police will be involved.

As we've said, talk to your GP about this and figure out why you've been stealing. If you're tempted again, remember how you're feeling now and don't do it.

HB

  • Thanks 1

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Honeybee 13.

if no one here has experience on security that leads me to think that it’s actually possible that shops do that kind of evidence building pass before they pass onto police.

I have stopped shoplifting and also seeking for a help but in the mean time I can’t just stop thinking and panicking that police will knock on my door one day

Regards 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I can't agree with you about security building evidence like that, we've never seen it here. Yes, secirity could remember you on subsequent occasions of stealing but that something different. We did have someone here who worked in security but they haven't posted recently.

I'm not sure what else we can say to you. It could be that you have to live with how you feel about what you did for a time, until the feeling fades. I'm sorry if this sounds harsh, but actions have consequences, as you've discovered.

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...