Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mbna Cca Not Received Offered Settle


yousef1973
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5347 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I Have A Mbna Credit Card, 2 Weeks Ago They Agreed Settlement 30%, Then When They Spoke To Their Supervisor, He Refused It.

They Told Me He Wont Take Less Than 35%.

Then When They Rang Me I Told Them I Cant Afford That, They Told Me To Borrow The Money, Anyway To Honour That Percentage I Must Make A Payment For £306 Today And We Will Then Send The Settlement Letter.without The £306 Paid Today Over The Phone,the Settlement Figure Will Be Removed.

So I Left It I Did Not Bother. Week Later I Rang Them, They Told Me They Would Call Me Back, But Never Did.

 

Anyway On 1 September I Sent Out An Officail Letter Requesting My Cca With £1 Postal Order. I Have Not Received The Agreement. But Got A Call Today. I Asked About My Contract, He Asks Why I Need It, People Only Ask For That When They Are Not Willing To Pay. I Asid Never Mind That, Send Me My Agreement And We Will Take It From Their. Anywaynow He Was Willing To Accept All Terms And Accept 30% And The Letter Will Be Sent To Me Next Week And Will State Debt Settled In Full.

 

What Should I Do, Shall Accept The 30% Settlement As The Debt Is £22000, Please Someone Advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

What Should I Do, Shall Accept The 30% Settlement As The Debt Is £22000, Please Someone Advice

 

No chance!:mad:

 

Clearly they have agreed to the settlement figure because they either can't find or have an unenforceable CCA.

 

Stick to your guns, you have asked them to supply you with the CCA if after 12+2 days they have not supplied you with an enforceable CCA then you can legally withhold all or any payment, until such time that they do.

 

Do not speak to them over the phone unless you are able to record your phone conversations, his flippant remark that "only people who ask for a CCA are those that won't pay" is just the tip of the iceberg if you continue to allow them to speak to you over the phone.

Keep everything in writing only, that way then you will have a paper trail of evidence if needed.

 

When was the Card taken out??

Was it over the internet??

In store??

Through a leaflet/paper/magazine??

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Think It Was Taken Out In 1996 Probably A Magazine, Not Totally Sure. I Know For A Fact When I Was Speaking To Him, He Said His Manager Declined The Offer.i Said I Am Not Bothered I Want My Agreement, And He Stated That It Is Not Possible To Write Of Debt.

So I Replied Dont Be Silly My Friend I Have Checked Numerous Things And Spoken To Right People,,,debts Have Been Settled For A Small Amount Or Been Written Of. So I Want My Cca. Kept Sayin Why Do You Want That, So I Said I Will Tell You When I Get It And Stated You Have 12+2 Days. He Said They Got The Letter On The 9th, So I Says Stop Lying I Have Proof That Is Was Signed For On 2nd Sept.

 

So He Tells , Thats Not How It Works Days Start From When It Reaches The Right Department.

 

I Replied I Am Not Bothered You Have 14 Days.

 

So He Says What Do You Want To Do.

 

I Said I Offered You 30% You Declined Now I Have No Option.

 

So He Says Not To Worry I Will Get That Letter Out To You Next Week.

 

My Concern Now Is Should I Aim For A Lower Percentage Or Go For A Total Right Off?

 

What Do You Advice???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well as you rightly pointed out to him, they have 12 days to supply you with the CCA from the 2nd, so if they fail to respond by Tuesday then you should send them the 'Account in dispute' letter.

 

Also, having had another read of your post, has there been a period of 6 years where you haven't paid them anything, or even acknowledged to them in writing that you owe them money??

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok not to worry, I was thinking of the Statute Barred route, but won't matter as you have been a good lad and been paying them;)

 

Are there any charges that they have applied to the account?

I am quietly confident that as this account goes back 11 years then they won't have the relevant documentation, and certainly won't have it in order!

 

See if they comply with the CCA request, scan and post whatever they send you, removing all of your personal details, address, account number, bar codes, etc etc.

 

Once they go past the deadline then you can legally stop all payments to them, I have a hunch that they will fail to produce a legally enforceable CCA and you won't have to pay them another penny:-D

 

But lets not count our chickens before the eggs have hatched!

 

 

 

Boo;)

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion 30% is too high to settle (I aim for 15% on the assumption that the DCAs bought the debt for 10% and 50% is a big enough profit for them).

 

That said, if you decide 30% is ok then ENSURE you do the following:

 

  1. Ensure there is a document IN WRITING setting out the terms of the settlement - signed by them;
  2. Get the settlement money paid by a THIRD PARTY (someone else writes the cheque or transfers the funds). Don't pay yourself;
  3. Account must show a £0 balance after you have paid;
  4. Account must be reported to CRA as PAID IN FULL or some other designation tha let's others know it was paid off TOTALLY;
  5. Ideally, ANY reference to this account ever existing is removed from your credit file;
  6. The debt/file is NOT sold or transferred to anyone else (often a DCA trick is to "settle" for X%, THEY agree not to chase you for the balance - and then they transfer the account to another DCA and THAT DCA then chases you.

I may have forgotten something, but you ned to be careful to ensure that by paying them it is the END of it. You have NO REASON to pay them IF they do not have a LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT. The only reason to pay them is because you can improve/rehabilitate your credit record etc. Otherwise, why bother?

 

If you pay them 30% they will have made a profit of 2X their investment in the file. You have effecitvely given them a profit for harassing you!

 

Like you, I am (reluctantly) willing to settle if no CCA - but only if I get something in return

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that. This account is still with mbna, and not with any debt agency.

 

He told me that the letter will be sent out to me stating the agreed amount, the rest written off and that the debt is satisfied in full and no other company chase you for it.

 

On the credit report it will state the partially settled and rest written off.

 

I have this feeling, when this letter comes its going to state that we agreed at 35%...too high.

 

obviously I will write back and state that is too high and no percentage agreed and only offering £5000 in full...they already know that amount will be paid by my uncle.

 

what do you think, obviously i will do what advice is given to me on these forums.

 

as for crefit report that is already ruined, defaults from all lenders etc.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like you are getting closer. I would ask to see a DRAFT of the actual letter before you send money. It is likely that they will tell you the letter wil say one thing, but it will actually say another. Once you have paid you have lost your bargaining power.

 

Also, if they have NO CCA and you are NOT INTERESTED in using this settlement opportunity to (at least partially) rehabilitate your credit rating, then, WHY are you proposing to settle with them??

 

How are YOU better off by settling than by not settling??

 

For me, the ONLY reason to settle is to try to get my credit report cleared up. If I did not want to do that,iwoudl not pay anyone.

 

Anyway, your call at the end of the day but thoght to raise the issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the Voltium case a few times before this. One thing that bothers me, is (I) account in dspute (ii) you send them a cheque in F&F (ii) you tell them it is F&F and (iv) they cash it. Don;t they have a way out in that, AFTER cashing the cheque, they WITHIN A REASNABLE PERIOD tell you the pament is NOT accepted in F&F.

 

Therefore, they have your money (ouch!) and you have no F&F.

 

I had been clear (by maybe wrong) that IF the money came from a third party, and the cheque is cashed, then THAT IS IT and they cannot EVER claim not in F&F.

 

Is this all a correct understanding?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya im subbing with interest

 

hoping you get this settled soon

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

My head is like a box of frogs today!

 

But as I understand it, when you give them a F&F offer, you should really get written confirmation from them that they will accept the F&F payment and will not take any further action.

 

If they fail to provide the evidence of a CCA, then you are in a much stronger position as you can put the account into dispute, and make them an offer of around 15% or less, reminding them that as they are unable to take any legally enforceable action they would be wise to accept the offer, or receive nothing!

 

 

Boo;)(the morning after the night before:()

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

always always always ask tem to put the f anf f in writing before making payment

 

always make sure it will be marked on your CF settled in full and or any adverse data is removed and that they or no other company will seek for a payment towards the debt and that you are fully discharged from it,(if you need a template just sout)

 

you could send them a letter with these details offering full and final and await them confirming in writing back that tis will be accepeted

 

one thing is if they do not have a cca the debt is not wiped and it still exisits. this means that you are not obligied to make any payment twards ituntl they do produce a valid cca.

 

if you want to get rid and clear your CF them a f af f isthey way to go

 

ida ;) (the night after the night before and the night before the morning after) :p

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In my opinion 30% is too high to settle (I aim for 15% on the assumption that the DCAs bought the debt for 10% and 50% is a big enough profit for them).

 

That said, if you decide 30% is ok then ENSURE you do the following:

 

  1. Ensure there is a document IN WRITING setting out the terms of the settlement - signed by them;
  2. Get the settlement money paid by a THIRD PARTY (someone else writes the cheque or transfers the funds). Don't pay yourself;
  3. Account must show a £0 balance after you have paid;
  4. Account must be reported to CRA as PAID IN FULL or some other designation tha let's others know it was paid off TOTALLY;
  5. Ideally, ANY reference to this account ever existing is removed from your credit file;
  6. The debt/file is NOT sold or transferred to anyone else (often a DCA trick is to "settle" for X%, THEY agree not to chase you for the balance - and then they transfer the account to another DCA and THAT DCA then chases you.

I may have forgotten something, but you ned to be careful to ensure that by paying them it is the END of it. You have NO REASON to pay them IF they do not have a LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT. The only reason to pay them is because you can improve/rehabilitate your credit record etc. Otherwise, why bother?

 

If you pay them 30% they will have made a profit of 2X their investment in the file. You have effecitvely given them a profit for harassing you!

 

Like you, I am (reluctantly) willing to settle if no CCA - but only if I get something in return

 

Good luck

 

nothing wrong with this advice- however- full and final settlement means what it says and there is no court that would countenance the so called "trick" of passing the remainder of the debt on to a third party to claim against you

 

so long as the agreement says that the payment is in full and final settlement of all matters outstanding between you then this is sufficient

Link to post
Share on other sites

STILL NO SETTLEMENT LETTER OF CCA FROM MBNA

 

GOT ANOTHER LETTER FROM THEM TELLING ME AS FOLLOWS :

 

Dera Mr xxxx

Your credit card account is now seriously arrears and the time is running out.

Your outstanding credit card balance is now xxxx. You must call your allocated account manager on 01244 629946 before 9pm. Please beware that a default is due to be registered on your credit file shortly. Should we seek a County court Judgment against you, this may result in the following actions

 

attachement of earnings

charging order

 

We could still help with your debt, by a reduced payment programme.

Alternatively I may still allow you to make a significantly reduced settlement of your balance.

 

We can only help if you respond to this letter toady before 9pm.

 

Yours sincerely.

 

THEY HAVE STILL NOT SENT CCA.16 DAYS HAVE PASSED.

 

DOES THIS LETTER REQUIRE ANY ACTION ?????

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have read the Voltium case a few times before this. One thing that bothers me, is (I) account in dspute (ii) you send them a cheque in F&F (ii) you tell them it is F&F and (iv) they cash it. Don;t they have a way out in that, AFTER cashing the cheque, they WITHIN A REASNABLE PERIOD tell you the pament is NOT accepted in F&F.

 

Therefore, they have your money (ouch!) and you have no F&F.

 

I had been clear (by maybe wrong) that IF the money came from a third party, and the cheque is cashed, then THAT IS IT and they cannot EVER claim not in F&F.

 

Is this all a correct understanding?

 

no, you cannot force a settlement on anyone

 

sending someone a part payment of what they claim you owe will simply result in them seizing the payment on account

 

you do not complete a full and final settlement UNTIL you have their written acceptance of your terms of settlement

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them the account in dispute letter:http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/571-failiure-to-provide-a-copy-of-the-agreement-within-the-prescribed-timescale

They are out of time, and this may focus their efforts on actually producing a valid CCA or entering into a F&F discussion.

 

Once they have received this letter they are unable to proceed with any collection activity and this includes trashing your credit file, fire it off pronto if you haven't done so already, remember, print your name don't sign and send it recorded!

 

 

Boo:wink:

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

one call yesterday, another call today. they want to settle the debt for 35%.

i wold him that is too high offer me lower.

 

he states his manager wont budge, below 35%. They would get more from a debt agency.

 

so i said i cant offer that amount as it is too high.

 

still no contract copy, he said that is requested and will be in post very soon.

 

as this account is now in dispute.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...