Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

No Food


jack1966
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5351 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

near enough no food left in this home, i signed on two weeks ago and im due to sign again tomorrow, in all this time ive had a £55 giro xxxxx

 

i called them thursday to ask what was going on and they told me, well you can manage you get tax credits :eek:, i dont. ive had my last tax credit notice which shows £0.00 (oh they owe me £4.26p). x

 

can anyone say about how much on average we should be getting? there is myself and husband - my son claims his own benefits my other son works. how long will it take to sort - bills are piling up with no means to pay them even token payments.

Edited by jack1966
too much info
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think its £100.95 for a couple and its paid fortnightly in arrears, so if you sign on tomorrow then you will get some money Wednesday, when did you make your claim, about three weeks ago,

If you did then the £55 sounds like your first payment, and you should get the full amount this week

 

Have you made a claim for housing benefit

 

there are experts on here who know more about JSA and I am sure will be along shortly to offer your more advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's not enough information in your post to know how much you should be receiving, or if you would qualify. What benefit are you claiming? Is it a joint claim? Contributions based, or income based?

 

Do you have any savings? Have either you or your husband received pay in lieu of notice? Have either of you left work voluntarily?

 

If you have no means to survive, you can ring Crisis Loans. The phone number varies according to your area, but it is free, and if they decide you are entitled to a Crisis Loan, you can pick up a giro from your local office.

 

If you are due a payment of benefit, Crisis Loans cannot make a payment and will instead contact the office which processes your benefit to make enquiries as to why the benefit has not been paid, and negotiate with them to sort it out.

 

Have you had a decision from the processing centre yet to say you are entitled? (Your award notice).

 

If you haven't had your decision letter I can tell you what the delay indicator is if you tell me what benefit you have claimed.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ive just been finished from work so not sure if its contributions or income based, i dont know much about this stuff, we have no savings, infact we live in an overdraft.

 

i have put in a claim for jsa, duno if joint or whatever, hubby got a letter to fill in regarding my work ect, filled in and sent they say they cant find it. we were a joint claim before my employment (started work may - finished august no work left).

 

never left voluntarily, no money in lieu, no moneys due to us

 

no letters no nothing

 

guy at benefit office said he would refer my complaint to processing and for someone to give me a call, that was thursday, no call as of yet.

 

no savings no money

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be right with you!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right. Given the information (and I am assuming hubbie doesn't work or receive other benefits) then you will receive £100.95 per week for a couple for income based JSA.

 

The average clearance time for the benefit to be processed (nationally) is 12 working days, but if you are willing to tell me which office you are claiming benefit from (which area processes your benefit), I can give you the figure for their office.

 

The delay indicator is 3 months. This is how long it can actually take before you can claim consolitary payment.

 

I would also enquire (ask to speak to a manager if necessary) about interim payments. This is where they pay you a rate of the benefit until your decision is reached. If they decided you did not qualify, they can claim the money back. If they refuse an interim payment you will receive a lump sum of the benefit they owe when your first payment is made.

 

If you haven't already, get a claim in for council tax benefit, and if you rent, housing benefit (for council accomodation) or Local Housing Allowance (For private let). If you are mortgaged then after 13 weeks of JSA (Income Based) you can apply for mortgage interest relief. This pays the interest on your mortgage, but not the capital.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That means he was probably in reciept of contribution based JSA which is payable for a maximum of six months. He must have reached the end of his claim. (£64.30 per week for 6 months)

 

Phone the JSA number and make sure it is a joint claim you have in. They may be transferring the claim of your husband's to income based JSA rather than processing your claim. The letter they sent him - the form - sounds like a JSA3 which is the form they send to transfer the benefit.

 

I'd advise you to ring again and explain you were supposed to get a call back, just to make sure that the claims don't cause problems for each other.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ErikaPNP your a star, i claim atxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, i have put in a claim for housing and council tax, but because my son has just moved back home (he works) they are charging (about )xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxin total until i hand i 5 payslips, he hasnt got them ( i could scream). ive just recieved this letter yesterday.

 

but thankyou so much for the advise, ive learnt something new

Edited by jack1966
too much info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, that area deals with quite a large volume of claims. The good news is that they have only been outside of the AACT (Acutal average clearance time) once, where it took 15 working days, all others were within 12 working days. However do bear in mind that these figures were before the recession was in full swing so it may take a little bit longer as more claims to JSA benefit are being made with mass redundancies.

 

As I said, please be sure you ring them to get a clearer picture of the claims. JSA isn't my strongest point but I'll help if I can.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erika

If a customer has a claim in for JSA IB then it goes over to Conts but he want to add a partner now, is it a new claim or a change of circstumances to the origiinal claim

 

I am only asking to see if its similar rules to I.S

 

 

 

and there nothing much you dont know :)

Edited by Jack Daniels
Link to post
Share on other sites

JSA (IB) doesn't transfer to conts based, it's the other way about.

 

I don't know the answer to your question, sorry lol. Each benefit is different and JSA is not my strong point.

 

I know that with Tax credit whether going from lone parent to couple or vice versa, the claim stops altogether and a new claim is required.

 

With DWP benefits if a partner dies, and that partner was the main claimant, the claim is closed and the surviving partner must apply in their own right.

 

With Housing benefit or council tax benefit, if a partner dies, the claim is suspended until they can assess if the surviving partner is entitled on their own, but not stopped. i.e payments are stopped but the claim is not. If the surviving partner is entitled, all payments which had ceased are backdated to (usually) the date of death.

 

But adding a partner to a JSA claim - beats me! Ask insyder or installspark - they will know!!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...