Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • oh well, at least your eign of terror is over now. so no contact directly since from/to sainsbury's. everything since has only been with DWF?
    • Replying to above  this was on the day that two store detectives approached me and my friend and took us into the back room and spoke to us when they explained they have been watching
    • as my learned friend above...and.. sadly because just like DCA's and initially yourself in this case, you believed they have some magical powers ...they DON'T. 85% of people blindly pay DCA's cause they know no better and think they are BAILIFFS. only the RETAILER can ever do court and none have done this on a silly member of joe public that did something stupid since the infamous 2012 Oxford case on retail loss. BAILIFFS can only ever be involved after you've been to court and lost a CCJ, fat chance re above... and anyway, no BAILIFF has any right of forced entry anyway on consumer debts even with a judgement so......... stop panicking and thinking everything that doesn't apply.. forget about them but p'haps a confidential GP visit might be a very good move... what slightly concerns me more here is:  who are 'them' that told you they'd reviewed a week of CCTV and come up with several shoplifting instances over that time amounting to the above? have you directly contacted or had contact from Sainsbury's? and know they HAVE done this? or is this DWF willy waving and they tricked you into  admitting several previous successful thefts... this is not the norm...  dx      
    • next step then await the N157 from her local court giving the time and date of a future hearing some month in the future. now she MUST file a witness statement 14 days (typically) to both the court and kearns .  so cant allow to much of a time lag before you are aware of that and get her WS done. wack us up 2 multipage pdf files please  one of what they returned for the CRP reply . and one for everything they sent back in 2022 you've found.  we do not need statements. ideally it would be nice to see their WS before hers is finally filed. dx  
    • Another interesting article in the Grauniad - Counterfeit barcode stamps furore carries echoes of Horizon scandal | Consumer affairs | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Royal Mail admits its scanners ‘make mistakes’ but stands by the process it uses to detect fakes as ‘robust’  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Totally Lost and In trouble. Debt Managers and Barclays


ashbash
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5031 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hello I'm a little confused.

 

Which part can't you believe? I didnt come on the forum for people to start saying its flannel and impossible and unbelievable!!! Sorry if it sounds so incredible and flannel and unbelievable but it has happened and I am in the very middle of it suffering ALL of it has happened!

I just needed some advice and a little help but it seems thats not going to happen.

The bank is Barclays and if you ever get into a situation like this you will see they don't give two hoots about your position.

I don't know how they did or how the bank gave me the money they did and NO I didnt have a 5k overdraft imit as I've explained earlier I had £200 I have £500 in my account when I withdrew the money. I don't know about cheques I have not seen any I dont know about cash being deposited because they told me they had done it

SO please please can you stop assuming that it is not true and some of it has not happened because all of it has exactly as I have told you.

I just need help and if it's nt possible then I'll just go and do a DRO and see if I can carry on with my degree. Thank you everybody who has been supportive and helpful sorry to sound so horrible but I'm feeling lke its the end everything for me before anything has started.

 

The police can't do anything! They just said I will go to court as an offender and be used as a witness against these people and in the end they will probably get away with it as it is my word against theirs and I will end up having to pay everything back anyway, so why should I have to go through all that just to be where I am now?

 

Never mind sorry for posting on your forum thank you anyway

Link to post
Share on other sites

ashbash when you've been on this forum a litlle longer you will realise that some problems turn into a debate at times. People are only trying to determine how this has happened & as with most scams the methods used can be unbelievable.

 

To be honest I find it incredulous that a bank would allow the withdrawal of £5K cash without some form of check being carried out, especially on a student a/c & particularly when a similar amount had been withdrawn recently. I find it even more alarming that the Police are taking the attitude they are, after all in the circumstances you are the victim of the fraud. As for you being prosecuted I cannot believe that because in order for that to happen your bank would have to make a complaint against you.

 

I think you should really seek professional legal advice, you can get this free and should ask through your Student Union office, alternatively you could make an appointment through the Law Centre Law Centres There is also a link to the college-of-law in my signature who may be able to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ashbash - I think what we are trying to understand is how the bank has left you high and dry when there should be no way you could have withdrawn money that 1. didn't exist and 2. put you well over any agreed limit.

 

Sorry if some of the questions make you feel like your being doubted (it is certainly not my intention), but the more info we can extract the more chance there is of giving the best advice in how to resolve this.

 

regards

 

BSC

Link to post
Share on other sites

I too am astonished by the reaction of the police. I really think it may be worth another approach, as I suspect you may have just got a bad officer. It would certainly make for an interesting trial if the victim of a crime were to be prosecuted for it, but I honestly don't think it would ever come to that, or that you would be arrested.

 

It would certainly help see off any creditors if you had a crime number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry.

 

But Ashbash is talking rubbish.

 

My sister is a cashier for Barclays in a large branch

 

I asked her about this and showed her this thread.

 

She said first of all even big branches like Birmingham City wouldnt be able to give 10k without any notice.

Also if a withdrawal had been made earlier a manager would have to countersigh this and make a note on a form which was kept on file.

 

It would also generate a call to risk.

 

Sorry to dampen this.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

ashbash - to clarify

 

in post number 28 you said "anyway I went to the bank closest to me a different branch and withdrew it"

 

Do you mean a different branch of Barclays or a different bank altogether?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was a Barclays just a different branch from the previous one. A i dnd i've even spoke to the fraud team in the bank, they responded go to the police.

 

Sorry i'm not entirely comfortable posting the crime number here.

 

dont worry about the guy who keeps saying troll, he just craves attention.

 

Anyway as it seems impossible to believe I'll just carry on it's ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was a Barclays just a different branch from the previous one. A i dnd i've even spoke to the fraud team in the bank, they responded go to the police.

 

Sorry i'm not entirely comfortable posting the crime number here.

 

dont worry about the guy who keeps saying troll, he just craves attention.

 

Anyway as it seems impossible to believe I'll just carry on it's ok.

 

Sorry again this isnt going to be allowed to happen.

 

Again this is directly from the horses mouth. If large funds had been deposited in to barclays non business account then it simply would be possible to do these two withdrawals.

This prevented by money laundering systems and detection.

No i do not crave attention but unfortunately you are not telling the truth. Ill leave the rest of you to be drawn in.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ash, if you really can't speak to your parents about this please try and find an older friend, relative, student counsellor, who will go to the police with you. If you were my daughter I'd be going straight to the police station and asking what on earth they were doing if they were refusing to take action against the people involved in this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with desperate daniella,

sorry ashbash, but you were led by greed. I dont mean to be harsh. BUt we all make dumb mistakes, but the fault is not yours. If i went to my bank today and demanded even £1500 they would chuck me out. Ive always been told by the banks that the money has to clear first. The bank is at fault and should pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually I got the impression that Ashbash thought she was helping a supposed friend, rather than for personal gain. Be that as it may, I agree with Pinky, it would be helpful if we could have the story in more detail, it's a bit incoherent in places, and it will help us to help you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it was a Barclays just a different branch from the previous one. A i dnd i've even spoke to the fraud team in the bank, they responded go to the police.

 

Sorry i'm not entirely comfortable posting the crime number here.

 

dont worry about the guy who keeps saying troll, he just craves attention.

 

Anyway as it seems impossible to believe I'll just carry on it's ok.

no one is asking you too post the crime number and you shouldnt, what people are saying is that if the police have given you a crime number then you can pass that on to the creditors as it is now a police matter, if the police as you say are going to charge you with the crime you certainly would not be given a crime number this is given only to the victims, which you are..

Link to post
Share on other sites

i am also finding this story strange, I deposited 5000 into my daughters account after a house sale and barclays immediately suspended the account until we could show them where the money came from...any large amount is now flagged up because of proceeds of crime bill, withdrawing 10,000 would almost certainly flag up at any branch immediately

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct quote from a Barclays manager :

 

"1) It is possible to debit an account for cash with no funds there. It would, however, require a manager's over ride to do it, and I sincerely doubt any manager of any level in a branch is going to expose themselves to a potential loss of £5,000 for a student.

2) Students can't clear against uncleared effects of £5,000 - the most they could is £1,000, and that would be on the basis of having previous history with us, etc.

3) Branches are very, very tight on holding money. They're unlikely to have £10,000 hanging around, and if they did...

4) They'd require it to be ordered...

5) They'd have to check entries and query why he was making two large withdrawals in one day (immediate fraud risk)...

6) They'd make sure it was drawing on cleared funds.

 

I don't doubt that such a story could happen - various AFF, 419 scams still go on - but certainly not for these amounts. If it was, it would be picked up somewhere and a case started by either Falcons (internal team dealing with high risk and application/detect fraud) or a Network Fraud Management Team. In which case your guy will have a reference number to show for his conversations with them. In this scenario, however, they'd likely move to close the accounts and write the funds off (we're insured for fraud losses, obviously).

 

To many holes in this storry"

Edited by phil_nottingham
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd agree with almost all of that, Phil. A friend of mine tried to cash about £800 on a Friday afternoon and couldn't because the funds had already been sent off/put in the safe, whatever.

 

The only exception I know of is Central-ish London branches which almost always will let you cash thousands without notice if they know you, and also, of course, if they check that the funds are there. :) Probably Manchester, Birmingham, Edinburgh, etc., branches may do the same.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not true to say a bank doesn't hold more than £10000 in cash - that's ridiculous. In any case, Ash states that she went to two different branches. Then there is the possibility of an account being hacked into online and being made to show a false balance - we simply do not know the details. It isn't helpful to project what might have happened or the policy of a certain bank. In my view it is better for us to listen to Ash and I fear she may have already gone with the attacks on her. This may be one young lady in deep trouble and CAG may not be able to help her because when she came on she was put down. Shame. There is always a smartar*e who knows better than everyone else and they usually have just appeared on the horizon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think it a shame that Ash may have gone away. This forum is here to help. That said, I never felt we got the full story (nor was what we did get artiulated particularly well) and each post seemed to raise more issues than it answered. TO really understand the sequence of events, Ash (if stil around) needs to do a step by by step chronology of events (leaving nothing out).

 

This is not the usual issue raised on this forum and all the CAGGERS are doing is just applying logic and commonsense. And on that basis, the story, as told, just does not apprear to add up. I am not saying she was not the victim of fraud, nor that it could not have happened. However, if she needs help here she needs to be much more forthcoming.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...