Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Need urgent help regarding a returned item


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5356 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Last week a bought a EEE TOP all in one touchscreen PC from Aria Technology, I took it out of the packaging and had a quick go with it and decided that it wasn't for me so i packaged it up securely in all the original packaging that i got with the item.

 

Today i receive an email saying it has been rejected due to apparently having scratches on the screen which i know is completely wrong.

 

Me and my partner packed it back up and was very careful with it plus we checked the screen and there was no marks on it whatsoever.

 

I will take the matter to Court if required but what do you think about this matter? It was sent back within 2 days of getting it.

Edited by thecookiemonster
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 125
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

You have rights under DSR if you bought it by mail order or online. However, if they are saying it is damaged (and it may well have become damaged in transit) you would be liable (or more properly, your carrier).

 

How did you arrange to return it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have rights under DSR if you bought it by mail order or online. However, if they are saying it is damaged (and it may well have become damaged in transit) you would be liable (or more properly, your carrier).

 

How did you arrange to return it?

 

I bought it online, But like i said it was packaged just as i had received it, and was packed in 3 different boxes, there is no way it could have been damaged in transit in my opinion but i am seething and fuming, as they are going to send an unwanted item back to me.

 

It was sent back using Parcelforce which i had to pay for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a [problem], ask for photographic evidence;could be faked though! If you are going to make a claim against the carrier they will want to see the evidence; Arrange for carrier to go to premises and inspect it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

sounds like a [problem], ask for photographic evidence;could be faked though! If you are going to make a claim against the carrier they will want to see the evidence; Arrange for carrier to go to premises and inspect it!

 

Exactly what has gone through my mind!

 

I used it for 5 mins, i didn't use it long enough to scratch it and it was packaged very very securely and i just cannot understand it for one minute, I have 4 witnesses who checked it before it was packed, It was just like new when it was sent back and now they are refusing to refund my money and said i will have to pay to get the item sent back to me but i don't want it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have rights under DSR if you bought it by mail order or online. However, if they are saying it is damaged (and it may well have become damaged in transit) you would be liable (or more properly, your carrier).
I'm not sure that's the case. The OFT guide for business on distance selling (parts 3.62) state that "If the consumer does not exercise reasonable care and the goods are damaged, [the retailer] may have a claim against them for breach of this statutory duty."

 

If reasonable care was taken, then the retailer has a statutory duty to make a full refund of all monies, other than the direct cost of returning the goods (and then, only if they had stated so in their terms and conditions).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure that's the case. The OFT guide for business on distance selling (parts 3.62) state that "If the consumer does not exercise reasonable care and the goods are damaged, [the retailer] may have a claim against them for breach of this statutory duty."

 

If reasonable care was taken, then the retailer has a statutory duty to make a full refund of all monies, other than the direct cost of returning the goods (and then, only if they had stated so in their terms and conditions).

 

More than reasonable care was taken, It was packed just as i had received it and there was not a single mark or scratch on the screen and i paid Parcelforce to collect the item and deliver it back to the company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The trouble is Parcelforce are well-known for being sonewhat careless, so if the goods were not the same when delivered back to the company, then your claim is against Parcelforce - which is complicated because you don't wat the item.

 

To protect your interests, you NEED photographs of the item as it was delivered to the firm. If they do not recieve it in a saleable condition, they do not have to refund, as it is immaterial to them WHO caused the damage. Incidentally, you'd be amazed at how well-packed stuff can be wrecked whilst the outer packaging remains intact.

 

The dealership are within their rights, if they do not recieve it undamaged they cannot resell it, so the responsibility is with you as they got it to you safely. Incidentally, the fact you paid for the return is correct - you changed your mind, so any return would be at your expense.

 

I believe claiming against Parcelforce is your only realistic action for resolving the issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any got any advice on what kind of email i should send to the company? Aria Technology Ltd?
An LBA, outlining their statutory duties under the DSRs.

 

You could use these as references:

 

The OFT's Business Guide to DSR , and The OFT's Consumer Guide to DSR.

Edited by My Real Name
Link to post
Share on other sites

The trouble is Parcelforce are well-known for being sonewhat careless, so if the goods were not the same when delivered back to the company, then your claim is against Parcelforce
If this were a contractual arrangement, then yes. However, this is a matter of statutory duties.

 

If it can be determined that employing Parcelforce was not taking reasonable care, then the claim might be against them.

 

To protect your interests, you NEED photographs of the item as it was delivered to the firm. If they do not recieve it in a saleable condition, they do not have to refund, as it is immaterial to them WHO caused the damage. Incidentally, you'd be amazed at how well-packed stuff can be wrecked whilst the outer packaging remains intact.

 

The dealership are within their rights, if they do not recieve it undamaged they cannot resell it, so the responsibility is with you as they got it to you safely. Incidentally, the fact you paid for the return is correct - you changed your mind, so any return would be at your expense.

DSRs do not afford the retailer the right to be able to resell any item returned under the DSRs. Section 3.59 of the OFT guide covers this to some extent.

 

"The DSRs do not link cancellation rights with a supplier’s ability to resell items as new."

 

I believe claiming against Parcelforce is your only realistic action for resolving the issue.
Link to post
Share on other sites

In issues like these, it becomes an issue of 'he says/she says' - What is so different about your return of an item? They will have refunded people and dealt with returns before. You used PARCELFORCE who have the Olympic record for throwing cardboard boxes - so you are in no position to confirm the level of damage on reciept, only that it left you undamaged.

 

Without proof, you've nothing to fall back on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"The DSRs do not link cancellation rights with a supplier’s ability to resell items as new."

 

You made this link, not me. The shop mist recieve the goods back in a saleable condition. If scratched, this is not a saleable condition, and they are not required to make a refund.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In issues like these, it becomes an issue of 'he says/she says' - What is so different about your return of an item? They will have refunded people and dealt with returns before. You used PARCELFORCE who have the Olympic record for throwing cardboard boxes - so you are in no position to confirm the level of damage on reciept, only that it left you undamaged.

 

Without proof, you've nothing to fall back on.

 

The item was sent to me in a big box, then that had another box inside it and then another box, and it was packaged so securely that it would have had to have been thrown around at some force to damage the actual item was also had been been packaged very securely in it's box and bare in mind that this box was put inside two other very securely packaged boxes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Other than the OFT guidance on Distance Selling Regulations.

 

Which is worth...? Not a lot if they assert the goods were damaged. I'm impressed you are prepared to accept that PF is a respected shipper! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

The item was sent to me in a big box, then that had another box inside it and then another box, and it was packaged so securely that it would have had to have been thrown around at some force to damage the actual item was also had been been packaged very securely in it's box and bare in mind that this box was put inside two other very securely packaged boxes.

 

Is this the issue? I thought it was fine when you recieved it? You just changed your mind and sent it back. THEN it goes pear-shaped! So it is the retailer who has the task of confirming safe delivery or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the issue? I thought it was fine when you recieved it? You just changed your mind and sent it back. THEN it goes pear-shaped! So it is the retailer who has the task of confirming safe delivery or not.

 

As i said it was fine when i got it, i did not want it so sent it back, it was packaged very very well indeed so how the hell did it supposedly have scratches on the screen when it got back to the retailer?

 

Yes i didn't think the item was as good as expected and sent it back for a refund which has now been refused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the issue? I thought it was fine when you recieved it? You just changed your mind and sent it back. THEN it goes pear-shaped! So it is the retailer who has the task of confirming safe delivery or not.

 

Sorry i messed up that other post, I meant to have said that the item was sent back to them in a big box, the actual item was packed securely in it's box and was then put inside another box and then another box just like i received it, It got to me fine and it would have got back to them fine in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You made this link, not me. The shop mist recieve the goods back in a saleable condition.
By what authority?

If scratched, this is not a saleable condition, and they are not required to make a refund.
But they are required to make a refund under the provisions of the DSRs.
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I've read concerning returns, I would certainly insure any goods I return under the DSR's.

 

But how do you prove to the carrier that the goods were undamaged when they were packed? A series of photos during the packaging process?

 

I realise none of this helps the OP. Apologies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...