Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
    • Yeah That's correct. We left rent payment coming out of his bank account from January 2023 - August 2023 until we could find somewhere to sort out his belongings which was fine. I tried to give notice a few times from August 2023 asking for advice from Sanctuary housing how we went about this explaining his condition and that he was in a Nursing home from December 2022. I explained we don't have any legal powers to his account like POT but were in the process of going for Deputyship and that I was the named person to act on his behalf to speak with Santuary housing. I said we could provide details of his condition and proof he was now in a nursing home with date he moved in. This went ignored despite repeated attempts to contact them until a housing manager contacted us end of February 2024 and notice was finally accepted with his tenancy coming to an end March 22 2024. Although they have continued to take rental payments for the flat despite someone else living in it from the 1st April. I wasn't aware payments were still being taken till I checked his May banks statements. I had asked them to back date rental payments to August 2023 when I gave notice rather than just giving notice in March 2024 but they've ignored that bit. I don't see why they shouldn't give it back they've taken money they shouldn't have.
    • go do a Direct Debit Guarantee Clawback to your bank if you've now got control of his bank account finny.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Just received a debt from bailiff company? Advice from ex bailiff employee. Please read!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm just giving honest information from working for these people.

I'm guessing not all bailiff companies send out a first letter then, just send it straight with a first calls bailiff? I can obviously only talk from my experience and I know at least one other company also sends a similar letter.

The first letter basically says "we have taken over the case from the council / client, contact us to arrange payment" As I said before, some councils allow immediate enforcement action.

I don't disagree with paying the council direct, if they accept it and you may say they can't refuse it but I'm afraid they do, I've seen it many times. Not every council is the same.

From experience, it can be a nightmare sometimes to get fees removed, even through the council because they then have to pay them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah that can happen, depends what area of the country you're in usually. A few councils down south send the case straight to an enforcement bailiff but not many. The company I worked for almost always sent a first letter then if the person called back within a week to make an payment arrangement (monthly/weekly) then that was that, they would send a levy bailiff if one was around but not always and even if he couldn't do the levy they would still leave the payment arrangement in place as long as it was kept to.

It happens in all bailiff companies around the country, and I am sure that the company you worked for did just the same at least the bailiffs did, Its rare to hear of a bailiff who sticks to the law half of them dont even know their own codes of conduct. The one I fought in court and won by the way thought that sticking his foot in the door was peaceful entry, shocked the judge and she tore him off a strip or two and corrected him in saying that he could not do this in future or he would be placed in front of her again and he would lose his certificate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not talking about bailiff action though, I'm talking about the methods the company uses, the company I worked for sent a first letter asking for payment arrangement, then it went to first calls and then enforcement if no payment. I dealt with thousands of these cases.

You seem to think I am defending bailiffs for some reason? I could tell you what unlawful methods bailiffs use every single day and one of the reasons I am here is to try and stop them, if only in the company I worked for but hopefully more.

Once again, this thread was to help people to avoid getting to the point of enforcement action, not everybody wants to go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bailiff companies defend their bailiffs regardless whether they are right or wrong so are just as bad, just because your company as you say did the right thing which I have doubts that it always did, not saying you didnt but they are there to make money as well as bailiffs by what ever means. You obviously had issues with the way they conducted their business otherwise you would not be an ex employer of the company so they wernt as rosey as you have made out. I am sure you are a nice person as you come across as one but people are and always will be wary of bailiffs and the companies who employ them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going round in circles a little here. The company I worked for were completely unlawful, especially the enforcement bailiffs and the company itself added many illegal fees, however, what I described about the first calls bailiffs and how the company sent out 'first letters' is true. In my experience it was much easier for a person to set the payment plan than to ignore it and try and fight them. The councils were often on the side of the company too. I'm not defending the company in any way. It is true that the way they (and other companies) make money is mostly from people who ignore correspondence and have huge fees added on for enforcement visits. If you speak to many people who had payment plans and paid off their debts successfully and then to those who didn't and ended up with huge fees, which the council wouldn't always remove then you would get very different answers on who was glad of their actions.

Again, just personal experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going round in circles a little here. The company I worked for were completely unlawful, especially the enforcement bailiffs and the company itself added many illegal fees, however, what I described about the first calls bailiffs and how the company sent out 'first letters' is true. In my experience it was much easier for a person to set the payment plan than to ignore it and try and fight them. The councils were often on the side of the company too. I'm not defending the company in any way. It is true that the way they (and other companies) make money is mostly from people who ignore correspondence and have huge fees added on for enforcement visits. If you speak to many people who had payment plans and paid off their debts successfully and then to those who didn't and ended up with huge fees, which the council wouldn't always remove then you would get very different answers on who was glad of their actions.

Again, just personal experience.

ahhh am a little wiser now ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i had a bailiff contact me about just over a year ago,regarding an unpaid debt (not council) and it can be a stressful time when you think your going to be hounded by these parasites,,but i knew one way or the other it had to be paid and i wasnt trying to escape from paying what i owed, but couldnt afford to pay what they wanted me to originally pay due to finacial circumstances,how ever i did contact the bailiff company which takes some courage for some people to actualy do,due to being scared witless ,and i made a payment arrangement with them and this was accepted and 2 monts ago the last payment was paid and i wasnt bothered by them as long as i kept the arrangement in place or defuat on paying the weekly instalments,i have since finished paying wht i owe and its a relief its done,how ever i dont think that its all down the these rip off merchants,that try to make your life a complete and utter misery its the system its self those in power the courts and the goverment,for allowing these **** to rip you off with ficticous fees,,wonder if the bailiffs were sent to the mp,s that stole tax payers money, and did the same thing to them,made them pay what they stole by way of instalments and ficticous fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

More ostriches and more bad advice. The point is and should always be that bailiff's are an anomaly in a civilized society and their clients, be it councils or traffic authorities, are tacitly supporting these parasites. The only way to deal with them is to not pay at all and then take them to court or report them to the police in each and every case where 1 sigle pence is illegally charged. All this advice about payment plans and how nice it is to be debt free after you have been paying £15 a month for 25 years is just silly. As it is now, the debt collection with associated bailiff industry is having a boom and as people are getting in to more and more financial problems and cannot pay their bills, it will get worse. The current system must be changed and enter the 21:st century where we treat people with respect and not as criminals and feed for leaches.

Gustavius

Link to post
Share on other sites

More ostriches and more bad advice. The point is and should always be that bailiff's are an anomaly in a civilized society and their clients, be it councils or traffic authorities, are tacitly supporting these parasites. The only way to deal with them is to not pay at all and then take them to court or report them to the police in each and every case where 1 sigle pence is illegally charged. All this advice about payment plans and how nice it is to be debt free after you have been paying £15 a month for 25 years is just silly. As it is now, the debt collection with associated bailiff industry is having a boom and as people are getting in to more and more financial problems and cannot pay their bills, it will get worse. The current system must be changed and enter the 21:st century where we treat people with respect and not as criminals and feed for leaches.

Gustavius

 

Amen!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one would like to hear more from the OP about the unlawful practices he is aware of. This is the sort of info that is needed, so can we let him just have a chance? After all, if we disagree with anything he says we don't have to follow his advice. I would still like to hear from him though. Actually, I think he is quite brave posting on here, and if he is genuine, and time will tell, I admire him for that.

 

This guy is NOT personally responsible for any misfortune that anyone on here has suffered at the hands of these thugs, but he may well have some very good ideas and advice if we allow him to voice that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there don t know if this is the right place to put this as i am not to good with computers, here goes i was in a business partnership which folded last year most of my suppliers excepted my arangement offer but one did not they took me to court and after determination they got judgement of £10 per month in may this year so i made the £10 payment well before time i spoke to the count court to make sure that it was £10 per month they said yes it was a joint judgement and £10 per month total which i paid a couple of days ago an enforcement officer turned up saying he had a high court writ and unless i paid the now 5100 pounds he would have to take goods i spoke to nat debt line who said the writ should not have been given as the payments are upto date so i rang je baring and co of london who got the judgement a lady on the phone said i had missed a payment as it was £20 per month because there was 2 in the partnership i asked her to ring the court to find out after 2 days she still had not bothered and said i would have to find the money to pay the bailiff which i don t have the bailiff is still saying i have to pay she won t ring the court and then call the bailiff off no one will tell who gave out the writ to apply for a stay but surely this is wrong and must beable to got to a court to get the bailiff stopped any advise would be grateful cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi there don t know if this is the right place to put this as i am not to good with computers, here goes i was in a business partnership which folded last year most of my suppliers excepted my arangement offer but one did not they took me to court and after determination they got judgement of £10 per month in may this year so i made the £10 payment well before time i spoke to the count court to make sure that it was £10 per month they said yes it was a joint judgement and £10 per month total which i paid a couple of days ago an enforcement officer turned up saying he had a high court writ and unless i paid the now 5100 pounds he would have to take goods i spoke to nat debt line who said the writ should not have been given as the payments are upto date so i rang je baring and co of london who got the judgement a lady on the phone said i had missed a payment as it was £20 per month because there was 2 in the partnership i asked her to ring the court to find out after 2 days she still had not bothered and said i would have to find the money to pay the bailiff which i don t have the bailiff is still saying i have to pay she won t ring the court and then call the bailiff off no one will tell who gave out the writ to apply for a stay but surely this is wrong and must beable to got to a court to get the bailiff stopped any advise would be grateful cheers

 

go here:

 

Bailiffs and Sheriff Officers - The Consumer Forums

 

and click on the new thread button on the left of the page

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ministry of Justice have today introduced an on line website to enable debtors to check whether a bailiff is certificated.

 

I have started a new thread and the details are here:

 

On line search to check if a Bailiff is Certificated.....

 

 

Dearest Tomtubby, what would we do without you. Thanx a lot.

GR

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm starting to think I should have named the title something like 'Have you decided to pay the bailiff company? How best to go about it' Maybe my thread was missing the target audience, either way I am sure I can help in other ways so take the advice or leave it. If it was me, I would fight to the death but I know how to without being confrontational, others don't.

BSC, I'm sure many people have given their advice on here before. Giving advice and opinion is part of being human, so is ignoring it if you don't agree.

 

I am working on a full write up of illegal / unethical / unfair / extortionate acts and fees, and how to avoid them, I'm sure it will be an interesting read. There really are easy ways to get a lot of these fees stopped, not just one off but stopped for every one. People just have to get together and do it. I will probably start a new thread for that though but it will have to wait until tomorrow as a long day at work.

Thanks for all the replies though, either positive or negative, I've had a really good insight to the feelings of people who have dealt with bailiffs.

Back tomorrow...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...