Announcements
-
-
Tweets
-
Posts
-
By BankFodder · Posted
Please post up your response here before you send it off. -
By Unknown2024 · Posted
In order to qualify for the Audi scrappage incentive, terms and conditions will apply. The old vehicle to be scrapped must be a Euro 1 to Euro 4 diesel passenger car first registered on or before 31 December 2009. Any make and any model is accepted, and must have been owned for 6 months or more. The scrappage incentive is available for selected new petrol, diesel or e-tron Audi cars only; used cars will not qualify. It is not available in combination with any other offers, including any finance offers. The new vehicle purchase is for retail customers only and must be registered in the same customer name as the old vehicle being traded in. The offer applies to new cars registered before 30 June 2018 -
By Unknown2024 · Posted
It wasn't a voluntary surrender. I did not agree to returning the car, it was marked stolen and the police took it. Hence the breach of S90 claim. They took around 13k off the RRP, 7k scrappage discount plus 1k cash deposit and 5k dealership discount. If the px car cannot be counted as a deposit then why did I even trade it in? I could have just had a 12k discount and kept my car. The fact is they did take my car and so it has to be treated as a deposit. They benefited from the px in some way or form or else they wouldn't have wanted my car. I googled audi scrappage scheme terms and conditions and found them, will have another look but failing that I have them saved on my laptop I can upload with the trial bundle. It also states that the car traded in must be in my name (it wasn't) but there is no benefit to me in bringing that up now -
Apologies. I did some extra work on the WS late last night after you'd already copied what was posted so the versions don't synch. My bad. Anyway to bring everything up to date I've added comments in blue to the version immediately above and made some small suggested changes in red. You will need the attachment for your Exhibit 2. Transcript - Excel v Wilkinson.pdf -
By Angryman1404 · Posted
Hope it’s just a last ditch attempt before it’s barred. It’s only been one letter and one email from them. So will ignore and see what happens. Thanks guys. Just been on IDRWW website and they quote 10 years UAE statute barred. That’s a bit crafty. If I hadn’t done my research first I may have contacted as they state incorrect Information.
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
-
Our picks
-
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.-
- 1 reply
-
-
Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld
ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,
Hello,
On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.
Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom. Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm. They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.
The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.
I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.
Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done.
Many thanks-
- 81 replies
-
-
A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report
WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,
Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299-
- 161 replies
-
-
Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available
BankFodder posted a post in a topic,
We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.
The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.
Frankly I don't think that is any accident.
One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.
Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.
We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
This is good ethical practice.
It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.
OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
-
-
-
Recommended Topics
-
style="text-align: center;">
Thread Locked
because no one has posted on it for the last 2007 days.
If you need to add something to this thread then
Please click the "Report " link
at the bottom of one of the posts.
If you want to post a new story then
Please
Start your own new thread
That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help
Thanks
-
Recently Browsing 0 Caggers
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Have we helped you ...?
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
Recommended Posts