Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
    • Farage rails and whines about not being allowed on the BBC ... ... but pulls out at the last minute of a BBC Panorama interview special. It was denied it was anything to do with his candidates being outed as misogynists and Putin apologists, or that farage was afraid Nick Robinson might throw some difficult questions at him ... despite farages recent practice at quickly cowering in fear.   It was claimed 'it wasn't in Nigels diary'     Nigel Farage pulls out of BBC interview at last minute amid Hitler row WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘Panorama’ special postponed as Reform UK party faces row over candidate who claimed UK would have been ‘better off’ if it had...   Waaahhhh
    • i'd say put lowells to strict proof of where the payment came from. cant hurt to send SB letter, even if proved not. at least they get your correct address. they'd have to link the old IVA times scale to a payment  these IVA F&F pots (if thats where it came from) most mugs dont even know they are not only taking most of your payments on fees but also creaming money off to supposedly offer F&F's.  funny when the IVA fails or is complete these sums of money in F&F pots never get given back or even mentions... these IVA firm directors esp with regard to knightsbridge and creditfix were fined and struck off more times than Paul Burdell of Link Fame and still managed to continue to scam people.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Invalid Default Notices


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In short, if a DN is invalid for whatever reason then the creditor cannot lawfully terminate the agreement on the back of that.

 

Is that what is being said here?

 

If thats the case then surely doesnt that mean its game over regarding dodgy DN's?

 

Vicky

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Vicky

 

As I understand it from wading through this entire thread earlier this week the key point is that the creditor's subsequent termination on the back of a dodgy DN is unlawful rescission. If YOU then ACCEPT their termination then the agreement is ended by mutual consent - and ALL you have to pay are the lawful arrears at the time you accepted the unlawful rescission. You MUST accept it and the sooner you do so the lower the amount (accrued arrears only) you still need to pay.

You may well find you did exactly that just a week or so after the crditors notice of termination but had forgotten you had sent that letter (similar to ones earlier in this thread)!!!!

You could also claim compensation from them if you have some spare salt to rub into their wounds.

 

Diddydicky and Pinky69 (among others) have some excellent posts throughout this thread if you want to check back. i

Hope this helps - if so tip my scales!

 

BD

Edited by Bigdebtor
typos
  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bill, haven't done anything yet with this account as it's only just kicked off but will follow the usual SAR route and find out when this default was applied.

 

Didn't know they had up to 6 months to register it with the CRA's so thanks for the new info. Have tipped your scales accordingly ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

BigDebtor

 

Thanks for that.

 

I have (well I believe I have) a dodgy DN from Egg then they terminated.

 

I havent sent them anything back to accept the termination.

 

Is it too late to do that now?

 

Its been months and its been passed to ARC/Trevor Munn to collect on their behalf (not sold to them)

 

Vicky

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi emandcole,

 

Didn't know they had up to 6 months to register it with the CRA's so thanks for the new info. Have tipped your scales accordingly :wink:

 

Thanks for the thanks;)

 

The time limit is because the whole idea of keeping a credit file is to maintain "accurate and up to date" information. After all, if a creditor could decide when to file a default, it could take them years to get their act together!

 

Bill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a DN from MBNA dated 11 January requiring remedy by 28 January, so only in time if First Class. (I'm already in dispute over the validity of their CCA.) Today, though, I received a letter (dated 19 January) telling me the account had been sold to Direct Legal. I assume that qualifies as unlawful recission.

 

What should be my next step? Should I write to MBNA or Direct Legal?

 

(I have an MBNA thread at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/224927-mbna-cca-legal.html and will upload the letters and provide links there shortly.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what happens if a contract is not terminated in writing, as I am going through the same thing with Welcome and I doubt they will be organised enough to terminate in writing!

 

they WILL either themselves or through a DCA demand you pay the outstanding balance of the account- and that is termination(unlawful repudiation - if done on the back of a defective dn or no dn)

Link to post
Share on other sites

BigDebtor

 

Thanks for that.

 

I have (well I believe I have) a dodgy DN from Egg then they terminated.

 

I havent sent them anything back to accept the termination.

 

Is it too late to do that now?

 

Its been months and its been passed to ARC/Trevor Munn to collect on their behalf (not sold to them)

 

Vicky

xxxx

 

Honeypot

 

You are in the same boat as me as I was not aware of the 'unlawful recission' theory at the time I had accounts terminated so did not reply at the time accepting this.

 

It would be helpful to understand what you should do in these circumstances.

 

Anyone?

 

Exchange

Link to post
Share on other sites

BigDebtor

 

Thanks for that.

 

I have (well I believe I have) a dodgy DN from Egg then they terminated.

 

I havent sent them anything back to accept the termination.

 

Is it too late to do that now?

 

Its been months and its been passed to ARC/Trevor Munn to collect on their behalf (not sold to them)

 

Vicky

xxxx

 

Vicky

 

I am sure you may find the letter you had forgotten you sent to Egg accepting it if you check your files! ;)

 

Anything have paid since then will have been to repay the arrears as they stood at that time. If you have paid nothing since then that's presumably simply becasue you indeed regarded the agreement as terminated - as both parties had said so in writing.

 

Check back through this thread for a follow up letter to the DCA copying your "unlawful rescission" letter sent off to Egg by you within a week or so of receipt of the Egg termination letter.

 

The chances also are that the Egg agreement is not enforceable - check the Egg thread by PT2357 as well about this.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens with older accounts that have been sold on to DCA? Do they still fall under the same umbrella? Even though the account has been terminated years ago? DCA don’t send out DN apparently, but the original creditor did?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good question by nks22

as I have been wondering the same myself, I have on my statements variations of around £15 or so for interest due for the next month, this variation is from 1 month to the next but it maybe that they have included the £12 charge for late payment. Any ideas

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more question if any can help. After being Defaulted can the creditors still carry on charging interest on the account for several months. and sorry another question, if creditor says account is closed does that constitute Termination?

Cheers

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

DCA don’t send out DN apparently, but the original creditor did?

 

If it's been passed to a DCA then the original CCA has, by definition, been terminated. You can't be in default with a DCA since you don't have any agreement with them on which to have defaulted.

 

There is some dispute (elsewhere on here) over whether or not it's necessary to accept an unlawful recission - after all, it's not as if you have the option to refuse a termination.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just one more question if any can help. After being Defaulted can the creditors still carry on charging interest on the account for several months. and sorry another question, if creditor says account is closed does that constitute Termination?

Cheers

Jim

 

Jim I asked that very question earlier this week on another thread - but haven't got an answer yet. In my case I am witholding payment as they haven't provided a true copy cca - but they are threatening to continue to add interest and I don't think that's fair as the delay in my paying more is down to them.

 

On your accepting their actual termination - if it was unlawful rescission - then all T&C's are void as there is no longer any agreement by you to pay anything further - and your only obligation is to pay lawful arrears - but you can deduct unfair charges and contractual interest and (I think?) compensation too.

 

It seems to be ESSENTIAL to agree to the unlawful termination otherwise it is not actually termination by virtue of being unlawful.

 

Hope this helps - if so, tip my scales.

 

BD

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

this is a typical acceptance of an unlawful repudiation and i would make a copy of it for future use

 

Dear Sirs,

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXXXXXXX in which you terminate the agreement (Demand payment in full of the outstanding balance)

 

Your action is an unlawful repudiation of the agreement and i accept your unlawful action and now consider myself relieved of any obligations that may have existed in the event that the alleged agreement did indeed exist.

 

Kindly advise me of the (genuine) amount of arrears outstanding as at the time of termination of the agreement.

 

Against your arrears may be a claim for unlawful rescission

 

I wait your advices

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

XXX

 

 

i would send recorded delivery

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's been passed to a DCA then the original CCA has, by definition, been terminated. You can't be in default with a DCA since you don't have any agreement with them on which to have defaulted.

 

.

 

NKS - are you sure? Can you point to case law or anything to confirm this? I can see there may be a difference if the DCA has BOUGHT the debt - but what if they are only chasing up on behalf of OC? :confused:

 

I hope you are right - but I just can't see it being that easy - otherwise no DCA could survive.

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

BigDebtor

 

Thanks for that.

 

I have (well I believe I have) a dodgy DN from Egg then they terminated.

 

I havent sent them anything back to accept the termination.

 

Is it too late to do that now?

 

 

Vicky

xxxx

Vicky

 

Diddydicky has just posted a copy letter pretty similar to the one you sent to Egg just after their termination notice following their dodgy DN!

 

Remember it now:idea:

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's been passed to a DCA then the original CCA has, by definition, been terminated. You can't be in default with a DCA since you don't have any agreement with them on which to have defaulted.

 

There is some dispute (elsewhere on here) over whether or not it's necessary to accept an unlawful recission - after all, it's not as if you have the option to refuse a termination.

 

of COURSE you have the option to refuse an unlawful termination that is the WHOLE point

 

i think you need to re read the threads on dn's to get a better understanding

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vicky

 

I am sure you may find the letter you had forgotten you sent to Egg accepting it if you check your files! ;)

 

 

Check back through this thread for a follow up letter to the DCA copying your "unlawful rescission" letter sent off to Egg by you within a week or so of receipt of the Egg termination letter.

 

 

 

BD

 

Hi BD

 

I havent sent any letter to Egg after they terminated nor have I paid anything.

 

So are you reckoning that I should have sent a letter?

 

Is it too late?

 

Getting muddled here

 

Vicky

xxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've uploaded my MBNA letters at http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/mbna/224927-mbna-cca-legal-2.html#post2718155 and would be grateful for any comments/advice.

 

On a more general note, how do you calculate the arrears for a DN? What can and can't be included?

 

Thanks.

 

you dont- you ask them to do that within your acceptance of repudiation letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

of COURSE you have the option to refuse an unlawful termination that is the WHOLE point

 

I only know that this has been discussed at length and there is a difference of opinion. I wouldn't claim to know who is right, though. (I'll try to find a link but it'll take some time.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

NKS - are you sure? Can you point to case law or anything to confirm this? I can see there may be a difference if the DCA has BOUGHT the debt - but what if they are only chasing up on behalf of OC?

 

My understanding (and it's only an opinion) is that only the original creditor can default you, not a DCA, as that's who your agreement is with. Even if a DCA is acting on behalf of a creditor the DN will be in the name of the creditor, not the DCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't be in default with a DCA since you don't have any agreement with them on which to have defaulted.

 

Au contraire -

 

ICO Version 3 Defaults: A guidance note 02.08. 2007

The ‘sale’ or assignment of debts on defaulted accounts

52 When the rights to a debt are sold to a third party, the lender has to make sure the records with the credit reference agency are accurate, up to date and adequate. If they want information about the debts to continue on the credit reference file they will need to come to an agreement with the purchaser about who is to be responsible for this.

 

53 If the purchaser agrees to take control of the record, the customer should be informed that the debt has been sold or assigned and to whom. The credit reference agency file should be changed to show the name of the purchaser and that the rights to the debt have been sold or assigned. The purchaser should then make sure the record is kept up to date including changes to the amount still owed. The purchase should not affect how long the record is kept. It should be removed six years after the default.

 

54 Where the purchaser of the debt does not agree to take control of the record, the original lender, and at least in part the credit reference agency, will remain responsible if the original record is kept on the file. When the debt is sold or assigned, the customer will no longer owe any money to the original lender. If the record is not removed, the sale or assignment should be recorded and the balance should be shown as zero. The customer should still be told who the debt has been sold or assigned to.

The full document is here - http://www.ico.gov.uk/what_we_cover/data_protection/guidance/technical_guidance_notes.aspx

Edited by Bill Shidding
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...