Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • T911, Nick, thanks, I got there in the end! Without boring you with the details, it is precisely the most ridiculous cases that end up being lost - because the Cagger knows the other party's case is rubbish so doesn't do the necessary work on their own case. G24 are well aware of double dipping.  They have either done it deliberately or else have cameras which can't handle multiple visits to the car park which G24 happily leave malfunctioning so the £££££ keep rolling in. Sadly most people aren't like you.  I've just read various reviews for the Retail Park on TripAdvisor and Parkopedia.  Virtually all of them are complaining about these unfair charges for daring to spend time & money shopping in a shopping centre.  Yet no-one is refusing to pay.  They moan but think they have been fined and cough up. G24 are unlikely to do court, but it's not impossible with two tickets. Try to get evidence that you were elsewhere at these times. Often retail parks will intervene, but I've Googled & Googled and cannot find an e-mail address for the place.  Could the manager of one of your favourite shops give you a contact e-mail address for the company that run the retail park? Right at the moment I'm supposed to be teaching someone who runs two shops at the local shopping centre, but I'm not as he has had to go to a meeting with the company that runs the shopping centre, so I know for a fact that these business relationships exist!!!
    • Afternoon DX, The files were in date order. How would I put them into an acceptable format? I'm not that pc literate.  
    • I think you need to tell us what actually happened. Your original post gives the impression that you were taken to court for a speeding offence. But you go on to say that you received no paperwork. So you could not have been summonsed for a speeding offence because the police had no evidence that you (or anybody else) was driving (and it seems you were not anyway). You were probably summonsed (or more likely received a Single Justice Procedure Notice) for "failing to provide the driver's details." You would not normally be banned for this offence if you were convicted - it carries six points. So did you have any earlier points which meant you were liable to a "totting up" ban?  If you were originally convicted (as it seems you might have been) how was that conviction set aside? Did you perform a Statutory Declaration? There is simply too much missing for any meaningful help to be given. It seems as if there may have been an error by the DVLA but before you consider suing those idiots until the cows come home, you need to explain exactly what has happened.  
    • Point 4 and 10 duplicate Point 5 and 8 duplicate  Try to keep to one para with regards the agreement...various paras duplicating the same. Statement of truth is out of date refer to the claimants statement    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with Various Debts and DCA's


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 323 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

so carry on with the CCJ payment.

pers i'd stop every other payment of silly small sums to anyone else.

all you are doing is running the statute barred date to infinity.

 

Original creditors dont do court.

 

just ENSURE everyone you are stopping payment too has you current and correct address going forward.

 

you'll get a TON of deforestation through your letter box.

pers i'd ignore EVERYTHING, just scan it and/or put it in a file for that particular debt.

 

these debts can NEVER comeback on your credit file as i suspect they were all defaulted +10yrs ago.

 

3 golden rules.

never move without informing the debt owner if its within 7yrs since your last payment

never ignore if/when a letter of claim arrives for any debt.

never ignore county court papers from northants bulk court.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

let it run.

see where they go like the others.

 

stop being scared of dca's too.

they are not bailiffs.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it happens they had sent two letters that my other half did not stress me about as I was dealing with a family situation.

 

First one asking me to call them and second to say that the dca with be administering the account.

 

They arrived about a week apart and I am waiting for dca letter.

 

Not sure what to do here.

I am dreading phone calls, home visits or public harassment or confiscation of property like car or phone etc. Please help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shanidev said:

I am dreading phone calls, home visits or public harassment or confiscation of property like car or phone etc. Please help.

 

what part of a dca is not a bailiff do you not understand?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for being so paranoid.

 

Two reasons got me sweating:

the letters came from prelitigation department and my previous mistake of returning dca's call.

 

They threatened to breakin through even front door, exposing me to my social circle to confiscating my car.

 

mbna did not respond to cca request, broke every guideline and dca took me to court.

 

Thanks for putting my mind at rest and putting me on track.

 

Much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no such thing as a pre litigation dept, just another bloke in a different coloured skirt sitting nearer to the bog in a call centre.

 

a dca can do nothing of the sort you mention above, which is why you never ever phone them...they LIE simply to scam people out of money that hey use to buy their drinks down the pub that night.

 

as for the varde court claim you had on an old mbna card debt sold to them.

you sent back forms admitting the debt, no wonder you got harassed.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Varde (MBNA) debt has since gone to PRA Group who sent me statement at the time plus bank details but no communication since.

 

Two letter were from HSBC headed pre-litigation department.

Yesterday, I received an automated 'contact us now'.

 

And this morning, letter from PO Box 189, Huddersfiled.

 

Through the window I can see it has Debtline in bold.

 

I am dreading opening it.

I have had letters from there in the past that I did 'Return to Sender' following advice from someone on YouTube.

Now, not sure what to do here. I have no idea on how best to deal with these people. 

 

Also, if I stop the nominal payment could they take me to court and then use 'he has been making payments' as evidence of my admittance? I have stopped nominal payment on one of them and waiting with baited breath. 

 

Please advise

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a dca is NOT A BAILIFF

totally powerless

 

why not open and scan up the letters.

 

all you are doing by keep making payments is be a nice little cash cow and run the SB date to infinity.

payment is not necessarily admittance of a debt no, just you got conned .

 

they might not hold any enforceable paperwork!

why do you think the OC sold it in the 1st place and not crushed you themselves in court...weird that eh?

 

dx

 

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I finally gathered up courage to open the letter. In summary, it says 'acting on bank's behalf, you have failed to contact, we know you are there, we will pester you until you contact'

 

Pardon me for being so thick. I am a little nervous. No doubt, I am going to receive further letters. Won't be contacting them. Do I just scan and file away? What's the better path; I have sent them back before when I do not recognise the sender. 

 

Thanks very much for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan 

dont bother sending back always was a stupid move

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I stopped token payments on one of them. Received letter saying they have noticed... your debt still stands... important to call us... etc. A month later they have sent the same thing with income-expenses sheet asking to complete it to help them help me. I didn't dare stop token payments on the other as long time ago the bank wrote to me saying wescot will now administer the account.

I am stressed a little with course they might take and also what to do with the second one. Please advise.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

the bank wrote to me saying wescot will now administer the account.

 English = Wescot will hound you as we cant be bothered and if you pay them they will take their cut as we have already wrote it off as a loss ......administer :becky:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

a dca is not a bailiff

stop paying them and being a nice little DCA cash cow.:frusty:

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...