Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Finance U Ltd Car Repossession letter received **Round 1 WON... Ding, ding... Round 2 now on**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3941 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

How is this progressing?

 

I have read with great interest all 35 pages today and some of it is simialr to what I'm going through with The Funding Corporation.

 

I have a Bill of Sale not signed by me or my partner,

the credit agreement is signed by us along with an employee of ACF

but the same employee has also witnessed this Bill of Sale.

 

The Funding Corp have agreed that the Bill of Sale is valid

but state that the Credit Agreement is valid

beceause it was enforced by the courts when we were going through a particulary bad patch

 

.Am I right in thinking because of the Logbook Loans judgement my Credit Agreement is invalid if someone can advise would be appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
  • Replies 583
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi nowayjose

 

I sat all yesterday afternoon reading your post with such interest its good to see the fruits of CAGs help to yourself and others and that the little guy or girl can take on the big bad bully and win.

 

Then you get the stubborn one that lost once and lets try again and bleed then of money for an agreement that does not exist makes me laugh.

 

You and everyone helping you (postggj to name a few) have done great to keep going at this for the length of time it has been going on.

 

Only to be a fly on the wall in the court would love to see the look on this guys face.

 

Anyway i hope it all goes well for you and the great help from CAG

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just for the record,

I had a problem with Finance U many years ago which caused me to voluntarily surrender my car to them.

 

 

Fortunately soon after, my work took me abroad.

 

 

I came back after 9 years, and they found me and tried to enforce the agreement.

My solicitor dealt with it as he said they were "statute barred" from continuing as there had been no correspondence from me for longer than 6 years.

 

 

Nothing now shows on my credit file but beware anybody.

If this kind of thing does happen and you corresepond the staute of limitation is reset and gives them 6 years to persue you legally so think twice before replying to any of their correspondence.

 

I woild love to know when this case goes to court,

I am now retired and have all the time in the world.

 

 

I would really enjoy sitting in court listening to the case.

 

 

Would give me a chance to gloat at those

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi Guys,

 

I too have had problems with F U ltd, i am intresed is this statute barred i see metioned. F U ltd hit me with a CCJ going back more than 7 years ago. I have moved home since then but they still on my back. I have never replyed to any of there letters or phoned them or contacted them in any way. I just stuck my head in the sand and hopped the problem would go away, but having read this thread i am optamistic that there might be light at the end of the tunnel and its not a steam train being driven by F U ltd.

 

So my question is, can a statute barred work even though they have a CCJ on me? Any and all info welcome :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, truth is I have bought 3 cars from them over the past 15 years and had ppi on all, i was wondering if i should persue to get this back as I think the total would be close to what they say I owe them. But if you think to contact them would be a mistake I will leave it and put my head back in the sand. I don't have any documents any more and would have to contact them to get copys, thats if they have them going back so far.

 

As always greatfull for any and all advice:-)

 

P.S after reading some of the other threads about Finance U ltd it seems it is a real posability that the CCJ i recived from them could be a fake. If i use one of these "see your credit report" sites, will it show me, not just the CCJ's but also who they are from?

Edited by Bones76
Link to post
Share on other sites

The best credit report site to use is Experian, this should tell you what you need to know because if there is a ccj registered against you it will be there however, any accounts older than six years that are closed, dormant or defaulted are automatically removed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

trouble with claiming back the ppi is you can only go back 6 years...if any of them are older than this its gonna be a no no....i have also had dealings with humphries and the guy is a shark....if you can stay out of his way all the better...if he tries to enforce ccj after all this time he is going to have to explain to the court why he hasnt acted on it before now

 

EDIT there is NO time limit on PPI - dx siteteam

Link to post
Share on other sites

in effect a ccj lasts until it is paid...in practice, after 6 years if they havent been used they should drop off your credit file and go away...humphries would be hard put to explain why he obtained a ccj but never acted on it after all this time....if it aint on your credit file i would ignore it...hope that helps in some way....one of the problems however with checking your credit file is that the moment you check and put your new details in he will know where to locate you....unfortunately credit ref agencies are in the pockets of these scumbags...remember cra agencies are used by them to check your credit files and history etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

thx guys and girls, just a few more quetions, sorry! debt4get? u say he would be hard to explain why he got the CCJ but not acted on it after all this time? how will that help me? if i send a sar and it shows details of all the cars i bought off him and the ppi, even after 6 years, will i still be able to make a claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets take it one at a time...if he hasnt acted on the ccj for the past 6 years he would have to reapply to the court if he now wanted to use it against you.....any ppi that is older than 6 years cannot be reclaimed....any ppi that is less than 6 years old can be claimed back even if it is not fully paid off

 

edit there is NOT time limit on PPI claims - dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question Bones76. Have you applied for any credit recently and been accepted, because if you have then there are no CCJs on your records. These days lenders only need a sniff of a problem and they'll turn you down. If you haven't applied for any credit then do so, like a credit card or something, then if rejected follow it up. If granted then you are in the clear. Wise advice from debt4get to stay away from humphries he is a total ****** and a licenced thief!

Link to post
Share on other sites

lets take it one at a time...if he hasnt acted on the ccj for the past 6 years he would have to reapply to the court if he now wanted to use it against you.....any ppi that is older than 6 years cannot be reclaimed....any ppi that is less than 6 years old can be claimed back even if it is not fully paid off

 

This is incorrect.

 

You can claim PPI back for as long as you can get Statements for. The six years starts from when YOU became aware it was mis sold.

 

Jogs

Link to post
Share on other sites

trouble with claiming back the ppi is you can only go back 6 years...

 

Dont know where you got this idea from debt4get ? If you have had a policy mis sold, then they are obliged to repay from inception.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry you are quite correct however unless you have the paperwork, companies are not obliged to keep the paperwork after the 6 year period, if you have the paperwork than you can claim over the 6 year period, but i wouldnt rely on them supplying the paperwork in order for you to claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3941 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...