Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I have an update on my case that I’d like to share with you all.  so after submitting 371 pages in my bundle, a witness statement and skeleton argument for my court case due to take place in Manchester on June 21st I got an email from my litigator stating that hmrc have pulled out and the case is now closed!    this is the body of the letter….. This letter, which is copied to the Appellant, pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009, the Respondents gives notice to the Tribunal of their intention to not defend the above appeal.   The Respondents respectfully invite the Tribunal to allow the appeal and close its file. In lieu of the above the Respondents would respectfully ask the Tribunal to vacate the hearing scheduled for Friday 21 June 2024. We would accordingly invite the Tribunal to close its file. Obviously this is extremely good news which hasn’t sunk in that after 3 years of fighting it is over.    I do have a further fight on my hands in that the Group Action I had joined with Independent Tax that had been disbanded in November last year and I chose not to continue with them. They are trying to bill me over 5k for the work they did under that Group Action which is ludicrous bearing in mind the whole point in joining was that it would keep the cost to a minimum as it would be shared between us all. They had asked if I wanted to continue to have them represent me on an individual level which I declined, if I hadn’t, goodness knows what they would have been trying to charge me now. 
    • President Ruto says Kenyans pay less tax than citizens in some other African countries.View the full article
    • As PM Sunak really showed his true colours at the D Day Commemorations by doing what? Oh I am the British PM lets just leave early I have better things to do and as he is called out on disrespecting all those veterans that served our country for the freedoms we have today he gives a groveling apology to little to late. He knew about this event for a long time and also knew that this is probably the last D Day Commemoration due to the age of those Veterans who gave so much for there countries freedom. Even on the day of the D Day Commemoration he still could have changed his plans As PM and stayed but choose not to showing such DISRESPECT to those Veterans, those that lost there lives and Families for the Freedoms we have today Being a Veteran myself I have never known a PM to show such disrespect what the hell was he thinking SHAME ON YOU PM SUNAK  
    • Thanks. We'll try to help over the weekend. If the hearing is on 05/07 then it's 90% sure that the deadline for filing your WS is 21/06.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mrs P V Cap One


phatram
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3327 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Mrs P

 

Please see below for some guidance on the requirements relating to copies of credit agreements.

Entitlement to copy of your credit agreement

 

On written request when accompanied by £1, you have the right to

a copy of you executed agreement

any other document referred to in ita statement showing certain information (this information is set out in Section 78(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974

Requirements relating to copies:

The copy of the executed agreement need not be an exact copy but it must be a true copy. This means certain details may be omitted from the original agreement such as the signature but you must be in no doubt as to the true nature of your obligations under the agreement. Where the terms have been varied as provided for within the agreement, the copy of the original agreement must be accompanied by a document setting out the current terms, as varied (The Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983).

 

Affect of failure to provide a copy of a consumer credit agreement:

 

Failure to provide a copy of your agreement within 12 days means the agreement cannot be enforced against you until a copy is provided (Section 78(6) Consumer Credit Act 1974).

 

Meaning of enforcement:

 

Unfortunately the meaning of ‘enforcement’ is not clear and therefore the question of whether a creditor can take you to court for debts owed in respect of an agreement they have failed to provide you with a copy of the agreement is not clear.

This issue was discussed in the case of Rankine & another v American Express Services Europe & others (High Court 16 May 2008 In this case the judge held that commencing proceedings was not enforcement. Please note this case is not an appeal case and is therefore not legally binding (i.e. does not have to be followed in future cases).

 

The Office of Fair Trading have provided some guidance on this area of the law but this guidance is only intended to assist trading standards departments with their advice and enforcement role and is not available to members of the public

The above advice is not intended to be taken as a definitive guide to the relevant law, only the courts can interpret statutory legislation with any authority

 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you want to discuss this matter further.

 

Kind regards

 

xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Trading Standards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Mrs P, subbed to your thread as I am at the same stage as you. The default notice is defective as they cannot say pay up in 28 days from the date of this letter, they must specify an actual date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I've had one of those too. If you write to them again, you will get a similar response and so the pingpong goes on.

 

They are playing silly bu**ers with my SAR at the moment. Allegedly they cannot find any information linking my name and my current or previous addresses. They want me to send them an account number. Not sure I have an account with them, but they keep phoning me asking for my date of birth :D

Please note that I am not a solicitor or legally trained. The advice I give is from my own personal experience based on my own personal circumstance. If you choose to follow any advice I may give, please make sure you understand the implications of following that advice. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your letter dated 1 JULY 2009 which quite frankly is a joke. You have NOT complied with my request, you have NOT sent what I requested and I refer you to the letter sent to you on the 24th June 2009, a copy of which is enclosed for ease of reference.

Yours faithfully

Edited by phatram
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I've received identical letters today as well (1st and 3rd ones )

 

Just sent them this ....

 

Dear Sirs,

 

Thankyou for your threatogram that I received this morning. I am truly frightened by your letter and I therefore enclose a cheque for the sum of £xxx.xx as payment in full. Would you like any additional sums for your inconvenience?

 

Reality Check

 

Unless Capital One have located a signed, correctly executed consumer credit agreement then I do not owe any money.

 

I understand that you are a wholly owned subsiduary of Capital One and purport to be a seperate Debt Collection company. I suggest that you put up or shut up. Take me to court and produce the non-existent agreement.

 

The lack of a compliant credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

* may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* may not pass the account to a third party.

* may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

Capital One have already breached the Banking Code and have been reported for such.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

 

HomerJ :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

 

Thank you for your letter of 14/07/09 the contents of which are noted

 

 

 

 

 

As holders of a Consumer Credit Licence you are obliged to comply with the Office of Fair Trading Guidelines on Debt Collection. I would therefore be obliged if you would provide me with an explanation as to why you are attempting to collect on an alleged debt which was disputed with CAPITOL ONE BANK (EUROPE) prior to your first contact with me, and has yet to be resolved

As per OFT guidelines Section 2.8k "not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt."

 

Since this is considered an unfair practice and contrary to the OFT guidelines, you should consider this letter as a formal complaint, and provide me with a copy of your complaints resolution procedure I also require you to confirm that you will now comply with the OFT guidelines, and will not attempt any further collection activity whilst the dispute is unresolved.

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that your continued pursuit is in violation of the CPUTR 2008, Protection from harassment Act 1997 section 3 as well as breaching a number of the OFT Collection Guidelines.

 

Should you fail to provide me with the required undertaking within 7 days, I shall report your breach of the OFT guidelines to Trading Standards and the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Take notice that I will not discuss this matter on the telephone, and all further communication must be in writing. Any further telephone calls will be perceived as harassment, and dealt with accordingly.

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you would prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by phatram
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm going to report this to the FOS asking them to force Crap 1 to prove this debt is mine.

 

Personally I dont think thats a good idea... FOS will side with Capital one in my opinion and just state you clearly have spent the money, the debt is yours.

 

Far better to restrict the complaint to Capital One will not provide the CCA which you require to check something (i.e. PPI / Prescribed interest rates not right) or something similar.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

 

 

I am in receipt of your letter dated xx September 2009

This account is in dispute with Capital One and has been since xx xxxxxxx xxxx.

Not only is this a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office of Fair Trading debt collection guidelines, but also in breach of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and Data Protection Act 1998. My previous dispute from xx xxxxxxx xxxxx has NOT yet been answered

 

 

As Capital One Bank (Europe) plc are now in default of my Consumer Credit Act request and have also breached *s10 Data Protection Act request , I consider this account to be in SERIOUS DISPUTE.

As you are aware while my Consumer Credit Act request remains in default enforcement action is NOT permitted, under s127 this constitutes a complete defence at law

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS

 

Now I would respectfully suggest that this account is returned to Capital One Bank (Europe) plc for resolution of these defaults and breaches, as Fredrickson International Ltd cannot lawfully pursue any enforcement activities.

 

If Fredrickson International Ltd chooses to ignore my dispute and attempt enforcement, I will initiate legal action and file reports with the appropriate authorities, including, but not limited to, Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, Information Commissioners Office, Financial Ombudsman Service and possible court action

 

After taking advice, I am of the opinion that any continued pursuit is in violation of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 in line with the Office of Fair Trading Collection Guidelines. I hope that this will not be necessary and an acceptable solution can be accomplished.

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter. I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...