Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ACPOA PCN 190424.pdf   1 Date of the infringement 30/3/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 19/4/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 23/4/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] No   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? No   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] N   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? APCOA   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Ludlow Tesco 2856   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. No  
    • So not entirely down to the ticket office, then. In fact you have been quite fortunate. The "Section 172" response provides the evidence the police need to prove that you were driving if they wish to prosecute you in court. In England and Wales there is a legal precedent which has determined that an unsigned s172 response does not meet the requirements of that part of the RTA. In effect, an unsigned response is equivalent to no response at all. (This precedent is not recognised in Scotland and there is a strategy to "go unsigned" to avoid conviction). When they receive an unsigned response the police are perfectly entitled to prosecute you for "Failing to provide drivers details" and they more often than not do. This offence carries six points, a hefty fine and insurance grief for up to five years. So you got lucky. The situation now is that the deadline for accepting a course is passed. Four months is the absolute maximum, with some forces cutting it back to as little as three months from the date of the offence. The police will not extend this because if you fail to complete the course before six months has elapsed, they can no longer prosecute you. They can only begin proceedings up to the corresponding date in June (i.e. if the offence was December 10th, they have until June 10th to begin proceedings). You will gain nothing by taking this to court. On the contrary you have a lot to lose. Courses are offered entirely at the discretion of the police, you have no right to one and the court has no powers to order one. Presumably you have been offered a fixed penalty of £100 and 3 points. If you are sentenced in court it will cost you at least three times that, possibly more (depending on your speed and your income). My advice: accept the fixed penalty and do it soon as there is a deadline for that as well and if you allow it to pass your matter will be taken to court anyway. Do not forget to submit your driving licence details as instructed when accepting the offer. If you fail to do so the police will have no time left to remind you (and they don't usually send reminders for this anyway) and, again, your case will end up in court.
    • put them all in one mass pdf please  read upload use the websites listed. dx
    • Hi all, I have an update: I have received the documents from the SAR, including photos. It appears that I was parked in a bay with a sign that requires a permit, however the pole that it is on does appear to be behind the barrier - see photo. Also, they documented that they DID NOT apply the PCN to my car because of safety concerns and I DID NOT receive the initial £60 PCN by post- see attached.CamScanner 05-10-2024 15.06.pdf appreciate nay feedback/ advice, current PCN fee stands at £100. CamScanner 05-10-2024 15.03.pdf CamScanner 05-10-2024 15.08.pdf CamScanner 05-10-2024 15.06.pdf
    • They said hi is this (name) I said no and they asked if he’s there tell him to contact us in regards to Sainsbury’s  I said ok bye
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Middle Lane Drivers


dandoogle
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5300 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

When it's busy though - is it OK to stay in the middle lane? I'm sorry this is really bad but I've never read the highway code! When its empty I'm always in the fast lane or the slow lane, but sometimes going down the M25 when it's busy it's more like an american freeway where cars are all in their respective lanes going around about the same speed - is it OK to be in the middle lane in this situation?

 

Why would you be in the 'fast' lane when the motorway is empty :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Lets put up this scenario for a debate

 

1. M Way is virtually empty, so proceed in Inside lane at just under/ on 70, if safe to do so. Overtake a lorry using 2nd lane and then return to 70 in inside lane Perfectly safe and legal and considerate so why sit in the outside lane if the rest of the road is clear?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago when Tony Blackburn was the top dj on Radio 1 (and I used to listen to it), he was doing his Christmas day programme. On the hand over with the dj before him, he was asked 'you got here ok then' and his reply I have never forgotten, "yep, I came down the M1, very quiet, I only saw 3 cars and they were all in the middle lane".

 

Moral, even then it happened and others were aware of it.

 

They were no different in 1959

 

m1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why bother driving at all?

 

I was on a dual carriageway tonight and right lane filters in to one The idiot in the right hand lane tried to force me off the road instead of slowing down.

 

One of those speed indicators ..don't know what they are called but are 'din fart' in Danish, told me to slow down when I was doing less than 30 mph because I was turning.

 

I tried to cross the road to take my daughter to school this morning and had to squeeze between cars that belonged to Keep Clear. I assume that's their name as it seems to be the same drivers that think it's their own personal parking space.

 

Grrr.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many years ago when Tony Blackburn was the top dj on Radio 1 (and I used to listen to it), he was doing his Christmas day programme. On the hand over with the dj before him, he was asked 'you got here ok then' and his reply I have never forgotten, "yep, I came down the M1, very quiet, I only saw 3 cars and they were all in the middle lane".

 

Moral, even then it happened and others were aware of it.

 

They were no different in 1959

 

m1.jpg

 

Perhaps the thinking is that should a hazard emerge you have the option of left or right. Ok you have the same on the inside lane but it's drummed in not to use the hard shoulder unless it's a dire emergency.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps the thinking is that should a hazard emerge you have the option of left or right

 

If you are in the middle lane you have to be concentrating on possible hazards 'emerging' from both left and right though. I find it the most stressful lane to be in from the point of having to watch what other drivers are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in the middle lane you have to be concentrating on possible hazards 'emerging' from both left and right though. I find it the most stressful lane to be in from the point of having to watch what other drivers are doing.

 

Good point! And one which I agree with! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are in the middle lane you have to be concentrating on possible hazards 'emerging' from both left and right though. I find it the most stressful lane to be in from the point of having to watch what other drivers are doing.

 

In theory you are correct and that is how it should be.

 

In practice most of the drivers I see plodding along in the middle lane are only concerned with what is happening in front. Thats why they are so dangerous and their lack of consideration for other road users is frustrating and causes other drivers to do things they would not normally do. Like undertaking or going from lane 1 to lane 3 and back again.

 

The plonker in the middle lane (if they notice) then says 'look at that idiot'

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

In theory you are correct and that is how it should be.

 

In practice most of the drivers I see plodding along in the middle lane are only concerned with what is happening in front. Thats why they are so dangerous and their lack of consideration for other road users is frustrating and causes other drivers to do things they would not normally do. Like undertaking or going from lane 1 to lane 3 and back again.

 

The plonker in the middle lane (if they notice) then says 'look at that idiot'

 

Pedross

 

Again a very valid point! MLD are oblivious to other vehicles around them. It is sooo frusrating and tempts you to perform manoeuvers that would not be necessary if they were less selfish, less arrogant and more aware of other drivers. :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some drivers just don't care. Get used to it.

 

Flamin woman today decided to pull out with no indicators after parking on the Keep Clear signs outside a school, as she does. No disability just stupid arrogance, sucking her teeth if anyone dares look at her to disprove. She treats it as her personal parking space. I hit the horn to warn her and she followed me down the road hitting her horn non stop. I stopped my car, got out and she drove on the pavement to get away.

 

I can't wait to see her again, same time and same place. And yes I will be doing the policing in that case as no one else seems bothered and it's an accident waiting to happen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done you! Just don't get sucked into doing something that gets you more attention from the police than her.

 

It would be a tragedy if you got pulled up for trying to show her the error of her ways.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She'll use the race card as an arguement and shout more obscene words. I'll use the common sense and safe for all one. I've taken my children to that school for over 14 years and never once have I had to park on yellow lines.

 

She is just an idle idiot that has tinted windows that she can't see through front and back.

 

 

She'll have a shock tomorrow..but not one that lands me in hot water.:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we the only people still on here at this ungodly hour?

 

I'll be waiting in eager anticipation for news of the outcome of your conversations with this person,you haven't said but it wouldn't be a 4x4 by any chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

She'll use the race card as an arguement and shout more obscene words. I'll use the common sense and safe for all one. I've taken my children to that school for over 14 years and never once have I had to park on yellow lines.

 

She is just an idle idiot that has tinted windows that she can't see through front and back.

 

 

She'll have a shock tomorrow..but not one that lands me in hot water.:D

Crapstone,

Had a similar situation when my youngest was at primary school and I mentioned it to the school headmaster as you have said 'its an accident waiting to happen'. They rang the polioce who waited for this person and give em a ticket. That may sound harsh but what would be harsher is if a kid got killed because of someone's laziness

Exasp

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are we the only people still on here at this ungodly hour?

 

I'll be waiting in eager anticipation for news of the outcome of your conversations with this person,you haven't said but it wouldn't be a 4x4 by any chance?

 

Lol... I'm the one driving the 4x4, which isn't a gas guzzler version. The offending car is a Hyundai SE Coupe.

 

'Lady' turned up, same place but later than usual. Putting off the plan of action until Friday. Some things are better served cold and very calculated. I've spoken to a few people and they are as annoyed as I am by her disregard for anyone other than herself and her own children.

 

It's a sign I'm getting old..I plan things instead of rushing in and making mistakes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapstone,

Had a similar situation when my youngest was at primary school and I mentioned it to the school headmaster as you have said 'its an accident waiting to happen'. They rang the polioce who waited for this person and give em a ticket. That may sound harsh but what would be harsher is if a kid got killed because of someone's laziness

Exasp

 

If we wait for a cop or a traffic warden to act we will be waiting a long time. They stand there and are a prevention and not the cure. They should make themselves less obvious and start handing the tickets out swiftly. No discussions or clock watching.

 

Better still give the authority to parents, as wardens, with the ability to ticket and as volunteers. If it works for councils that allow portable speed cameras and self-policing to deter, then the same should work for parking laws.

 

If plan A doesn't work ..plan B will ...and there is always plan C to fall back on. Reminds me ..my bat. needs replacing ..either that or it's the alter. or leads. Must get it checked out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol... I'm the one driving the 4x4, which isn't a gas guzzler version. The offending car is a Hyundai SE Coupe.

 

That's a surprise, the Hyundai is a nice enough car, but not exactly standard school run material, at least no around here.

 

Shame you couldn't confront her today but never mind, her time will come. You might want to try the local paper with this story. In Glasgow, the Evening Times carried out a campaign of photographing, naming and shaming drivers who parked on the zig zags outside schools.

 

The paper was threatened with legal action if they published and the photographer was threatened with violence by several angry parents, including some women (!). Undeterred the pictures appeared daily over about 12 weeks with different schools being targeted each time.

 

The headmasters were hugely supportive and the scheme was a great success but it was amazing how arrogant the drivers were considering they were clearly in the wrong.

 

Fingers crossed!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a surprise, the Hyundai is a nice enough car, but not exactly standard school run material, at least no around here.

 

Shame you couldn't confront her today but never mind, her time will come. You might want to try the local paper with this story. In Glasgow, the Evening Times carried out a campaign of photographing, naming and shaming drivers who parked on the zig zags outside schools.

 

The paper was threatened with legal action if they published and the photographer was threatened with violence by several angry parents, including some women (!). Undeterred the pictures appeared daily over about 12 weeks with different schools being targeted each time.

 

The headmasters were hugely supportive and the scheme was a great success but it was amazing how arrogant the drivers were considering they were clearly in the wrong.

 

Fingers crossed!

 

Now that's a thought! Our local council were going to launch cars to spy on ignorant drivers but it all fell flat. Yet we can have the Google cars riding around filming and uploading images?

 

Hi-tech cameras in school cars blitz : Express & Star

 

The headmistress of the school has been great but her authority stops at the gates and there aren't enough wardens or police available to be there on a daily basis and I don't expect them to be.

 

A few of the parents I've approached are in favour of either:

 

Asking for delegated powers and appointed reps. to be able to enforce parking as volunteers.

 

Asking that traffic cones are supplied and put in place, again by volunteers.

 

Or the people are named and shamed with photographs, witnessed and made public.

 

Thursday ..The same woman..doing exactly the same as she did to me. Parked half on the pavement on zig-zags and pulled out without indicating again in front of another 4x4. All caught on camera and when the driver beeped his horn she is shouting obscene racist comments and braking without cause.

 

Friday...Same lady turns up late as I'm leaving the school. A chinese man, another one who regularly parks on the lines has taken her 'space'. Behind him is a car belonging to an indian person and in front is a taxi, driven by an indian person. All illegally parked.

 

She started honking her horn at the chinese person to move and swearing at him. She's looks to be of african descent and was calling them all the names under the sun in a racist way because they wouldn't move for her. Then they all started with name calling despite all being in the wrong. Again all caught on camera.

 

She had to park on the other side of the road, across someones driveway. She didn't manage to get out the drivers side ..Damn my battery. If looks could kill and her words..

 

I've never heard such racism before and it's not coming from the stereotypical white facist. They should be ashamed of themselves, I've only seen these cars and people since the new term so they'll have to learn it's not tolerated and they can't use race or ignorance.

 

Support the whole school and 'every child matters' in education and their welfare/safety in getting there or beggar off somewhere else that will tolerate your selfish attitude.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats an amazing story Crapstone

 

I started off speechles with all sorts of ideas racing through my brain.

 

Then I realised the next step. Start your own thread called 'selfish illegal parking outside schools' or something like, get the relevent posts transfered and it will attract people with similar experiences.

 

There might be people with answers or ideas who maybe don't drive and would not have an interest in 'middle lane drivers'

 

Pedross

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we wait for a cop or a traffic warden to act we will be waiting a long time. They stand there and are a prevention and not the cure. They should make themselves less obvious and start handing the tickets out swiftly. No discussions or clock watching.

 

Better still give the authority to parents, as wardens, with the ability to ticket and as volunteers. If it works for councils that allow portable speed cameras and self-policing to deter, then the same should work for parking laws.

 

If plan A doesn't work ..plan B will ...and there is always plan C to fall back on. Reminds me ..my bat. needs replacing ..either that or it's the alter. or leads. Must get it checked out.

 

It will take a child to be run over because of these selfish inconsiderate 'parents' before action is taken unfortunately.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

another thought. Raise the issue with your local police road safety officer. Request police have a presence for several days on a random basis to give miscreants a sound telling off/issue tickets etc. A motorcycle patrol officer should do for an hour or so. If they raise difficulties like staffing levels, priorities etc mention that you were also thinking of speaking to the local paper about the problem. If the police can't help, do contact the paper. My experience is that most features editors like to undertake crusades and one involving child safety should get their support. The name and shame campaign had amazing success in Glasgow. The practice is indefensible in the eyes of any right thinking parent and the "I'll only be a minute" argument just doesn't wash.

 

I would also enlist the help of your local councillor. I recently approached mine about stupidly parked cars obscuring the view around a dangerous corner despite double yellow lines. It seems the lines were incorrectly drawn so tickets couldn't be issued. The councillor arranged for the correct markings to be applied, one day of ticketing followed and now everyone parks in the free car park 50 yards away. Not only is the road much safer, but the councillor has boosted her re-election chances so everyone wins.

 

This is a relatively simple problem caused by a few inconsiderate and selfish drivers, I hope one of these suggestions will provide a solution for you.

 

Just a thought, before the "check the TRO" brigade come galloping over the hill, let's not forget that this is about child safety not inconveniencing drivers or making money. I'm sure the council, parents and school staff would much rather see the school entrance kept clear than collect a few quid from tickets.

 

I'm picturing the learned judge' asking the motorist who's car obscured the view of the driver who ran over a child asking why he was parked on school zig zags? I don't think "because there wasn't a valid TRO" would impress his honour somehow.

 

You have to wonder if these ignorant b*st*rds would park there if instead of zig-zags there was a polite notice saying "please don't park here because there's a real danger of creating an accident" would have more effect? I doubt it somehow as these kind of people are the same as those who park in disabled bays because it's raining - they are beneath contempt!

Edited by rickyd
Link to post
Share on other sites

Even my five year old can't understand people who park on double yellows or over other peoples' driveways near her school. When we walk past them she points at them and shouts 'Ooooohhhhhh mummy, they shouldn't be parked there', 'no, but they do because they are idiots'. I would love to get there early and put nails on the road where they park.

 

Middle lane drivers make me fuuuurrrrious, I don't know what it is that they don't understand either :eek:

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid that children expect all things delivered on a plate these days i.e. a car journey to school. They acquire quick return from computer games, tv, etc..........why should their journey to school be any different? Too many parents are too quick to pander to their 'darlings' requests, a simple NO is often sufficient, followed by an explanation of why their demands will not be met.

Of course I understand safety implications of children walking alone (especially younger children), so walk with them! This would ensure safe and legal parking for the few children who live beyond walking distance from the school.

I realise my point of view is controversial, however, I believe that parenting has somehow lost its way. We may attempt to make our childrens' world perfect but are we preparing them for a world beyond our parental status?

In my opinion far too many parents are prepared to make their childrens' lives 'easy', this offers them no favours for the 'real' world they inevitably face.

Off subject I guess, but my rant over!!!! My children 12, and 15 walk to school, and are well aware that myself and my partner can and do say NO when applicable.

Sos for the rant but feel better now! :)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well said! Perhaps its better to kill or injure someone else's child whilst they drop off their own precious darlings.

 

I've always thought that the argument "We have a 4x4 because we want to protect our kids" is a ludicrous position to adopt. It suggests that their kids are more important than others' kids, especially when the biggest threat to them comes from being hit by a 4x4!

 

It does support the "I'll do what I want, I'm bigger than you" mindset which seems to underpin everything that makes us angry theses days.

 

Of course it would be too much to expect one of the parents to walk to school with their kids wouldn't it? I suppose we'll always get the "but we both work" scenario, but have they no neighbours, relatives or friends who could walk them to school?

 

Its pathetic, these non-walking, not traffic wise, frail little things are our future - dear, oh dear!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...