Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Russia’s economy has been cut off from the global financial system - but it is still growing. Why?View the full article
    • Well done. Are you able to tell us more about how it went on the day please? HB
    • when mediation call they will ask the same 3 questions that are in their email you had to accept it going forward. simply state 'i do not have enough information from the claimant to make an informed decision upon mediation so i refuse. end of problem.  
    • Food prices, including a $40 chicken, has stoked fury and calls for big foreign supermarket chains to come to Canada.View the full article
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business CEntre Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio i Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue –  15 Feb 2024 Particulars of Claim What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?  The claim is for the sum of £922 due by the Defendant under and agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a Capital One account with an account reference of [number with 16 digits] The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit ACt 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 16-06-23, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of the issue of these proceedings in the sum of £49.15 The Claimant claims the sum of £972 What is the total value of the claim? £1112 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? I dont know the details of the PAPDC to know if it was pursuant to paragraph 3, but I did receive a Letter of Claim with a questionaire/form to fill. Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? no Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned/purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I was aware, I'm not certain I received a 'Notice of Assignment' from Capital One but may have been informed the account had been sold without such a title on the letter? Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Not since the debt purchase, and not from Capital One. Why did you cease payments? I can't remember - it was the tail end of the pandemic and I may not have had enough income to keep up payments - I am self-employed and work in the event industry - at that time. I also had a bank account that didn't allow direct debits and may have just forgotten payments and became annoyed at fines for late payments. What was the date of your last payment? Appears to be 20/4/2022 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No Here is my Defence: Defence - 1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had an agreement with Capital One but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification by way of a CPR 31.14 and section 78 request.. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. I am unaware of having been served with a Default Notice pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment pursuant to the Law and Property Act 1925 Section 136(1) 5. The Defendant has sent a request by way of a section 78 pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974, for a copy of the agreement, the Claimant has yet to comply and remains in default of said request. 6. A further request has been made via CPR 31.14 to the Claimants solicitor, requesting disclosure of documents on which the Claimant is basing their claim. The Claimant has not complied and to date nothing has been received. 7. It is therefore not accepted with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant and the Claimant is put to strict proof to: a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement and; b) show how the Claimant has reached the amount claimed for and; c) show the nature of the breach and evidence by way of a Default Notice pursuant to sec 88 CCA1974 d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim 8. As per Civil Procedure 16.5 it is expected that the claimants prove the allegation that the money is owed 9. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of section 136 of the Law of Property Act and section 82A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief. .................. Please note that I had to write a defence quite quickly as I hit the deadline. At the time of writing the defence, I hadn't been able to find correspondence from Capital One, but had since found default letter etc. I submitted CCA request and CPR 31.14. However, I didn't get any proof of postage or use registered post for the CPR (an oversight) but did with the CCA request. I received a pack which included a letter from Overdales, going over the defence I'd filed, as well as letters of Lowells and reprints of letters from Capital One. But I have no idea if this pack is in response to the CCA request or the CPR ! I would have expected two separate responses ... although I do know they are both the same company. Looking over the pack today, and looking through old emails .. I find some discrepancies in the Capital One default letters (notice of default and Claim of default). They are both dated *before* an email I have stating that a default can be avoided. The one single page of agreement sent (so not the full agreement) has a 16 digit number at the top in small print, next to 'Capital One' which corresponds to a number called 'PURN' printed at the top of each of the 10 pages of ins and outs of the account (they're not official statements, but a list of monthly goings) yet no mention anywhere on either of the account number. I cant really scan them at the moment - I can later tomorrow, but that will be after the mediation call I'm sure. I guess I may be on my own for this mediation ... I am not certain the CCA request has been satisfied .. or if the CPR has been . And then I appear to have evidence that the Default notices provided are fabricated ? Yet, I do have (elsewhere ... not at home) Default letters from Capital One I can check ..
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank of Scotland terminated without default notice and without claiming full balance, Blair, Oliver Scott DCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4818 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hiya all

 

im with you on this, i will put out this similar request as what lexis has pointed out to us and underdog on my bos thread and see if i can get someone to give us a bit of help, two pronged attack is better than one

 

mind you pls dont read my mind where id want that prong to land.....;)

 

ops my halo just slipped

 

laters angel x:lol:

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 443
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

HELP ANYONE?

 

Have had a letter today from BOS Mastercard offering me refund of charges but saying their default is not invalid and the account still up and running - they say they don't have to add days on for posting - They have put a sheet for signing to accept the offer

 

I am not going to do anything - any thoughts anyone??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Cleo did you ask for a refund of charges?

 

Unfortunately they do have to take into account postage dates as if they didnt and they send it on day 1 there is no way you would get the 14 days as is a requirement, aload of bumf from the idiots.

 

Also yet again think that they are above the law and the consumer Credit Act and think that it is ok to reinstate your account [like mine] unilaterally:rolleyes:

 

Cleo BRW told me to stop writing longs letters telling them where they went wrong and not to give them any more ammunition [although you [we] have plenty against them] they seek to frustrate you and get you to react and give them more information.

 

I have not replied to their january letter, the last thing I sent apart from s.a.r wis the letter in december as I said that I would ignore further requests for payment due to their unlawful termination and conduct of the account. The reply I got to that in january did NOT warrant any further replies as all had been said in december.

 

Milly X

 

P.S we neen BRW. I will PM my thread and get hime to look at your post.

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

By the way if BRW:) does pop in.

 

 

I did work out all the figures you suggested way earlier in the thread,so even if they produce a Default Notice in the end, the unlawful penalty charges[C] taken away from [F] the missed payments/arrears figure alone would be over half of the default sum claimed, {going on the legal sum claimed on termination] so would not be di minimus as it is 52%:D If the default notice is as they say from the 18th august as they suggest [never received as you know and they refrain from sending me the copy,] unfortunately for them it would equate to approx 100%, so even better and would render that invalid let alone every unlawful thing they have done since!!!

 

Milly XX

 

milly XX

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Folks!

 

Sorry to be a damp squib, but am flat out on something at the moment, so can only offer very limited help.

 

All I can say is keep things plodding along, as arguing with DCAs and bankers is almost futile until it gets to Court.

 

The main issue is to decide if you are in a good position, state what they have or have not done (keep key things back if it is something they can fix), and thereafter just hold firm and do not rise to their jibes and attempts to knee jerk you into something.

 

If you fight them, then you must resign yourself to a Claim arriving. If one doesn't, then you know they know they are stuffed.

 

But if one does, then don't take that as being they are not still stuffed, but also don't underestimate their capacity for bending the rules and pushing their luck.

 

There is no need to get excited until the Court Claim plops on your doormat. Once that happens, then things won't suddenly go pear shaped. It'll take many Weeks, almost certainly many Months, before you'll ever see the inside of a Court.

 

Sure, things will need to be done, AOS by +14 Days, Defence by +28 Days etc, but you will then have time to get things ready and yourself prepared. It may never make Court, but always plan that it will.

 

Until then, don't give them anything that can be used against you.

 

Keep gathering things against them, watch their tactics, help others out who are further ahead than you with the same bankers, as by helping you will learn.

 

But right now, most of you, as far as I can tell, are OK at the moment. You are still at the Mexican Stand-off stage! Who will blink first etc!

 

If they are bothering you, i.e. Calls or letters that breach the OFT Debt Collection Guidelines then put all of your efforts into compiling that evidence against them. Investigate Call Recorders etc.

 

IOW, re-direct your energies towards things that can help you.

 

The danger when nothing much is happening, is you'll lean forwards and get stuck peering into your own belly buttons! Fighting every last little trick they try, and reading too much into what they say.

 

Break it down into the key issues, and then think how it looks from the other side of the Court. If you need to show you were responsible and made the right noises, then send them a letter or two. But if you feel you have said all of the key things and the bankers/DCA won't listen, then step back and do not play an active part.

 

Do also remember that once a DCA has the issue, it's a fairly sure sign the banker is doing very little. Once the DCA gives up, then watch what happens next carefully. If another DCA pops up, relax, as it's just more hot air. Once a Lawyer joins in, then take more note, but work out how to spot the real Lawyers who will try to shaft you, and the ones who just make DCA like noises.

 

I apologise for stating the obvious, but I cannot stress how important it is to not get too excited until you need to. Don't Panic, Don't Panic, Don't Panic....OK...NOW PANIC!

 

The time for getting excited will come, or it won't!

 

Until you get to the safety of +6 Years from the last Payment, you need to just stay on low alert. The closer to +6 Years, the less alert you need to be. If only a few Months or a Year from when you started the battle, stay frosty and keep peepers peeled!

 

If we kept our Troops on Red Alert all the time, they'd soon get knackered or lazy or both. For now, stay on Green Alert, but be ready to go to Amber or Red as needed.

 

But going to Red Alert now and trying to stay there, and all you'll do is burn out or you will start making mistakes with what you say and do. The bankers and DCAs want you jumping around like rabbits in the headlights at night. So don't give them that pleasure, chill out, relax, and enjoy finding things to use against them!

 

Finally, divert all other energies to making or saving money. The best way to fight them is to make enough money so you do not need to fight them.

 

Cheers,

BRW

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

phone log update:

 

16th feb:

8.08am

8.40am

5.44pm

6.14pm

8.30pm

 

17th feb

5.08pm

5.40pm

8.35pm

 

18th feb

8.12am

8.48am

5.21pm

5.52pm

 

19th feb

8.14am

8.45am

5.13pm

5.43pm

8.50pm

Milly X

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quickie - if the DN states an amount that is the actual balance (I know they can't really do this unless the whole lot is arrears, but I'm going hypothetical here), or alternatively it shows arrears, but your balance as it stands includes charges/penalties, am I reading it right that the DN is not correct?

 

I only ask as surely pretty much every DN in that case would fall foul of this - certainly the £20+ charges have been deemed unlawful, but the £12 ones have only been left as a little less unfair than the £20+ ones haven't they? So following that logic (well my logic anyway:)), if you've been issued with a DN it will almost certainly have a charge or two included and is therefore kaput.

 

Is that right, or am I muddling myself?

 

Really hoping I'm right though;)

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Lexis this is from my thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank-bank-scotland/171374-bank-scotland-terminated-without.html#post1867381

 

Thats how I read it like you are reading it from BRW's post.that the default sum would be incorrect. It did not say just the charges on the missing payments/arrears.

 

milly

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya milly hope you are well and likewise to our fellow posters

 

again a huge thanks for BRW as always i am truely inspired by his wise words, i have really learnt a lot, and im not jumping through hoops no more and im forever mindful of what letters i do write of the judge reading it in the future;)

 

i print off the posts that i know will help me from everyone and you shold see my little computer area its truely a haven lol

 

i learn when i read it and then read it a bit later on and i will get all the info together and am planning for court, even if it never happens

 

never had a default notice until now on my bos - others are hitting me hard too but hey girls and boys, its about survival of the fittest at the moment and learning everything to help us in our defence

 

laters angel x:cry:

Edited by angel_1

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Consumer Credit Act Agreements

Wilson & Anor v Hurstanger Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 299 (04 April 2007)Wilson & Ors v. Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2003] UKHL 40 (10 July 2003)Dimond v. Lovell [2000] UKHL 27; [2000] 2 All ER 897; [2000] 2 WLR 1121 (11th May, 2000)McGinn v Grangewood Securities Ltd. [2002] EWCA Civ 522

logo-s.GIFDefault NoticesWoodchester Lease Management Services Ltd v Swain and Co - [2001] GCCR 2255 logo-s.GIFData Protection Act Smith v Lloyds TSB 2005 [2005] EWHC 246 (Ch)Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] EWCA Civ 1746'logo-s.GIFFailure to remove inaccurate dataRICHARD DURKIN v DSG RETAIL LIMITED and HFC BANK PLC logo-s.GIFCounter Claim for DamagesKpohraror v Woolwich Building Society - [1996] 4 All ER 119

 

ttp://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/299.html

 

In the case of Dimond v Lovell [2000] UKHL 27, Lord Hoffmann said:

logo-s.GIF Parliament intended that if a consumer credit agreement was improperly executed, then subject to the enforcement powers of the court, the debtor should not have to pay.

Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 633, Sir Andrew Morritt, Vice Chancellor said:

logo-s.GIF The creditor must be taken to have made a voluntary disposition, or gift, of the loan monies to the debtor. The creditor had chosen to part with the monies in circumstances in which it was never entitled to have them repaid

When this case was appealed to the House of Lords on a matter regarding the Human Rights Act (Wilson & Ors v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry [2003] UKHL 40), Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead said

logo-s.GIF The message to be gleaned from sections 65, 106, 113 and 127 of the Consumer Credit Act is that where a court dismisses an application for an enforcement order under section 65 the lender is intended by Parliament to be left without recourse against the borrower in respect of the loan… when legislation renders the entire agreement inoperative, to use a neutral word, for failure to comply with prescribed formalities the legislation itself is the primary source of guidance on what are the legal consequences. Here the intention of Parliament is clear.

And from Francis Bennion known as the architect of the Consumer Credit Act following the House of Lords Appeal

logo-s.GIF Dr Lawson may be interested to know that I included the provision in question (section127(3)) entirely on my own initiative. It seemed right to me that if the creditor company couldn’t be bothered to ensure that all the prescribed particulars were accurately included in the credit agreement it deserved to find it unenforceable, and that the court should not have power to relieve it from this penalty. Nobody queried this, and it went through Parliament without debate. I’m glad the House of Lords has now vindicated my reasoning and confirmed hat nobody’s human rights were infringed.

Justice of the Peace (2003) 773

 

Edited by millymollymoo
All for reference
  • Haha 1

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they can't Lexis; but they'll probably try;) :rolleyes:

 

Just to give everyone a heads up: Their latest tactic with me is sending doorstep collectors to my house (despite them acknowledging receipt of the 'revoke right to visit' letter) and charging me for their criminal tort of trespass, hiding it under a letter charge reference on the monthly statement:mad: Harrassment, criminal acts and unfair penalty charges - they don't know when to stop digging, do they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

20th feb

5.08pm

5.39pm

 

21st feb

9.41am

10.15am

 

23rd feb

8.05am

8.36am

5.03pm

5.35pm

8.10pm

8.40pm

 

SO far 84 calls between 30th jan and 23rd feb!

Edited by millymollymoo
updatecalls

CAPITAL ONE (O/H!): Won £1864.63 including contractual :D

GE MONEY: WON £266.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya all

 

thanks milly for your post 189 info, fab, i will be printing that one off too.lol;);)

 

i have to reply to the doorstop visitor, thanks underdog, got to get that in another fee i suppose,,

 

anyway im off this week so am getting everything in order - im in fighting mood :D

 

oh anyone of you guys had something sold onto 1st credit?? cheers angelx

 

be back laters

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cleo here - see earlier posts on this thread - In letter from BOS - they say ""copies of historical terms and conditions unfortunately , are not available, however were provided to you when you opened the account" - if they were supposed to be on the back of the original does that mean they don't have it?? it sayd "UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET OUT OVERLEAF" on the application form/agreement they sent me

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey angel

 

OH had a CitiBank account passed onto them 2/3 years ago - they passed it onto Connaught fairly swiftly. I think this was because OH ignored any debt letters (silly boy didn't even tell me) so they decided it was duff. It's still with 1st Credit as the 'buyer' of the account from Citi though - and they haven't come up with an agreement yet. After 5 months:D

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh very sorry also for your loss milly

 

hope you have some good memories though in time will help

 

take care hugs angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...