Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • just to be clear here..... the DVLA do not send letters if a drivers licence address differs from any car's V5C that shows the same driver as it's registered keeper.
    • sorry she is a private individual, the cars are parking on her land. she can clamp the cars. only firms were outlawed from doing it bazza. thats what the victims of people dumping cars on their drives near airports did and they didn't not get prosecuted.    
    • The DVLA keeps two records of you. One as a driver and one for your car. If they differ you might find out in around a month when they will send you a reminder as well as to your other half for their car. If you receive nothing then you can be fairly sure that you were tailgating though wouldn't explain why they didn't pick up your car on one of drive past their cameras. However even if you do get a PCN later then your situation will not change. The current PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 which is the main law that covers private parking. It doesn't comply for two reasons. 1. Section 9 [2][a] states  (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; The PCN states 47 minutes which are the arrival and departure times not the time you were actually parked. if you subtract the time you took to drive from the entrance. look for a parking place  park in it perhaps having to manoeuvre a couple of times to fit within the lines and unload the children reloading the children getting seat belts on  driving to the exit stopping for cars pedestrians on the way you may well find that the actual time you were parked was quite likely to be around ten minutes over the required time.  Motorists are allowed a MINIMUM of ten minutes Grace period [something that the rogues in the parking industry conveniently forget-the word minimum] . So it could be that you did not overstay. 2] Sectio9 [2][f]  (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Your PCN does not include the words in brackets and in 2a the Act included the word "must". Another fail. What those failures mean is that MET cannot transfer the liability to pay the charge from the driver to the keeper. Only the driver is now liable which is why we recommend our members not to appeal. It is so easy to reveal who was driving by saying "when I parked the car" than "when the driver parked the car".  As long as they don't know who was driving they have little chance of winning in court. This is partly because Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. And because anyone with a valid motor insurance policy is able to drive your cars. It is a shame that you are too far away to get photos of the car park signage. It is often poor and quite often the parking rogues lose in Court on their poor signage alone. I hope hat you can now relax and not panic about the PCN. You will receive many letters from Met, their unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors threatening you with ever higher amounts of money. The poor dears have never read the Act which states quite clearly that the maximum sum that can be charged is the amount on the signs. The Act has only been in force for 12 years so it may take a  few more years for the penny to drop.  You can safely ignore everything they send you unless or until they send you a Letter of Claim. Just come back to us if they do send one of those love letters to you and we will advise on a snotty letter to send them. In the meantime go on and enjoy your life. Continue reading other threads and if you do get any worrying letters let us know. 
    • Hopefully the ANPR cameras didn't pick up the two vehicles, but I don't think you're out of the woods just yet. MET's "work" consists of sending out hundreds of these invoices every week so yours might be a few days behind your partner's. There is also the matter of Royal Mail.  I once sold two second-hand books to someone on eBay.  Weirdly the cost of sending them separately was less than the cost of sending them in one parcel.  So to save a few bob I sent them seperately.  One turned up the next day.  One arrived after four days.  They were  sent from the same post office at the same time! But let's hope I'm being too pessimistic. Please update us of any developments.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

problems with halifax


sussex1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3436 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have been having an arguments for some time with Halifax re this CCA which I originally felt was an application form and stated the account was therfore in dispute

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax2-2.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax-2.jpg

 

I heard nothing for a few months but did receive statements adding interest and late charges etc, even though i advised when account in dispute they cannot and today finally received this letter

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifaxoct2.jpg

 

I have only posted their responses to various issues i raised

 

What I am concerned with now is

 

is the CCA valid, the terms are on th ereverse of the doc and do have £25 fees but the front does say application and there is no Halifax signature

 

if it is enforecable fair enough but what about their commetns they can add fees etc (their answer number 3)even when an account is in dispute?

 

I am pretty certain they cannot but what would be my response and on what am i basing this?

 

many thanks for any suggestions

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 280
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Hi

 

I have been having an arguments for some time with Halifax re this CCA which I originally felt was an application form and stated the account was therfore in dispute

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax2-2.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax-2.jpg

 

I heard nothing for a few months but did receive statements adding interest and late charges etc, even tgough i advised when account in dispute they caano and today finally received this letter

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifaxoct2.jpg

 

I have only posted their responses to various issues i raised

 

What I am concerned with now is

 

is the CCA valid, the terms are on th ereverse of the doc and do have £25 fees but the front does say application and there is no Halifax signature

 

if it is enforecable fair enough but what about their commetns they can add fees etc (their answer number 3)even when an account is in dispute?

 

I am pretty certain they cannot but what would be my response and on what am i basing this?

 

many thanks for any suggestions

 

Hi this is just my opinion based on my own experiance and from reading and helping on other threads.

 

I have seen cases where an application form with all the prescribed terms within the document has been accepted by a court as an executable agreement. I would tend to agree with your interpretation that charging interest applying charges and reporting default etc is enforcing an account while in dispute.

 

Problem for me is that I have only disputed an account after obtaining advice on an agreement or lack of one, I have been advised that a creditor could start to apply charges etc when/if a dispute is resolved.

 

Sorry I cannot be more helpful dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

thamks, I am leading towards this may well be enforceable but am concerned with the charges.

 

Since the account was put in dispute the debt has goe up by £400 on a £3k balance and previously I had been paying £10 per month with interest etc frozen for a couple of years.

 

Any other views on how i should respond?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sussex

 

I have got the same application form.

I think Halifax are trying to be cocky and photocopying the T&C on the reverse.

 

I am prety sure the original agreement does not have the t&C on the reverse as I says on my agrement that I should have received a copy of the T&C in the post.

 

Something else that gives it away is the T&C conditions are leaflet size, photcopied at an angle and there is a leaflet ref number bottom right.

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with HAK, i dont think the second scan is part of the original signed doc, therefore i dont think they have an enforcable agreement.

 

Does it actually say on the page you signed that the prescribed terms are overleaf?

 

I would send them the account in dispute letter, and stop paying them.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for your help, I have hoewver already sent the disputed letter and this is their reply. Is there anything more specific i could or should be saying?

 

I stopped paying them from the end of April when the account first 12+2 days were up. They have since added charges, late fees and interest and as you will see in the link above they say that when account is in dispute this means they just can't enforce it but can request payments and add charges. Any ideas what i should reply to this? Its just annoying to see the debt is now substantially higher frim when i first requested my CCA?

 

thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received exactly the same front & diferent T&C on the back (different figures in the APR box & diff. Ref No in the bottom right hand corner).These are my thoughts on it from my own thread:

 

Yes, my name & address are correct.

My date of birth is wrong.

My bank's name is missing but the sort code is there & time with bank is there.

 

The basic form is in light lettering & then they have printed in bold letters each of the required fields (except as above).

 

They seem to be suggesting that this is a follow-on form after they have got the details from my Application Form & they have added them for me just to sign.

 

I am very "picky" and everything has to be just right with me.I even get told off for correcting the kids' homework lol so it would be VERY unusual for me just to let it go through.I underline my signature & the one on this form has the "underline" right through my name which again is not normal.

I was either having a very bad day or someone is in to cut & paste.

 

Might be interesting to see the original application form if one exists - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) perhaps?

 

There is printing on the back of the form.

It is called "Financial Information" and lists special promotion rate, APR, handling charges for cash, charges - but it has a different document reference (in tiny type on the bottom edge of the form) to the front!

i.e. it could have been photocopied to look as one page.

Think these would be the conditions of use?

 

I just have a "feeling" about it - such as the fact that it is presumably exactly the same as my application form.If I have already answered all of these questions in my handwriting why would they just copy them down neatly & send in essence the same form out for me to sign again?

And they haven't signed it.

 

If that one is enforceable why send out the shiny new 8 page contract with detailed T&C which isn't signed & only shows my current address?

I feel like they are trying to flannel me & am tempted at the moment to call their bluff.

 

My form is Feb 2004.

 

Would Sussex1 & Having_a_Knightmare mind measuring the distance from the top edge of the back page down to the top of "I" for Important Information? Mine measures 52mm.

 

If they are cut & pasting by hand then the distances should vary even if they have managed to keep them square.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry for delay I see what you mean re the print codes and the front and rear of mine are different as well. All the details on the front are correct though.

 

I have noticed the right side of the box "the agreement" is not boxed off. It makes no mention of the terms being overleaf or similar and it is not signed by them.

 

The distance from the top of the page to "I" on the reverse is 54mm and it is at an angle as you say.

 

Any view on what to say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you remember receiving this "For Your Signature" form to sign?

I can't but it was 4+ years ago.I dont know why they would re-write the handwritten application just to have you sign a "neat" copy of the same?

 

Why not just progress to the proper agreement?

 

Did you get a lovely "bells & whistles" 8 page agreement beginning "Parties" and going into great detail?

 

Mine features my new address & is unsigned.I think it just shows what I should have received & their letter went into loads of blurb about "You've been happy enough to pay the acount for 4 years, what's the problem now".

 

........& a threatogram from Blair,Oliver & Snott on the same day.

 

Smells fishy.

 

I wouls SAR them & specifically ask for a copy of all app.forms & agreement.See if they can get the photocopying on the back of your form to match the one you already have lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received exactley the same thing for my daughter. It looks like someone has tried quite hard to make sure the terms on the back are not to squiffy :D. We also received print outs of agreements which are not signed but stating that the agreement is between halifax and my daughter blah blah. Apart from the MBNA agreement , which is two photocopies of what looks like ripped paper this is the weirdest one I have recieved :D

 

Oh also can i just ask, Im going to also send a SAR to all of the creditiors, does this mean that they will send me a new CCA? Gotta try and get these charges back, i ould support a small country on what theyve had out of may daughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

 

I also received a lovely "bells & whistles" agreement featuring my current address & unsigned. I also had the same "you've been happy enough to pay the account for 7 years yada, yada, yada...".

 

I have also now received a threatogram from Blair, Oliver and Snott claiming that I've been ignoring their attempts to contact me (wtf?!!?). Blatantly untrue as I asked for them to contact me by letter only, and haven't received a thing until their latest "love letter".

 

I've sent an S.A.R to Haliprats and told BOS to back off as the account is still in dispute.

 

Not sure what I'll receive next, but I'm sure it will be worth the wait....

 

I am worried about what their next move will be, but hopefully I'll find sufficient advice and support on CAG to respond in kind!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh also can i just ask, Im going to also send a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to all of the creditiors, does this mean that they will send me a new CCA? Gotta try and get these charges back, i ould support a small country on what theyve had out of may daughter.

 

When you say "new" CCA do you mean another ie repeat copy?

 

I asked this question on my own thread but never got an answer.

 

I would have thought that if a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) covered everything they held on you then they should suppy another CCA but they may say that you have already had that one.Not sure.

 

Their reply doesn't really add up as it's "too much".It probably covers their responsibilities under CCA but they may be answering a different question.

 

Can't understand why all my papers from them are covered in (fresh) staple holes? Even the single photocopy of the Signature sheet???:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a massive issue with these cca's. Im trying to sort out my daughters nightmare finances, but and call me suspicious by nature, its not hard to photocopy bit and bobs where you want them. This is my whole problem of not seeing the true agreement, which i know they wont send me so what to do ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have a massive issue with these cca's. Im trying to sort out my daughters nightmare finances, but and call me suspicious by nature, its not hard to photocopy bit and bobs where you want them. This is my whole problem of not seeing the true agreement, which i know they wont send me so what to do ????

 

Learn to play poker lol.:D

 

Not for the money but you have to be able to play everyone else's hand as well as your own.I've only been into all this CAG stuff for a couple of months but I think you start to get a sense when they are struggling & flanneling.

 

As I said with mine they just went into overload - "you've been quite happy upto now" letter, tons of T&C, big shiny new agreement,BOS threats, so at the moment I'm treading water until I can afford the tenner to SAR them!

 

Unless things change I am happy to call their bluff because if they were holding "Pocket Aces" they would have upped the stakes by now.;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you remember receiving this "For Your Signature" form to sign?

I can't but it was 4+ years ago.I dont know why they would re-write the handwritten application just to have you sign a "neat" copy of the same

 

no i cant but like you it was back in 04

 

Did you get a lovely "bells & whistles" 8 page agreement beginning "Parties" and going into great detail?

 

yes but these are current terms. I've had nothing from BOS. I think I am just going to send the ususal non compliant letter and point out to them the print codes on either side and ask them to confrim they are the same document. Also they have not signed it and nowhere does it say refer to terms overleaf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sussex i have the orginial terms for 2004 and they are not whats on the back of your cca...not even close:)

 

 

I'm not sure why, if they have the original of these docuemnts why, they would not copy the full terms. Perhaps thats it, they simply don't have the original!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why, if they have the original of these docuemnts why, they would not copy the full terms. Perhaps thats it, they simply don't have the original!

 

I think they are making it up as they go along.

 

Nearly every sheet has multiple staple holes in it.

I think they swap the paperwork around to suit whoever is writing to them.

 

If you read their statements regarding CCA obligations they are probably correct but are answering a different question.

 

" I enclose the necessary documents to demonstrate a fully executed agreement under s.78 of the CCA 1974."

 

Yes, you have but the one original page that I have signed doesn't seem to!:p

Link to post
Share on other sites

right, i think I need to mention (again) they can't add charges when is dispute and question if what they have sent is one document or not.

 

I've used several differnt letters I have found on here (thanks to all the original posters) and intend to send them this....anyone got any views, particualrly re the authenticity of what they say is a valid CCA?

 

When an account is in dispute, you are not permitted to ask for

payment, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you. Furthermore, whilst

the dispute remains, you are not entitled to charge any interest to the

account, nor make any further charges to the account. In the absence of a properly executed agreement, such an act would also be an offence under the

Data Protection Act 1998.

To register information with a credit reference agency, you must

have written consent from the data subject to collate and share such

information. This consent is given in the form of a signed credit agreement,

so until you produce such an agreement, you may not do this.

To comply with section 61 of the consumer credit act 1974 which by

the way refers to the signing of an agreement (Not an application), a

document must conform to regulations made under the provisions of section

60(1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 otherwise it cannot be properly executed

 

Now then, these regulations I refer to are the Consumer Credit (Agreements)

Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553). These regulations set out the form and

content of agreements. For an agreement to be compliant with the regulations

it MUST embody within the agreement, the prescribed terms laid out in the

SI1983/1553 without the prescribed terms the agreement does not conform to

section 60(1) 1974 and therefore cannot be properly executed as described in

section 61(1) CCA 1974.

 

For your information in case you are unsure. The prescribed

terms referred to are contained in schedule 6 column 2 of the Consumer

Credit (Agreements) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1553) and are inter alia: - A

term stating the credit limit or the manner in which it will be determined

or that there is no credit limit, A term stating the rate of any interest on

the credit to be provided under the agreement and A term stating how the

debtor is to discharge his obligations under the agreement to make the

repayments, which may be expressed by reference to a combination of any of

the following--

(a)Number of repayments;

(b)Amount of repayments;

©Frequency and timing of repayments;

(d)Dates of repayments;

(e)The manner in which any of the above may be determined;

or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

 

I also wish to point out that these terms MUST be contained

within the agreement and NOT in a separate document headed terms and

conditions or words to that effect. On the front of the document you have

supplied there is no reference to what is on the rear and neither is it

signed by you. On the front it also states it is an application and "I

understand Halifax PLC may use credit scoring techniques to assess my

application".

 

Furthermore, if you look at the printed codes on the bottom

right of both sides of this document they are different. If this was one

document would these not be the same? In addition, the conditions on side

two are at an angle and not central.

 

To summarise, I consider you have failed to comply with a lawful request for

a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents

mentioned in it, failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed

to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be viewed as both UNLAWFUL

and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful

harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under

section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in

relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your

own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a

detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a 'legal right'; you must

outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this

reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to

remove all such data.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory

authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your

intentions to resolve this matter.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had another thought.

 

As we all have the same front form with different reverse side featuring Important Financial Information.

 

If it is a "true" double sided form on the original then that would mean that they had to get the whole lot of forms re-printed every time the interest rates on the back changed!

 

Would cost a fortune but it's either that or having the tea-boy print them off their own computer quickly enough to keep up with the credit card orders.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so if they have clearly 'doctored' the agreements even if its just by photocopying different terms on the back and there seems to be a fair few of us that have these then what do we do now?

 

I'm going to write back & tell them that they have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to supply a "true" copy of the Agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent the letter i referred to ealrier and it was signed for on 11th october.

 

I received however the attached default notice today dsated 7th October

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax14101-1.jpg

 

http://i297.photobucket.com/albums/mm223/sussex1/halifax14102.jpg

 

Has anyone got any opinion as to whether this been sent correctly (it was not sent recorded) and does it contain all that it should?

 

Given i have told them in a letter thery have reeived since this notice was sent what, if anything do i need to do?

 

many thanks again for any advice

Edited by sussex1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...