Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

i have been confirmed as in hardship but what do i do now


jjandbump
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We got a form from NatWest as we saud that we were in financial difficulties, it said to fill it out and they would see if they could look at the claim.

 

We filled it out that shows we dont have enough to make ends meet, with 2 young children we are getting worse and worse as the time goes on.

 

We are 2 payments behind with our car HP, we have baliffs knocking on the door for council tax, we have made an agreement with them now to pay only £100 a month.

 

But NatWest said they cant help or look at our case/claim as we do not owe the bank money and there is nothing they can do.

 

Is this the case???

 

At lease if we could get the £1000.00 back we are able to clear the car arrears and the majority of the baliff, any suggestions or what i should write would be really helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you asking the bank for a loan then as you do not say that you are claiming any charges back? Have you considered a debt management plan with CCCS CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity as I have found them very helpful and they are recognised by every company that I do/have owed money too. Prioritising any debts is important but so is having money to eat, buy clothes, mortgage/rent, gas electricity. This is what CCCS will help you to do. No need to worry about 'phone calls or unwelcome knocks on your front door once the plan is in operation. All the best if this advice is helpful.

 

Have you been charged by credit cards or any other organisations, secured loans etc.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no we were claiming charges as there is the stay we asked them to look at our case ass the oft has said that they still have to look at cases of those in hardship.

 

they sent this form to prove hardship then said as we dont owe them money they wont look at it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i have just recently made a claim for my bank charges back and i am a single parent also a student and i also have more going out each month than i do coming in. I did say that i was suffering financial hardship but all i recieved back from Natwest dated 08/11/2007 is what looks like a standard letter saying that they believe that all charges are "fair, transparent and legal" and that they and other banks are now in a legal case with the office of fair trading and that all cases are now frozen until the result of the test case. In the letter there was no mention of my concerns about hardship of financial difficulties. i do not really know where to go next with this claim, any recommendations would be helpful thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Crazydriver,

 

have a read of this

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/115023-application-removal-stay-grounds.html

 

Though to be honest I think IMO you will have to wait until the OFT test case finishes, this shouldn't stop you from going through all the motions, send the lba, file the claim etc if and when the claim gets stayed try the principles in the above thread i posted

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Some people are having some luck with the FOS - however the criteria that they have put in some correspondence is (in my own words)

 

They will only consider cases that the charges on the account have either caused the hardship - or are worsening the hardship situation.

 

In other words if you are in a difficult position not caused by the charges - but you feel that the repayment of the charges would help allieviate your situation they may not get involved.

 

I guess from what you are saying you had charges on your account - but when your income went in they were paid and then you did not owe the charges?

 

The only argument I suppose would be ( and this would be hard to prove ) that because your income was taken up by the charges you found yourself in problems in other areas?

 

Did you have any particular change in circumstances that has caused your problems?

 

 

Simons story in abbey has some useful posts regarding letters and banking code etc.

 

Be prepared for a long read:)

 

 

Jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Banofi v A&L #WON#

 

How the banks differ:confused:

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

hi there looking for some advice, i have had a claim with natwest but we have become recently very hard up due to falling behind when i lost my job, my hubby is trying to claim these charges and we sent the letter in saying that we were in hardship and behind with council tax and car HP this refund would help us get back on our feet (in a nut shell) my hubby got a phone call today to say that if we felt that way they would close the account. Its only a basic account as it is, we have terrible credit as we had a buisness go down that we worked for and both fell so behind it taken ages to get back on track, so worriedwont get another account, can they do this? what do i do?

 

any help/advice would be appreciated would like to know whats what before speaking with them again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, jjandbump.

 

I was with HBOS over 25 years, and they closed my account after my first claim :o

 

Ask them not to close the account. If this is seen to be retaliatory, due to your bank charges claim, you can complain about them.

 

Continue to claim back all the charges.

 

Have you seen this................

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/13832-do-you-need-parachute.html

 

Might help if they do decide to close your account.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jjandbump, welcome to the Nat West forum.

 

First things first - open a parachute account as Maroondevo has already stated above. Nationwide are pretty good (you may even be able to get DD facilities) as a first stop. Once you've got a new account - transfer everything over to it (DD's, income, etc).

 

 

Secondly, send Nat West a letter explaining the treatment you've received as a 'customer' (use the Borehamwood address) and explain how disappointed you are with their pathetic level of service. The fact you're moving your banking business elsewhere is of no consequence - just send the letter anyway.

 

Finally - wait and see what Nat West do once you've moved your banking business elsewhere. If you have an overdraft and they make threats about 'calling this in' - post back and somebody will advise you on your next step. There's always more than one way to skin a cat! ;)

 

Best of luck :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

i got a letter today reading:

 

i refer to recent correspondence in relation to your finianicial hardship and thank yu for the supporting documentation you provided. I advise that your request has been assessed and confirmed subject to a regular token payment as appropiate, we can bring your account in to our financial hardship agreement can continue, if required, until the result of the office of fair trading and uk banks court case outcome is known.

 

until the result of the test case is known we can confirm that no further charges or interest will be charged to your account.

 

once the legal proceedings between the oft and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint regarding bank charges as quickly as possible.

 

 

 

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN, TOUGH NO REFUND LIKE EVERYONE ELSE FOR YEARS TO COME???????

 

ANYONE THAT CAN TELL ME WHAT TO DO NOW WOULD BEVERY MUCH APPRECAITED.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No it sounds like, if you have any items returned on the account that the bank will not charge you for them even if they bounce them.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have already stated they would deal with that once the court case is over so that means no refund for now, that's how it reads.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are quite a few people who have had interim refunds of charges recent in hardship cases, mainly Lloyds and Abbey though, don't know of any Natwest yet. You could try pushing the hardship angle further and see if you can get a partial payment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you please explain what is defined as 'hardship'. I'm on a DMP and Natwest are still charging me interest and what I pay them each month doesn't even cover that. My income and expenditure are such that my lifestyle is 'basic' and that is putting it mildly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

well natwest get better and better, following the letter this week they have debited another £152 of charges and we have no money for food shopping , i dont know what to do, just off to see if i can borrow from a relative, ITS A JOKE THEY DO WHAT THEY WANT WHEN THEY WANT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i got a letter today reading:

 

i refer to recent correspondence in relation to your finianicial hardship and thank yu for the supporting documentation you provided. I advise that your request has been assessed and confirmed subject to a regular token payment as appropiate, we can bring your account in to our financial hardship agreement can continue, if required, until the result of the office of fair trading and uk banks court case outcome is known.

 

until the result of the test case is known we can confirm that no further charges or interest will be charged to your account.

 

once the legal proceedings between the oft and the banks finish, we will resolve your complaint regarding bank charges as quickly as possible.

 

 

 

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN, TOUGH NO REFUND LIKE EVERYONE ELSE FOR YEARS TO COME???????

 

ANYONE THAT CAN TELL ME WHAT TO DO NOW WOULD BEVERY MUCH APPRECAITED.

 

Providing you've been making the regular token payments mentioned in the first highlighted paragraph I would send them a copy of their letter stating that they would not apply any further charges and interest

Please note: I have no qualifications in this area and any advice offered is given in good faith.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/Ombudsman-news/40/40_setoff.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the mean time in order to have money for food you may be able to obtain a crisis loan (which is an interest free loan from the Social Fund to cover emergencies or disaster and is paid via a giro that can be cashed at the post office). You can get the number to phone to apply from your local jobcentre.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...