Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry I've only just come onto break it just goes to page one of the thread for me. Do you know what post # it was?
    • Agree HB. Remove the cease and desist stuff. Otherwise it's a cracker! Shame you've used so many big words that they will just not understand.😅
    • That sounds pretty good. My only concern is the bit about the cease and desist letter to Excel, please wait for the guys to comment on your letter. HB
    • No mention of Schedule 4 of POFA = Only the driver is liable, not the keeper. Simply don't tell them who the driver is, which means  don't appeal. From a quick search of the site, yours is the first case I can see with Carparksecurities we've seen here so it'd be excellent if you keep up to date and engage with this thread. General advice is to ignore everything until / unless you ever get a letter of claim.
    • So I am now in receipt of a second Letter of Claim this time from DCBL although their letter head now says " DCBLegal"  😱 Now I'm guessing one response to a letter of claim is sufficient and I could ignore this but having been inspired by other snotty letters I wanted to have another bash at one. How does this sound? Dear Lackeys of Company with Unconscionable Morals, Thank you ever so much for gracing me with yet another Letter Before Claim on behalf of Excel Parking Services. How many of these delightful missives do you plan on sending before you muster the courage to follow through on your threats to take me to court? Just so we're clear, here is the response (in italics by that I mean the slanted text below) I previously sent to Excel’s Letter Before Claim, in case your attention to detail is as lacking as I suspect: I am currently 2-0 up in terms of Small Claims Court proceedings and I look forward to the opportunity to claim a hat trick, this case being more straightforward than my previous two. I will be asking the court for an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g) due to your conduct over this absurd claim. Despite my best efforts, you continue to assert that I have breached your terms. However, I cannot breach terms that I was not present to accept. Have you even read my initial response? I suggest you review it thoroughly and save yourself some money. Additionally, please refer to section 13 of the IPC Code of Practice, 2023 edition. I eagerly await your deafening silence. Remarkably, I haven't heard a peep from Excel since my response; instead, they've passed the baton to you to perform this tiresome routine once more. Consider this my official notice that I am sending a cease and desist letter to Excel Parking Services. Their relentless hounding has crossed the line into clear harassment. Any further demands for payment from you, as Excel's lackeys, will be regarded as nothing more than shameless acts of intimidation and harassment. I now look forward to the deafening sound of your silence. Yours sincerely,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Having a CCJ set aside - costs?


Kefz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5663 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just trying to put the final icing on the cake with paying off my past debts, and trying to have a CCJ set aside. The upshot is that 3 years ago out of the blue, a creditor put the account into the hands of a solicitor (well, debt collection outfit working out of a solicitors practice) who then put it into county court. Upon receiving the court papers, I spoke to the solicitors and agreed a payment plan to avert the legal action and made an immediate payment (May 2005).

 

I'm not sure what happened the month after (June 2005) but I think I assumed they'd just continue taking it off my card, but in July 2005 with absolutely no contact I received a letter from the court saying that the solicitors had entered for judgement by default and had been granting it.

 

For the 6-18 months after this I was in dispute with the solicitors (whilst continuing to pay), after that the communication went dead. Now there's a hearing for me to have the CCJ set aside at the end of the month, and I've entered the following evidence:

 

1) Letters from both sides investigating the likely loss of letters from one to the other

2) Letter saying that they did agree to settle out of court in May, didn't receive June payment and then went for the default judgement June/July (??? can you do that if you have settled, especially given fact #1 ?)

3) Letter from the original creditor refusing my CCA request last month on the basis that it is being dealt with by their solicitors (shouldn't have have passed the letter on instead)?

4) Explanation for the long delay in applying for set aside (i.e. attempting to resolve through communication, nasty working week to try and make ends meet etc)

 

Now, they've responded with a wad of paperwork and a refusal to not have the CCJ set aside - and now are trying to claim a silly figure per hour on top of what they believe they're owed for 'ligitation assistant's' time! Surely they can't claim costs on this even if I was to be refused the set-aside since my application isn't vexatious or anything like that?

 

What are people's thoughts about all of this since most people's experience of having CCJs set aside on this forum range from very straight forward to insanely difficult?

 

TIA!

 

Kefz

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kefz

 

Dont know if you have looked here a lot of good advise re set asides :-

 

You should find all the information you need here:-

 

National Debtline England & Wales | Debt Advice | Factsheet 12 How To Set Aside A Judgment In The County Court

 

the court fee is £75 by the way!

 

Regards

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy

 

Thanks for that mate - I've already gone through the information and put all the paperwork etc in - the hearing is at the end of the month.

 

Cheers

 

Kefz

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi kefz

to answer your question ref set asside

 

i had a ccj set asside last year, its quite straight forward.

it helps if the original creditor does not object to your application.

in court you sit at a table and the judge asks you why it should be set asside.

at the end of the day its up to the judge to set asside, not the creditor.

i think the talk about costs is just to frighten, nothing to do with them.

you have paid the court to decide.

 

i must say its very hard now to get a set asside with out a very good cause, but in your case take your correspondents with you to court.

have you sent the correspondents to the court with your application.

i say this because judges have made there mind up before the hearing on the evidence submitted. this shows you have done your home work and are not wasting the courts time by going over things again.

best to keep the judge in the right frame of mind by doing the work for him.

my application lasted no more than ten minutes and ccj gone from cra within the week.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, thanks for the info - do you HAVE to attend the court? The solicitors have already backed out of attending in person.

Edited by Kefz
extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I have read on other threads, you are advised that it is in your interests to attend. :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A question for you all if I may.

When applying for your set aside and submitting a N244, did you get it witnessed by a solicitor? I'm about to go for Halifax before the date set for their attachment of earnings hearing, No CCA, failed to comply with SAR, Late Charges, Over Limit Charges and PPI going back years.

Cheers

IC3

Link to post
Share on other sites

IC3GB

 

 

You can have it witnessed by a Sol or alternativly at Court.

 

Regards

 

Andy;)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Just wondering if Kefz still visits and the result of this case, as I have an old one I want to get set aside for lack of CCA too!!

When you've had all the help you need, make sure you stick around to help others too!

Just think, if everyone left the site after they'd got their help, there might not be anyone left the next time YOU come back needing more assistance!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ker

 

I do indeed - to be honest, it went tango uniform unfortunately. Despite hearing that the judgement was not legitimate due to it being a judgement by default whilst under the CCA (not allowable) and with clear evidence including a letter from the solicitors firm of them actually admitting to coming to an agreement then effectively changing tack a month later, a letter was sent after the hearing stating under the Act which dictates set asides, I hadn't "shown enough evidence".

 

Just to make it more interesting, the judge slapped me for the costs of the other half at the required one hour of a paralegal's time to bind a document full of mostly irrelevant information, and obviously I lost the money required to begin the set aside process. Oh, and the letter duly mentions that there is no appeal process.

 

If I'm being honest I wish and I'd probably recommend to either negotiate with the firm to settle in full on condition of the judgement being set aside, or paid it off then set it aside in the hope that they didn't challenge it since they'd had their pound of flesh as it looks like I'm stuck with it.

 

Hope this helps

 

K

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...