Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Druid v Barclays Bank


The Druid
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6279 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Great thread, good luck in court with case.

 

Assuming they don't phone up and try and settle at the weekend, it seems they only have 2 days before the trial.

 

I've put in my N1 for £1,400 plus interest, so waiting to see if they defend and what the date is. Sounds like they like to wait to the very last minute too settle.

 

Harry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Breakfast, its nearly lunch!!!!! :D

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received from Barclays ('Arry Lombardi)

today:-

Dear Mr *.******,

Claim against Barclays PLC, Harlow county Court

Claim Number *******

I refer to the above proceedings.

We have credited your account with the full amount claimed, including interest up to todays date. This amount £3,938.83 is in full and final settlement of your claim.

I trust that this will bring an end to this matter.

Yours sincerely

Anthony Lombardi

Legal Clerk

 

 

WAIT FOR IIIIIIIIIIIIIT !!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, here it is peeps. Quite proud of this one too !!!! ROFLMAO

 

 

 

Barclays Legal & Compliance

Litigation & Disputes

Level 29

One Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

 

Dear Mr Lombardi,

Thank you for your letter dated 26 january 2007,

received today.This letter is to confirm the contents of the e-mail you will

have, no doubt, already received.

It would appear that your grasp of the basic principles of mathematics

is somewhat vague, and that your understanding of the English

language is, at the very least, tenuous.

As of todays date (27/01/2007), the sum I am claiming is £5,201.29

I refer you to my letter, dated 25 january 2007 which you will have also

already received.

As previously stated, I am perfectly happy to let the judge decide what is

claimable, or unclaimable, fair or unfair in this case.

Thank you for crediting my account with the sum of £3,938.83

I will accept this payment only as part settlement, and on the clear and

unambiguous understanding that I will pursue recovery of the full amount

at Harlow County Court on the 31st of this month.

I will take this opportunity to remind you that on receipt of this letter you

will have 24 hours to decide what you wish to do. If you wish to contact

me before 10.30 AM on the 31st, you may phone me on ***** *** ***

between 14:00 hrs and 16:00 hrs on the preceeding day. I shall,

again, remind you that I will also be seeking reimbursement of the

earnings I will have lost through having to attend court, in addition to my

reclaimed charges and court costs as of 31st January.

If I have no contact with you beforehand, I very much look forward to

meeting you, in court, on the 31st January.

Yours sincerely

 

*********

 

Pick the bones out of that 'arry !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice letter. who the hell do they think they are just crediting a figure they deem fair, that you have already told them you will not accept anything else other than the FULL amount.

 

I hope this one goes all the way, but it wont!

Barclays Bank - SETTLED - £4225.00

First National - SETTLED - £125.00

Lloyds TSB - SETTLED - £994.87

Capital 1 - SETTLED - £827.95

Online Finance - SETTLED - £349.60

Argos - SETTLED - £121.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

God this is so exciting!

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 06/11/2006 - no statements yet

Prelim Letter sent 13/11/2006

"Sorry you're unhappy" received 16/11/2006

LBA sent 27/11/2006

Reply to LBA with 50% offer received 01/12/2006

"Thanks, but no Thanks" sent 01/12/2006

MOCL filed 11/12/06 - deemed served 17/12/06

MOCL acknowledged 29/12/06

Non compliance with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent 04/01/07

Statements Received 08/01/07

MOCL Defended 12/01/07

AQ received 17/01/07

AQ done and delivered 19/01/07

Court date 22/05/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

FURTHER REPORT !!

If you look at my post 112, I told 'Arry Lombardi, that I would be on a specific phone line between the hours of 14:00 hrs and 16:00 hrs, TUESDAY 30th.

Bearing in mind that today is Monday, I now begin to wonder if he isn't loosing the plot somewhat. The phone has been going potty all afternoon !!!!!!!!

Don't worry peeps, I didn't answer it, just let it ring and ring. It seems my 4 yr old grandaughter is able to distinguish the days of the week better than he can. LOL.

I get the distinct impression that someone at Barclays legal department is now starting to sweat. You may think I'm cutting it a bit close, but remember, Barclays have had from day 1 to settle this claim and stop all this nonsense.

"D" day is Wednesday at 10:30 AM. I've a mind to stick 'em for out of pocket expenses such as printer paper, printer cartridges, postage and the like. What with the days wages I'll claim as well, I intend to rub their noses in it good and proper !!!

As I used to get told in the military, "If you can't take a joke, you shouldn't have joined " !!! ROFLMAO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh, I love it. I'm working from home tomorrow so I'll have a peek in here at 2pm to see what's going on. I'll miss the Archers but it'll be worth it.

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 06/11/2006 - no statements yet

Prelim Letter sent 13/11/2006

"Sorry you're unhappy" received 16/11/2006

LBA sent 27/11/2006

Reply to LBA with 50% offer received 01/12/2006

"Thanks, but no Thanks" sent 01/12/2006

MOCL filed 11/12/06 - deemed served 17/12/06

MOCL acknowledged 29/12/06

Non compliance with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent 04/01/07

Statements Received 08/01/07

MOCL Defended 12/01/07

AQ received 17/01/07

AQ done and delivered 19/01/07

Court date 22/05/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP PRESS !!!!!

Just received this by e-mail from 'Arry !! Having not been able to contact me by phone this afternoon,by now he must be doing his pieces !!!!

 

"Dear Mr ******

 

Thank you for your letter dated 25 January which I received today.

 

Further to my letter dated 24 January 2007, Barclays maintains its stance regarding your charges. In relation to your claim, Barclays is prepared to offer an ex-gratia payment of a further £250.

 

The total settlement figure is now £4,260.50. This figure includes charges, interest up to today’s date and costs.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Anthony Lombardi

 

Anthony Lombardi

Legal Clerk

Litigation and Disputes

0207 116 4523 "

 

Just looked back over the letter he sent on Saturday, and the charges mentioned in there bear no relationship whatsoever to what I'm actually claiming. So, either he's losing his marbles because of the amount of claims he's having to handle, or, his secretary's as mad as a box of frogs !! ROFLMAO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hee hee hee hee. I like your style.

 

Nice to see them get a bit worried, I remember that feeling from when they'd clobbered me with a load of charges and I thought they were going to bounce the mortgage as well. Taste of their own medicine, and about time too.

 

Unless I've slipped up somewhere over the last 20 yrs, I don't think Barclays have my phone number anywhere. I've certainly not volunteered it, and the phone's not in registered in my name, so they'd have trouble finding it. I'm pretty sure I've never emailed them either, although I do use internet banking so they may have an email address for me. It may be interesting to add Lombardi's email address to your "spammers" list so his emails bounce back to him - just for a giggle.

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 06/11/2006 - no statements yet

Prelim Letter sent 13/11/2006

"Sorry you're unhappy" received 16/11/2006

LBA sent 27/11/2006

Reply to LBA with 50% offer received 01/12/2006

"Thanks, but no Thanks" sent 01/12/2006

MOCL filed 11/12/06 - deemed served 17/12/06

MOCL acknowledged 29/12/06

Non compliance with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent 04/01/07

Statements Received 08/01/07

MOCL Defended 12/01/07

AQ received 17/01/07

AQ done and delivered 19/01/07

Court date 22/05/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

LATEST NEWS FROM THE FRONT-LINE !!!

Reply to 'Arry's latest e-mail (you'll LOVE this) !!

 

"

Dear Mr Lombardi,

Thank you for your e-mail, received this evening.

May I take this opportunity to point out that the figures mentioned in your letter, dated 24 January 2007, bear no relationship whatsoever to the amounts I am reclaiming.

As of todays date (29/01/20070) the amount I am reclaiming for "account fees" (including interest at 8%) is £619.68. This sum excludes the £118.00 that has already been refunded to my account, and NOT the £718.44 you mention in your letter.

You make mention of the sum of £519.84 (including interest at 8%) being reclaimed for overdraft interest charges. As of todays date, the sum I am reclaiming is £566.16 (including interest at 8%). I would suggest that you look again at the last schedule of reclaimed charges I sent and have a re-think.

I will admit that the interest charges may not be accuratly calculated. As I mentioned in a previous letter, because of the obscurity of your banks charging regime, I have no idea whatsoever which interest charges relate to what transgression. On this amount, AND THIS AMOUNT ALONE, I am prepared to be somewhat flexible. Otherwise, again as previously stated, I will be quite hapy to let the judge decide what I can or cannot claim back.

With regard to the ex-gratia payment of £250.00; I will accept this money as part payment against the FULL amount claimed ( with due consideration to my comment above), and on the clear understanding that I will seek restitution of the full amount claimed, in court, if neccesary.

I look forward to seeing you, or your representative, in court on Wednesday.

Yours sincerely,

Mr *.******

 

THE GAME'S AFOOT !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

im sorry but you are too cocky and it wont do you any favours at all.. ive claimed back 13k from barclays in one go and they were quite reasonable with me. drop the cocky act it doesnt work im afraid and shows a bad example to newbies. just tone it down please. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

this has got to be the best thread on here.

good on you druid i hope you get the lot.:lol:

 

 

i got all mine back without the need to really let rip and be cocky. lets not forget the banks are watching this site. lets be professional about it yes. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being cocky is one thing being confident another.

That aside,there are one or two choice words that have been directly associated to individuals.

There has to be a line in the divide,and therefore I am just saying that while there is no harm done with harmonious banter and a bit of joviality,we should remember that line.

We should also remember that 1000s of Barclays claims have already been settled by conventional means that did not involve pun nor personals.

You will get your settlement when they decide to give it I am sure they will not escalate it because of anything that is written here and I am sure that by now they have seen it all before over the last 12 months if you dont believe me......ask Keith Jeremiah.

;)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent thread. Looking forward to the next installment. I am now in recipet of my statements from Barclays and will be tabbing up what they owe me and getting that out this week. Probably about the same time as you have them in court...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...