Norwich Union wont check other cars details

[rdm2006]

you are clutching at straws now pal:wink: But that is your choice and good luck to you

 

And yes if there is an accident it will have played a part in it as gizmo says.

[rdm2006]

It will only play a part in that it happened to be there. It will be as culpable as a skip or wall.

 

 

And before you ask he said it here.

[gyzmo]

I think I qualified the "playing a part" bit by stating it is only because of its presence - i.e, that if it was not there it would not be run into regardless. It does nothing to contribute to the accident

[JonCris]

you are clutching at straws now pal:wink: But that is your choice and good luck to you

 

And yes if there is an accident it will have played a part in it as gizmo says.

 

So you would partly blame the skip........skip.....you do not have to say anything when questioned but if you don't say something which you later rely on in court.......................huh

[gyzmo]

[rdm2006]

So you would partly blame the skip........skip.....you do not have to say anything when questioned but if you don't say something which you later rely on in court.......................huh

 

no i did not say it would be anyones fault - that would be discovered when the accident occurs if one does but the driver that left that skip would have played a part in it.

[JonCris]

Ok................then lock it up

[rdm2006]

whatever :D:D:D:D You think a skip can talk

 

And the one thing you have failed to notice whilst you were trying to show how right you think you are.

 

 

You have also shown the blind vindictiveness of which you accuse the OP

 

Give someone enough rope and .......

[JonCris]

blind vindictiveness:confused: ...................against a skip:confused: wattsa matter losing the argument:rolleyes:

[rdm2006]

blind vindictiveness:confused: ...................against a skip:confused: wattsa matter losing the argument:rolleyes:

 

 

Argument - what argument we are expressing opinions

 

Would i argue with someone who appears to believe that leaving a skip, car etc in the middle of the road is a sensible thing to do

 

 

mmmmmm

[BADGER 69]

Surely, If I park my car in such a place and manner that it causes a hazard and this hazard leads to an incident/accident, then I have contributed to the accident/incident.

An actual case. A person parks vehicle on wrong side of road around a blind corner with headlights on at night. Car,driven by person not familiar with the road, comes around corner, jumps to the conclusion that the parked car is on the other side of the road and thus tries to pass said parked car on the left and hits the wall. Passenger is killed. Do you suggest that driver of parked car has no responsibility for the death?

[JonCris]

Wrong Badger........ever heard of the pink elephant syndrome

[JonCris]

Argument - what argument we are expressing opinions

 

Would i argue with someone who appears to believe that leaving a skip, car etc in the middle of the road is a sensible thing to do

 

 

mmmmmm

 

Sorry your missing the point.......It's all meant to be tongue in cheek & to demonstrate that blaiming the skip is as daft as blaming a car

[rdm2006]

Sorry your missing the point.......It's all meant to be tongue in cheek & to demonstrate that blaiming the skip is as daft as blaming a car

 

sorry you are missing the point nobody is blaming the skip. it did not put itself there, its the person who put it there, he cant be held responsible by current law but is he completely devoid of all responsibility ?

[JonCris]

Oh dear I give up......

[BADGER 69]

Wrong Badger........ever heard of the pink elephant syndrome

 

What have pink elephants got to do with it? Both this and the case I refered to earlier actualy happened.

[letshelp]

Children lets keep it civil, everyone is falling out and trying to gain points over each other, its like lreading the minutes to Prime Ministers question time. Come on guys you are better than this if you can't help/support the OP, just have you say and back off.

[Guest Old_andrew2018]

Hi letshelp,

 

How are you, I thought this thread had run its course and died as no one replied for over 3 days, and still nothing from the OP.

I wonder if they have taken professional advice on their quiery/s.

 

Well now the thread is revieved shall we say, we may recieve an up-date.

 

Regards

 

Andy

[patdavies]

I wonder if they have taken professional advice on their quiery/s.

 

From a psychiatrist hopefully....

 

Back into a stationary vehicle and it's someone else's fault f0r being there.

[letshelp]

Hi Old Andrew,

 

I didn't wish to revive all the bitterness I was just making comment that it got a bit nasty in places and thats not what we are about. Or, I don't believe it is. I can see both sides of peoples argument here but dislike the aggressive tone displayed by some, I believe it could be counterproductive and may put people off posting.

regards to all

[Guest Old_andrew2018]

Hi Old Andrew,

 

I didn't wish to revive all the bitterness I was just making comment that it got a bit nasty in places and thats not what we are about. Or, I don't believe it is. I can see both sides of peoples argument here but dislike the aggressive tone displayed by some, I believe it could be counterproductive and may put people off posting. The problem you will agree is that forum members were not able to give the OP the advice he wanted, although one might argue that if they split the three separate issues as qymzo eleqently put it in Post #29, then they may have recieved different advice.

regards to all

 

Regards

 

Andy

[gyzmo]

The problem is when people blindly re-iterate the same point without any regards to what is being said. In other words, banging head against a brick wall. It would be different if those who disagree raised counterarguments or questioned details, which did happen but then reverted to old ground.

 

I am a stickler for what I say. I have had disagreements with other members - some on matter of preference, others on matters of law or fact. The diffence is being able to say that one is the correct position and being able to back it up, or saying that ones own position is wrong in the face of other evidence.

 

That has unfortunately not happened here. The problem has occurred because people simply wanted to hear what they wanted to hear. After reiterating the same point over and over, people, rightly or wrongly, get het up.