Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hopefully I’m able to help someone else out with a future post however this particular subject I’m completely at a loss and ever so anxious regarding! I’ll get the letter out when my police officer husband is asleep to see what the company is whom will be writing to me. I know parking companies now seek compensation so I’m expecting these too as they have advised. 
    • You're welcome. Lots of people aren't sure where to post when they arrive but you'll get used to the forum. HB
    • I’m so sorry for posting in the wrong place and I am so thankful you have replied to me thank you.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I've moved your thread to our Retail Loss Prevention subforum for further advice. It sounds as if you may get letters from people like DWF solicitors or a company called Retail Loss Prevention but we always recommend to ignore them. If the police weren't called on the day you aren't going to hear from them. Ask us any questions you want to and keep in touch but I don't think this will go anywhere. Best, HB
    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are CapitalOne really this stupid?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi BrummyBoy

You didnt 'Have' to supply them any info at all. This is all part of their tactics to get as much info from you as possible. Remember not to sign anything to these bottom feeders.

If they threaten you, then the first thing is to request a CCA. Then get advise from this site as to whether it is enforceable. Then its pretty much a waiting game.

Enjoy the moment and try not to worry too much

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 386
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi BrummyBoy

You didnt 'Have' to supply them any info at all. This is all part of their tactics to get as much info from you as possible. Remember not to sign anything to these bottom feeders.

If they threaten you, then the first thing is to request a CCA. Then get advise from this site as to whether it is enforceable. Then its pretty much a waiting game.

Enjoy the moment and try not to worry too much

 

 

Hi bazaar, what is a CCA? if they do default me am I correct that my credit rating is destroyed for atleast 6 years? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to an unexpected drop in income, I was unable to pay my Capital One credit card account monthly payment in full from 2005. Since then I made arrangements to pay a reduced amount each month, which is reviewed every 6 months. The arrangement is due for renewal again, and they have decided to threaten me with default and blamed the Government for the legislation. I contacted my MP and found this to be a lie. Has anyone else had this problem and can advise me how to respond to them. I do not want a default on my file. Thanks
Was this their long term/short term payment plan letter? Basically stating that the plan you were on was no longer 'available' so you had to choose between paying it off in 6 months or getting a default on your file?

 

If so, I had this too, but when they sent the Default notice through it seems to have a little bit of one sentence missing, which is apparently a no-no as the text they use has to be verbatim to the acknowledged text used. I'm keeping this quiet for the time being with them, but hoping I can use it in the near future as a little kicker for them:)

 

With regards to the info they 'require' otherwise they 'will not be able to consider your payment offer' (or similar wording). For next time, be aware they absolutely can not require this extra stuff. I spoke to National Debtline, and it's been confirmed by many people on here - they are entitled to see your I/E form only, you can only be made to disclose anything else to a court (ie statements, bills, payslips etc).

 

When they sent the letter I suspect you had to me, I wrote back telling them to get knotted for the extra info, as they knew they had no right to it, that my enclosed I/E form was a true declaration of my finances (which it was I hasten to add - I don't fudge figures at all. Sadly:rolleyes:), and that they needed to stop misleading me as their customer by telling me big old porkies about what they were entitled to see. I didn't even mention the payment plan, but they still wrote back accepting it!! Just so you know they don't have the right to pry into everything in your life;)

 

Unfortunately it seems that if you do need to choose the longer term option you will end up with a default. Good news is it may not be valid...

 

Oh, and as a final thought, have you CCA'd them?

 

Just a quick question, I've been locked in dispute with this lot since May trying to set up a lower payment plan, did they 'force' you to provide wage slips, bank statements etc etc before they would accept a payment plan? My OH is now jobless and they are getting £100 a month and their

still not satisfied.

This is a massive amount to pay when you're out of work! Are you on benefits (sorry, personal question, but if you live on benefits you should be able to offer a token payment of £1, as the reason for the benefit is to allow you enough money for the absolute basics, therefore you do not have any disposable income to offer them).

 

I have been on a plan with them for about 2 years now. The balance owing was about 4.5k, and we were paying about £8 on it (we are on benefits, but with a tiny amount of extra income so bumped it up as much as we could). Last year - before I found CAG and knew I could complain - they forced me to increase to over £15, which seems like nothing but was a kicker. This year, after sending my I/E form along with the letter, despite me agreeing to continue at the present rate (rather than rock the boat), they wrote back accepting the amount showing on my I/E form which was under £7!

 

I'd be very tempted to give it another go with them, and do not hold back on expenses. I absolutely do not mean lie - there's no point, and it's too easily found out which will do you no good at all. I just mean include everything, no matter how mundane. If you really can't afford it they just can't have it, it's that simple.

 

We are in the same position with MBNA and have been since June/July, only we're not paying them what they want - we couldn't afford the minimums, they won't accept the pro-rata amount offered, so we just started paying it anyway. They keep writing, I keep telling them no. Eventually it'll go to a DCA, but they can't get something we don't have, and quite frankly they'll probably be more human than MBNA!

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA is the Consumer Credit Act - it allows you to request a copy of your original agreement, and if they don't comply you are within your rights to withhold payments and the debt is unenforceable until they comply (if they ever do).

 

If they do comply but what they send you isn't valid (there are plenty of people on here who will help you with that bit as and when you need it), then they may be stuck with an unenforceable debt which you may be able to get written off/offer a small f+f on.

 

Of course they could have something of worth, but reading through the cap1 forums, and from what they sent me, it's less likely this will happen.

 

You need to send a £1 postal order (or a cheque signed by someone else), along with a letter requesting it - template N I think in the letters library - to them, and they have 12 working days to comply. After that if they have not sent anything you are within your rights to withhold payment, but I'd err on the side of caution and give them a while to comply so that you don't find yourself in schtum.

 

Do not sign the letter! Use a digital signature or just print. This is the site I use for signatures, I find it handy. vLetter Free Font Demo Online - Try Our Real Cursive Handwriting Fonts

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lexis200, When OH became unemployed, firm went belly up - no wages, no notice, no holiday pay & no 'package'after 18years service we contacted NDL who were very helpful (before I found CAG), I took things very (too) seriously and using my 'disposable' income & OH JSA, with reflection I was too generous with capone1, we have had nothing but complete grief & harassment from them - all because I refuse to comply to their demands to give them information which they have absolutely no right to have - confirmed by NDL, TS, Consumer Direct yet they still won't give up their demands. Have kicked Debitarse back into touch twice over this.

 

Thanks to CAG I don't take any cr#p from them anymore.

 

BC

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BC

 

You've had a rough ride:(

 

I was exactly the same before I found this site. Every letter/phone call received was, I assumed, as good as law, and I had to do everything they said. For the first couple of reviews then, Cap1 (and others who asked - Co-Op spring to mind as a bunch of right bankers) got all the info they wanted.

 

Then I called NDL as a last resort (isn't it odd/stupid what you will put off doing when you're embarrassed/humiliated about something - it's only money after all, and the vast majority of our debt was for reasons beyond our control, but I still didn't want to phone) and told them what was going on, and they put me straight.

 

After that I found my way on here from MSE and have steadily grown in confidence until now I'm quite happy to tell them where to get off, either in writing or on the phone. My favourite one now is when someone phones for my OH, and I just refuse to put him on.

 

'Is Mr Lexis in'

'Yes'

'Can you get him please, it's a personal banking matter'

'No'

'Oh'

 

and so on:D It seems to throw them so much more than saying they're out. Of course I do still have the days when I don't think I can open another letter from them, but they're few and far between.

 

Have you tried to send them a revised I/E form with a lower amount, and just told them your circumstances have worsened? If they're already hassling you over the large amount you're paying - which it seems is stretching you in order to cover it - you may as well get the hassle for an amount you can actually afford!

 

Lexis:)

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've come to the conclusion that no matter what I tell them they still insist on proof which they WONT get, and since they sent power2annoy to knock on our door saying that they've lost contact (which is a lie as I always write and send recorded), just because I won't talk to them on the phone doesn't mean I've lost contact. Since this visit I ignore everything and pay what we can afford, they are adding charges which when the time comes we will reclaim, I am starting to build a case for telephone harassment and will probably add unlawful charges to that.

 

Totalled up their calls this morning 504 since end of July.

 

BC

Link to post
Share on other sites

504???????

 

I don't think you're starting to build a telephone harassment case, I think you hit it about 450 calls ago!

 

We seem to have been very lucky with calls. I think maybe I'm just so blo**y stubborn with them that they can't be bothered any more, other than for the occasional call to say they still love us.

 

I'm glad you're only paying what you can afford though. I honestly can't see why they decide it's worth their time and money to chase debts that can not be paid back at the rate they want! If it's blatantly clear that you can't afford more, what on earth is the point in all this harassment? It doesn't even make good business sense - surely if while someone is in financial trouble they try and help, and give the support needed, once you're in a better situation you're far more likely to pay back the rest. As it is, they insist on hounding you which makes you simply want to screw them.

 

Have you CCA'd them at all to see if they have anything resembling an actual agreement?

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

further to my other posts on the above subject c/q have obviously given up the ghost.

cap i have now sold the debt to the daft boys in leeds

got a letter this morning 2 letters in one envelope from leeds

one unsigned from cap1 and the usual from lowell

it seems lowells are up to their tricks again

the letter from cap 1 was done by lowells its the same type head refs are the same wording is the same plus its insigned

companies house and t/s have now got to be involved

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello eos

i may have misled you

cap i gave it to c/q to issue the threatograms

cca c/q they sent an application form

sent them further request and reminder of their duties under the cca

heard nothing fron c/q or cap 1 until the 2 letters in 1 envelope arrived this morning from the louts in leeds.

its so obvious that the leeds mob have written the letter purported to be from cap 1 its laughable.

since my earlier post have contacted t/s in leeds who dont appear to be interested (now theres a change)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cap 1 are a laugh a minute and getting battier. I CCAd them months ago - they sent the usual crap in reply. Recently they sent a default notice that no more resembles a default notice than fly in the air then terminated the account. So they cannot now claim the capital, only arrears, and there are no arrears as they froze the account. So they get nothing since there is no agreement and if they argue there is an agreement they still get nothing because they terminated the account after sending an unlawful default notice. Heads I win, tails I win. You couldn't make it up!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cap one also froze my account nearly 2 years ago when I started on a payment plan with them. They recently defaulted me too (telling me that my previous payment plan was now 'unavailable' and if I couldn't pay off in 6 months, I'd have to change to a 'long term' plan and get a default). The default notice doesn't have a remedy date, just a 'pay within 28 days', doesn't include any remedy payments (just shows my balance) and has a few errors with capitalisation etc.

 

In addition to this though, in one of the letters sent after they got my letter stating their agreement was not enforceable, they asked for the arrears of about £2k. This would be about what I would have paid if I wasn't on the payment plan.

 

Having read your post above Pinky, would I be right in assuming that there should not be any arrears due to the account being frozen whilst on a payment plan? Or at the very least, only a small amount from when the plan was being set up but was not in force?

 

Thanks

 

Lexis:)

Edited by lexis200

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Pinky:)

 

Could they charge me the minimum payments that would have been paid if the plan had not been in place though?

 

Sorry for all the questions - I just like to know where I stand.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends what they agreed to with the plan managers. They can waive the interest on a loan, leaving only the capital to pay, or they can simply extend the period of payment and the original terms of the agreement remain unaltered ie once the plan is terminated, all sums due on the original agreement are payable. Under a credit card, if they agree to freeze the interest then they cannot suddenly charge for interest not paid during the time of the plan. You would need to get exactly what they agreed to with the plan managers and how much of it was in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you got an application form in response to your CCA requests- I'm feeling all left out now!

 

They keep telling me they've got a signed CCA but they aren't obliged to show me it under s77 (or is it 78?) and enclose current t&c's. They've replied to my dispute letter saying they've complied.

 

I even SAR'd them to try and get it, but nothing to do with the CCA was enclosed whatsoever....

Link to post
Share on other sites

At least you got an application form in response to your CCA requests- I'm feeling all left out now!

 

They keep telling me they've got a signed CCA but they aren't obliged to show me it under s77 (or is it 78?) and enclose current t&c's. They've replied to my dispute letter saying they've complied.

 

I even Subject Access Request'd them to try and get it, but nothing to do with the CCA was enclosed whatsoever....

 

 

When I SARd them I only received statments...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Pinky:)

 

About the SAR's - if you specifically asked for it, I'm pretty sure they have to provide. I'd be tempted to pose the question to those in the know, and if I'm right you need to get a non-compliance letter off to them, and if they don't respond then also to the ICO.

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are talking bo**l#ox! They must send you a copy of the agreement on request and their refusal to do so tells you they haven't got one. This must be a be a new tack because they never have them! I wouldn't chase them for it. Once I had sent the request, I would wait to see what they come up with next and reply to that - direct to their complaints department. You never know what they will come up with next - they are a wonder to behold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you followed the usual procedure to request your CCA by using the template letter and sent that with the correct fee then they MUST comply, or fail to uphold their claim against you.

 

Try IadaInFife's letter - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/172071-letter-co-solicitors.html#post1856406

 

If you specified that the CCA should be supplied as part of a SAR then they should have done so, or have they failed that request as well. A lot of people accept that the SAR is just for the OC to send a loads of statements or a complete printout of transactions.

 

If the request is worded correctly you could ask them for trasnscripts of all telephone calls, as recorded by their operatives - which can often turn up some quite unexpected comments... A SAR is supposed to provide you with EVERYTHING that data controller has on file against you, the subject.

 

How many readers of this now feel rather short changed?

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...