Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Interesting. Thanks for that London.  That’s what I’m gathering.     iv no doubt they would send me fake documents but would they really dare present fake documents to a court of law?
    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MacKenzie Hall - Final Notice, please help?!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5823 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On the battlefield , he is within yards of reaching the walls of the great keep of the statute barred . He can choose to engage them in the field now, or delay until he is safely behind those walls and then fire off as many letters as he likes, and hopefully a few holy hand grenades of the FOS as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The OP lives in Scotland so the debt would be extinguished after 5 years

 

Is this correct - in that case, should I not be sending the 'prove it' letter but instead the statue barred letter?

 

So far:

 

We've had a letter asking to call - the wife did and asked them to send out more info

We've had a letter asking to call (4th april), which we didn't

We've had a final notice letter (7th april), giving us until noon today to pay in full, which we haven't.

 

I was planning on sending the prove it letter today, recorded delivery (unsigned) but should I be re-thinking this?

Or should I still send the prove it, and if they send info through which shows it's from 2002 (as they advised my wife on the phone) then send the statute barred letter?

 

Thanks again for all your input!

 

JB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I'd send the stat-barred letter.

 

Under Scottish law, if a lender allows time to pass without receiving any payment an action for recovery may become barred under the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973. (For details of this Act see Gloag and Henderson 10th edition at Chapter 15.). These debts are completely extinguished and cannot be enforced. Once the prescriptive period expires the debt cannot be allowed as a deduction.

 

To sum up, basically once a debt becomes statute barred it is up to the debtor whether or not they wish to pay the debt. A debt can not become unstatute barred.

 

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

 

Bottom six :eek: Crap or what ? :lol:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, I would always send the prove it letter first, and then reply to what they say... but it's a matter of personal choice, there's no real wrong anwer. The prove it letter just has the advantage you give nothing away.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the wording for a Scottish Statute Barred/Debt Extinguished Letter (thanks Rory and the Govan Law Centre)

 

 

Dear Morons

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 Part 1 Section 6 "If, after the appropriate date, an obligation to which this section applies has subsided for a continuous period of 5 years:

 

(a) without any relevant claim having been made in relation to the obligation, and

(b) without the subsistence of the obligation having been relevantly acknowledged,

then as from the expiration of that period the obligation shall be extinguished:"

 

The last acknowledgement of this alleged debt was made over five years ago. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written acknowledgement from myself in the relevant period under Part 1 Section 6 of The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 , I would respectfully suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against myself to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

Should you continue to pursue this account without providing this evidence I shall seek an interdict and damages accordingly. A formal complaint will also be made to Trading Standards along with a report to the OFT questioning your fitness to hold a consumer credit license.

 

The behaviour of your company is in my opinion a clear breach of Section 2.13/14 of the OFT Guidelines concerning Statute Barred Debts and probably an offence under section 40 (1)The Administration of Justice Act 1970.

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

yours etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again JB,

 

Just one more thing, never be affraid of these idiots, they are nothing but parrassites, who will tell you any old lies hoping you will pay up, even if you don`t owe anything. No matter how much you are in debt, you are better than these horrible fools, and there is always a way out. There will always be someone around to help on CAG.

 

All they are interested in is money, they will tell you to get it any way to can to pay up. In short, if they ring and they catch you out, just speak to them however you seem fit. My last conversion with some turb burgler at Crapone ended with me telling to `f*** O** you stupid, irritating little c***, your pis**** me off now, so stop f****** ringing`, LOL, I haven`t heard from them since.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

 

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh my gosh I was cracking up at this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: :lol: :lol: Oh my gosh I was cracking up at this!

 

 

LOL, Thanks!

 

Even my girlfriend thought it was funny when she heard. I don`t think the moronic little fudge packer on the other end laughed much though, the poor soul, LOL.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL, Thanks!

 

Even my girlfriend thought it was funny when she heard. I don`t think the moronic little fudge packer on the other end laughed much though, the poor soul, LOL.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

 

'poor soul' dont feel sorry for them, they drive you to get abusive! nothing short of what he deserved!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The good thing about having MH on your case is that you know you have an unenforcable debt as they are the real bottom feeders who pick up the debts that others have tried and failed with. They seem to be good buddies of that shower from Leeds who specialise in the purchase of unenforcable and Statute Barred debts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys are the mutts nutts ... :D

 

Sent off the prove it letter today - just to be on the safe side. Oh, and it will let me toy with them a bit longer, i'm actually looking forward to their reply now..

 

While the wife is insistant it was paid off at the time, I'm not so sure - however it was certainly no later than 2002 so would be statute barred anyhow so I can relax a little bit now.

 

Thanks to everyone for their input so far, it's really appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jb,

 

Glab your feeling more relaxed about this crowd of empty heads.

 

I think sending of the `prove it` letter was probably the best move if your both unsure as to wether the alleged debt is actually paid. At least they`ll have to furnish you with more information as to what they hell they are actually on about.

 

From now on, just sit back and enjoy the ride. There`s no need to do anything else, untill the next pile of crap drops through your letterbox.

 

No doubt, someone (like me) will be along soon to mock these pathetic excuses of humans and humour us all in our darkest hour, LOL.

 

I`m just waiting for someone little emtpy head, turd burlging knob jockey to ring me again so I can give him/her/it a load of abuse ;)

 

Watching with interest.

 

Ciao for now.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

have fun with these ppl

 

i cant believe they are allowed to do th things they do.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In a funny kind of way i miss the daily threatograms and phone calls

But on the other hand it is kind of peaceful

You could always play a couple of Rab C Nesbitt tapes:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah i hate the fact that we have only had post once this week as we use to get it every day.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

im actually looking forward to the next threatogram from, Link, Lowell, Red, Hamptons, Scotcall, Debt Managers, Capquest.

Nothing at all for about 2 weeks i miss them like old friends now, i got a phone call from Lowells and when i asked where my CCA was he siad what! and hung up oh dear oh dear i do hate to upset them

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ODC what did i say to u yeaterday.

 

No Making the pregnant woman laugh.

 

Thats about rite does he also have a asbo and drink problem?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again everyone .. I'm back .. and so are MH :p

 

Got a letter from MH this morning saying that the debt had defaulted in Feb 03, and I have seven days to pay in full, blah blah ..

 

So, am I right in thinking that as they claim it defaulted in Feb 03, that under Scottish law I can claim it is Statute Barred now?

 

Is there anything I should do before I send off that letter, or is now the time to send it?

 

Anything else I should watch out for, that they are holding up their sleeve?

 

Thanks again peeps for all the advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you live in Scotland yes, send the stat barred letter.

 

If you live south of the border send MH a CCA request. That will force them to find the signed, true copy of the credit agreement (which they probably don't have), a statement of account showing the amount owed and how it was calculated (on their abacus - I don't think so) and their right to collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Apologies, been my holidays, so here's a quick update.

 

Sent off the stat barred letter and got one back a couple of weeks later saying that they would not be pursuing the issue any longer blah blah ..

 

Then, two days later got a letter offering us a deal - we could pay them half of what they claimed was owed and they would write off any further (alledged) debts. I just ignored this letter, and didn't respond given we already had a letter from them saying they are no longer pursuing the case.

 

Got the second letter on the 11th of may, and have not heard anything further from them.

 

So, all in all a very simple resolution to what appeared to be a scary unexpected situation initially. Still don't know if the claim was legitimate or not, however it appears that it's all resolved now.

 

Thanks very much to everyone for their input and advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...