Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Inside a DCA!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4920 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I have read that but how does it help me?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to thank onthebrink & Brassed Off for the advice they gave to me. Today i received a letter (after sending a Formal Complaint) and i have had monies credited to my account,SEE MY TREAD.http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/133190-door-collector-debt.html

 

Thanks again, if you read my tread i was very low but was given guidence and a win was found from a loss HOOOOOOOOOOO HAPPY DAYS. When you feel it`s all against you fight and turn to your friends in C.A.G:grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes but neither of these post about deed of assignment have asnwer my original question really.

 

I asked why a DCA issues a notice of litigation giving u 7 days to comply when the 7 days are all ready up B4 they send the letter?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's because they have cocked up and you should challenge this in court (but keep your blood pressure down, honey!).

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try.

 

The strange thing is i have not recieved any court papers and they are collection on a timebarred debt and for a company i was never with or a address that never existed and still does not.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the letter was dated easter monday, 24th March, and said i had to contact them within 7 days or they will start court procdeings against me.

 

the 7 days were up on the 30th and the letter was not posted until after the 7 days were up according to the post mark of the letter post mark says the 1st April. Recieved 2nd April.

 

Also i have not recieved any court papers.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi OTB

 

Came late into this thread late, (obviously not paying attention!!) and spent most of this weekend trying to absorb the wealth of information within it.

 

Have to say, it's excellent. A big thanks to you and other contributers.

 

Something I have not seen so far:

 

What is the exact legal position regarding firms that are solicitors, but are also DCA's?

 

The type I have in mind are firms in which debt collection represents a major segment of their business and often advertise as such. However, if referred to as a DCA, they hotly deny the fact as if that absolves them from any responsibility in that department.

 

Second point is, who has responsibilty for policing them?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

this question might have allready been answered, but a great long thread

 

what is the position for a dca with a statute barred debt

some are now saying its from the default date

ime sure its from the last action, the limitations act begins from then

the last time payment or corresopndents was received from the debtor,not the default date

please confirm

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes the letter was dated easter monday, 24th March, and said i had to contact them within 7 days or they will start court procdeings against me.

 

the 7 days were up on the 30th and the letter was not posted until after the 7 days were up according to the post mark of the letter post mark says the 1st April. Recieved 2nd April.

 

Also i have not recieved any court papers.

 

OK so your seeking advice on the assumption that they have or will issue proceedings against you?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allwood the short answer is no But it would help us to answer if you explained why you need to know.

 

Unlike other data I think evidence of searches is removed much more quickly - how long I'm not sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

Been talking to Information Commissioners Office on the phone and was advised that Barclay card and some other institution's do keep date for up to 7 years. I advised the person on the phone that all I got was statements and the old microfilm were illegible and the Bcard sent me duplications of the same statements for before 2004 going back to 2002 and newer printouts of the same statements that goes up to 2008 and no credit agreements are available, all they have is only copies of the statements that they have sent me. I read out the last paragraph of BC letter to the Information Commissioners Office person on the phone in which BCard said that is all the information that they hold on my account. The person at Information Commissioners Office said then they have no more information on me as stated in the last paragraph of their letter.

I then asked Information Commissioners Office, as BCard confirmed that they have no more information on i.e., agreements etc how can Eqifax keep updating my credit report every month by BCard. Information Commissioners Office told me that they did not know and I would have to ask them that. I have sent a S.A.R to Equifax but not got back anything from them as yet. Also I inquired about the 2 traces on my credit file by wescot and BCW one 2006 and one in 2007 again Information Commissioners Office again said that I would have to ask Equifax this.

When I asked Equifax last year about the traces they told me that they would have had to have all the necessary paperwork before they could put anything on my credit file, therefore how could Equifax have this information if BCard has not got it. There is so many inconsistencies, what do I do next.

Also I informed Information Commissioners Office that Bcard was outside the time like in replying to my request and I was told to put a complaint in to them in writing but stating that I had received the documents, I was also told that I had this complaint with a year. No doubt when complains been made, say around 10 months after Bcard non compliance Information Commissioners Office will have brought in a new policy for banking code.

You cannot win. I am still in limbo about this.

 

More data lost by HSBCmad.gif

 

BBC NEWS | Business | HSBC loses customers' data disc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Allwood the CRA's comment to you is an assumption on their part which might have no basis whatsoever in fact.

 

They (conveniently) assume that before their client update a consumers file they MUST have the authority to do so - Whether they do or not is to the CRA irrelevant. Their attitude is one of "don't ask don't say"

 

However should you complain or request the evidence of consent to process your data they can no longer claim 'good faith' if it's subsequently found to be 'unavailable'

 

Suggest you write to the CRA enclosing copies of any evidence that Barclays DON'T have your agreements & ask how they could have claimed they had authority to process your data when their client effectively admits they don't

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you Jon, I will do this when I received their S.A.R from them, I have sent them a reminder with a copy to ICO (if that dose any good) Hopefully, I will received this back from them shortly. :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No jon

 

My original post about this was asking why a DCA sends you a letter giving u 7 days till court action on first contact.

 

Thats what i want aswering other than the fact is this type of action legal.

 

I did say this in post number 425 which is the original post regarding this.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They can issue when they like but if the court learns that they either haven't attempted to negotiate or given you less than 14 days to respond the court won't be happy

 

They are expected to give you at least 14 days to respond - the same as with a default

Link to post
Share on other sites

No jon

 

My original post about this was asking why a DCA sends you a letter giving u 7 days till court action on first contact.

 

Thats what i want aswering other than the fact is this type of action legal.

 

I did say this in post number 425 which is the original post regarding this.

 

GODMOTHER

ANOTHER GOLDEN RULE TO REMEMBER:

these companies do not 100% use the royal mail to deliver letters : probably use uk mail :who virtulalyy dump the letter in the local sorting office system .

 

so NEVER EVER THROW ANY OF THESE ENVELOPES AWAY becaus on the back there is a dates stamp to the left where the envelope entered into the royal mail system & and you have "not delivered by " evidence :grin:

:cool: sunbathing in juan les pins de temps en temps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is just hissing me off really that companys are allowed to do this and that they dont even give a thought for the law.

 

I know how the new chose who delivers your mail postal service works as i have family with royal mail. They charge these other companys a fortune just for them to recieve and deliver the mail for them. I think the law has not been changed for ppl other than royal mail to deliver your mail to your door.

 

Oh i cant wait for this to kick of then they will need to answer lots of questions first b4 this gets down to the fact thy are trying to get a CCJ on a SB debt and for a company i have not been supplied by.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where has ONTHEBRINK gone?? :(

 

Come back soon :)

jaxads

 

Halifax - £2281, successfully refunded all charges after LBA letter & telephone call.

Have been offered the difference between the £20 and £12 charges from Capital One -- am sending LBA for remainder.

GE Money - Received settlement of £441, being total charges requested. No interest though.

CCA'd Bank of Scotland / Blair Oliver Scott to produce CCA Agreements on two Credit Cards - well in default, although still chasing payment!!!

EOS Solutions "ceased action on account" on behalf of a friend.

 

All in all, quite busy at the moment and enjoying every minute of it
:eek:

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...