Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have recently found myself in financial difficulties and with the help of forum members in another thread regarding this, I think I can get myself sorted. My query here is how to deal with a Cifas marker that has been logged against me by one of my creditors for "evasion of payment". Admittedly yes I did get a £5000 loan with them and have not paid any payment but at the start of the year, which is when the loan landed, I realised I was going to be struggling to repay that and other debts and I contacted MCB to ask if there was any way I could extend the loan from 24 months to 36 months. I explained my situation and that I was going with a DMP and asked them if they could help me with this. They did not reply. I then emailed them again a month later explaining that my DMP was going ahead and could they confirm that the direct debit was indeed cancelled. Again, they did not reply. The DMP fell apart and so did everything else thereafter. My bank withdrew my overdraft and said I could not stay with them (I thought initially that it was because of the DMP) so I opened another account (Starling) and set up all my direct debits etc with the new bank. A month into being with the new bank, they contacted me and said they were closing my account in three months. So I started applying for other basic accounts and every single one of them either refused or revoked.  Through the help in the other thread, I requested a SAR from Cifas and discovered that I have this marker against my name for "evasion of payment". I have logged a complaint with MCB on the advice of other forum members, but my query really is do you think the marker is fair given that I did ask them for help and I did explain that I was going to be struggling financially to repay the loan over the original two years, and is there any way that I can get it removed? I fully admit that I have yet to make a payment to them and I suppose in my naivety and panic I thought if I emailed them early on they could extend the loan and help me out, but they didn't even reply  I did manage to open an account with Monzo before the marker was in place, but I am very concerned that if Monzo do what Starling did, I will have no bank account to pay my bills or get my wages paid into.  Realistically based on the information I have given here, what do you think my chances are of getting this marker removed? Any help/advice on this would be greatly appreciated x
    • Thank you dx, that is what I intend to do now. I have gone through all the SAR documents, a lot of which I am seeing for the first time! As per my previous post #116 letters and statements alleged to have been sent to me, as recorded on their system notes I have not received. Letters I have sent requesting information and account statements have not been recorded as being received by them, all were sent either by Recorded or Special Delivery. I have all the proof you menrtioned from my files for payments and from their SAR info for fees added. Thanks t
    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private ticket from UKCPS £75!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4208 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Whose Perky? Cases quoted in that web article are genuine judgements

 

Who IS Perky?

 

or

 

Who's Perky?

 

I hope you get someone to proof-read your court papers before you submit them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Extract from UKCPS website

 

We then undertake in full the collection of the parking charge. Should the parking charge not be paid within 10 days from the date of issue, we obtain the vehicles licensing and owner registration details from the DVLA and pursue the driver/owner through the courts for the fine. During this process we expedite total confidentiality to both parties (you and the driver/owner) and we are bound at all times by the DVLA's code of conduct and the Data Protection Act.

 

Unfortunately this isn't actually true. If it were at least one of the cases would have made it here.

 

I've looked through UKCPS website and cannot find the quote above. if it really does exist then please send the full url as it is indeed slightly outdated and needs ammendment. thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

perhaps you should also get them to change this bit - which is patently illogical and misrepresents the actual postion.

 

Under section 143 (1) of the Road Traffic Act 1988 - The a keeper should know at all times who is driving a vehicle and to ensure they are insured, if a keeper allows a vehicle to be driven without insurance they are guilty of a criminal offence - By stating many people have access to a vehicle and as a result the defendant can not state who had it any one given date/time then they are confirming they did not know who was driving and therefore cannot be certain the vehicle was insured.

 

the keep erjust doesn't have to know of the insured drivers were driving the car just that they are insured - and insured drivers doesn't just mean those on the RKs policy. many polices allow other drivers with the keepers permission so there are hundreds and hundreds of thousands of potential drivers out there with valid insurance.

And the RK is under NO obligation whatsoever to respond to a PPC with the details of whosoever may have been driving the car in any case.

 

So the above italicised quote is just a meaningless bluff in an attempt to get people to 'cough up'. Like much of the rest of the page.

 

Is CPS part of the BPA ?

 

Oh and tell Perky that he needs to check the e-trading regs - his site looks non compliant and he may wish to fix it before someone reports it. His legal team can look at it I suppose.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Link to previously hightlighted section of UKCPS website here:

 

UKCPS Car Park Management

 

Don't know if UKCPS is part of the BPA or not, although they certainly do sport the BPA logo on their website.

 

BTW UKCPS is a different outfit than our Wolverhampton friends, this lot are based in Huddersfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I received a ticket for £75 on my windshield from UKCPS for parking near a shop close to where I live in Rothwell. The guy who runs this company apparently lives on this street and calls it a private road. Whether it is or not is unknown to me as I presumed I was parking on land owned by the shop.

 

I have searched and found no evidence that this is privately owned...

 

Street Register

 

After reading all the details about this company on here I feel they dont have the legal right to charge me. Is this correct??

Edited by stilleddiesangel
Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as the ticket is concerned, they wouldn't have the right to charge you whether you were parked in a private road, public road, car park, or even on the moon! It's an invoice for an extortionate amount of money that you are under no obligation to pay.

Don't be a mug this year - you don't have to pay private parking tickets!

 

Find the campaign on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/You-dont-have-to-pay-private-parking-tickets-Spread-the-word/225644216626?ref=ts

 

Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/dontpayppcs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi stilleddiesangel, what you have from UKCPS is a nice bit of paper to keep as a reminder of what you were doing that day at that time. They will send you further reminders of this initial reminder just in case it slips your memory. They are such generous guys that they will even pay £2.50 to obtain your home address and this will allow them to post them to your home. Some might even have a red & white checked border!!!!

 

File them away in case you ever need to prove where you were at that precise time. Although they do ask for payment for this reminder service, both they and we know only a fool would pay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this forum after I had left this message on their site, not giving my address btw... (I wish I had found this forum first)

 

I believe this ticket was left in error as I was parked on One

Stop property during the 3 mins of my time there. No road was blocked,

emergency services would have been able to enter and exit side road without

obstacle and there was no inconvenience to any other motorist or resident. I

am legally querying this ticket. Thank you.

 

Their reply was....

 

Thank you for your email

The area you were parked (off Leadwell Lane Rothwell) is indeed private

land. It does not belong to the 'One Stopshop' but to the many residents of

the properties on that street. Signage at the entrance to the site and

throughout its length clearly indicates that it is for permit holders only

or for those who wish to pay £75 for the privilege of using those

facilities. As the driver it is your responsibility to take heed of all

signage. You entered into a contract. This contract is fully legal and can,

if necessary, be enforced in the courts.

You may have seen some of the Internet forums which offer advice to

motorists over parking issues. Please be wary of the advice offered on these

forums. It is not advice from lawyers and certainly is not advice that can

be upheld by the many court decisions which have gone in UKCPS's favour. We

can supply you with details of these cases and indeed some of the forum

postings clearly indicate the cases that have been settled in our favour

in-spite of forum advise offered to the defendant indicating they can ignore

the parking charge.

Payment can be made online at ukcps.net/payonline or by phone 01132456080 .

Please allow 24hrs from now so that ticket details can be entered onto our

systems.

 

Peter Haswell

Office Manager

UKCPS Ltd

0113 2456080

 

I think even with the best will in the world, £25 per minute is slightly excessive for a parking fee. The ticket says Leadwell Lane and Leadwell Lane is a public road as per LCC. If they want money from me for this, they can take me to court. I signed no contract, I certainly didnt agree to any contract.

 

I am a single parent on a very low income. The saying "blood and stone" springs to mind. This has had me in tears. I dont have that kind of money.

Edited by stilleddiesangel
Link to post
Share on other sites

"......the many court decisions which have gone in UKCPS's favour"

 

I wonder why they haven't enrolled on this site and listed, er, say, ten of "the many" ?

 

Sam

All of these are on behalf of a friend.. Cabot - [There's no CCA!]

CapQuest - [There's no CCA!]

Barclays - Zinc, [There's no CCA!]

Robinson Way - Written off!

NatWest - Written off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

"......the many court decisions which have gone in UKCPS's favour"

 

I wonder why they haven't enrolled on this site and listed, er, say, ten of "the many" ?

 

Sam

 

DAVIES - UKCPS (November 2009)

UKCPS - KHAN (Leeds 2008)

UKCPS - OCKENDEN (SCARBOROUGH FEB 2009)

 

are three to start with. Plus others settled in our favour by mediation

Edited by peternet
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

You may have seen some of the Internet forums which offer advice to

motorists over parking issues. Please be wary of the advice offered on these forums.

I like this very much! Shows how much these companies are getting narked by the widespread advice available online! :D

 

It is not advice from lawyers and certainly is not advice that can

be upheld by the many court decisions which have gone in UKCPS's favour.

I seem to remember there are a very large number of legally qualified people offering advice on this and other motoring forums.

 

We can supply you with details of these cases and indeed some of the forum postings clearly indicate the cases that have been settled in our favour in-spite of forum advise offered to the defendant indicating they can ignore the parking charge.
Must be referring to the "nobbled" posting by Simon7685 a couple of years ago. Obviously scripted, and used as a very transparent piece of propaganda.

Don't be a mug this year - you don't have to pay private parking tickets!

 

Find the campaign on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/pages/You-dont-have-to-pay-private-parking-tickets-Spread-the-word/225644216626?ref=ts

 

Follow us on Twitter http://www.twitter.com/dontpayppcs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, as they have conveniently confirmed in their email answer to you they are not the owners of the land. Seeing as only the owners can enter into a contract with a driver, they are confirming they have no legal right to demand these monies.

 

If you want some entertainment keep emailing them, post the replies here. If you can manage to get a proper address out of them it will be of interest.

 

Meanwhile report them to companies house, cause I bet a pound to a penny they don't have a full address on the ticket they left you (po box doesnt cut it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Meanwhile report them to companies house, cause I bet a pound to a penny they don't have a full address on the ticket they left you (po box doesnt cut it).

You need to talk to the compliance section of Companies House.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address on the note is indeed a PO Box number in Huddersfield. What difference does that make?

 

The main thing for me is that this ticket says Leadwell Lane and on investigation, that road is public. Therefore this ticket is void. As for a possible CCJ, I dont have a credit rating anyways so it makes no odds to me.

 

Also, it says on the parking notice charge that unauthorised removal or interference is an offence. How is it an offence if it's not police issued? Unauthorised by who?

 

 

road-search.jpg

Edited by stilleddiesangel
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The area of land stilleddiesangel parked on is private - that is well established - the actual precise name is not that important - land registry maps will indicate the private status of the land. We have sent stilleddiesangel images of her vehicle parked adjacent to very clear signage indicating the contract terms she entered into by parking there. perhaps she could post those images (?).

The parking charge notice placed on her vehicle is an invoice with a nominal value of £75 - therefore unauthorised removal is theft - that is a police matter.

I await stilleddiesangel's response with interest. Ours will be to accept payment or to take necessary action to recover the monies owing - this is a very clear case of entering a contract and failing to abide with the terms of that contract (of course we are still within the initial period to settle the invoice before late payments are incurred).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • 2 months later...

Hi. This is the first time I have posted on here. Well done to all who successfully defeat these [problematic]. I received a ticket a few months ago and as this forum says, I got 4 or 5 letters which I binned. This morning I received a letter from "Court Proceedings Limited London" who I assume are a debt collection agency. They threatened me with £325???? I am a little worried. What should I do next please???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

hi, just wanted to reitterate what most are saying ..please dont pay these highway robbers.(at least dick turpin wore a mask) lol....i have today received my first notification of ukcps in what will be likely a six or seven part series...this is the fourth time of dealing with these irritants .please dont pay them .dont be intimidated by them and laugh at them ...i actually rang them lAST YEAR AND TAUNTED THEM , DARING THEM TO TAKE ME TO COURT ... NEEDLESS TO SAY , THEY NEVER . i look on there little parking attendants as kind of car park security gaurds now, its all they are fit for .. haha...serioudly tho ..anyone getting a ticket of these scurge of society , please dont pay .they are just trying it on . four times ive had them and nowt never happens . they are a joke

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...