Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
    • Well, they trashed their last election manifesto pledges, so nothing new really is it? They just find weasel words to try to claim they haven't actually failed if you just look at it just a little squinted and in this particular way  - and are stupid.
    • I think they're inventing stuff now. They seem to know they won't be around to implement any of it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Constructive Dismissal Claim, Ill advise from Union ..V frustrated :-(


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5876 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Thanks for looking at my thread...Im not sure of the response Ill get so I shall keep it short.

 

I was bullied at work by my Manager and when it became extreme I filed a grievance, naturally the business (MAJOR PLAYER) did not find in my favour, I then raised a Constructive Dismissal Grievance as the business re structured whilst I was off sick and excluded me from the chart. I left the company in June 07 however we have only JUST finished completing the grievance procedure, once again as expected they have covered their tracks :evil:

 

I have now applied to the ET for CD, however the employer is claiming the case out of time. Ive had UNION advise all along but the union failed to advise me to submit to the ET whilst the grievance was being heard.

 

Im gutted as potentially the company now get away with protecting a bully, managing someone out of the business and believe me I have STRONG evidence and statements from other victims of this tyrant.

 

Anyone here who can help?

 

XXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am beginning to regard joining a union as they are so lack a daisy with advice and possibly not giving the services that you are paying for which is bad news for employees as they are the only ones that you can rely on for good advice but I am having trouble just getting a meeting with one of them each time I am being fobbed off which is not good enough. The reasons I have had so far is going on holiday too much work for them to do, this makes me wonder who are they working for the employer or the employee. :evil:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well...my former employer raised this time thing with ACAS...who then in turn to my Union Rep...who then asked the union solicitors who confirmed it was correct.

 

Im no employment law expect...should my union rep not have known about the time limits?

 

I know my previous employer knew...they played me, I had told them I was waiting for the outcome of the appeal meeting before proceding to ET (this was with the rep present) anyway they wrote a letter to me dated 2nd December telling me they did not uphold my claim and that I had exhausted the grievance procedure, they did NOT send the letter until 4th Jan, dated 4th Jan. I only became aware of this when I went back into an email they had sent me beginning of Dec, I had opened the FIRST attachment as it was something I'd requested, and overlooked the second. The second was sent by them in ERROR.

 

It proves to me that they deliberatly delayed formally notifying me of the outcome til Jan...knowing I would submit to and ET and they would try to get it thrown out on time:mad: :evil:

 

It just feels like an employer can bully, intimidate and cover their tracks..

 

I hear you about the Unions as well....you seek comfort from the Union but their so damn complicated and so it seems in my case damn incompetent...I may now not be able to pursue my former employer which leaves me where???

 

Hows things with you??

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't timed out at all.

 

At the end of the grievance procedure you have 3 months to file at ET.

 

How can you file an ET whilst a grievance is ongoing, and at appeal stage... You can't because you wouldn't have a decision to file against!

 

You can present all their sly tricks too. Here's the ET1 form for you to print and fill in;

http://www.employmenttribunals.gov.uk/pdfs/ET1_Claim_Form.pdf

 

Please call ACAS yourself, I think you've had bad advise throughout this.

 

Acas - Home

HELPLINE 08457 47 47 47

 

Best wishes, Dave (Senior Shop Steward - GMB Union).

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't timed out at all.

 

At the end of the grievance procedure you have 3 months to file at ET.

 

How can you file an ET whilst a grievance is ongoing, and at appeal stage... You can't because you wouldn't have a decision to file !

 

Please call ACAS yourself, I think you've had bad advise throughout this.

 

Acas - Home

HELPLINE 08457 47 47 47

 

Best wishes, Dave (Senior Shop Steward).

 

May I call you Dave? :)

 

Dave

 

 

You have NO idea how much this would mean to me, I would be overjoyed :) I just thought if Acas and The Union and the Solicitors were all in agreement it must be right, but YES, I should absolutely MAKE THAT CALL myself. Thats what I thought, Why would I submit a claim to the ET before I'd had the outcome...bare in mind I was trying to be positive of a satisfactory outcome. Their arguement is I left their employment in June, the usual time limit is 3 months, this was mutually extended, and the appeal hearing itself wasnt until November.

 

:)

 

Ill make that call tomorrow and post back the outcome...thanks so much for responding

Link to post
Share on other sites

and the appeal hearing itself wasnt until November.

Then you would have 3 months from the date of the outcome letter of the appeal meeting, or if you can prove they delayed sending it by having the stamped/franked envelope or email headers, 3 months from that date.

 

I really think you should download and print that form and get it in ASAP.

 

It's best to call the ACAS number as close to 9am as possible to stand a chance of getting through, it's extremely busy, and you may have to persevere.

 

Regards, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's best to call the ACAS number as close to 9am as possible to stand a chance of getting through, it's extremely busy, and you may have to persevere.

 

Regards, Dave.

 

 

I absolutely shall...Im on the 7.30am train to London so I will be bright eyed and bushy tailed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

This isn't timed out at all.

 

At the end of the grievance procedure you have 3 months to file at ET.

 

How can you file an ET whilst a grievance is ongoing, and at appeal stage... You can't because you wouldn't have a decision to file against!

 

You can present all their sly tricks too. Here's the ET1 form for you to print and fill in;

http://www.employmenttribunals.gov.uk/pdfs/ET1_Claim_Form.pdf

 

Please call ACAS yourself, I think you've had bad advise throughout this.

 

Acas - Home

HELPLINE 08457 47 47 47

 

Best wishes, Dave (Senior Shop Steward - GMB Union).

 

 

I disagree and would have thought the OP's complaints are out of time.

 

It appears the OP was dismissed in June 07.

 

Prior to this the OP claims she was bullied and raised a grievance which was not upheld. The exact date of this is not given but it was clearly before June 07.

 

Time limits are only extended to six months, from three months, and only then if the matter complained about was raised as a greivance within the original three month limit of the matter/s complained about.

 

This would mean the last incident of bullying arised probably sometime before June 07 and the dismissal was June 07.

 

These dates are clearly now more than three/six months.

 

An internal grievance procedure, and the length of it, cannot take precedence over statutory time limits with an ET.

 

By suggesting that a complainant has three months from the end of the grievance procedure to submit an ET is wrong.

 

All the ET demands is that a grievance was submitted at least 28 days before presenting to an ET. It does not demand that a grievance has to be concluded.

 

Firms drag their heels for this very reason and the OP has been a victim of it. As have I.

 

However, the OP may be able to argue that her union's advice to her was incorrect about time limits but I wouldn't hold too much hope. I too was represented by a union but the ET still time barred my claims-and just by 5 days.

 

ET's are very strict and unforgiving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree and would have thought the OP's complaints are out of time.

 

It appears the OP was dismissed in June 07.

 

Prior to this the OP claims she was bullied and raised a grievance which was not upheld. The exact date of this is not given but it was clearly before June 07.

 

Time limits are only extended to six months, from three months, and only then if the matter complained about was raised as a greivance within the original three month limit of the matter/s complained about.

 

This would mean the last incident of bullying arised probably sometime before June 07 and the dismissal was June 07.

 

These dates are clearly now more than three/six months.

 

An internal grievance procedure, and the length of it, cannot take precedence over statutory time limits with an ET.

 

By suggesting that a complainant has three months from the end of the grievance procedure to submit an ET is wrong.

 

All the ET demands is that a grievance was submitted at least 28 days before presenting to an ET. It does not demand that a grievance has to be concluded.

 

Firms drag their heels for this very reason and the OP has been a victim of it. As have I.

 

However, the OP may be able to argue that her union's advice to her was incorrect about time limits but I wouldn't hold too much hope. I too was represented by a union but the ET still time barred my claims-and just by 5 days.

 

ET's are very strict and unforgiving.

 

 

Hello and thank you for your response.

 

To confirm certain points, I resigned from the business in June 2007, the grievance against the Manager however did not conclude until LATE July, the Grievance against the business for potential constructive dismissal was raised in May 07 but only concluded in Jan 08.

 

I guess this is where my Union are getting confused. I am frustrated obviously...unfortunatly I was unable to make contact with ACAS today but will try again tomorrow.

 

The ET have allocated a case number and a provisional hearing...it is in the hearing that I have been made aware that my former employer will try to get my claim struck out on time.

 

:( :( :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and thank you for your response.

 

To confirm certain points, I resigned from the business in June 2007, the grievance against the Manager however did not conclude until LATE July, the Grievance against the business for potential constructive dismissal was raised in May 07 but only concluded in Jan 08.

 

I guess this is where my Union are getting confused. I am frustrated obviously...unfortunatly I was unable to make contact with ACAS today but will try again tomorrow.

 

The ET have allocated a case number and a provisional hearing...it is in the hearing that I have been made aware that my former employer will try to get my claim struck out on time.

 

:( :( :(

 

Ok, that's clearer but it still appears to be out of time.

 

Do you mean your provisional hearing is actually a pre-hearing review? This is held to decide, amongst others, if a claim is time barred.

 

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter when an internal grievance is concluded in respect to making a claim to an ET. In fact, it doesn't even need to be concluded.

 

The issue an ET wants to determine is if you had actually instigated a grievance in the first place to be able to bring a claim.

 

You did. However, it is now too long a period of time to bring a claim.

 

You have to focus on when you raised your grievances, not on when they concluded. And then add on 3/6 months to those important dates for your time limit.

 

(ie May 07 gave you until November 07)

 

Sorry. But it is worthwhile mentioning bad advice from the union and also the fact you were sick too.

 

But an ET usually ignores such things.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, that's clearer but it still appears to be out of time.

 

Do you mean your provisional hearing is actually a pre-hearing review? This is held to decide, amongst others, if a claim is time barred.

 

Unfortunately, it doesn't matter when an internal grievance is concluded in respect to making a claim to an ET. In fact, it doesn't even need to be concluded.

 

The issue an ET wants to determine is if you had actually instigated a grievance in the first place to be able to bring a claim.

 

You did. However, it is now too long a period of time to bring a claim.

 

You have to focus on when you raised your grievances, not on when they concluded. And then add on 3/6 months to those important dates for your time limit.

 

(ie May 07 gave you until November 07)

 

Sorry. But it is worthwhile mentioning bad advice from the union and also the fact you were sick too.

 

But an ET usually ignores such things.

 

 

:( :( :( Oh no...this is terrible news...I just dont understand why a Union Rep would not know this...:mad:

 

Is there any other avenues I can go down? Is this limited to a ET??

Link to post
Share on other sites

The last directly related cause of action was Jan 08.

 

That gives until April 08 to raise an ET claim.

 

Afraid not.

 

Jan 08 is when a grievance relating to a dismissal was finally concluded by her ex-employers. This grievance was submitted in May 07.

 

That makes any ET claim for unfair dismissal as out of time by some three months.

 

ET's don't change time limits just for employers to conclude a grievance as and when they like.

 

That is the whole point of time limits.

 

In any case, ACAS, her union and her solicitor have already told her this. I also agree with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Al is right. I was told by ACAS to submit ET1 and state that the grievance procedure is still being carried out. This was to stop my claim going out of time.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Afraid not.

 

Jan 08 is when a grievance relating to a dismissal was finally concluded by her ex-employers. This grievance was submitted in May 07.

 

That makes any ET claim for unfair dismissal as out of time by some three months.

 

ET's don't change time limits just for employers to conclude a grievance as and when they like.

 

That is the whole point of time limits.

 

In any case, ACAS, her union and her solicitor have already told her this. I also agree with them.

 

 

it seems your right....:( I was going along with the advice from my union rep during a stressful time with my previous employer and also the death of my Father, I took my unions advice as concrete, why would I after all have cause to question their advice....where do I stand now? whats the process of a formal complaint to the Union?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Some thoughts on your case

1. If you are time barred on the claim to the ET then have you considered a civil court remedy? I believe time limits are different. If you are in the Union you could ask them for legal assistance in the civil court.

2. The bereavement you experienced could be a reason to extend the 6 month time limit at the ET. I believe it would depend on other things such as whether you were taking care of your other affairs at the time such as applying for a new job or taking up a new job. If you were not taking care of your other affairs then this would be a reason to extend the 6 month limit.

 

How did your ET provisional hearing go

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Im soo sorry for not replying sooner, you must think Im terribly rude, I only just located the email alert in my spam filter.:(

 

In response to your points.

 

1, I am meeting with a solicitor on Thursday morning along with my union rep with a view to looking at a civil breach of contract claim and will update you once Ive had the meeting.

 

The preliminary hearing is booked for 15th May and the Union have now dropped me because they claim there is a potential claim for me to take legal action against them on the grounds of negligence therefore there is a conflict of interestm they have arranged said appointment for me as per above to try to remedy the situation. They have said they simply cannot go along to the prelim hearing at the ET as they will have to answer very uncomfortable questions about time limits that they SHOULD have known:-x

 

2, During the time period of my fathers death I was absent from work and soley caring for him, after he passed away I was then ill with tonsilitis and off work. This takes out a good siz week period of time. BUT I have been advised this will be irrelevent as the UNION SHOULD have submitted the ET1 on my behalf.

 

 

ET hearing on 15th May.

 

Thanks for replying and once again sorry for the delay

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunetely the advice of Unions seems consistantly to fall below what could be reasonably expected. Many people post on this forum about poor Union representation.

 

The very first thing that anybody should consider in regard to bringing a case to an ET concerning dismissal and grievances is time limits.

 

If you think it would benefit, then you may wish to ask the tribunal chairman to compel the Union representative to attend and/or disclose his notes.

 

I hope your preliminary hearing goes well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...