Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5860 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

 

Been trying to help a mate out with a case that her aunt has brought against her.

 

Claire has had a case brought against her by her aunt and certain froms the courts should have issued to her never have been.

 

Firstly only half of the claim pack was issued. Rang them up they said sorry it was an error we will send you the missing pages.

 

Rang them back 5 days later as they had not been recieved. This guy said we only send out the claim form you have to get the rest of it off line. Well Claire does not have the internet so how could she get the claim froms of the interent or what forms she needed.

 

She was then told to get them from her local county court.

 

This is the same CC as what issued the claim and it is a 80 mile round trip if she was to bus or taxi it. She pointed out that her local CC is the same CC she is speaking to and she needs the forms.

 

He sent them out and they arrived by RD the next day.

 

Now they should have sent out a AQ but this was never recieved along with the letter that came with it the next thing calire heard was a letter detailing the next directions.

 

Now she has asked that they case gets transfered to her local magistrates courtsand they told her she would need to fill in a N244.

 

Well the N244 is a form that none of the courts seem to hold and one that when l looked on line its a application notice for draft orders.

 

Now what do we do?

 

Can l send a letter to the courts asking for the case to be moved or can somebody advise me on the correct form number or if this is the correct form what do l have to put on it so claire can seign it and send it off?

 

Chrissi

  • Haha 1

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can caccording to the courts.

 

A previous case that was being heard at a different court was also transfered to my local magistrastes courts. Also the other problem is getting to the courts due to disablilty she will not be able to us public transport to get there and a taxi will cost over £300 there and back.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

She can ask for the hearign ot be held at her local court or for a telephone hearing.

Magistrates = criminal and County is civil, so like Micheal I would be surprised if it could be transferred. Some magistrates courts share the same buildings as the county court so this maybe the case you are referring to.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The local Magistrates courts rents a court to the local CC twice a week so l think as they do that they should be willing to transfer the case.

 

The original case l am talking about was DVLA issued a case threw northampton bulk centre and then when we defended it they had it transfered to the local CC then transfered to a day the local CC is at Mag courts.

 

Could anybody help with the forms problem please?

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stand corrected.

 

CPR 30 only mentions tranfers between County Courts and the High Court

PART 30 - TRANSFER

 

which must be by application ie N244. It's used for any application not just draft orders

 

Also the other problem is getting to the courts due to disablilty she will not be able to us public transport to get there

Certainly mention this
Link to post
Share on other sites

would it also help if l put on the form for her she would need a adapted taxi one suitable for wheelchairs? and her carer?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and what the company has advised it will cost her to get there and that the company have said as they will be using petrol to get back she needs to pay those charges as well?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

rite so basing this on my DVLA case i need to fill this out like this?

 

the case gets transfered to XXX county court (local county court) then transfered on to XX (local magistrates courts) on either of the days that XX CC rent a court form XX magistrates courts.

 

The Godmother is litigant in person. The godmother would have problems getting to XX courts due to disability. For the godmother to get to the courts at XX time on the trial date she would need to get a special taxi that is adapted to her wheel cahir and would need to have her carer come to. There would need to be a taxi as publc transport does not provide wheel cahir access for the whole journey and this would result in the carer and the god mother being stranded at XX which is XX miles away from the courts. The taxi journey will cost approximatly £150.00 just for the godmother to get there and the taxi firm has said that half of the cost is for them to get back to XX as they would need to use perrol to get back. An Approximate cost of them same to get the god mother home.

 

is this rite?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

those are what we have been quoted and those are the lowest ones.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The case be transfered to XXX county court (local county court) then transfered on to XX (local magistrates courts) on either of the days that XX CC sit at XX magistrates courts.

 

The Defendant is a litigant in person. The Defendant would have problems getting to XX courts due to disability. For the Defendant to get to the courts at XX time on the hearing date she would need to get a special taxi that is adapted to her wheelchair and would need to have her carer come too. The lowest quote for a return journey by taxi is approximately £300.

 

Public transport would not offer an alternative, as it does not provide wheelchair access for the whole journey and this would result in the carer and the Defendant being stranded at XX which is XX miles away from the courts. Therefore a taxi is the only practical option, but would severely disadvantage the Defendant financially.

 

For the above reasons, the Defendant respectfully request that the claim be transferred to XX Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a question but l cant fit everything into the because section what can l do?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW l forgot to mention it is only the last line missing which has about 3 words on it

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

into form and it is form nunber N244

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section A:

 

....that:

 

The case be transfered to XXX county court (local county court) then transfered on to XX (local magistrates courts) on either of the days that XX CC sit at XX magistrates courts.

 

...because:

 

The Defendant is disabled and would be financially disadvantaged attending a hearing at XX Court

 

Section B:

 

Tick evidence in Part C in support of my application

Section C:

 

 

The Defendant is a litigant in person. The Defendant would have problems getting to XX courts due to disability. For the Defendant to get to the courts at XX time on the hearing date she would need to get a special taxi that is adapted to her wheelchair and would need to have her carer come too. The lowest quote for a return journey by taxi is approximately £300.

 

Public transport would not offer an alternative, as it does not provide wheelchair access for the whole journey and this would result in the carer and the Defendant being stranded at XX which is XX miles away from the courts. Therefore a taxi is the only practical option, but would severely disadvantage the Defendant financially.

 

For the above reasons, the Defendant respectfully request that the claim be transferred to XX Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok ty Micheal.

 

You got what l meant even thought l typed it wrong.

 

Just a further question.

 

I am one of her witnesses in the case does a witness having problems with getting to the courts, as the courts have said we need to attend in person, also help he case?

 

If they dont accept the request can the defendant ask for her costs to be awarded in the N244 or would this only be a in court request.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am one of her witnesses in the case does a witness having problems with getting to the courts, as the courts have said we need to attend in person, also help her case?

 

You could mention it if you like, but frankly I would be surprised if they refused the application on the basis of what you've already said.
Link to post
Share on other sites

well l would not be suprised if they do refuse the application as they seem to have lost the letter that told her she needed to file a allocation questionnaire and never informed her what was going on till l got on there backs about it.

 

But they still never sent the AQ they should have sent.

 

Chrissi

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BO how r u ?

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok BO i appreciate support as it saves me from knockin the aunt out for taking advantage of claire

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok all

 

Ty for your help, Got the papers in the post yesterday morning for claire who signed them when she came round on friday. Though l would save us both a trip to the PO as l had stuff that needed posting.

 

Will let you know what the judge says.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...